The Issue At issue in this proceeding is whether Wilgen Wandique, Jr., a minor, suffered an injury for which compensation should be awarded under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan.
Findings Of Fact Wilgen Wandique and Concepcion Wandique, are the parents and natural guardians of Wilgen Wandique, Jr. (Wilgen), a minor. He was born a live infant on August 21, 1996, at Hialeah Hospital, a hospital located in Dade County, Florida, and his birth weight was in excess of 2500 grams. The physician providing obstetrical services during the birth of Wilgen was Gustavo Ruiz, M.D., who was at all times material hereto, a "participating physician" in the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan (the Plan), as defined by Section 766.302(7), Florida Statutes. Wilgen's delivery at Hialeah Hospital on August 21, 1996, was apparently difficult due to his large birth weight, and was complicated by a shoulder dystocia. Following delivery, Wilgen was noted having evidence of a mild to moderate compromise of the upper right brachial plexus, an Erb's palsy, which affected the range of motion on the upper right extremity, including the arm, forearm, and hand. Otherwise, Wilgen's presentation was unremarkable, and he evidenced no abnormalities with regard to his mental status and, as hereafter noted, no motor abnormalities of central nervous system origin. A brachial plexus injury, such as that suffered by Wilgen during the course of his birth, is not, anatomically, a brain or spinal cord injury, and does not affect his mental abilities. Moreover, as heretofore noted, apart from the brachial plexus injury, Wilgen was not shown to suffer any other injury during the course of his birth. Consequently, the proof fails to demonstrate that Wilgen suffered an injury to the brain or spinal cord caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury during the course of labor or delivery, and further fails to demonstrate he is presently permanently and substantially, mentally and physically impaired.
The Issue The issue in this case is whether Reshnaya E. Francois suffered a birth-related injury as defined by section 766.302(2), Florida Statutes, for which compensation should be awarded under the Plan.
Findings Of Fact Reshnaya E. Francois was born on January 31, 2016, at Broward Health, in Coral Springs, Florida. Reshnaya weighed in excess of 2,500 grams at birth. The circumstances of the labor, delivery, and birth of the minor child are reflected in the medical records of Broward Health submitted with the Petition. At all times material, both Broward Health and Dr. Wajid were active members under NICA pursuant to sections 766.302(6) and (7). Reshnaya was delivered by Dr. Wajid, who was a NICA- participating physician, on January 31, 2016. Petitioners contend that Reshnaya suffered a birth- related neurological injury and seek compensation under the Plan. Respondent contends that Reshnaya has not suffered a birth- related neurological injury as defined by section 766.302(2). In order for a claim to be compensable under the Plan, certain statutory requisites must be met. Section 766.309 provides: The Administrative Law Judge shall make the following determinations based upon all available evidence: Whether the injury claimed is a birth- related neurological injury. If the claimant has demonstrated, to the satisfaction of the Administrative Law Judge, that the infant has sustained a brain or spinal cord injury caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury and that the infant was thereby rendered permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired, a rebuttable presumption shall arise that the injury is a birth-related neurological injury as defined in § 766.302(2). Whether obstetrical services were delivered by a participating physician in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate postdelivery period in a hospital; or by a certified nurse midwife in a teaching hospital supervised by a participating physician in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate postdelivery period in a hospital. How much compensation, if any, is awardable pursuant to § 766.31. If the Administrative Law Judge determines that the injury alleged is not a birth-related neurological injury or that obstetrical services were not delivered by a participating physician at birth, she or he shall enter an order . . . . The term “birth-related neurological injury” is defined in Section 766.302(2), Florida Statutes, as: . . . injury to the brain or spinal cord of a live infant weighing at least 2,500 grams for a single gestation or, in the case of a multiple gestation, a live infant weighing at least 2,000 grams at birth caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate postdelivery period in a hospital, which renders the infant permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired. This definition shall apply to live births only and shall not include disability or death caused by genetic or congenital abnormality. (Emphasis added). In the instant case, NICA has retained Donald Willis, M.D. (Dr. Willis), as its medical expert specializing in maternal-fetal medicine and pediatric neurology. Upon examination of the pertinent medical records, Dr. Willis opined: The newborn was not depressed. Apgar scores were 8/8. Decreased movement of the right arm was noted. The baby was taken to the Mother Baby Unit and admission exam described the baby as alert and active. The baby had an Erb’s palsy or Brachial Plexus injury of the right arm. Clinical appearance of the baby suggested Down syndrome. Chromosome analysis was done for clinical features suggestive of Down syndrome and this genetic abnormality was confirmed. Chromosome analysis was consistent with 47, XX+21 (Down syndrome). Dr. Willis’s medical Report is attached to his Affidavit. His Affidavit reflects his ultimate opinion that: In summary: Delivery was complicated by a mild shoulder dystocia and resulting Erb’s palsy. There was no evidence of injury to the spinal cord. The newborn was not depressed. Apgar scores were 8/9. Chromosome analysis was consistent with Down syndrome. There was no apparent obstetrical event that resulted in loss of oxygen or mechanical trauma to the baby’s brain or spinal cord during labor, delivery or the immediate post delivery period. The baby has a genetic or chromosome abnormality, Down syndrome. A review of the file in this case reveals that there have been no expert opinions filed that are contrary to the opinion of Dr. Willis. The opinion of Dr. Willis that Reshnaya did not suffer an obstetrical event that resulted in loss of oxygen or mechanical trauma to the baby’s brain or spinal cord during labor, delivery, or the immediate post-delivery period is credited. In the instant case, NICA has retained Michael S. Duchowny, M.D. (Dr. Duchowny), as its medical expert in pediatric neurology. Upon examination of the child and the pertinent medical records, Dr. Duchowny opined: In summary, Reshnaya’s examination today reveals findings consistent with Down syndrome including multiple dysmorphic features, hypotonia, and hyporeflexia. She has minimal weakness at the right shoulder girdle and her delayed motor milestones are likely related to her underlying genetic disorder. There are no focal or lateralizing features suggesting a structural brain injury. Dr. Duchowny’s medical report is attached to his Affidavit. His Affidavit reflects his ultimate opinion that: Neither the findings on today’s evaluation nor the medical record review indicate that Reshnaya has either a substantial mental or motor impairment acquired in the course of labor or delivery. I believe that her present neurological disability is more likely related to Downs syndrome. For this reason, I am not recommending that Reshnaya be considered for compensation within the NICA program. A review of the file in this case reveals that there have been no expert opinions filed that are contrary to the opinion of Dr. Duchowny. The opinion of Dr. Duchowny that Reshnaya did not suffer a substantial mental or motor impairment acquired in the course of labor or delivery is credited.
