Findings Of Fact Antonia was born on March 14, 2012, at Plantation General Hospital located in Plantation, Florida. Antonia weighed 3,665 grams at birth. Donald Willis, M.D. (Dr. Willis), was requested by NICA to review the medical records for Antonia. In an affidavit dated September 19, 2013, Dr. Willis opined the following: It is my opinion that the pregnancy was complicated by poorly controlled Diabetes with a large-for-gestational age baby and resulting in dystocia at delivery. The baby was depressed at birth, but “rapidly improved.” The baby suffered a brachial plexus injury from the shoulder dystocia, but there was no evidence of brain injury. As such, it is my opinion that delivery was complicated by a shoulder dystocia with resulting brachial plexus injury. However, there was no apparent brain or spinal cord injury from loss of oxygen or mechanical trauma. Michael S. Duchowny, M.D., a pediatric neurologist, was retained by NICA to examine Antonia. Dr. Duchowny examined Antonia on August 28, 2013. In an affidavit dated September 18, 2013, Dr. Duchowny opined as follows: It is my opinion that Antonia’s neurological examination reveals evidence of a complete left brachial plexus palsy involving nerve roots C5 to T1. She thus has both an Erb’s and Klumpke’s paralysis which is judged to be severe. There appears to be little benefit from her previous surgery as she most likely had an avulsive type injury. In contrast, Antonia’s cognitive status and motor ability in her other three extremities are well preserved. I had an opportunity to fully review the medical records that were sent on July 25, 2013. The records confirm the family’s history of shoulder dystocia at birth. Antonia’s Apgar scores were 0, 6 & 8 at 1, 5 and 10 minutes. Her brachial plexus palsy was recognized immediately. She was intubated in the delivery room but extubated at 10 minutes of age. Of note, an MRI of Antonia’s brachial plexus performed on June 29, 2012[,] revealed pseudomeningocele formation at the C7 and T1 levels. As such, it is my opinion that Antonia’s brachial plexus palsy places her damage outside the central nervous system as it involves cervical and upper thoracic root segments. Although her injury was likely acquired as a result of mechanical forces during delivery, the location of her impairment is outside the central nervous system (brain and spinal cord). I therefore believe that Antonia should not be considered for compensation with the NICA program. A review of the file does not show any contrary opinions to those of Dr. Willis and Dr. Duchowny. The opinions of Dr. Willis and Dr. Duchowny that Antonia did not suffer a brain or spinal cord injury due to oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury during labor, delivery, and resuscitation during the post- delivery period are credited.
Findings Of Fact Robert Charles Crump was born on August 15, 2009, at Baptist South Hospital located in Jacksonville, Florida. Charlie weighed 2,505 grams at birth. Donald Willis, M.D. (Dr. Willis), was requested by NICA to review the medical records for Charlie, to determine whether an injury occurred to the brain or spinal cord caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period. In a medical report dated September 17, 2014, Dr. Willis described his findings in part as follows: In summary, the mother presented at 34 weeks with premature rupture of the membranes in early labor. Variable HFR [sic] decelerations developed during the last two hours prior to delivery. Cesarean section was done for the non-reassuring FHR pattern. The newborn was depressed. The newborn hospital course was complicated by respiratory depression, hypotension and one episode of apnea. Although the baby was discharged home with a normal exam, MRI at 16 months of age was done for evaluation of a weak left hand and found a prior cerebral stroke. It is likely the baby suffered some degree of oxygen deprivation during labor, delivery and/or in the immediate post resuscitation period. However, it is less clear that any oxygen deprivation during this time period resulted in brain injury. No head imaging studies were done during the newborn hospital course. The child did suffer a stroke, which was documented at 16 months of age by MRI. There was an apparent obstetrical event that likely resulted in some degree of oxygen loss to the baby’s brain during labor, delivery and continued into the immediate post delivery period. Without imaging studies during the newborn hospital course, I am unable to determine if this oxygen deprivation resulted in the child’s brain injury (stroke). Pediatric Neurology evaluation would be helpful in this determination. Dr. Willis reaffirmed his opinion in an affidavit dated March 8, 2016. NICA retained Michael S. Duchowny, M.D. (Dr. Duchowny), a pediatric neurologist, to examine Charlie and to review his medical records. Dr. Duchowny examined Charlie on November 5, 2014. In a medical report dated November 5, 2014, Dr. Duchowny opined as follows: In summary, Charlie’s general physical and neurological examinations reveal a mild left hemiparesis, notable mainly for asymmetry of movement. His muscle tone is well-preserved and he has full range of movement bilaterally with the exception of full left supination. Charlie is functioning cognitively at age level. He has done remarkably well in his therapies. I reviewed the medical records