The Issue At issue in this proceeding is whether Thalya Greene, a minor, suffered an injury for which compensation should be awarded under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan.
Findings Of Fact Fundamental findings Daniel Greene and Lizbeth Greene, are the parents and natural guardians of Thalya Greene (Thalya), a minor. Thalya was born a live infant on August 27, 1998, at Baptist Medical Center, a hospital located in Jacksonville, Florida, and her birth weight was in excess of 2,500 grams. The physician providing obstetrical services during Thalya's birth was R. William Quinlan, M.D., who was, at all times material hereto, a participating physician in the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan, as defined by Section 766.302(7), Florida Statutes. Thalya's birth At or about 4:35 a.m., August 27, 1998, Mrs. Greene (with an estimated date of confinement of September 19, 1998, and the fetus at 36+ weeks) presented to Baptist Medical Center in early labor. Vaginal examination revealed the membranes to be intact, and the cervix at 3 centimeters dilatation, effacement at 50 percent, and the fetus at station -2. External fetal monitoring applied at 4:37 a.m., reflected a reassuring fetal heart tone, and Mrs. Greene was admitted to labor and delivery at or about 4:40 a.m. Mrs. Greene's labor progressed steadily, and external fetal monitoring reflected a reassuring fetal heart tone throughout the course of labor and delivery. At or about 7:30 a.m., dilatation was noted as complete; at 7:49 a.m., the membranes were artificially ruptured, with clear fluid noted; and at 7:55 a.m. Thalya was delivered spontaneously (cephalic presentation) without incident. On delivery, Thalya was noted as "pale blue" in color, and was bulb suctioned and accorded free flow oxygen; however, she breathed spontaneously, and did not require resuscitation. Initial newborn assessment noted no apparent abnormalities. Apgar scores were recorded as 7 at one minute and 8 at five minutes. The Apgar scores assigned to Thalya are a numerical expression of the condition of a newborn infant, and reflect the sum points gained on assessment of heart rate, respiratory effort, muscle tone, reflex irritability, and color, with each category being assigned a score ranging from the lowest score of 0 through a maximum score of 2. As noted, at one minute, Thalya's Apgar score totaled 7, with heart rate, muscle tone, and reflect irritability being graded at 2 each; respiratory effort being graded at 1; and color being graded at 0. At five minutes, Thalya's Apgar score totaled 8, with heart rate, respiratory effort, muscle tone, and reflex irritability being graded at 2 each, and color again being graded at 0. Thalya was admitted to the newborn nursery at or about 8:50 a.m. Assessment on admission was grossly normal. Thalya's status post-delivery was uneventful until 11:30 a.m. (approximately 3 1/2 hours after delivery) when she experienced a choking episode (secondary to spitting up) and turned dusky over the face and chest. In response, Thalya was placed under a radiant warmer, suctioned, and given blow by oxygen (for approximately 3 minutes) until she pinked up. Thereafter, Thalya's course was again uneventful until 1:00 a.m., August 28, 1998, when she again appeared dusky, and was accorded blow by oxygen. At the time, it was noted that the CBC drawn during the first dusky spell was within normal limits and that the blood culture that had been obtained was preliminarily negative. Thereafter, Thalya's course was again without apparent complication until approximately 10:23 p.m., when she "became dusky not associated with feed," and was again suctioned and accorded blow by oxygen. At that time, Thalya was noted as "pink and intermittently tachypneic with rare grunting." Following neurologic consult, Thalya was transferred to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) for further observation and management. Thalya was received in the NICU at 10:34 p.m. At the time, she was observed as "warm and pink with grunting noted." EKG leads were applied and revealed a heart rate of 180, respiratory rate of 50, blood pressure of 76/49, and a rectal temperature of 100.3. Examination revealed nystagmus (an involuntary rapid movement of the eyeball) and some jerky movements of her extremities. CBC showed a white blood count of 5,000, and blood culture was ordered. Working diagnosis was "suspected septis" and Thalya was started on ampicillin and gentamicin. At 12:35 a.m., August 29, 1998, Thalya evidenced symptoms of seizure activity, and was loaded with phenobarbital. Spinal tap of August 29, 1998, as well as the results of the blood culture drawn of August 28, 1998, was positive for Group B Streptococcus. An infectious disease consult was obtained and Thalya was managed on antibiotics for three weeks, and maintained on phenobarbital for her seizure activity. CT and MRI of the head on August 29, 1998, were normal; however, a head ultrasound of September 3, 1998, showed minimal intra-axial fluid. Chromosomal studies were normal. Thalya was discharged to her parents' care on September 15, 1998, on phenobarbital and ampicillin. Final diagnosis on discharge included bacterial infection due to Streptococcus, Group B; streptococcal meningitis; and seizures. Thalya's subsequent development Following her discharge from Baptist Medical Center, Thalya was initially followed by Carlos H. Gama, M.D., a pediatric neurologist. Dr. Gama's first neurological examination occurred on November 3, 1998, when Thalya was 2 months