Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Find Similar Cases by Filters
You can browse Case Laws by Courts, or by your need.
Find 49 similar cases
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES vs. LOIS JEAN NASWORTHY, D/B/A CHRISTIAN HOME FOR THE ELDERLY, 89-002572 (1989)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 89-002572 Latest Update: Jul. 06, 1990

The Issue Whether or not Respondent failed to assure that a management staff person completed a required food service management training course and used proscribed bed side rails in an adult congregate living facility in violation of Section 400.419(3)(c), Florida Statutes.

Findings Of Fact At times material hereto, Respondent has been licensed to operate an adult congregate living facility (ACLF) pursuant to Chapter 400, Part II, Florida Statutes and Chapter 10A-5, Florida Administrative Code. On May 18, 1987, Diane Cruz, a representative of Petitioner, conducted an inspection of Respondent's facility. Ms. Cruz cited Respondent for failure to complete a food service management training course and the deficiency was memorialized in a written report of deficiencies received by Respondent on June 22, 1987. The survey report established a correction deadline of July 18, 1987. On January 7, 1988, Tammy Smith, also a representative of Petitioner, conducted an inspection of Respondent's facility which inspection revealed that neither Respondent nor any other staff member or designated management person had completed a food service management training course. Respondent completed a food service management training course on January 27, 1988, or approximately eight months after the correction deadline set forth by Petitioner in its May 18, 1987, inspection. Respondent did not request an extension of time to complete the requirement that a food service management training course be completed by a management employee. During Ms. Smith's inspection of Respondent's ACLF on January 8, 1988, Smith observed both full and three-quarter side bed rails being used in the facility. This deficiency was discussed with Respondent and was noted in Smith's written inspection survey report which was received by Respondent on February 2, 1988. Immediate correction of the deficiency was required and was noted on the survey report. On February 25, 1988, Sharon McCray, Petitioner's investigator, conducted a routine follow up inspection of Respondent's facility. Ms. McCray's inspection revealed that a full bed rail was still in use on one of the beds and that a three-quarter bed rail was in the facility. During the hearing, Respondent maintains that she was confused regarding the type of bed rail which is permitted in a ACLF and the circumstances under which a bed rail is permissible. Petitioner presented several survey reports and each report contains an invitation to contact the surveyor in the event that Respondent or a health care provider had any question regarding any citations noted on the survey reports. Respondent never requested clarification of the noted deficiencies on any of the deficiencies for which she was cited in the survey reports. Also, Petitioner admits that she both obtained and read the pertinent rules and statutes relative to operation of ACLFs prior to submitting her application for licensure in 1986. Respondent admits that the bed rails were in the facility at both the January and February, 1988 inspections by Petitioner. During the hearing, Patrick Hagen testified that the bed with the full size rails was donated by a local health agency and that it was not in use in the ACLF. Additionally, Respondent introduced a copy of a physician's order for a bed rail for one resident dated June 19, 1987. Mr. Hagen immediately took the rails off the bed with the full rails on it however they continued to use the second bed with the three-quarter (approximate 30 inches long)1 rail.

Recommendation Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is RECOMMENDED: Petitioner enter a Final Order imposing an administrative fine against Respondent in the amount of $500.00 payable to Petitioner within thirty days of entry of its Final Order. DONE and ENTERED this 6th day of July, 1990, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida. JAMES E. BRADWELL Hearing Officer Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building 1230 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, FL 32399-1550 (904) 488-9675 Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 6th day of July, 1990. Copies furnished to: Edward A. Haman, Esquire Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services 7827 North Dale Mabry Highway Tampa, Florida 33614 Amelia M. Park, Esquire 11311 North Armenia Avenue Tampa, Florida 33612 Sam Power, Agency Clerk Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services 1323 Winewood Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0700 John Miller, General Counsel Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services 1323 Winewood Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0700

Florida Laws (1) 120.57
# 7
JENNIFER CASON, D/B/A JENNIFER'S ADULT CARE vs DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, 89-003882 (1989)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:St. Petersburg, Florida Jul. 20, 1989 Number: 89-003882 Latest Update: Dec. 10, 1990

The Issue Whether or not Petitioner's license to operate Jennifer's Adult Care should be renewed.