sent on October 14, 2014. They document Charlie’s birth at 34 weeks gestation at Baptist Medical Center South in Jacksonville following premature rupture of membranes productive of blood-tinged amniotic fluid. Charlie was born by emergent Caesarian section for arrest of descent and presented limp, apneic and cyanotic. Apgar scores were 2 and 7 at 1 and 5 minutes. He was resuscitated via bag and mask and breathed spontaneously at just over 2 minutes. His NICU stay was complicated by apnea and bradycardia which resolved fully and transient respiratory depression. Charlie was never intubated or mechanically ventilated and was maintained on room air from August 17th until discharge on August 24th. No neonatal brain imaging was performed. MRI scan of the brain on February 8, 2011 revealed an old ischemic infarct involving the anterior limb of the right internal capsule. The remainder of the brain was normal. A consideration of the findings from today’s evaluation and record review lead me to recommend that Charlie not be considered for compensation within the NICA program. He has normal mental functioning and a mild motor deficit. Furthermore, his stroke was likely acquired prenatally, and there is no evidence of either mechanical injury or oxygen deprivation in the course of labor, delivery or the immediate post-delivery period. Dr. Duchowny reaffirmed his opinions in an affidavit dated February 24, 2016. A review of the file in this case reveals that there have been no expert opinions filed that are contrary to the opinion of Dr. Willis that there was an apparent obstetrical event that likely resulted in some degree of oxygen loss to the baby's brain during labor, delivery or the immediate post- delivery period. Dr. Willis’ opinion is credited. There are no expert opinions filed that are contrary to Dr. Duchowny’s opinion that Charlie has normal mental functioning and a mild motor deficit, and that his stroke was likely acquired prenatally. Dr. Duchowny’s opinion is credited.
The Issue At issue in this proceeding is whether Emmanuel Hooks, a minor, suffered an injury for which compensation should be awarded under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan.
Findings Of Fact Fundamental findings Petitioner, Brianna Denise Davidson, is the mother and natural guardian of Emmanuel Hooks, a minor. Emmanuel was born a live infant on July 26, 1999, at Gulf Coast Medical Center, a hospital located in Panama City, Florida, and his birth weight exceeded 2,500 grams. The physician providing obstetrical services at Emmanuel's birth was Steven G. Smith, M.D., who, at all times material hereto, was a "participating physician" in the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan, as defined by Section 766.302(7), Florida Statutes. Emmanuel's birth At or about 9:10 p.m., July 25, 1999, Ms. Davidson (with an estimated date of delivery of July 26, 1999, and the fetus at 40 weeks gestation) presented to Gulf Coast Medical Center in labor. Initial vaginal examination revealed the cervix at 2-3 centimeters dilation, effacement as "thin," and the fetus at station -3. External fetal monitoring revealed a reassuring fetal heart rate (of 140-150 beats per minute), with accelerations. Ms. Davidson was continually monitored, and at 11:00 p.m., she was admitted to labor and delivery. At the time, uterine contractions were noted at 3-5 minute intervals, and vaginal examination revealed the cervix at 3 centimeters, effacement at 90 percent, and the fetus at station -3. Ms. Davidson's labor apparently did not progress, and at 2:49 a.m., July 26, 1999, she was started on Pitocin. Thereafter, Ms. Davidson's labor progressed slowly, and at 6:45 a.m., vaginal examination revealed the cervix at 5 centimeters, effacement at 90 percent, and the fetus at station -1. In the interim, external fetal monitoring continued to reveal a reassuring fetal heart rate. Ms. Davidson's labor continued to slowly progress, and by 9:00 a.m., vaginal examination revealed the cervix at 8 centimeters, effacement at 100 percent, and the fetus at station -1. In the interim, at 8:48 a.m., Ms. Davidson's membranes spontaneously ruptured, with clear fluid noted. Thereafter, variable decelerations were noted with each contraction, consistent with umbilical cord compression, and fetal heart base line remained reassuring (in the 140-beat minute range). From 9:00 a.m. to 11:45 a.m., Ms. Davidson's labor failed to progress (with the cervix at 8 centimeters, effacement at 100 percent, and the fetus at station -1), and at 11:45 a.m., Ms. Davidson was transported to the operating room for delivery by caesarean section. Notably, between 9:00 a.m., and 11:45 a.m., while variable decelerations continued, the fetal heart rate base line remained in the 140-beat per minute range, and fetal electrode revealed the presence of short term variability. According to the records, Ms. Davidson was in the operating room at 11:45 a.m., anesthesia started at 11:45 a.m., surgery started at 12:32 p.m., and Emmanuel was delivered at 12:35 p.m. Of note, the "nucal cord x 1" observed during delivery was described as "loose," and fetal heart monitoring in the operating room and immediately prior to the caesarean section revealed a reassuring fetal heart rate. On delivery, Emmanuel was bulb-suctioned, but did not require resuscitation. Initial newborn assessment noted no apparent abnormalities, and