The Issue At issue is weather Tyler Anthony Carter, a minor, qualifies for coverage under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan (Plan).
Findings Of Fact Stipulated facts Victoria Knight Carter and Roy Carter are the natural parents of Tyler Anthony Carter, a minor. Tyler was born a live infant on February 7, 2005, at North Shore Medical Center, a licensed hospital located in Miami, Florida, and his birth weight exceeded 2,500 grams. Obstetrical services were delivered at Tyler's birth by Ramon Hechavarria, M.D., who, at all times material hereto, was a "participating physician" in the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan, as defined by Section 766.302(7), Florida Statutes. Coverage under the Plan Pertinent to this case, coverage is afforded by the Plan for infants who suffer a "birth-related neurological injury," defined as an "injury to the brain or spinal cord . . . caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate postdelivery period in a hospital, which renders the infant permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired." § 766.302(2), Fla. Stat. Here, the proof demonstrated that Tyler's delivery was complicated by a shoulder dystocia, which caused a brachial plexus injury, that resulted in a weakness (an Erb's palsy) in the left upper extremity. Otherwise, Tyler was not shown to suffer any injury at birth. To address the nature and significance of Tyler's injury, NICA offered the testimony of Michael Duchowny, M.D., a physician board-certified in pediatrics, neurology with special competence in child neurology, and clinical neurophysiology.1 (Respondent's Exhibit 1, deposition of Dr. Duchowny). Dr. Duchowny evaluated Tyler on October 17, 2007, and reported the results of his physical and neurological evaluation, as follows: PHYSICAL EXAMINATION reveals an alert, cooperative 2 1/2-year-old, well-developed and well-nourished toddler. Tyler[] weighs 29 pounds. His skin is warm and moist. There are no dysmorphic features or neurocutaneous stigmata. Head circumference measures 49.2 centimeters, which is within standard percentiles for age. The fontanels are closed. There are no cranial or facial anomalies or asymmetries. The neck is supple without masses, thyromegaly or adenopathy. The cardiovascular, respiratory, and abdominal examinations are unremarkable. Tyler's NEUROLOGICAL EXAMINATION reveals an alert and sociable toddler. His speech is fluent and appropriately articulated. He maintains an age appropriate stream of attention. His social skills are appropriately developed for age. Cranial nerve examination is unremarkable. The extraocular movements are fully conjugate in all planes and the pupils are 3 mm and briskly reactive to direct and consensually presented light. A brief funduscopic examination is unremarkable. There are no significant facial asymmetries. The uvula is midline and the pharyngeal folds are symmetric. The tongue is moist and papillated. Motor examination reveals an asymmetry of the upper extremities. There is slightly diminished muscle bulk in the distal left upper extremity. Tyler is unable to raise the left arm past neutrality. He tends to posture the left arm with flexion at the elbow and wrist. Tyler cannot fully supinate the left hand. He can build a tower with using either hand and has bimanual dexterity. However, he demonstrates a consistent right hand preference. There are no fixed contractures. The deep tendon reflexes are 2+ in the lower extremities and the right upper extremity but 1+ at the [left] biceps. The sensory examination is intact to withdrawal of all extremities to stimulation. The neurovascular examination reveals no cervical, cranial or ocular bruits and no temperature or pulse asymmetries. In SUMMARY, Tyler's neurological examination reveals a mild left Erb's palsy, which was likely acquired during delivery due to traction on the brachial plexus. In contrast, there are no abnormalities referable to the right upper extremity or the lower extremities. Tyler's mental functioning is appropriate for age level. (Joint Exhibit 1, Report of Dr. Duchowny, dated October 17, 2007; Respondent's Exhibit 1, pp. 15 and 16). An Erb's palsy, as evidenced by Tyler, is a weakness of an upper extremity due to damage to the nerve roots of the left brachial plexus, a peripheral nerve injury, and does not represent an injury to the brain or spinal cord (the central nervous system). (Respondent's Exhibit 1, pp. 10 and 11).2 Moreover, the physical impairment Tyler suffers is mild, as opposed to substantial, and there is no compelling evidence of mental impairment, much less substantial mental impairment. (Respondent's Exhibit 1, pp. 8-10). Ackley v. General Parcel Service, 646 So. 2d 242, 245 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)("The determination of the cause of a non-observable medical condition, such as a psychiatric illness, is essentially a medical question."); Thomas v. Salvation Army, 562 So. 2d 746, 749 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)("In evaluating medical evidence, a judge of compensation claims may not reject uncontroverted medical testimony without a reasonable explanation."). Consequently, while Tyler may have suffered a mechanical injury, permanent in nature (to his left brachial plexus) during the course of birth, he does not qualify for coverage under the Plan.
The Issue At issue in this proceeding is whether Hawke Carter, a minor, suffered an injury for which compensation should be awarded under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan.
Findings Of Fact As observed in the preliminary statement, neither Petitioner nor anyone on her behalf appeared at hearing, and no proof was offered to support her claim. Contrasted with the dearth of proof offered by Petitioner, Respondent offered the opinions of Michael S. Duchowny, M.D., a physician board-certified in pediatric neurology, and Charles Kalstone, M.D., a physician board- certified in obstetrics and gynecology. It was Dr. Duchowny's opinion, based on his neurological evaluation of Hawke on July 26, 2000 (at 2 1/2 years of age) and his review of the medical records regarding Hawke's birth, as well as the opinion of Dr. Kalstone, based on his review of the medical records, that Hawke's current neurological condition (which reveals evidence of severe motor and cognitive deficits) did not result from oxygen deprivation, mechanical trauma or any other event occurring during the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period. Rather, it was their opinion that Hawke's disabilities are developmentally based and associated with a congenital syndrome, genetic in origin. Given Hawke's immediate perinatal history, which evidences an uncomplicated labor, delivery, and immediate post-partum period, as well as evidence of congenital heart disease, a diagnose of DiGeorge syndrome (confirmed by positive FISH analysis) and dysmorphic (malformed) features, the opinions of Doctors Duchowny and Kalstone are rationally based and supported by the record. Consequently, their opinions are credited, and it must be resolved that Hawkes' disability is associated with genetic or congenital abnormality, and is not related to any event which may have occurred during the course of his birth.