of age, and was reported as follows: I had the opportunity of seeing Thalya for a neurological evaluation. The following are my diagnosis and recommendations. Diagnosis: Status post neonatal Group B Streptococcal meningitis. Seizures. Hypotnia. Recommendations: Obtain EEG. Obtain trough Phenobarbital level. Obtain records. Return to this office in one month for reevaluation and further recommendations. Comments: * * * . . . Since discharged from NICU mother reports that Thalya had done well. She is feeding well and thriving. No seizures have been noted. She continues on Phenobarbital, taking 4mls po bid. A blood level was obtained prior to this visit but this result is not available. Mother reports that Thalya has normal awake and sleep cycles. She seems to be moving all extremities spontaneously and symmetrically. There has not been any apneic spells or unusual behaviors suggestive of seizure like activity . . . . The examination today reveals a head circumference is 40.5cm (in the 90th percentile). Her weight is in the 90th percentile and height is in the 50th percentile. The baby is alert. She is able to turn her eyes to light, but does not track the examiner in a 90 degree range. The pupils were equal and reactive. Red reflex was present bilaterally. Facial grimace was symmetric. Suck was appropriate. Strength seems to be grossly unremarkable. Deep tendon reflexes were +2 in the upper extremities, +3 in the lower extremities at the knees and +2 at the ankles. No clonus was seen. Babinski's were present bilaterally. There was evidence of hypotonia of her axial musculature, being approximately moderate in severity. There was also decrease in head control. The patient's moro reflex reveals appropriate abduction of her upper extremities symmetrically. Traction response was decreased. Tone and neck reflex was absent. Palmar and Plantar reflexes were present. Muscle tone was low. The sensory examination to touch seemed to be unremarkable. Spine examination was noncontributory. The patient has no obvious dysmorphic features, organomegalies or skin abnormalities. Anterior fontanel was open and normal tense with no musculatures. Therefore, it is my opinion that Thalya has a history of neonatal Group B Streptococcal meningitis and sepsis associated with seizures. She is now seizure free. Her examination is remarkable for hypotonia, which most likely is on central basis. Therefore, the above recommendations were made. She will be reassessed in one month in this office. The EEG (Electroencephalogram) recommended by Dr. Gama was obtained on November 9, 1998, and read as abnormal. Specifically, the EEG report noted: This EEG is abnormal because of mild background disorganization which was seen bilaterally but more prominently over the right hemisphere, especially in the frontal region. This finding suggest[s] a diffused cerebral dysfunction such as seen in mild encephalopathy. In addition, a structural lesion in the right hemisphere cannot be excluded. Thalya was next seen by Dr. Gama on December 7, 1998. The results of that examination were reported as follows: Diagnosis: Seizure disorder. Stable on Phenobarbital. S/P [status post] Bacterial Group B Streptococcal Meningitis. Hypotonia. Developmental delay. Abnormal EEG. * * * Comments: . . . Thalya continues to be active. She is feeding well and gaining weight properly. She is making more cooing sounds and attempting to roll over, but she has not been successful in this area. Her examination demonstrates that her head circumference is 42cm. She is alert. She follows the examiner. Her pupils are equal and reactive. Face is unremarkable. She does seem to stick her tongue out intermittently. The motor examination demonstrates that she has decrease traction and head control for her age. She also has a tendency to keep her hands fisted, but this is only intermittently. She does not reach for objects yet. She is unable to hold weight in her lower extremities. Muscle tone seems to be slightly decreased in the axial musculature in particular. Therefore, it is my recommendation that we proceed with an MRI of the brain to rule out structural abnormalities of the right hemisphere.1 In addition, we have discussed the treatment with Phenobarbital. This should be continued for at least six months before making any further recommendations . . . She will be reassessed in this office in 1-2 months. Dr. Gama's next neurological examination of Thalya occurred on January 12, 1999, and was reported as follows: Diagnosis: Seizure disorder. Stable on Phenobarbital. S/P bacterial group B streptococcal meningitis. Hypotonia. Improving. Borderline developmental delay. Abnormal EEG * * * Comments: Thalya is doing extremely well. She is getting physical therapy twice a week and making progress. She is more attentive. She follows the examiner in a 180 degree range. She has good social skills. Anterior fontanel is soft. Head circumference is 44cm which is slightly above the 90th percentile, but she has been growing parallel to this with no problems. Cranial nerve examination is unremarkable. Motor examination demonstrates that she is unable to put weight in lower extremities, otherwise, she moves all extremities spontaneously. Deep tendon reflexes were unremarkable. No obvious pathological reflexes were elicited during today's visit. Muscle tone was normal to low. Denver Developmental Screen test reveals that she seems to be appropriate for her age in most of the areas. However, she is unable to roll over but she is showing some attempts to do this. The rest of the