Apgar scores were recorded as 8 at one minute and 9 at 5 minutes. The Apgar scores assigned to Emmanuel are a numeric expression of the condition of a newborn infant, and reflect the sum points gained on assessment of heart rate, respiratory effort, muscle tone, reflex response, and color, with each category being assigned a score ranging from the lowest score of 0 through maximum score of 2. As noted, at one minute, Emmanuel's Apgar score totaled 8, with heart rate, respiratory effort, muscle tone, and reflect response being graded at 2 each, and color being graded a 0. At five minutes, Emmanuel's Apgar score totaled 9, with heart rate, respiratory effort, muscle tone, and reflex response again graded at 2 each, and color now graded at 1. Such scores are considered normal, and inconsistent with recent hypoxic insult or trauma. Following the initial newborn assessment, Emmanuel was transported to the regular nursery, where he remained until he was discharged with his mother on July 29, 1999. Notably, the newborn nursery admission assessment was grossly normal, and there is no evidence of any complication during Emmanuel's stay. Emmanuel's subsequent development On December 10, 2001, following the filing of the subject claim, Emmanuel was examined by Dr. Michael Duchowny, a physician board-certified in pediatrics, neurology with special competence in child neurology, electroencephalography, and clinical neurophysiology. Dr. Duchowny reported the results of his neurology evaluation, as well as the history he obtained from the parents, as follows: HISTORY ACCORDING TO MR. AND MRS. HOOKS: Emmanuel is a 2 1/2 year old boy who the parents indicated suffers from cerebral palsy and brain injury. They began by explaining that Emmanuel suffered brain injury at birth due to a cord being wrapped around his neck. He was delivered by emergency caesarean section. They noted that Emmanuel's MRI has shown periventricular leukomalacia and furnished a copy of the MRI report. Emmanuel's growth and developmental milestones have been slow. He did not rollover until 9 months, nor did he sit until a year of age. He stood at 14 months, walked at 18 months and said his first word at age 2. He now has a lexicon of only one word ("ma-ma"). Emmanuel is not toilet trained. He is described as being extremely active. He does not sit still at anytime during the day and it is difficult to examine him or provide therapy. He attends a wellness center where he receives physical, speech and occupational therapy on a twice weekly basis. Communication is a particular problem area for him. Emmanuel's appetite has also been diminished and he is now "only starting to eat". His mother indicated that Emmanuel suffers from "low muscle tone" and that he drools frequently. She also mentioned that he wakes up frequently at night and is just beginning to sleep more consistently. Emmanuel does not play with other children at school. His activity level and intrusiveness have precluded meaningful peer interactions. The parents are aware that his eye contact is poor. The parents stated that Emmanuel "had seizures", but then went on to explain that 2 EEG's were normal and he was never placed on medication. The events were described as "getting into a trance". He has not had motor convulsions. FAMILY HISTORY: Both parents are healthy. A 4 year brother had no medical problems and there are no family members with degenerative illnesses, mental retardation or cerebral palsy. Emmanuel was born at Gulf Coast Medical after a 39 week gestation. He weighed 8-pounds, 9- ounces at birth and breathed well. He was discharged from the nursery at 3 days of age. Emmanuel is fully immunized, has no significant drug allergies and never been hospitalized or undergone surgery. His vision and hearing are said to be excellent. PHYSICAL EXAMINATION reveals an alert, but extremely active and well developed 2 1/2 year old toddler. Emmanuel weighs 39-pounds. His head circumference measures 50.2 cm and there are no cranial or facial anomalies or asymmetries. Emmanuel's neck is supple without masses, thyromegaly or adenopathy. The cardiovascular, respiratory and abdominal examinations are normal. Emmanuel's NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION is difficult to complete, as he is constantly in motion. The physical examination requires restraint from his father, as he continually tries to touch things and pull items off the desktop and shelves. Emanuel has very poor eye contact and did not communicate in words at anytime during the session. It was difficult for him to follow commands as well, as his attention span constantly shifted. He drooled intermittently. The tongue movements are poorly coordinated. Cranial nerve examination reveals full visual fields to direct confrontation testing. There is blink to threat from either direction. I could not perform a fundoscopic examination. There are no facial asymmetries. Motor examination reveals mild generalized hypotonia with full range of motion. There are no adventitious movements, aside from the high activity level and no evidence of focal weakness or atrophy. Emmanuel's gait is stable, but slightly wide- based and he has generalized hypotonia. The deep tendon reflexes are 2+ bilaterally and plantar responses are in flexion. There is withdrawal of all extremities to touch. Neurovascular examination reveals no cervical, cranial or ocular