The Issue At issue is whether Jhaleil Dixon, a minor, qualifies for coverage under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan (Plan).
Findings Of Fact Stipulated facts Rosina Dixon is the natural mother and guardian of Jhaleil Dixon, a minor. Jhaleil was born a live infant on February 17, 2004, at Shands Medical Center, a hospital located in Jacksonville, Florida, and his birth weight exceeded 2,500 grams. Coverage under the Plan Pertinent to this case, coverage is afforded by the Plan for infants who suffer a "birth-related neurological injury," defined as an "injury to the brain or spinal cord . . . caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate postdelivery period in a hospital, which renders the infant permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired." § 766.302(2), Fla. Stat. The etiology of Jhaleil's impairments To address the likely etiology of Jhaleil's impairments, Ms. Dixon testified on her own behalf, and offered the testimony of Page Lutchman. In contrast, NICA offered the testimony of Donald Willis, M.D., a physician board-certified in obstetrics and gynecology, and maternal-fetal medicine, together with Dr. Willis' reports and the medical records related to Jhaleil's birth. Based on Dr. Willis' review of the medical records, it was his opinion that, within a reasonable degree of medical probability, Jhaleil did not suffer an injury to his brain or spinal cord caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation. In so concluding, Dr. Willis noted that Apgar scores were 3 and 7, at one and five minutes, respectively; that while depressed at birth, Jhaleil responded quickly to minimal resuscitation; umbilical cord blood gas was normal, with pH of 7.19 and base excess of -3.1; neurologic consultation was consistent with bilateral brachial plexus injury, not an injury to the brain or spinal cord; MRI of the spine on day 3 of life was negative; and, there being no evidence of multisystem system involvement (i.e., seizures, renal failure), Jhaleil's newborn stay was not otherwise consistent with injury to the brain or spinal cord. The opinions of Dr. Willis are rationally based, supported by the record, and credible. Consequently, it must be resolved that, more likely than not, Jhaleil's impairments were not the result of a brain or spinal cord injury caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation. See Vero Beach Care Center v. Ricks, 476 So. 2d 262, 264 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)("[L]ay testimony is legally insufficient to support a finding of causation where the medical condition involved is not readily observable."); Ackley v. General Parcel Service, 646 So. 2d 242, 245 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)("The determination of the cause of a non-observable medical condition, such as a psychiatric illness, is essentially a medical question."); Thomas v. Salvation Army, 562 So. 2d 746, 749 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)("In evaluating medical evidence, a judge of compensation claims may not reject uncontroverted medical testimony without a reasonable explanation."). Therefore, the proof fails to support the conclusion that Jhaleil suffered a "birth-related neurological injury," as required for coverage under the Plan.
The Issue Whether Ashley Villarreal has suffered an injury for which compensation should be awarded under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan, as alleged in the claim for compensation.
Findings Of Fact Preliminary matters Ashley Villarreal (Ashley) is the natural daughter of Roy Villarreal and Carmen Luna. She was born a live infant on January 2, 1989, at Bethesda Memorial Hospital in Palm Beach County, Florida, and her birth weight was 3090 grams. The physician delivering obstetrical services during the birth of Ashley was Allen Dinnerstein, M.D., who was, at all times material hereto, a participating physician in the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan, as defined by Section 766.302(7), Florida Statutes. The birth of Ashley Villarreal At or about 4:15 p.m., January 2, 1989, Carmen Luna was admitted to Bethesda Memorial Hospital. At the time, Carmen Luna was in active labor, and Ashley was post term with a gestational age of 41 weeks. Otherwise, Carmen Luna's pregnancy had been without complication. External fetal monitoring was commenced at 4:50 p.m. and indicated that the fetal heart tone was sporadically within the 60 beat per minute level, with a slow return to baseline; a level sufficient to indicate occasional fetal bradycardia and fetal distress. 1/ This situation evidenced a need for surgical intervention, and at 5:20 p.m. Carmen Luna was taken to the operating room. Anesthesia commenced at 5:25 p.m., a cesarean section surgical procedure was commenced at 5:39 p.m., and Ashley was delivered at 5:44 p.m. The operative report reflects that the following occurred during the course of the procedure: . . . a transverse incision was made into the uterus releasing meconium stained fluid. The vertex was delivered and the baby suctioned with DeLee. A loop of cord over the neck was removed and the baby then delivered completely continually being suctioned as the cord was double clamped and severed and the infant given to the neonatologist for care . . . . The delivery records likewise reflect that Ashley had a blue appearance at delivery, the presence of meconium staining, and the following resuscitation measures: "Stimulation," "Bulb Suction," "DeLee Suction," "Mech Suction" and "Whiffs Oz." When delivered, Ashley presented Apgar scores of 6 at one minute and 8 at five minutes. These scores are a numerical expression of the condition of a newborn infant, and reflect the sum points gained on assessment of the heart rate, respiratory effort, muscle tone, reflex irritability, and color, with each category being assigned a score ranging from the lowest score of 0 through a maximum score of 2. As noted, at one minute, Ashley's Apgar score totaled 6, with respiratory effort and reflex irritability being graded at 2 each, heart rate and muscle tone being graded at 1 each, and color being graded at 0. At 5 minutes, Ashley's Apgar score totaled 8, with heart rate, respiratory effort and reflex irritability being graded at 2 each, and muscle tone and color at 1 each. Such total scores could be characterized by an obstetrician as "good." Pertinent to this case, color, heart rate and respiratory effort are primarily related to the cardiovascular system, and color is the least significant indicator of an infant's brain or neurological status at birth. The categories of reflex irritability and muscle tone are, however, neurological assessments, which offer the greatest insight into the neurological condition of an infant at birth. Ashley's Apgar scores relative to those categories which reflect neurological status at birth were collectively a total of 3 out of a possible 4 at both 1 and 5 minutes. Under the circumstances, Ashley's Apgar scores, either globally or discretely, fail to reflect a hypoxic event at birth. At 6:00 p.m., following delivery, Ashley was admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit due to respiratory distress, possibly secondary to meconium aspiration. Ashley was accorded extra oxygen, via oxygen hood, for two days, and her meconium aspiration was successfully treated with antibiotics. During her admission, no clinical observations were noted that one would typically expect in a child undergoing hypoxic encephalopathy, and no neurological consult was ordered. 