examination was noncontributory. Thalya was last seen by Dr. Gama on April 29, 1999, and he reported the results of that follow-up neurological examination as follows: Diagnosis: Seizure disorder. Stable on Phenobarbital. S/P Bacterial Group B Streptococcal Meningitis. Hypotonia. Improved. Comments: Thalya continues to do extremely well, with no recurrent seizures. She is tolerating the medication properly . . . . The patient continues to make progress in her development. The examination today demonstrates that her head circumference is 46.7cm. She is maintaining this in the 90th percentile. She has no obvious focal or lateralizing deficits. Her muscle tone has improved considerably and she is gaining milestones appropriately. She was felt to be at her age level in most of the areas tested . . . . Thalya's subsequent neurologic development was followed by Joseph A. Cimino, M.D., a board-certified pediatric neurologist. Dr. Cimino reported the results of his first neurological examination by October 15, 1999, as follows: DIAGNOSES: 1) GBS meningitis/sepsis. Neonatal seizures. Static encephalopathy with motor and language delay. * * * DEVELOPMENTAL HISTORY: The history is obtained from the parents. The child rolled from front to back at 7 months, back to front at 8 months, sat at 7 to 8 months, crawled at 11 months. She was getting in to sitting at 10 to 11 months, pulled to stand at 12 months, began to cruise at 13 months, is not yet walking independently, says mama but not specifically, does not say dada nor does she wave hi or bye. She began physical therapy at 3 months of age and this was initially twice a week and 1 month ago was decreased to once a week. She is not in speech therapy, although the family states the EIP evaluation at 10 months showed she had a receptive language at 4 months. The concern is that audiological evaluation have shown some missed frequency hearing deficit. * * * PHYSICAL EXAMINATION: The head circumference is 48 1/4 cms which is between the 75th and 98th percentile for chronologic age of 14 months. GENERAL EXAM: On inspection this is a well- nourished, healthy youngster who is alert and attentive. The abdomen was soft and nontender without organomegaly. The cardiovascular exam revealed regular rate and rhythm and no murmurs were appreciated. No cranial bruits are noted. The extremities were normal. The lungs were clear to auscultation. The skin exam was without café au lait spots or hypopigmented macules. The spine was without hair tufts or dimpling. In observing this child crawl and again reaching for objects I did not see any focality, nothing to suggest an old infarction which may be a complication of neonatal bacterial meningitis. In addition a CT scan was reported as negative. NEUROLOGICAL EXAM: The child is very social and attentive with good reciprocal play with a puppet. She smiled quite easily. Although with hands-on evaluation she did become irritable and cried. Assessment of tone was quite difficult. She tracked very nicely with full extraocular movements no ophthalmoparesis or nystagmus. The pupils were equal and reactive to light and facial movements were symmetric. I was not able to get an adequate look at the fundi. Corneal reflexes were intact. With regards to the motor exam, she reached quite nicely for objects without preference. She in fact did crawl well, transitioned into a sitting position but did W sit, usually associated with low muscle tone. With hands-on exam it was very difficult as she was crying and had a lot of active resistance to know exactly the status of her tone. She pulls to stand with a mature pattern with hip flexion. She sat quite nicely with her back straight, able manipulate objects. She did not slip through my grip on vertical suspension. Her deep tendon reflexes were 2/4 and symmetric in both the upper and lower extremities. The sensory exam was grossly intact to pain. IMPRESSION: GBS meningitis/sepsis . . . early onset. Neonatal seizure without recurrence, successfully tapered off of Phenobarbital. Prematurity 36 weeks gestation. Language delay. I think at 13 months adjusted age she should be saying mama and dada specifically, have more jargoning, waving hi and bye, and say several other words in addition to mama and dada which are used specifically. There is clearly risk of hearing deficit given meningitis and the use of Gentamicin and this child needs to be followed closely. History of motor delay. Clearly rolling at 6 months adjusted age is delayed. Sitting at 6 to 7 months adjusted age is normal, the family gave a chronologic age of 7 to 8 months but at 36 weeks gestation it is fair to make a 1 month adjustment which I am assuming they would do at EIP. She began to cruise at 13 months chronologic age which is 1 year. Her adjusted age is now 13 months and clearly walking independently can be normal up to 18 months at the outside limits. She appears to be making nice improvement in this area . . . . Thalya was next seen by Dr. Cimino on May 1, 2000, and most recently on November 10, 2000. Dr. Cimino reported the results of his most recent follow-up examination as follows: DIAGNOSES: 1) GBS meningitis. Neonatal seizures. Prematurity 36 weeks gestation Language delay. CLINICAL HISTORY: This is a 2 year old female seen in follow up on 5/1/2000. At that time she was having episodes of spacing out. We obtained an EEG that was normal for the awake and sleep state. Because of the GBS meningitis and developmental delay we obtained an MRI also done in September that was normal. She underwent a speech evaluation on 6/23/2000 