bruits and no temperature or pulse asymmetries. Cerebellar testing could not be completed due to poor cooperation. In SUMMARY, Emmanuel's neurologic examination is significant for multiple areas of developmental delay. He is extremely overactive and inattentive, and has a significant behavior and communication problem. He additionally demonstrates poor eye contact and has a significant social disability. There are no specific focal or lateralizing findings to suggest a structural brain lesion. The findings on Emmanuel's neurologic examination suggests a diagnosis of a pervasive developmental disorder. Emmanuel fits within the autistic spectrum and this was communicated to the family . . . . The cause and timing of Emmanuel's neurological impairment To address the issue of whether Emmanuel's impairments were associated with an "injury to the brain or spinal cord . . . caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period in a hospital," as required for coverage under the Plan, Petitioner offered selected medical records relating to Ms. Davidson's antepartum course, as well as those associated with Emmanuel's birth and subsequent development. Additionally, Emmanuel's parents testified on their own behalf, and Respondent offered the deposition testimony of Dr. Duchowny, whose qualifications were previously noted, and the deposition testimony of Dr. Donald Willis, a physician board-certified in obstetrics and gynecology, as well as maternal-fetal medicine. As for the cause and timing of Emmanuel's impairments, it was Dr. Duchowny's opinion, based on the results of his neurology evaluation and review of the medical records, that Emmanuel's impairments are not related to perinatal asphyxia or trauma. More particularly, Dr. Duchowny expressed his views, as follows: Q. Based on your review of the records and your evaluation of Emmanuel Hooks, can you give us an overview of his condition? A. Yes. I thought that Emmanuel's neurologic examination revealed evidence of developmental neurologic impairment. He was hyperactive and had an attention deficit disorder and additionally had significant behavior, social and communication problems. All of this suggested he had developmental problems in multiple areas, consistent with a diagnosis of pervasive developmental disorder. Many of the children with pervasive developmental disorder go on to develop childhood autism as they get older. * * * Q. In this particular case, do you believe that Emmanuel's condition was acquired during the course of labor-delivery in the immediate post-delivery period? A. No, I do not. Q. What is the basis for that opinion? A. The basis for my opinion is that autism is a developmental disorder which results from unknown factors operating in utero prior to the onset of labor and delivery and is not a recognized complication of birth asphysia or birth trauma. Q. I take it your opinion is that Emmanuel Hooks did not acquire whatever neurological deficits he had as a result of any oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring during labor-delivery or the immediate post- delivery period? A. That's correct. Q. In fact, was there any evidence in the medical records of any oxygen deprivation that occurred during the course of labor- delivery or resuscitation during the immediate post-delivery period? A. No. Q. Was there any evidence of mechanical injury occurring during the course of labor- delivery or the immediate post-delivery resuscitative period? A. No, there was not? Q. In your opinion, were Emmanuel's problems acquired prior to the course of labor- delivery? A. Yes. As for Dr. Willis, he was also of the opinion that the medical records revealed no evidence of oxygen deprivation or other trauma associated with Emmanuel's birth. The medical records, as well as the testimony of the physicians and the parents, have been carefully considered. So considered, it must be concluded that the proof failed to demonstrate that any impairment Emmanuel suffers was occasioned by an injury to the brain or spinal cord injury caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period.
The Issue Whether Ashley Villarreal has suffered an injury for which compensation should be awarded under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan, as alleged in the claim for compensation.
Findings Of Fact Preliminary matters Ashley Villarreal (Ashley) is the natural daughter of Roy Villarreal and Carmen Luna. She was born a live infant on January 2, 1989, at Bethesda Memorial Hospital in Palm Beach County, Florida, and her birth weight was 3090 grams. The physician delivering obstetrical services during the birth of Ashley was Allen Dinnerstein, M.D., who was, at all times material hereto, a participating physician in the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan, as defined by Section 766.302(7), Florida Statutes. The birth of Ashley Villarreal At or about 4:15 p.m., January 2, 1989, Carmen Luna was admitted to Bethesda Memorial Hospital. At the time, Carmen Luna was in active labor, and Ashley was post term with a gestational age of 41 weeks. Otherwise, Carmen Luna's pregnancy had been without complication. External fetal monitoring was commenced at 4:50 p.m. and indicated that the fetal heart tone was sporadically within the 60 beat per minute level, with a slow return to baseline; a level sufficient to indicate occasional fetal bradycardia and fetal distress. 