2/ On January 7, 1989, Ashley was discharged as an apparently well baby. Subsequent developments On July 29, 1989, Ashley was seen by M. Arenstein, D.O., for a "well baby visit," and no abnormalities were noted; however, on September 6, 1989, Ashley was again seen by Dr. Arenstein at which time the parents expressed their concern regarding Ashley "not sitting up, crawling, etc." Consequently, Dr. Arenstein referred Ashley for a pediatric consult with Jeffrey Perelman, M.D. Ashley was seen by Dr. Perelman on September 19, 1989, and he diagnosed her as developmentally delayed, and ultimately referred her to David Ross, M.D., for a neurological evaluation. Dr. Ross saw Ashley on July 2, 1990, and concluded: The patient has some mild facial dysmorphism with developmental delay in all fields associated with an abnormal neurologic exam with persistence of postural reflexes and hyperreflexia. The spectrum of findings is consistent with mental retardation of a mild to moderate degree probably due to cerebral palsy. 3/ Dr. Ross' ultimate diagnosis was mental retardation, and he recommended that Ashley have a full evaluation, including "an image of the brain either with CT scan or MRI (an EEG, torch titers, chromosome analysis)." Ashley was referred in August 1990, for a CT brain scan and an EEG. The CT scan is a neuroimaging study which can identify structural brain abnormalities occasioned by an hypoxic insult, as well as other causes. The EEG is a device used to detect abnormalities of the electrical currents of the brain such as seizure activity, which is often a manifestation of hypoxic insult at birth, and the death of neuronal cells. Here, both the CT scan and EEG were within normal limits. Ashley continued to be treated by Dr. Perelman through June 1991; however, on August 14, 1991, she came under the care of Miguel Simo, M.D., another pediatrician, because the parents were apparently dissatisfied with Dr. Perelman. Upon examination, Dr. Simo diagnosed Ashley as developmentally delayed, and referred her to Laszlo Mate', M.D., a physician practicing child neurology, for evaluation. Dr. Mate' examined Ashley on August 29, 1991, and observed: . . . a small, dysmorphic female in no apparent distress. Her head circumference is 47 cm which is in the 25th percentile. She doesn't have any neurocutaneous abnormalities. Her palmer creases are somewhat abnormal, but not of simian nature. Her fingers are slightly abnormal, extra long, and she seems to have a proximal displacement of both thumbs. Her ears are malformed with very small earlobes. The ears are somewhat posterior rotated and low set. Her eyes are almond shape but in view of her Indian heritage, that's probably normal. Both parents seem to have similar shaped eyes. The child has a somewhat prominent nose. The mouth is somewhat fishmouth in character and she has fairly shallow temporal area. She doesn't have any eyelashes on her lower eyelid. Dr. Mate's impression was: This is a markedly abnormal child with a developmental quotient in the 30's. She's currently is 30 months old and she functions around a 9-10 month level. She has multiple minor malformations which made the diagnosis of cerebral palsy somewhat unlikely. I suspect we are dealing with some prenatal etiology, either genetic or pregnancy related. 4/ Dr. Simo also referred Ashley for an MRI of the brain. An MRI, as with a CT scan, is a neuroimaging study which can identify structural abnormalities occasioned by hypoxic insult, as well as other causes. The MRI, performed September 20, 1991, was abnormal, evidencing "poor and decreased white matter myelinization extending to the frontal, occipital, and parietal cortex and decrease in white matter content in the centrum semiovale." Such damage could be reflective of birth asphyxia, developmental immaturity of the brain, or a myriad of other causes. Finally, Dr. Simo referred Ashley to Oscar Febles, M.D., a physician practicing genetics. Dr. Febles examined Ashley on November 1, 1991, and rendered a diagnosis of "psychomotor retardation of unknown etiology." Concluding, Dr. Febles observed: The clinical findings in this patient are not diagnostic of a particular genetic syndrome . . . In conclusion, this patient presents a clinical picture characterized by psychomotor retardation that cannot be diagnosed on the clinical findings and/or testing done. The fact that she presents diffuse demyelinization on the MRI would favor the diagnosis of cerebral palsy and/or a CNS degenerative disease. It is my recommendation that an MRI be repeated in approximately 6 months to see if the demyelinization process of the cortex previously seen is progressive or static. If found to be progressive it would indicate a CNS degenerative disease (e.g. leukodystrophies) and if static the diagnosis of cerebral palsy is most likely. In addition, it is also recommended . . . Genetic re-evaluation in 1 year. Whether, consistent with Dr. Febles' recommendation, an MRI was repeated or Ashley had a subsequent genetic re- evaluation does not appear of record. Notably, however, while Ashley was genetically tested and found to have a normal karyotype, such test does not rule out the preponderance of genetic disorders which manifest themselves in microscopic point mutations within a chromosome as opposed to total chromosomal malformation. The medical experts at hearing As to whether Ashley had sustained permanent and substantial mental and physical impairment as a result of an injury to her brain resulting from oxygen deprivation during the course of labor, delivery or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period, petitioners offered the testimony of Dr. David Ross, who, although a board certified neurologist, does not regularly treat neonates. Dr. Ross examined Ashley on July 2, 1990, and March 2, 1994. It was Dr. Ross' opinion that Ashley suffered a substantial and permanent mental and physical impairment as a consequence of oxygen deprivation during the course of labor and delivery. Compared with the opinion of Dr. Ross, the respondent offered the testimony of Dr. Michael Duchowny. Dr. Duchowny is a child neurologist who is board certified in pediatrics, neurology with special competence in child neurology and clinical neurophysiology. Dr. Duchowny is associated with the department of neurology at Miami Children's Hospital and routinely treats neonates suspected of having suffered a hypoxic event at birth. Dr. Duchowny examined Ashley on September 21, 1992, as well as observed her at hearing, and was familiar, as was Dr. Ross, with the pertinent medical records. It was Dr. Duchowny's opinion that Ashley was substantially and permanently mentally impaired, but that her physical impairment could best be described as mild to moderate. As to causation, it was Dr. Duchowny's opinion that the cause (etiology) of Ashley's mental and physical impairment (neurologic syndrome) was a developmental problem of in utero (prenatal) or genetic origin, and that any fetal distress she may have suffered at birth was not substantial and did not contribute to her condition. [Tr. 97] Here, I accept the testimony and opinion of Dr. Duchowny as being the more credible and substantial as to whether Ashley sustained a substantial and permanent mental and physical impairment, and the cause of such dysfunction. Dr. Duchowny's opinions are credible, supported by the observations of other physicians as heretofore noted, and are most consistent with conclusions to be drawn or inferences raised by the medical records received into evidence.