that showed auditory comprehension at 9-12 months, verbal expression at 6-9 months. Impression was overall global delay and she has been in speech therapy twice a week at Brook's Rehab. Her chronologic age at the time of the evaluation was 22 months. At this time she began to walk at 15 months. She says mama and specifically, dada non- specifically. She will repeat words but does not have a lot of spontaneous words. She does wave hi and bye. PHYSICAL EXAMINATION: The head circumference is 50 1/4 cms which is between the 75th and 98th percentile. This continues to grow at the same rate. She is crying and extremely uncooperative. She is very frightened by many of her past appointments. She did track, had full extraocular movements without nystagmus or ophthalmoparesis. Her facial movements do appear sysmetric. Tone is low even with her resisting. She ran to her mother, I did not see any abnormalities. Her gait certainly was not wide based. She seemed to get off the floor well. Her sensory exam was grossly intact to pain. The deep tendon reflexes were difficult due to her withdrawal. IMPRESSION: Status-post Group B strep neonatal meningitis with neonatal seizure without recurrence. Language delay. Most likely reflecting sequela of the meningitis. There is a good percentage of these children who do have severe deficits. However, the EEG and MRI did not show any abnormalities. There is no slowing of the background activity and no decrease or delay in myelination reported on the MRI. PLAN: . . . Continue speech therapy . . . Reassess in 6 months. The cause of Thalya's neurologic dysfunction Regarding the cause of Thalya's neurological dysfunction, the proof is compelling that during labor and delivery Mrs. Greene was vaginally infected with Group B Streptococcal (GBS), that during delivery the infection was transmitted to Thalya, and that over the next 24 to 48 hours the infection process rapidly progressed causing meningitis and the resultant brain injury. Consequently, it may be said that Thalya's neurologic dysfunction is associated with a brain injury caused by meningitis (an inflammation of the membranes that envelop the brain and spinal cord), secondary to a GBS infection acquired during the birthing process (most likely subsequent to rupture of the membranes and during the course of delivery). The dispute regarding compensability As a touchstone to resolving the dispute regarding compensability, it is worthy of note that the Plan establishes a no-fault administrative system that provides compensation for an infant who suffers a narrowly defined "birth-related neurological injury." Under the Plan, a "birth-related neurological injury" is defined as: [I]njury to the brain or spinal cord of a live infant weighing at least 2,500 grams at birth caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period in a hospital, which renders the infant permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired. Section 766.302(2), Florida Statutes. Here, there is no serious dispute that Thalya is neurologically impaired or that such impairment is attributable to a brain injury caused by the infection process discussed infra. Rather, what is at issue is whether the cause of Thalya's brain injury and the nature of her impairment fit the narrowly defined term "birth-related neurological injury." In this regard, it is Intervenor's view that Thalya's brain injury (occasioned by an infectious process) may reasonably be described as having been "caused by mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period," and that such injury rendered her "permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired." Conversely, Petitioners and Respondent are of the view that that the cause of Thalya's brain injury was not a "mechanical injury," and that she was not rendered "permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired." Of the two, Petitioners' and Respondent's view is by far the more compelling. The nature and timing of Thalya's injury To address the nature and timing of Thalya's injury, the parties offered the opinions of three physicians: Charles Kalstone, M.D., a physician board-certified in obstetrics and gynecology; Joseph Cimino, M.D., a physician board-certified in pediatric neurology; and James Perry, M.D., a Fellow of the American Academy of Neurology. (Joint Exhibits 2-4). Notably, these physicians shared strikingly similar views, and were of the opinion that Thalya's brain injury was caused by infection induced meningitis, a process distinguishable from an injury caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury. Stated otherwise, the physicians were of the opinion that Thalya's injury could not reasonably be described as having been caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury.2 Given the plain and ordinary meaning of the words used in the term "mechanical injury" (as physical harm or damage caused by machinery, tools, or physical forces), their conclusion was most reasonable.3 Consequently, it is resolved that Thalya's brain injury was not caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period. Thalya's current mental and physical presentation At hearing, the only authoritative proof offered with regard to Thalya's current mental and physical presentation was the testimony of Dr. Cimino, Thalya's pediatric neurologist. It was Dr. Cimino's opinion that while Thalya may evidence substantial cognitive impairment, she does not evidence substantial physical impairment. Such opinions are grossly consistent with the record and are credited.