1/ This situation evidenced a need for surgical intervention, and at 5:20 p.m. Carmen Luna was taken to the operating room. Anesthesia commenced at 5:25 p.m., a cesarean section surgical procedure was commenced at 5:39 p.m., and Ashley was delivered at 5:44 p.m. The operative report reflects that the following occurred during the course of the procedure: . . . a transverse incision was made into the uterus releasing meconium stained fluid. The vertex was delivered and the baby suctioned with DeLee. A loop of cord over the neck was removed and the baby then delivered completely continually being suctioned as the cord was double clamped and severed and the infant given to the neonatologist for care . . . . The delivery records likewise reflect that Ashley had a blue appearance at delivery, the presence of meconium staining, and the following resuscitation measures: "Stimulation," "Bulb Suction," "DeLee Suction," "Mech Suction" and "Whiffs Oz." When delivered, Ashley presented Apgar scores of 6 at one minute and 8 at five minutes. These scores are a numerical expression of the condition of a newborn infant, and reflect the sum points gained on assessment of the heart rate, respiratory effort, muscle tone, reflex irritability, and color, with each category being assigned a score ranging from the lowest score of 0 through a maximum score of 2. As noted, at one minute, Ashley's Apgar score totaled 6, with respiratory effort and reflex irritability being graded at 2 each, heart rate and muscle tone being graded at 1 each, and color being graded at 0. At 5 minutes, Ashley's Apgar score totaled 8, with heart rate, respiratory effort and reflex irritability being graded at 2 each, and muscle tone and color at 1 each. Such total scores could be characterized by an obstetrician as "good." Pertinent to this case, color, heart rate and respiratory effort are primarily related to the cardiovascular system, and color is the least significant indicator of an infant's brain or neurological status at birth. The categories of reflex irritability and muscle tone are, however, neurological assessments, which offer the greatest insight into the neurological condition of an infant at birth. Ashley's Apgar scores relative to those categories which reflect neurological status at birth were collectively a total of 3 out of a possible 4 at both 1 and 5 minutes. Under the circumstances, Ashley's Apgar scores, either globally or discretely, fail to reflect a hypoxic event at birth. At 6:00 p.m., following delivery, Ashley was admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit due to respiratory distress, possibly secondary to meconium aspiration. Ashley was accorded extra oxygen, via oxygen hood, for two days, and her meconium aspiration was successfully treated with antibiotics. During her admission, no clinical observations were noted that one would typically expect in a child undergoing hypoxic encephalopathy, and no neurological consult was ordered. 2/ On January 7, 1989, Ashley was discharged as an apparently well baby. Subsequent developments On July 29, 1989, Ashley was seen by M. Arenstein, D.O., for a "well baby visit," and no abnormalities were noted; however, on September 6, 1989, Ashley was again seen by Dr. Arenstein at which time the parents expressed their concern regarding Ashley "not sitting up, crawling, etc." Consequently, Dr. Arenstein referred Ashley for a pediatric consult with Jeffrey Perelman, M.D. Ashley was seen by Dr. Perelman on September 19, 1989, and he diagnosed her as developmentally delayed, and ultimately referred her to David Ross, M.D., for a neurological evaluation. Dr. Ross saw Ashley on July 2, 1990, and concluded: The patient has some mild facial dysmorphism with developmental delay in all fields associated with an abnormal neurologic exam with persistence of postural reflexes and hyperreflexia. The spectrum of findings is consistent with mental retardation of a mild to moderate degree probably due to cerebral palsy. 3/ Dr. Ross' ultimate diagnosis was mental retardation, and he recommended that Ashley have a full evaluation, including "an image of the brain either with CT scan or MRI (an EEG, torch titers, chromosome analysis)." Ashley was referred in August 1990, for a CT brain scan and an EEG. The CT scan is a neuroimaging study which can identify structural brain abnormalities occasioned by an hypoxic insult, as well as other causes. The EEG is a device used to detect abnormalities of the electrical currents of the brain such as seizure activity, which is often a manifestation of hypoxic insult at birth, and the death of neuronal cells. Here, both the CT scan and EEG were within normal limits. Ashley continued to be treated by Dr. Perelman through June 1991; however, on August 14, 1991, she came under the care of Miguel Simo, M.D., another pediatrician, because the parents were apparently dissatisfied with Dr. Perelman. Upon examination, Dr. Simo diagnosed Ashley as developmentally delayed, and referred her to Laszlo Mate', M.D., a physician practicing child neurology, for evaluation. Dr. Mate' examined Ashley on August 29, 1991, and observed: . . . a small, dysmorphic female in no apparent distress. Her head circumference is 47 cm which is in the 25th percentile. She doesn't have any neurocutaneous abnormalities. Her palmer creases are somewhat abnormal, but not of simian nature. Her fingers are slightly abnormal, extra long, and she seems to have a proximal displacement of both thumbs. Her ears are malformed with very small earlobes. The ears are somewhat posterior rotated and low set. Her eyes are almond shape but in view of her Indian heritage, that's probably normal. Both parents seem to have similar shaped eyes. The child has a somewhat prominent nose. The mouth is somewhat fishmouth in character and she has fairly shallow temporal area. She doesn't have any eyelashes on her lower eyelid. Dr. Mate's impression was: This is a markedly abnormal child with a developmental quotient in the 30's. She's currently is 30 months old and she functions around a 9-10 month level. She has multiple minor malformations which made the diagnosis of cerebral palsy somewhat unlikely. I suspect we are dealing with some prenatal etiology, either genetic or pregnancy related. 4/ Dr. Simo also referred Ashley for an MRI of the brain. An MRI, as with a CT scan, is a neuroimaging study which can identify structural abnormalities occasioned by hypoxic insult, as well as other causes. The MRI, performed September 20, 1991, was abnormal, evidencing "poor and decreased white matter myelinization extending to the frontal, occipital, and parietal cortex and decrease in white matter content in the centrum semiovale." Such damage could be reflective of birth asphyxia, developmental immaturity of the brain, or a myriad of other causes. Finally, Dr. Simo referred Ashley to Oscar Febles, M.D., a physician practicing genetics. Dr. Febles examined Ashley on November 1, 1991, and rendered a diagnosis of "psychomotor retardation of unknown etiology." Concluding, Dr. Febles observed: The clinical findings in this patient are not diagnostic of a particular genetic syndrome . . . In conclusion, this patient presents a clinical picture characterized by psychomotor retardation that cannot be diagnosed on the clinical findings and/or testing done. The fact that she presents diffuse demyelinization on the MRI would favor the diagnosis of cerebral palsy and/or a CNS degenerative disease. It is my recommendation that an MRI be repeated in approximately 6 months to see if the demyelinization process of the cortex previously seen is progressive or static. If found to be progressive it would indicate a CNS degenerative disease (e.g. leukodystrophies) and if static the diagnosis of cerebral palsy is most likely. In addition, it is also recommended . . . Genetic re-evaluation in 1 year. Whether, consistent with Dr. Febles' recommendation, an MRI was repeated or Ashley had a subsequent genetic re- evaluation does not appear of record. Notably, however, while Ashley was genetically tested and found to have a normal karyotype, such test does not rule out the preponderance of genetic disorders which manifest themselves in microscopic point mutations within a chromosome as opposed to total chromosomal malformation. The medical experts at hearing As to whether Ashley had sustained permanent and substantial mental and physical impairment as a result of an injury to her brain resulting from oxygen deprivation during the course of labor, delivery or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period, petitioners offered the testimony of Dr. David Ross, who, although a board certified neurologist, does not regularly treat neonates. Dr. Ross examined Ashley on July 2, 1990, and March 2, 1994. It was Dr. Ross' opinion that Ashley suffered a substantial and permanent mental and physical impairment as a consequence of oxygen deprivation during the course of labor and delivery. Compared with the opinion of Dr. Ross, the respondent offered the testimony of Dr. Michael Duchowny. Dr. Duchowny is a child neurologist who is board certified in pediatrics, neurology with special competence in child neurology and clinical neurophysiology. Dr. Duchowny is associated with the department of neurology at Miami Children's Hospital and routinely treats neonates suspected of having suffered a hypoxic event at birth. Dr. Duchowny examined Ashley on September 21, 1992, as well as observed her at hearing, and was familiar, as was Dr. Ross, with the pertinent medical records. It was Dr. Duchowny's opinion that Ashley was substantially and permanently mentally impaired, but that her physical impairment could best be described as mild to moderate. As to causation, it was Dr. Duchowny's opinion that the cause (etiology) of Ashley's mental and physical impairment (neurologic syndrome) was a developmental problem of in utero (prenatal) or genetic origin, and that any fetal distress she may have suffered at birth was not substantial and did not contribute to her condition. [Tr. 97] Here, I accept the testimony and opinion of Dr. Duchowny as being the more credible and substantial as to whether Ashley sustained a substantial and permanent mental and physical impairment, and the cause of such dysfunction. Dr. Duchowny's opinions are credible, supported by the observations of other physicians as heretofore noted, and are most consistent with conclusions to be drawn or inferences raised by the medical records received into evidence.
The Issue The issue in this case is whether Jacob McGowan (Jacob) suffered a birth-related injury as defined by section 766.302(2), Florida Statutes, for which compensation should be awarded under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan.