The Issue At issue in this proceeding is whether Thalya Greene, a minor, suffered an injury for which compensation should be awarded under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan.
Findings Of Fact Fundamental findings Daniel Greene and Lizbeth Greene, are the parents and natural guardians of Thalya Greene (Thalya), a minor. Thalya was born a live infant on August 27, 1998, at Baptist Medical Center, a hospital located in Jacksonville, Florida, and her birth weight was in excess of 2,500 grams. The physician providing obstetrical services during Thalya's birth was R. William Quinlan, M.D., who was, at all times material hereto, a participating physician in the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan, as defined by Section 766.302(7), Florida Statutes. Thalya's birth At or about 4:35 a.m., August 27, 1998, Mrs. Greene (with an estimated date of confinement of September 19, 1998, and the fetus at 36+ weeks) presented to Baptist Medical Center in early labor. Vaginal examination revealed the membranes to be intact, and the cervix at 3 centimeters dilatation, effacement at 50 percent, and the fetus at station -2. External fetal monitoring applied at 4:37 a.m., reflected a reassuring fetal heart tone, and Mrs. Greene was admitted to labor and delivery at or about 4:40 a.m. Mrs. Greene's labor progressed steadily, and external fetal monitoring reflected a reassuring fetal heart tone throughout the course of labor and delivery. At or about 7:30 a.m., dilatation was noted as complete; at 7:49 a.m., the membranes were artificially ruptured, with clear fluid noted; and at 7:55 a.m. Thalya was delivered spontaneously (cephalic presentation) without incident. On delivery, Thalya was noted as "pale blue" in color, and was bulb suctioned and accorded free flow oxygen; however, she breathed spontaneously, and did not require resuscitation. Initial newborn assessment noted no apparent abnormalities. Apgar scores were recorded as 7 at one minute and 8 at five minutes. The Apgar scores assigned to Thalya are a numerical expression of the condition of a newborn infant, and reflect the sum points gained on assessment of heart rate, respiratory effort, muscle tone, reflex irritability, and color, with each category being assigned a score ranging from the lowest score of 0 through a maximum score of 2. As noted, at one minute, Thalya's Apgar score totaled 7, with heart rate, muscle tone, and reflect irritability being graded at 2 each; respiratory effort being graded at 1; and color being graded at 0. At five minutes, Thalya's Apgar score totaled 8, with heart rate, respiratory effort, muscle tone, and reflex irritability being graded at 2 each, and color again being graded at 0. Thalya was admitted to the newborn nursery at or about 8:50 a.m. Assessment on admission was grossly normal. Thalya's status post-delivery was uneventful until 11:30 a.m. (approximately 3 1/2 hours after delivery) when she experienced a choking episode (secondary to spitting up) and turned dusky over the face and chest. In response, Thalya was placed under a radiant warmer, suctioned, and given blow by oxygen (for approximately 3 minutes) until she pinked up. Thereafter, Thalya's course was again uneventful until 1:00 a.m., August 28, 1998, when she again appeared dusky, and was accorded blow by oxygen. At the time, it was noted that the CBC drawn during the first dusky spell was within normal limits and that the blood culture that had been obtained was preliminarily negative. Thereafter, Thalya's course was again without apparent complication until approximately 10:23 p.m., when she "became dusky not associated with feed," and was again suctioned and accorded blow by oxygen. At that time, Thalya was noted as "pink and intermittently tachypneic with rare grunting." Following neurologic consult, Thalya was transferred to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) for further observation and management. Thalya was received in the NICU at 10:34 p.m. At the time, she was observed as "warm and pink with grunting noted." EKG leads were applied and revealed a heart rate of 180, respiratory rate of 50, blood pressure of 76/49, and a rectal temperature of 100.3. Examination revealed nystagmus (an involuntary rapid movement of the eyeball) and some jerky movements of her extremities. CBC showed a white blood count of 5,000, and blood culture was ordered. Working diagnosis was "suspected septis" and Thalya was started on ampicillin and gentamicin. At 12:35 a.m., August 29, 1998, Thalya evidenced symptoms of seizure activity, and was loaded with phenobarbital. Spinal tap of August 29, 1998, as well as the results of the blood culture drawn of August 28, 1998, was positive for Group B Streptococcus. An infectious disease consult was obtained and Thalya was managed on antibiotics for three weeks, and maintained on phenobarbital for her seizure activity. CT and MRI of the head on August 29, 1998, were normal; however, a head ultrasound of September 3, 1998, showed minimal intra-axial fluid. Chromosomal studies were normal. Thalya was discharged to her parents' care on September 15, 1998, on phenobarbital and ampicillin. Final diagnosis on discharge included bacterial infection due to Streptococcus, Group B; streptococcal meningitis; and seizures. Thalya's subsequent development Following her discharge from Baptist Medical Center, Thalya was initially followed by Carlos H. Gama, M.D., a pediatric neurologist. Dr. Gama's first neurological examination occurred on November 3, 1998, when Thalya was 2 months of age, and was reported as follows: I had the opportunity of seeing Thalya for a neurological evaluation. The following are my diagnosis and recommendations. Diagnosis: Status post neonatal Group B Streptococcal meningitis. Seizures. Hypotnia. Recommendations: Obtain EEG. Obtain trough Phenobarbital level. Obtain records. Return to this office in one month for reevaluation and further recommendations. Comments: * * * . . . Since discharged from NICU mother reports that Thalya had done well. She is feeding well and thriving. No seizures have been noted. She continues on Phenobarbital, taking 4mls po bid. A blood level was obtained prior to this visit but this result is not available. Mother reports that Thalya has normal awake and sleep cycles. She seems to be moving all extremities spontaneously and symmetrically. There has not been any apneic spells or unusual behaviors suggestive of seizure like activity . . . . The examination today reveals a head circumference is 40.5cm (in the 90th percentile). Her weight is in the 90th percentile and height is in the 50th percentile. The baby is alert. She is able to turn her eyes to light, but does not track the examiner in a 90 degree range. The pupils were equal and reactive. Red reflex was present bilaterally. Facial grimace was symmetric. Suck was appropriate. Strength seems to be grossly unremarkable. Deep tendon reflexes were +2 in the upper extremities, +3 in the lower extremities at the knees and +2 at the ankles. No clonus was seen. Babinski's were present bilaterally. There was evidence of hypotonia of her axial musculature, being approximately moderate in severity. There was also decrease in head control. The patient's moro reflex reveals appropriate abduction of her upper extremities symmetrically. Traction response was decreased. Tone and neck reflex was absent. Palmar and