Findings Of Fact Adam was born on June 11, 2018, at HealthPark Medical Center, in Fort Myers, Florida. Adam was a single gestation and his weight at birth exceeded 2500 grams. Obstetrical services were delivered by a participating physician, Jane A. Daniel, M.D., in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period in a hospital, HealthPark Medical Center. As set forth in greater detail below, the unrefuted evidence establishes that Adam did not sustain a “birth-related neurological injury,” as defined by section 766.302(2). Donald Willis, M.D., a board-certified obstetrician specializing in maternal-fetal medicine, was retained by Respondent to review the pertinent medical records of Ms. Johnson and Adam and opine as to whether Adam sustained an injury to his brain or spinal cord caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury that occurred during the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period in a hospital. In his affidavit, dated December 11, 2020, Dr. Willis summarized his opinions as follows: In summary, an abnormal FHR pattern developed during labor and resulted in a depressed newborn. Cord blood pH was 6.9 with a base excess of -18.6. Seizures began shortly after birth. The newborn hospital course was complicated by multi-system organ failures, consistent with birth-related oxygen deprivation. MRI on DOL 4 was suggestive of HIE, but findings improved with follow-up MRI. There was an apparent obstetrical event that resulted in oxygen deprivation to the brain during labor, delivery and continuing into the immediate post-delivery period. The oxygen deprivation resulted [in] a potential for brain injury, but the follow-up normal MRI suggests that no actual brain injury occurred. Respondent also retained Michael S. Duchowny, M.D., a pediatric neurologist, to review the medical records of Ms. Johnson and Adam, and to conduct an Independent Medical Examination (IME) of Adam. The purpose of his review and IME was to determine whether Adam suffered from a permanent and substantial mental and physical impairment as a result of an injury to the brain or spinal cord caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post- delivery period. Dr. Duchowny reviewed the pertinent medical records and, on October 20, 2020, conducted the IME. In his affidavit, dated December 16, 2020, Dr. Duchowny summarized his opinions as follows: In summary, Adam’s evaluation reveals findings consistent with a substantial motor but not mental impairment. He evidences a spastic diplegia, but with relative preservation of motor milestones, and age-appropriate receptive and expressive communication. Adam additionally has a severe behavior disorder, and has a sleep disorder and attentional impairment. His seizures are in remission. Review of the medical records reveals that Adam was the product of a 40 week gestation and was delivered vaginally with Apgar scores of 3, 6, 7 and 6 at one, five and 10 minutes. Terminal meconium was noted at delivery. Adam initially required positive pressure ventilation until his respirations were subsequently managed with nasal CPAP. His cord gas pH was 6.917 with a base excess of – 18.6. Adam developed seizures in the NICU and was intubated on the first day of life for apnea. Multiple seizures were documented on video/EEG monitoring. He was oliguric on the first day of life and had elevated liver function studies. An elevated lactic acid level was noted and there was a borderline elevation of DIC parameters. Adam was enrolled in a body hypothermia protocol on the first day of life. His blood pressure was maintained with dopamine. A head ultrasound on June 11 at 22:23 (DOL#2) was unremarkable. A brain MR imaging study performed on June 15, (DOL#5) revealed multifocal areas of restricted diffusion. Follow-up brain MR imaging study on July 5th revealed near-complete resolution of the previously observed diffusion abnormalities. A third MR imaging study obtained one month ago confirms the resolution of the DWI findings noted on the first brain MR imaging study. In conclusion, Dr. Duchowny opined that Adam does not have a substantial mental impairment, and, therefore, did not recommend that Adam be considered for inclusion in the Plan. The undisputed findings and opinions of Drs. Willis and Duchowny are credited. The undersigned finds that Adam did not sustain an injury to the brain or spinal cord caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period in a hospital, which rendered him permanently and substantially mentally and physical impaired.
Findings Of Fact Dontae Bess, Jr., was born on July 21, 2011, at Lakeland Regional Medical Center in Lakeland, Florida. NICA retained Donald C. Willis, M.D. (Dr. Willis), to review Dontae’s medical records. In a medical report dated August 19, 2016, Dr. Willis made the following findings and expressed the following opinion: Spontaneous vaginal delivery was without difficulty. Birth weight was 3,220 grams. The baby was not depressed. Apgar scores were 9/9. No resuscitation was required at birth. The baby went to the normal newborn nursery and had an uncomplicated newborn hospital course with discharge on DOL 2. The child had developmental delays. MRI was done at 5 years of age and was “unremarkable.” In summary, pregnancy was induced for hypertension at term. There was no fetal distress during labor and the baby was not depressed at birth. The newborn hospital course was benign. MRI at 5 years of age did not suggest brain injury. There was no apparent obstetrical event that resulted in loss of oxygen or mechanical trauma to the baby’s brain or spinal cord during labor, delivery or the immediate post delivery period. Dr. Willis reaffirmed his opinion in an affidavit dated January 26, 2017. Dr. Willis’ opinion that there was no obstetrical event that resulted in loss of oxygen or mechanical trauma to the baby’s brain or spinal cord during labor, delivery or in the immediate post-delivery period is credited. Respondent retained Laufey Y. Sigurdardottir, M.D. (Dr. Sigurdardottir), a pediatric neurologist, to evaluate Dontae. Dr. Sigurdardottir reviewed Dontae’s medical records, and performed an independent medical examination on him on September 21, 2016. Dr. Sigurdardottir made the following findings and summarized her evaluation as follows: Summary: Dontae is a 5-year 2-month-old African-American male who is brought to the visit for an independent medical examination on his developmental delays. On review of his prenatal and birth history, I do not see any evidence of a likely hypoxic injury. He was born healthy and had no complications in the immediate postnatal period. He has then progressed to have mild gross motor delay and a quite significant language delay, although he is at this time in a regular education kindergarten. Neuroimaging did not show evidence of significant ischemic injury. Result as to question 1: The patient is found to have no substantial physical impairment, but to have a substantial language impairment at this time. Results as to question 2: There is no evidence in the medical record review of a substantial hypoxic event during labor or delivery, the infant had no signs of an encephalopathy in the immediate post natal period and no evidence of ischemic injury on neuroimaging. His language delay is not felt to be birth-related. Results as to question 3: Dontae’s prognosis for life expectancy is excellent and for full recovery is good. In light of the above-mentioned details and the lack of any evidence to suggest a birth related hypoxic injury, I do not recommend Dontae being included in the Neurologic Injury Compensation program, and I would be happy to answer additional questions. Dr. Sigurdardottir reaffirmed her opinions in an affidavit dated January 20, 2017. In order for a birth-related injury to be compensable under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan (Plan), the injury must meet the definition of a birth- related neurological injury and the injury must have caused both permanent and substantial mental and physical impairment. Dr. Sigurdardottir’s opinion that while Dontae has a substantial language impairment, he has no substantial physical impairment, is credited. A review of the file in this case reveals that there have been no expert opinions filed that are contrary to the opinion of Dr. Sigurdardottir that Dontae does not have a substantial physical impairment.
