The Issue At issue in this proceeding is whether Hawke Carter, a minor, suffered an injury for which compensation should be awarded under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan.
Findings Of Fact As observed in the preliminary statement, neither Petitioner nor anyone on her behalf appeared at hearing, and no proof was offered to support her claim. Contrasted with the dearth of proof offered by Petitioner, Respondent offered the opinions of Michael S. Duchowny, M.D., a physician board-certified in pediatric neurology, and Charles Kalstone, M.D., a physician board- certified in obstetrics and gynecology. It was Dr. Duchowny's opinion, based on his neurological evaluation of Hawke on July 26, 2000 (at 2 1/2 years of age) and his review of the medical records regarding Hawke's birth, as well as the opinion of Dr. Kalstone, based on his review of the medical records, that Hawke's current neurological condition (which reveals evidence of severe motor and cognitive deficits) did not result from oxygen deprivation, mechanical trauma or any other event occurring during the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period. Rather, it was their opinion that Hawke's disabilities are developmentally based and associated with a congenital syndrome, genetic in origin. Given Hawke's immediate perinatal history, which evidences an uncomplicated labor, delivery, and immediate post-partum period, as well as evidence of congenital heart disease, a diagnose of DiGeorge syndrome (confirmed by positive FISH analysis) and dysmorphic (malformed) features, the opinions of Doctors Duchowny and Kalstone are rationally based and supported by the record. Consequently, their opinions are credited, and it must be resolved that Hawkes' disability is associated with genetic or congenital abnormality, and is not related to any event which may have occurred during the course of his birth.