Findings Of Fact Based upon my observation of the witnesses and their demeanor while testifying, documentary evidence received and the entire record compiled herein, the following relevant facts are found. Jennifer Cason is the owner/operator of Jennifer's Adult Care. Jennifer's Adult Care is an adult congregate living facility (ACLF) situated at 1022 13th Avenue South in St. Petersburg, Florida. Petitioner's ACLF license expired by its terms on February 8, 1989. Petitioner's license renewal application was denied by the Respondent by letter dated May 25, 1989. Petitioner is the subject of a confirmed report of abuse dated October 19, 1988 confirming the exploitation of C.C. a resident in Petitioner's ACLF. Petitioner was advised that she could challenge the confirmed classification if she considered that the classification was inaccurate or that it should otherwise be amended or expunged. Petitioner failed to challenge the report. On October 21, 1988 Respondent imposed a moratorium on admissions at Petitioner's ACLF. The census at that time was eight residents. That moratorium has not been lifted and therefore remains in effect at this time. As of October 2, 1990, Petitioner has not requested an exemption of the confirmed abuse report to be qualified eligible to work with disabled adults or aged persons. Petitioner's ACLF has a history of deficiencies based on surveys dating from its inception. As example, Mrs. Diane Cruz, a human services surveyor specialist who has been employed by Respondent for more than eleven years conducted a survey of Petitioner's ACLF on May 17, 1988. As a result of that survey, the following deficiencies were noted: (a) The staff's time sheets were not posted or available for review; (b) the facility did not provide adequate staff and services appropriate to the needs of the residents, to wit: one resident required catheter care and there was either no staff person or other qualified third party provider available to provide the needed catheter care; (c) the food service staff was not knowledgeable regarding purchasing sufficient quantities of essential food, proper sanitary conditions necessary for safe food preparation and food types that meet the minimum requirements for a regular diet and (d) the staff person responsible for the supervision of self-medication was not trained. The deficiency relating to the lack of staff training and the supervision of self-medication was a repeat deficiency. Petitioner was allowed through June 17, 1988 to comply with the agreed corrective action plans. By July 18, 1988 most of the items cited as deficiencies were corrected however, Petitioner failed to correct two deficiencies relating to admission criteria and resident standards including (a) one resident's health assessment had not been completed more than 60 days prior to admission to the facility and five residents who were admitted to the facility for more than 30 days did not have a health assessment on file. Both of these deficiencies were corrected on October 5, 1988. Petitioner was also cited for certain deficiencies in the area of the physical plant in that (a) there was an inoperable ceiling light in Room 2; (b) there was no floor under the tub in the first floor corridor bath; (c) there were no non-slip safety devices in the tub of the upstairs corridor bath; (d) there was a hole in the ceiling at the south end of the first floor corridor and (e) the corners of the paneling in the first floor sitting room were broken off. Petitioner was allowed through June 17, 1988 to correct these deficiencies. As of July 18, items (a), (b), and (c) were corrected, however, items (d) and (e) remained uncorrected and were not in compliance until October 5, 1988. John C. Morton is Respondent's human services program director. He has been employed by the agency in excess of 11 years having served in his current position for approximately 3 1/2 years. As part of Morton's duties, he reviews survey reports, schedule surveys and respond to complaints received regarding ACLFs. Morton is familiar with Petitioner's facility from his review of survey findings and staff discussions. Morton prepared a deficiency report dated October 20, 1988 issued to Petitioner based on information he received from Respondent's office of adult protective services regarding a resident that Petitioner left in sole charge of Petitioner's ACLF. The resident that was left in charge was not trained to care for the residents of Petitioner's ACLF. As a result of that report, Morton cited Petitioner for failing to provide at least one staff member within the facility at all times; failure to provide sufficient staff to meet the needs of residents and leaving a resident in sole charge of other residents. The moratorium on admissions was issued effective October 21, 1988, based on that report. Mary Cook is employed by Respondent as a public health nutrition consultant. Ms. Cook has been so employed in excess of three years. She is familiar with Petitioner's facility having surveyed it on several occasions during the last three years. On January 23, 1989, Ms. Cook conducted a follow-up survey to determine whether Petitioner was in compliance with the moratorium. Following her review of the staffing patterns as listed on work schedules provided her, Petitioner listed only one staff person to work for the entire day on Sunday. However, when Ms. Cook arrived at the facility, two staff members were present. Upon inquiry, Ms. Cook was able to determine that the staff person who was present but who was not listed as working according to the schedule, also indicated that she was on duty at another area ACLF, Anita's Personal Care. Ms. Cook also participated in a survey conducted at Petitioner's facility on April 6 and 14, 1989. As a result of that survey, Petitioner was cited with deficiencies of minimum staffing standards based on the following: Several residents were being utilized as staff members to provide services to other residents including transportation, housekeeping and personal services; the facility did not have trained staff present at the facility necessary to supervise the administration of medication; (c) insulin was injected into one resident by a staff member who is not licensed to administer such medications; and (d) staff did not consistently document the residents deviation from normal food intake. Petitioner acknowledged receipt of FPSS Report No. 88-075890. Petitioner also admitted that she did not send a written request to contest the confirmed report nor has she sought an exemption to be qualified to work with disabled adults or aged persons.

Recommendation Based on the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions of law, it is RECOMMENDED that: Respondent enter a final order denying Petitioner's renewal application for licensure as an adult congregate living facility and cancel Petitioner's conditional license for that facility. DONE and ENTERED this 10th day of December, 1990, in Tallahassee, Florida. Copies furnished to: Paula M. Kandel, Esquire Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services 7827 North Dale Mabry Highway Tampa, FL 33614 William P. Murphy, Esquire 1500 Morgan Street Tampa, FL 33602 Sam Power, Agency Clerk Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services 1323 Winewood Blvd. Tallahassee, FL 32399-0700 Linda Harris, General Counsel Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services 1323 Winewood Blvd. Tallahassee, FL 32399-0700 JAMES E. BRADWELL Hearing Officer Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building 1230 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, FL 32399-1550 (904) 488-9675 Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 10th day of December, 1990.

Florida Laws (1) 120.57
# 10

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer