The Issue At issue is whether Maxwell Hubmann, a minor, qualifies for coverage under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan (Plan).
Findings Of Fact Stipulated facts related to compensability Petitioners, Roger and Sara Hubmann, are the parents of Maxwell Hubmann, a minor. Maxwell was born a live infant on March 25, 2008, at Sacred Heart Hospital, a hospital located in Pensacola, Florida, and his birth weight exceeded 2,500 grams. Obstetrical services were delivered at Maxwell's birth by Brian Sontag, M.D., who, at all times material hereto, was a "participating physician" in the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan, as defined by Section 766.302(7), Florida Statutes. Coverage under the Plan Pertinent to this case, coverage is afforded by the Plan for infants who suffer a "birth-related neurological injury," defined as an "injury to the brain . . . caused by . . . mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate postdelivery period in a hospital, which renders the infant permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired." § 766.302(2), Fla. Stat. See also §§ 766.309 and 766.31, Fla. Stat. Here, the parties have stipulated, and the proof is otherwise compelling, that Maxwell suffered a traumatic brain injury during the delivery process. (Transcript, pp. 9 and 10; Respondent's Exhibits 1-4). What remains to resolve is whether such injury rendered Maxwell permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired. To address the nature and significance of Maxwell's injury, NICA offered the affidavit and report of Michael Duchowny, M.D., a physician board-certified in pediatrics, neurology with special competence in child neurology, and clinical neurophysiology, who evaluated Maxwell on January 28, 2009. Based on his evaluation, as well as his review of the medical records, Dr. Duchowny was of the opinion that while Maxwell suffered a traumatic brain injury during delivery, his mental function was normal and his motor deficit was quite mild. In so concluding, Dr. Duchowny documented the results of his examination, as well as his conclusions, as follows: PHYSICAL EXAMINATION today reveals an alert, well-developed and cooperative, well- nourished 10-month-old infant. Maxwell weighs 24 pounds and is 30 inches in height. The skin is warm and moist. There are no neurocutaneous stigmata. The hair is blond and of normal texture. The spine is straight without dysraphism. The head circumference measures 46.1 centimeters which is within standard percentiles. The anterior and posterior fontanels are patent and flat. There are no cranial or facial anomalies or asymmetries. The tongue and palate are moist. The neck is supple without masses, thyromegaly or adenopathy. The cardiovascular, respiratory, and abdominal examinations are unremarkable. Maxwell's NEUROLOGICAL EXAMINATION reveals him to be alert, cooperative and fully attentive. He is quite sociable and maintains an age appropriate stream of attention. He has good central gaze fixation with conjugate following movements. The pupils are 3 mm and react briskly to direct and consensually presented light. Funduscopic examination revealed no abnormal retinal findings. There are no significant facial asymmetries of movement. The uvula is midline and the pharyngeal folds are symmetric. Tongue movements are full in all planes. Motor examination reveals an asymmetry of movement with relatively greater movement on the right side. The left upper extremity has mild stiffness but has full range of motor. There is fine motor dexterity of both hands but Maxwell demonstrates a right arm preference and will preferentially reach for an object with the right hand. When an object is moved to the left, he will ultimately offer the left and readily transfers between hands. He has symmetrical movement of both legs. He has well-developed traction and grasp responses and good head control for age. The deep tendon reflexes are slightly exaggerated being 3+ at the knees and biceps. There are no pathologic reflexes. Plantar responses are downgoing. He can stand and bear weight with good axial tone and support does not take steps independently. He has good sitting balance as well. Sensory examination is intact to withdrawal of all extremities to stimulation. Neurovascular examination reveals no cervical, cranial or ocular bruits and no temperature or pulse asymmetries. In SUMMARY, Maxwell's neurological examination reveals that his motor developmental milestones are on time despite a very mild asymmetry of movement and muscle tone in the upper extremities. He is preferentially a right hander due to the motoric asymmetry. In other respects, Maxwell's neurologic status is quite good and his overall level of mental functioning appears to be on target at age level. I have had an opportunity to fully review the medical records which were mailed on January 12, 2009. The records indicate that Maxwell's neurologic problems at birth were the result of mechanical injury acquired during the delivery process. However, he has made remarkable progress and his mental function is normal and his motor deficit is quite mild . . . . (Respondent's Exhibits 3 and 4). Here, the opinions of Dr. Duchowny were logical, consistent with the record, not controverted, and not shown to lack credibility. Consequently, it must be resolved that Maxwell's brain injury did not render him permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired. See Thomas v. Salvation Army, 562 So. 2d 746, 749 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)("In evaluating medical evidence, a judge of compensation claims may not reject uncontroverted medical testimony without a reasonable explanation.").
Findings Of Fact Adam was born on June 11, 2018, at HealthPark Medical Center, in Fort Myers, Florida. Adam was a single gestation and his weight at birth exceeded 2500 grams. Obstetrical services were delivered by a participating physician, Jane A. Daniel, M.D., in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period in a hospital, HealthPark Medical Center. As set forth in greater detail below, the unrefuted evidence establishes that Adam did not sustain a “birth-related neurological injury,” as defined by section 766.302(2). Donald Willis, M.D., a board-certified obstetrician specializing in maternal-fetal medicine, was retained by Respondent to review the pertinent medical records of Ms. Johnson and Adam and opine as to whether Adam sustained an injury to his brain or spinal cord caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury that occurred during the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period in a hospital. In his affidavit, dated December 11, 2020, Dr. Willis summarized his opinions as follows: In summary, an abnormal FHR pattern developed during labor and resulted in a depressed newborn. Cord blood pH was 6.9 with a base excess of -18.6. Seizures began shortly after birth. The newborn hospital course was complicated by multi-system organ failures, consistent with birth-related oxygen deprivation. MRI on DOL 4 was suggestive of HIE, but findings improved with follow-up MRI. There was an apparent obstetrical event that resulted in oxygen deprivation to the brain during labor, delivery and continuing into the immediate post-delivery period. The oxygen deprivation resulted [in] a potential for brain injury, but the follow-up normal MRI suggests that no actual brain injury occurred. Respondent also retained Michael S. Duchowny, M.D., a pediatric neurologist, to review the medical records of Ms. Johnson and Adam, and to conduct an Independent Medical Examination (IME) of Adam. The purpose of his review and IME was to determine whether Adam suffered from a permanent and substantial mental and physical impairment as a result of an injury to the brain or spinal cord caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post- delivery period. Dr. Duchowny reviewed the pertinent medical records and, on October 20, 2020, conducted the IME. In his affidavit, dated December 16, 2020, Dr. Duchowny summarized his opinions as follows: In summary, Adam’s evaluation reveals findings consistent with a substantial motor but not mental impairment. He evidences a spastic diplegia, but with relative preservation of motor milestones, and age-appropriate receptive and expressive communication. Adam additionally has a severe behavior disorder, and has a sleep disorder and attentional impairment. His seizures are in remission. Review of the medical records reveals that Adam was the product of a 40 week gestation and was delivered vaginally with Apgar scores of 3, 6, 7 and 6 at one, five and 10 minutes. Terminal meconium was noted at delivery. Adam initially required positive pressure ventilation until his respirations were subsequently managed with nasal CPAP. His cord gas pH was 6.917 with a base excess of – 18.6. Adam developed seizures in the NICU and was intubated on the first day of life for apnea. Multiple seizures were documented on video/EEG monitoring. He was oliguric on the first day of life and had elevated liver function studies. An elevated lactic acid level was noted and there was a borderline elevation of DIC parameters. Adam was enrolled in a body hypothermia protocol on the first day of life. His blood pressure was maintained with dopamine. A head ultrasound on June 11 at 22:23 (DOL#2) was unremarkable. A brain MR imaging study performed on June 15, (DOL#5) revealed multifocal areas of restricted diffusion. Follow-up brain MR imaging study on July 5th revealed near-complete resolution of the previously observed diffusion abnormalities. A third MR imaging study obtained one month ago confirms the resolution of the DWI findings noted on the first brain MR imaging study. In conclusion, Dr. Duchowny opined that Adam does not have a substantial mental impairment, and, therefore, did not recommend that Adam be considered for inclusion in the Plan. The undisputed findings and opinions of Drs. Willis and Duchowny are credited. The undersigned finds that Adam did not sustain an injury to the brain or spinal cord caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period in a hospital, which rendered him permanently and substantially mentally and physical impaired.
The Issue At issue in this proceeding is whether Erika Calle, a minor, suffered an injury for which compensation should be awarded under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan.
Findings Of Fact Coverage under the Plan Pertinent to this case, coverage is afforded under the Plan when the claimant demonstrates, more likely than not, that the infant suffered an "injury to the brain or spinal cord . . . caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period in a hospital, which renders the infant permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired." Sections 766.302(2) and 766.309(1)(a), Florida Statutes. Here, Erika's physical presentation is dispositive of the claim and it is unnecessary to address her mental presentation, or the timing or cause of her condition. Erika's physical presentation To address Erika's present physical status, the parties offered the opinions of Trevor Resnick, M.D., a pediatric neurologist; Michael Duchowny, M.D., a pediatric neurologist; and Marilyn Lerman Taché, a speech-language pathologist.1 Those opinions are grossly consistent and conclude that Erika evidences no motor impairment. Consequently, it must be resolved that Erika is not "permanently and substantially . . . physically impaired," as required for coverage under the Plan.