Plantar reflexes were present. Muscle tone was low. The sensory examination to touch seemed to be unremarkable. Spine examination was noncontributory. The patient has no obvious dysmorphic features, organomegalies or skin abnormalities. Anterior fontanel was open and normal tense with no musculatures. Therefore, it is my opinion that Thalya has a history of neonatal Group B Streptococcal meningitis and sepsis associated with seizures. She is now seizure free. Her examination is remarkable for hypotonia, which most likely is on central basis. Therefore, the above recommendations were made. She will be reassessed in one month in this office. The EEG (Electroencephalogram) recommended by Dr. Gama was obtained on November 9, 1998, and read as abnormal. Specifically, the EEG report noted: This EEG is abnormal because of mild background disorganization which was seen bilaterally but more prominently over the right hemisphere, especially in the frontal region. This finding suggest[s] a diffused cerebral dysfunction such as seen in mild encephalopathy. In addition, a structural lesion in the right hemisphere cannot be excluded. Thalya was next seen by Dr. Gama on December 7, 1998. The results of that examination were reported as follows: Diagnosis: Seizure disorder. Stable on Phenobarbital. S/P [status post] Bacterial Group B Streptococcal Meningitis. Hypotonia. Developmental delay. Abnormal EEG. * * * Comments: . . . Thalya continues to be active. She is feeding well and gaining weight properly. She is making more cooing sounds and attempting to roll over, but she has not been successful in this area. Her examination demonstrates that her head circumference is 42cm. She is alert. She follows the examiner. Her pupils are equal and reactive. Face is unremarkable. She does seem to stick her tongue out intermittently. The motor examination demonstrates that she has decrease traction and head control for her age. She also has a tendency to keep her hands fisted, but this is only intermittently. She does not reach for objects yet. She is unable to hold weight in her lower extremities. Muscle tone seems to be slightly decreased in the axial musculature in particular. Therefore, it is my recommendation that we proceed with an MRI of the brain to rule out structural abnormalities of the right hemisphere.1 In addition, we have discussed the treatment with Phenobarbital. This should be continued for at least six months before making any further recommendations . . . She will be reassessed in this office in 1-2 months. Dr. Gama's next neurological examination of Thalya occurred on January 12, 1999, and was reported as follows: Diagnosis: Seizure disorder. Stable on Phenobarbital. S/P bacterial group B streptococcal meningitis. Hypotonia. Improving. Borderline developmental delay. Abnormal EEG * * * Comments: Thalya is doing extremely well. She is getting physical therapy twice a week and making progress. She is more attentive. She follows the examiner in a 180 degree range. She has good social skills. Anterior fontanel is soft. Head circumference is 44cm which is slightly above the 90th percentile, but she has been growing parallel to this with no problems. Cranial nerve examination is unremarkable. Motor examination demonstrates that she is unable to put weight in lower extremities, otherwise, she moves all extremities spontaneously. Deep tendon reflexes were unremarkable. No obvious pathological reflexes were elicited during today's visit. Muscle tone was normal to low. Denver Developmental Screen test reveals that she seems to be appropriate for her age in most of the areas. However, she is unable to roll over but she is showing some attempts to do this. The rest of the examination was noncontributory. Thalya was last seen by Dr. Gama on April 29, 1999, and he reported the results of that follow-up neurological examination as follows: Diagnosis: Seizure disorder. Stable on Phenobarbital. S/P Bacterial Group B Streptococcal Meningitis. Hypotonia. Improved. Comments: Thalya continues to do extremely well, with no recurrent seizures. She is tolerating the medication properly . . . . The patient continues to make progress in her development. The examination today demonstrates that her head circumference is 46.7cm. She is maintaining this in the 90th percentile. She has no obvious focal or lateralizing deficits. Her muscle tone has improved considerably and she is gaining milestones appropriately. She was felt to be at her age level in most of the areas tested . . . . Thalya's subsequent neurologic development was followed by Joseph A. Cimino, M.D., a board-certified pediatric neurologist. Dr. Cimino reported the results of his first neurological examination by October 15, 1999, as follows: DIAGNOSES: 1) GBS meningitis/sepsis. Neonatal seizures. Static encephalopathy with motor and language delay. * * * DEVELOPMENTAL HISTORY: The history is obtained from the parents. The child rolled from front to back at 7 months, back to front at 8 months, sat at 7 to 8 months, crawled at 11 months. She was getting in to sitting at 10 to 11 months, pulled to stand at 12 months, began to cruise at 13 months, is not yet walking independently, says mama but not specifically, does not say dada nor does she wave hi or bye. She began physical therapy at 3 months of age and this was initially twice a week and 1 month ago was decreased to once a week. She is not in speech therapy, although the family states the EIP evaluation at 10 months showed she had a receptive language at 4 months. The concern is that audiological evaluation have shown some missed frequency hearing deficit. * * * PHYSICAL EXAMINATION: The head circumference is 48 1/4 cms which is between the 75th and 98th percentile for chronologic age of 14 months. GENERAL EXAM: On inspection this is a well- nourished, healthy youngster who is alert and attentive. The abdomen was soft and nontender without organomegaly. The cardiovascular exam revealed regular rate and rhythm and no murmurs were appreciated. No cranial bruits are noted. The extremities were normal. The lungs were clear to auscultation. The skin exam was without café au lait spots or hypopigmented macules. The spine was without hair tufts or dimpling. In observing this child crawl and again reaching for objects I did not see any focality, nothing to suggest an old infarction which may be a complication of neonatal bacterial meningitis. In addition a CT scan was reported as negative. NEUROLOGICAL EXAM: The child is very social and attentive with good reciprocal play with a puppet. She smiled quite easily. Although with hands-on evaluation she did become irritable and cried. Assessment of tone was quite difficult. She tracked very nicely with full extraocular movements no ophthalmoparesis or nystagmus. The pupils were equal and reactive to light and facial movements were symmetric. I was not able to get an adequate look at the fundi. Corneal reflexes were intact. With regards to the motor exam, she reached quite nicely for objects without preference. She in fact did crawl well, transitioned into a sitting position but did W sit, usually associated with low muscle tone. With hands-on exam it was very difficult as she was crying and had a lot of active resistance to know exactly the status of her tone. She pulls to stand with a mature pattern with hip flexion. She sat quite nicely with her back straight, able manipulate objects. She did