The Issue Whether Ashley Villarreal has suffered an injury for which compensation should be awarded under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan, as alleged in the claim for compensation.
Findings Of Fact Preliminary matters Ashley Villarreal (Ashley) is the natural daughter of Roy Villarreal and Carmen Luna. She was born a live infant on January 2, 1989, at Bethesda Memorial Hospital in Palm Beach County, Florida, and her birth weight was 3090 grams. The physician delivering obstetrical services during the birth of Ashley was Allen Dinnerstein, M.D., who was, at all times material hereto, a participating physician in the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan, as defined by Section 766.302(7), Florida Statutes. The birth of Ashley Villarreal At or about 4:15 p.m., January 2, 1989, Carmen Luna was admitted to Bethesda Memorial Hospital. At the time, Carmen Luna was in active labor, and Ashley was post term with a gestational age of 41 weeks. Otherwise, Carmen Luna's pregnancy had been without complication. External fetal monitoring was commenced at 4:50 p.m. and indicated that the fetal heart tone was sporadically within the 60 beat per minute level, with a slow return to baseline; a level sufficient to indicate occasional fetal bradycardia and fetal distress. 1/ This situation evidenced a need for surgical intervention, and at 5:20 p.m. Carmen Luna was taken to the operating room. Anesthesia commenced at 5:25 p.m., a cesarean section surgical procedure was commenced at 5:39 p.m., and Ashley was delivered at 5:44 p.m. The operative report reflects that the following occurred during the course of the procedure: . . . a transverse incision was made into the uterus releasing meconium stained fluid. The vertex was delivered and the baby suctioned with DeLee. A loop of cord over the neck was removed and the baby then delivered completely continually being suctioned as the cord was double clamped and severed and the infant given to the neonatologist for care . . . . The delivery records likewise reflect that Ashley had a blue appearance at delivery, the presence of meconium staining, and the following resuscitation measures: "Stimulation," "Bulb Suction," "DeLee Suction," "Mech Suction" and "Whiffs Oz." When delivered, Ashley presented Apgar scores of 6 at one minute and 8 at five minutes. These scores are a numerical expression of the condition of a newborn infant, and reflect the sum points gained on assessment of the heart rate, respiratory effort, muscle tone, reflex irritability, and color, with each category being assigned a score ranging from the lowest score of 0 through a maximum score of 2. As noted, at one minute, Ashley's Apgar score totaled 6, with respiratory effort and reflex irritability being graded at 2 each, heart rate and muscle tone being graded at 1 each, and color being graded at 0. At 5 minutes, Ashley's Apgar score totaled 8, with heart rate, respiratory effort and reflex irritability being graded at 2 each, and muscle tone and color at 1 each. Such total scores could be characterized by an obstetrician as "good." Pertinent to this case, color, heart rate and respiratory effort are primarily related to the cardiovascular system, and color is the least significant indicator of an infant's brain or neurological status at birth. The categories of reflex irritability and muscle tone are, however, neurological assessments, which offer the greatest insight into the neurological condition of an infant at birth. Ashley's Apgar scores relative to those categories which reflect neurological status at birth were collectively a total of 3 out of a possible 4 at both 1 and 5 minutes. Under the circumstances, Ashley's Apgar scores, either globally or discretely, fail to reflect a hypoxic event at birth. At 6:00 p.m., following delivery, Ashley was admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit due to respiratory distress, possibly secondary to meconium aspiration. Ashley was accorded extra oxygen, via oxygen hood, for two days, and her meconium aspiration was successfully treated with antibiotics. During her admission, no clinical observations were noted that one would typically expect in a child undergoing hypoxic encephalopathy, and no neurological consult was ordered. 2/ On January 7, 1989, Ashley was discharged as an apparently well baby. Subsequent developments On July 29, 1989, Ashley was seen by M. Arenstein, D.O., for a "well baby visit," and no abnormalities were noted; however, on September 6, 1989, Ashley was again seen by Dr. Arenstein at which time the parents expressed their concern regarding Ashley "not sitting up, crawling, etc." Consequently, Dr. Arenstein referred Ashley for a pediatric consult with Jeffrey Perelman, M.D. Ashley was seen by Dr. Perelman on September 19, 1989, and he diagnosed her as developmentally delayed, and ultimately referred her to David Ross, M.D., for a neurological evaluation. Dr. Ross saw Ashley on July 2, 1990, and concluded: The patient has some mild facial dysmorphism with developmental delay in all fields associated with an abnormal neurologic exam with persistence of postural reflexes and hyperreflexia. The spectrum of findings is consistent with mental retardation of a mild to moderate degree probably due to cerebral palsy. 