Findings Of Fact Jacob was born on July 2, 2015, at Shands at the University of Florida (Shands), Gainesville, Alachua County, Florida. The pregnancy, labor, and delivery of his mother, Christy Gonzalez, were managed by employees of UF Health Physicians and employees of Shands. At all times material, both the hospital and the physicians group were active members under NICA pursuant to sections 766.302(6) and (7). Christy Gonzalez, age 32, presented to Shands on July 1, 2015. This was her second pregnancy. Ms. Gonzalez's prior pregnancy resulted in an emergency cesarean section at 37 weeks after a failed induction/arrest of labor due to gestational hypertension. Based on orders given by OBGYN Georgia Graham, M.D., Christy Gonzalez was admitted to the Labor and Delivery Suite at approximately 12:05 p.m. Ms. Gonzalez was started on Pitocin at 2:47 p.m. for induction/augmentation. Labor progressed slowly over the next approximate 30 hours during which time Ms. Gonzalez continued on Pitocin and exhibited several periods of ongoing and apparent uncontrolled maternal hypertension. Fetal heart monitoring started at 8:13 a.m. on July 1, 2015, and, as labor progressed, the fetal heart rate pattern demonstrated accelerations, and late and early/variable decelerations. The fetal heart rate reached 90 and below at numerous points throughout the day on July 1, 2015, including at 9:34 a.m., 9:54 a.m., 11:04 a.m., 11:10 a.m., 1:05-1:48 p.m. (multiple decelerations), 2:11-2:15 p.m., 2:16-2:18 p.m., 2:31 p.m., and 9:36-9:38 p.m. On July 2, 2015, the fetal heart rate continued to demonstrate accelerations and decelerations with "High FHR" noted at 8:56 p.m. (156/67), as well as 9:15 p.m. and 9:21 p.m. The fetal monitor strips indicate prolonged periods of fetal distress throughout this long period of labor. At approximately 11:00 p.m. on July 2, 2015, Ms. Gonzalez was taken into the operating room for emergency cesarean section due to decreased variability and repetitive decelerations in the fetal heart rate. Jacob was born a live infant at 11:42 p.m. on July 2, 2015. Jacob was a single gestation, weighing 4,366 grams at birth. Jacob was delivered by Dr. Anushka Chelliah, who was a NICA participating physician on July 2, 2015. Petitioner contends that Jacob suffered a birth-related neurological injury and seeks compensation under the NICA Plan. Respondent contends that Jacob has not suffered a birth-related neurological injury as defined by section 766.302(2). Jacob was born via cesarean section secondary to failed induction and vaginal birth after cesarean section, and non- reassuring fetal heart rate tracing and nuchal cord. Jacob was delivered with no respiratory effort and a heart rate less than 60. Post-birth resuscitation included tactile stimulation, intubation, suctioning, and positive pressure ventilation. His Apgar scores were 1 at one minute, 3 at five minutes and 4 at 10 minutes. Physical examination at birth revealed he was pale, had poor tone and negative grasp, and poor moro and suck reflexes. Following color change and rise in his heart rate and increasing oxygen saturations, Jacob was transferred to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) for further management. Initial assessment of Jacob included intrapartum fetal asphyxia, chorioamnionitis affecting fetus or newborn, meconium aspiration, injury to scalp secondary to birth trauma, respiratory failure of newborn, and HIE (hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy) for which HIE protocol for cooling was initiated. Upon arrival to the NICU, Jacob was initially placed on a conventional ventilator with oxygen saturations in the upper 80s. He was quickly transitioned to a high frequency ventilator/oscillator with excellent response. Jacob’s initial blood gas showed good ventilation and medical personnel were able to sequentially wean his amplitude, and he was started on 100-percent oxygen. He was passively cooled until three hours of life when active cooling was started. By 12:46 a.m., physical examination showed a more reassuring neurological examination, although high risk for seizures and neurologic sequelae was noted. Physical examination at four hours of life revealed Jacob was pink, alert, reacting appropriately to stimulation, reactive to light, had a positive suck reflex, gag reflex, mildly increased tone in all extremities, reflexes of 3+ in his lower extremities, 2+ in his upper extremities, slow grasp in feet and brisk grasp in hands. Jacob was discharged from the hospital on August 10, 2015 (day of life 39). His hospital course was complicated by glucose and electrolyte derangements, adrenal hemorrhage, seizures, hypotension, coagulopathy, E coli sepsis with presumed meningitis and poor feeding. The hospital discharge summary reflects that he was actively moving all extremities, had received antibiotics secondary to E coli sepsis and suspect meningitis, was weaned from the ventilator to a continuous positive airway pressure machine (CPAP) at five days of life and had been stable on room air since July 11, 2015, was discharged with 10 mg of phenobarbital every 12 hours, that a physical exam revealed a mildly hypotonic normal male and that he had been on full oral feeding since August 3, 2015, with an appropriate weight gain pattern at discharge. The neurological status section of the hospital discharge summary reflects that Jacob's initial MRI on July 6, 2015, showed evidence of frontal and occipital cortical and subcortical injury globally. A repeat MRI on July 12, 2015, showed improvement in cortical injury with some evidence of injury over the head of the left caudate. He initially had seizure activity on EEG and was loaded with phenobarbital. The last two continuous EEGs on July 11, 2015, and July 16, 2015, however, showed no seizure activity, and the plan was to allow him to outgrow his phenobarbital dose. On August 12, 2015, Jacob presented to his pediatrician for a well child visit. At this time difficulty breast feeding was reported by the mother. The pediatrician noted "no obvious developmental delays or difficulties" and "great