not slip through my grip on vertical suspension. Her deep tendon reflexes were 2/4 and symmetric in both the upper and lower extremities. The sensory exam was grossly intact to pain. IMPRESSION: GBS meningitis/sepsis . . . early onset. Neonatal seizure without recurrence, successfully tapered off of Phenobarbital. Prematurity 36 weeks gestation. Language delay. I think at 13 months adjusted age she should be saying mama and dada specifically, have more jargoning, waving hi and bye, and say several other words in addition to mama and dada which are used specifically. There is clearly risk of hearing deficit given meningitis and the use of Gentamicin and this child needs to be followed closely. History of motor delay. Clearly rolling at 6 months adjusted age is delayed. Sitting at 6 to 7 months adjusted age is normal, the family gave a chronologic age of 7 to 8 months but at 36 weeks gestation it is fair to make a 1 month adjustment which I am assuming they would do at EIP. She began to cruise at 13 months chronologic age which is 1 year. Her adjusted age is now 13 months and clearly walking independently can be normal up to 18 months at the outside limits. She appears to be making nice improvement in this area . . . . Thalya was next seen by Dr. Cimino on May 1, 2000, and most recently on November 10, 2000. Dr. Cimino reported the results of his most recent follow-up examination as follows: DIAGNOSES: 1) GBS meningitis. Neonatal seizures. Prematurity 36 weeks gestation Language delay. CLINICAL HISTORY: This is a 2 year old female seen in follow up on 5/1/2000. At that time she was having episodes of spacing out. We obtained an EEG that was normal for the awake and sleep state. Because of the GBS meningitis and developmental delay we obtained an MRI also done in September that was normal. She underwent a speech evaluation on 6/23/2000 that showed auditory comprehension at 9-12 months, verbal expression at 6-9 months. Impression was overall global delay and she has been in speech therapy twice a week at Brook's Rehab. Her chronologic age at the time of the evaluation was 22 months. At this time she began to walk at 15 months. She says mama and specifically, dada non- specifically. She will repeat words but does not have a lot of spontaneous words. She does wave hi and bye. PHYSICAL EXAMINATION: The head circumference is 50 1/4 cms which is between the 75th and 98th percentile. This continues to grow at the same rate. She is crying and extremely uncooperative. She is very frightened by many of her past appointments. She did track, had full extraocular movements without nystagmus or ophthalmoparesis. Her facial movements do appear sysmetric. Tone is low even with her resisting. She ran to her mother, I did not see any abnormalities. Her gait certainly was not wide based. She seemed to get off the floor well. Her sensory exam was grossly intact to pain. The deep tendon reflexes were difficult due to her withdrawal. IMPRESSION: Status-post Group B strep neonatal meningitis with neonatal seizure without recurrence. Language delay. Most likely reflecting sequela of the meningitis. There is a good percentage of these children who do have severe deficits. However, the EEG and MRI did not show any abnormalities. There is no slowing of the background activity and no decrease or delay in myelination reported on the MRI. PLAN: . . . Continue speech therapy . . . Reassess in 6 months. The cause of Thalya's neurologic dysfunction Regarding the cause of Thalya's neurological dysfunction, the proof is compelling that during labor and delivery Mrs. Greene was vaginally infected with Group B Streptococcal (GBS), that during delivery the infection was transmitted to Thalya, and that over the next 24 to 48 hours the infection process rapidly progressed causing meningitis and the resultant brain injury. Consequently, it may be said that Thalya's neurologic dysfunction is associated with a brain injury caused by meningitis (an inflammation of the membranes that envelop the brain and spinal cord), secondary to a GBS infection acquired during the birthing process (most likely subsequent to rupture of the membranes and during the course of delivery). The dispute regarding compensability As a touchstone to resolving the dispute regarding compensability, it is worthy of note that the Plan establishes a no-fault administrative system that provides compensation for an infant who suffers a narrowly defined "birth-related neurological injury." Under the Plan, a "birth-related neurological injury" is defined as: [I]njury to the brain or spinal cord of a live infant weighing at least 2,500 grams at birth caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period in a hospital, which renders the infant permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired. Section 766.302(2), Florida Statutes. Here, there is no serious dispute that Thalya is neurologically impaired or that such impairment is attributable to a brain injury caused by the infection process discussed infra. Rather, what is at issue is whether the cause of Thalya's brain injury and the nature of her impairment fit the narrowly defined term "birth-related neurological injury." In this regard, it is Intervenor's view that Thalya's brain injury (occasioned by an infectious process) may reasonably be described as having been "caused by mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period," and that such injury rendered her "permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired." Conversely, Petitioners and Respondent are of the view that that the cause of Thalya's brain injury was not a "mechanical injury," and that she was not rendered "permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired." Of the two, Petitioners' and Respondent's view is by far the more compelling. The nature and timing of Thalya's injury To address the nature and timing of Thalya's injury, the parties offered the opinions of three physicians: Charles Kalstone, M.D., a physician board-certified in obstetrics and gynecology; Joseph Cimino, M.D., a physician board-certified in pediatric neurology; and James Perry, M.D., a Fellow of the American Academy of Neurology. (Joint Exhibits 2-4). Notably, these physicians shared strikingly similar views, and were of the opinion that Thalya's brain injury was caused by infection induced meningitis, a process distinguishable from an injury caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury. Stated otherwise, the physicians were of the opinion that Thalya's injury could not reasonably be described as having been caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury.2 Given the plain and ordinary meaning of the words used in the term "mechanical injury" (as physical harm or damage caused by machinery, tools, or physical forces), their conclusion was most reasonable.3 Consequently, it is resolved that Thalya's brain injury was not caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period. Thalya's current mental and physical presentation At hearing, the only authoritative proof offered with regard to Thalya's current mental and physical presentation was the testimony of Dr. Cimino, Thalya's pediatric neurologist. It was Dr. Cimino's opinion that while Thalya may evidence substantial cognitive impairment, she does not evidence substantial physical impairment. Such opinions are grossly consistent with the record and are credited.