3/ Dr. Ross' ultimate diagnosis was mental retardation, and he recommended that Ashley have a full evaluation, including "an image of the brain either with CT scan or MRI (an EEG, torch titers, chromosome analysis)." Ashley was referred in August 1990, for a CT brain scan and an EEG. The CT scan is a neuroimaging study which can identify structural brain abnormalities occasioned by an hypoxic insult, as well as other causes. The EEG is a device used to detect abnormalities of the electrical currents of the brain such as seizure activity, which is often a manifestation of hypoxic insult at birth, and the death of neuronal cells. Here, both the CT scan and EEG were within normal limits. Ashley continued to be treated by Dr. Perelman through June 1991; however, on August 14, 1991, she came under the care of Miguel Simo, M.D., another pediatrician, because the parents were apparently dissatisfied with Dr. Perelman. Upon examination, Dr. Simo diagnosed Ashley as developmentally delayed, and referred her to Laszlo Mate', M.D., a physician practicing child neurology, for evaluation. Dr. Mate' examined Ashley on August 29, 1991, and observed: . . . a small, dysmorphic female in no apparent distress. Her head circumference is 47 cm which is in the 25th percentile. She doesn't have any neurocutaneous abnormalities. Her palmer creases are somewhat abnormal, but not of simian nature. Her fingers are slightly abnormal, extra long, and she seems to have a proximal displacement of both thumbs. Her ears are malformed with very small earlobes. The ears are somewhat posterior rotated and low set. Her eyes are almond shape but in view of her Indian heritage, that's probably normal. Both parents seem to have similar shaped eyes. The child has a somewhat prominent nose. The mouth is somewhat fishmouth in character and she has fairly shallow temporal area. She doesn't have any eyelashes on her lower eyelid. Dr. Mate's impression was: This is a markedly abnormal child with a developmental quotient in the 30's. She's currently is 30 months old and she functions around a 9-10 month level. She has multiple minor malformations which made the diagnosis of cerebral palsy somewhat unlikely. I suspect we are dealing with some prenatal etiology, either genetic or pregnancy related. 4/ Dr. Simo also referred Ashley for an MRI of the brain. An MRI, as with a CT scan, is a neuroimaging study which can identify structural abnormalities occasioned by hypoxic insult, as well as other causes. The MRI, performed September 20, 1991, was abnormal, evidencing "poor and decreased white matter myelinization extending to the frontal, occipital, and parietal cortex and decrease in white matter content in the centrum semiovale." Such damage could be reflective of birth asphyxia, developmental immaturity of the brain, or a myriad of other causes. Finally, Dr. Simo referred Ashley to Oscar Febles, M.D., a physician practicing genetics. Dr. Febles examined Ashley on November 1, 1991, and rendered a diagnosis of "psychomotor retardation of unknown etiology." Concluding, Dr. Febles observed: The clinical findings in this patient are not diagnostic of a particular genetic syndrome . . . In conclusion, this patient presents a clinical picture characterized by psychomotor retardation that cannot be diagnosed on the clinical findings and/or testing done. The fact that she presents diffuse demyelinization on the MRI would favor the diagnosis of cerebral palsy and/or a CNS degenerative disease. It is my recommendation that an MRI be repeated in approximately 6 months to see if the demyelinization process of the cortex previously seen is progressive or static. If found to be progressive it would indicate a CNS degenerative disease (e.g. leukodystrophies) and if static the diagnosis of cerebral palsy is most likely. In addition, it is also recommended . . . Genetic re-evaluation in 1 year. Whether, consistent with Dr. Febles' recommendation, an MRI was repeated or Ashley had a subsequent genetic re- evaluation does not appear of record. Notably, however, while Ashley was genetically tested and found to have a normal karyotype, such test does not rule out the preponderance of genetic disorders which manifest themselves in microscopic point mutations within a chromosome as opposed to total chromosomal malformation. The medical experts at hearing As to whether Ashley had sustained permanent and substantial mental and physical impairment as a result of an injury to her brain resulting from oxygen deprivation during the course of labor, delivery or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period, petitioners offered the testimony of Dr. David Ross, who, although a board certified neurologist, does not regularly treat neonates. Dr. Ross examined Ashley on July 2, 1990, and March 2, 1994. It was Dr. Ross' opinion that Ashley suffered a substantial and permanent mental and physical impairment as a consequence of oxygen deprivation during the course of labor and delivery. Compared with the opinion of Dr. Ross, the respondent offered the testimony of Dr. Michael Duchowny. Dr. Duchowny is a child neurologist who is board certified in pediatrics, neurology with special competence in child neurology and clinical neurophysiology. Dr. Duchowny is associated with the department of neurology at Miami Children's Hospital and routinely treats neonates suspected of having suffered a hypoxic event at birth. Dr. Duchowny examined Ashley on September 21, 1992, as well as observed her at hearing, and was familiar, as was Dr. Ross, with the pertinent medical records. It was Dr. Duchowny's opinion that Ashley was substantially and permanently mentally impaired, but that her physical impairment could best be described as mild to moderate. As to causation, it was Dr. Duchowny's opinion that the cause (etiology) of Ashley's mental and physical impairment (neurologic syndrome) was a developmental problem of in utero (prenatal) or genetic origin, and that any fetal distress she may have suffered at birth was not substantial and did not contribute to her condition. [Tr. 97] Here, I accept the testimony and opinion of Dr. Duchowny as being the more credible and substantial as to whether Ashley sustained a substantial and permanent mental and physical impairment, and the cause of such dysfunction. Dr. Duchowny's opinions are credible, supported by the observations of other physicians as heretofore noted, and are most consistent with conclusions to be drawn or inferences raised by the medical records received into evidence.