tone." Counseling was given on breast feeding and feeding, and orders were given for evaluation and treatment by ophthalmology and occupational therapy. On August 24, 2015, Jacob presented to his pediatrician for sores in his mouth and feeding problems, and fussiness with spit up and vomiting in preceding days. He was on no medications at this time. His physical exam was normal. Neurological exam was also normal with present and normal newborn reflexes noted. "Great weight gain" was noted. Counseling was given concerning gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and feeding. On September 3, 2015, Jacob presented to his pediatrician for a well child visit. At this time, his mother was curious as to whether he needed therapy for motor development. He was noted to be feeding well and complete resolution of his GERD symptoms was noted. Medications at that time included only ranitidine syrup (a stomach acid reducer). All areas of development were noted to be normal for his age and a physical examination, including neurological examination, were also normal. The pediatrician noted in assessment that although the mother reported a diagnosis of brain damage, her concerns regarding motor skills were not apparent, as Jacob was noted to be moving well, trying to roll, could lift his head, and was grasping a rattle in his stroller--all of which were noted to be "very impressive for 2 months." On October 29, 2015, Jacob presented to his pediatrician with complaints of right ear pain and discharge, low-grade fever, tugging at his ear, and fussiness. Medications at this time included only ranitidine syrup. A physical exam was normal with the exception of crusty discharge noted in his ears. He was prescribed antibiotics and ranitidine was refilled. On November 10, 2015, Jacob presented to his pediatrician with complaints of congestion and ear drainage. There were no concerns with Jacob's feeding at this time, and he was noted to eat baby food and use a bottle. Medications at this time included only ranitidine syrup. His physical exam was normal with the exception of erythematous noted in both ears. Antibiotics were prescribed. On November 23, 2015, Jacob presented to his pediatrician for a well child visit. At this time Jacob was taking ranitidine daily for GERD and was in physical therapy/occupational therapy for delayed milestones and trouble sucking. He was noted to be eating solid foods since three months of age, eating baby food, and using a bottle. Ranitidine was refilled. "All areas of development are appropriate for age" was noted. A physical exam was normal. Plans for future care included continued use of ranitidine for GERD, continued therapies for delayed milestones, and a referral to otolaryngology for audiometry. On January 6, 2016, Jacob presented to his pediatrician for a six-month follow-up visit. At this time it was noted that he was getting occupational and physical therapy weekly. It was also noted that he had been diagnosed with hand, foot, and mouth disease and had spots in his throat and discharge from his right ear. The only medication at this time was ranitidine, which was refilled. No concerns with his nutrition were noted. Developmental history testing revealed a “pass” in all areas, except difficulty rolling left to right and sitting alone. Allergic rhinitis symptoms were noted, however, a physical exam was normal. Plans for future care on this visit included referral for a failed hearing screening, continued ranitidine, and continued occupational therapy. At the request of NICA, Donald C. Willis, M.D., who is board-certified in obstetrics and gynecology and maternal-fetal medicine, reviewed the medical records included in the Stipulated Record as Joint Exhibits A through E. In his report dated August 10, 2016, Dr. Willis opined that, [t]here was an apparent obstetrical event that resulted in loss of oxygen to the baby's brain during labor, delivery and continuing into the immediate post delivery period. The oxygen deprivation resulted in brain injury. I am unable to comment about the severity of the brain injury. At the request of NICA, Laufey Y. Sigurdardottir, M.D., who is board-certified in neurology, reviewed the medical records included in the Stipulated Record as Joint Exhibits A through E, and performed a thorough examination of Jacob on August 31, 2016. Dr. Sigurdardottir's report, dated August 31, 2016, reveals that Jacob's mother gave an "excellent history and timeline of the pregnancy with Jacob, his birth, and aftermath." Jacob's developmental history is reported by Dr. Sigurdardottir to include walking independently between 11 and 12 months of age; speaking five words; and report by mother of some hand tremors when reaching for objects. Jacob is noted to have been weaned from phenobarbital at six months of age and he has had no further seizure activity. Dr. Sigurdardottir's neurological exam revealed a pleasant and interactive boy interested in his surroundings. His motor exam revealed symmetric, normal muscle tone and equal use of both extremities. His gait was symmetric and seemed age appropriate. His reflexes were present and at times slightly increased, but never spread from right to left. Balance and coordination were noted to be difficult to fully assess, but seemed to be within normal limits for his age. He manipulated toys in a conventional manner with no autistic characteristics or repetitive behaviors seen. Dr. Sigurdardottir noted that Jacob had made a remarkable recovery and that there were no obvious abnormalities noted upon neurologic exam. Dr. Sigurdardottir concluded her report with her opinions that, The patient is found to have no substantial physical and/or mental impairment at this time. Jacob did have a neurological injury to the brain due to oxygen deprivation, and his hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy is felt to be birth related. At this time, Jacob's prognosis for life expectancy and full recovery is good. Petitioner did not submit or introduce into evidence any expert reports rebutting the opinions of Dr. Willis or Dr. Sigurdardottir.