The Issue At issue is whether Tristen Onofry, a minor, qualifies for coverage under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan (Plan).
Findings Of Fact Stipulated facts Victoria Hill and Keith Onofry are the parents of Tristen Onofry, a minor. Tristen was born a live infant on July 29, 2002, at Tallahassee Memorial Regional Medical Center, Tallahassee, Florida, and his birth weight exceeded 2,500 grams. The physician providing obstetrical services at Tristen's birth was Minal K. Krishnamurphy, M.D., who at all times material hereto, was a "participating physician" in the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan, as defined by Section 766.302(7), Florida Statutes. Coverage under the Plan Pertinent to this case, coverage is afforded by the Plan for infants who suffer a "birth-related neurological injury," defined as an "injury to the brain or spinal cord . . . caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate postdelivery period in a hospital, which renders the infant permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired." § 766.302(2), Fla. Stat. See also §§ 766.309 and 766.31, Fla. Stat. To resolve whether Tristen suffered a "birth-related neurological injury," the parties offered the medical records related to Tristen's birth and subsequent development (Joint Exhibit 1), and the opinions of Michael Duchowny, M.D., a physician board-certified in pediatrics; neurology, with special competence in child neurology; and clinical neurophysiology (Joint Exhibit 2). Notably, Dr. Duchowny evaluated Tristen on October 6, 2004, and reported the results of his evaluation, as follows: PHYSICAL EXAMINATION reveals an[] alert and cooperative, well developed, well-nourished, 2-year-old, left-handed boy. Tristen weighs 23 pounds and is 32 inches tall. His head circumference measures 46.4 centimeters, placing him at the 10th percentile for age match controls. There are no dysmorphic features and no cranial or facial anomalies . . . [or] asymmetries. There are no neurocutaneous stigmata. The neck is supple without masses, thyromegaly, or adenopathy. The cardiovascular, respiratory and abdominal examinations are normal. Tristen's NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION reveals him to be cooperative but with no speech output. He does know colors by pointing. He does not interact with meaningful speech sounds. He seems to enjoy the examination and actively participated. There are prominent tongue thrusting movements and intermittent drooling. The cranial nerve examination reveals full visual fields to direct confrontation testing. Funduscopic examination reveals sharply demarcated disc margins without optic pallor. There is no retinopathy. Pupils are 3 mm and react briskly to direct and consensually presented light. The extraocular movements are conjugate and full in all planes of gaze. The motor examination reveals a static hypotonia with dynamic hypertonicity most prominent in the lower extremities. At rest, Tristen demonstrates an overly full range of motion at all joints. He will then stiffen with activated movement. There are bilateral AFO's in place. Tristen shows no evidence of stable weightbearing and has poor head control with the head flopping forward. He has a wide based stance and demonstrates truncal ataxia. He is able to grasp objects only with a palmar grasp and has no evidence of developed pincher grasp in either hand. He tends to grasp cubes but cannot transfer and drops them readily. He cannot build a tower of cubes. There are no pathological reflexes. The deep tendon reflexes are 2+ in the upper extremities but 3+ at both knees and 3+ at the ankles. There are bilateral Babinski responses. The spine is straight without dysraphic features. Tristen maintains a plantar grade attitude when held in the vertical position. His shoulder girdle seems to slip through the examiner's hands. Sensory examination is intact to withdrawal of all extremities to stimulation. The neurovascular examination reveals no cervical, cranial, or ocular bruits and no temperature or pulse asymmetries. As for the etiology of Tristen's impairments, it was Dr. Duchowny's opinion, based on the results of his neurologic evaluation of Tristen and review of the medical records, that, while of unknown etiology, Tristen's impairments were most likely developmentally based, and not associated with oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or the immediate postpartum period. In so concluding, Dr. Duchowny observed that the impairments demonstrated by Tristen are consistent with the syndrome of ataxic cerebral palsy, a developmentally-based brain disorder acquired before the onset of labor. Dr. Duchowny was also of the opinion that the medical records did not reveal evidence of a substantial mechanical or hypoxic event having occurred during labor and delivery. As for the significance of Tristen's impairments, it was Dr. Duchowny's opinion that Tristen is permanently and substantially physically impaired. However, mentally, Tristen is not similarly affected or, stated otherwise, he is not permanently and substantially mentally impaired. Notably, Dr. Duchowny's opinions were uncontroverted, grossly consistent with the record, and credible.