Findings Of Fact Neha was born on May 15, 2012, at Broward General Medical Center, located in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Neha weighed six pounds nine ounces at birth. NICA retained Michael S. Duchowny, M.D., as its medical expert in pediatric neurology. Dr. Duchowny examined Neha on March 20, 2013, and reviewed her medical records. In an affidavit dated April 24, 2013, Dr. Duchowny opined as follows: Neha’s neurological examination is significant only for a mild degree of hypontia coupled with very slight motor development delay. In other regards, she seems to be developing quite well and I suspect that her language development will progress on schedule. There are no focal or lateralizing findings to suggest structural brain damage. A review of medical records reveals that Neha was born by stat cesarean section at Broward General Hospital due to fetal bradycardia. She was delivered with a full body nuchal cord and a true knot that was removed at birth. There was evidence of severe metabolic acidosis-arterial blood gases drawn 11 minutes after birth revealed a pH of 6.66, PC02 of 162, P02 of 11, and base excess of -32. These values were improved on a repeat series drawn at 12:27 PM. Thick meconium was suctioned below the vocal cords and Neha was diagnosed with meconium aspiration syndrome. Seizures occurred several after birth and were treated with phenobarbital and phenytoin. As previously stated by the family, Neha was immediately enrolled in a general hypothermia protocol. Of significance, a brain ultrasound exam obtained on May 15 at 6:46 PM, was normal and an MRI scan of the brain obtained on May 23 (DOL #8) was also within normal limits. Neha’s examination today does not reveal either a substantial mental or motor impairment, findings are consistent with the lack of significant MRI findings. I believe that the hypothermia protocol in all likelihood was neuro-protective and more likely than not, contributed to Neha’s positive outcome. Given Neha’s favorable outcome, I believe that she should not be considered for inclusion within the NICA program. As such, it is my opinion that Neha Kannikal is not permanently and substantially mentally impaired nor is she permanently and substantially physically impaired due to oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring during the course of labor, delivery or the immediate post-delivery period in the hospital during the birth of Neha Kannikal. A review of the file does not show any opinion contrary to Dr. Duchowny's opinion that Neha does not have a substantial and permanent mental and physical impairment due to lack of oxygen or mechanical trauma is credited.
The Issue At issue is whether Maxwell Hubmann, a minor, qualifies for coverage under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan (Plan).
Findings Of Fact Stipulated facts related to compensability Petitioners, Roger and Sara Hubmann, are the parents of Maxwell Hubmann, a minor. Maxwell was born a live infant on March 25, 2008, at Sacred Heart Hospital, a hospital located in Pensacola, Florida, and his birth weight exceeded 2,500 grams. Obstetrical services were delivered at Maxwell's birth by Brian Sontag, M.D., who, at all times material hereto, was a "participating physician" in the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan, as defined by Section 766.302(7), Florida Statutes. Coverage under the Plan Pertinent to this case, coverage is afforded by the Plan for infants who suffer a "birth-related neurological injury," defined as an "injury to the brain . . . caused by . . . mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate postdelivery period in a hospital, which renders the infant permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired." § 766.302(2), Fla. Stat. See also §§ 766.309 and 766.31, Fla. Stat. Here, the parties have stipulated, and the proof is otherwise compelling, that Maxwell suffered a traumatic brain injury during the delivery process. (Transcript, pp. 9 and 10; Respondent's Exhibits 1-4). What remains to resolve is whether such injury rendered Maxwell permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired. To address the nature and significance of Maxwell's injury, NICA offered the affidavit and report of Michael Duchowny, M.D., a physician board-certified in pediatrics, neurology with special competence in child neurology, and clinical neurophysiology, who evaluated Maxwell on January 28, 2009. Based on his evaluation, as well as his review of the medical records, Dr. Duchowny was of the opinion that while Maxwell suffered a traumatic brain injury during delivery, his mental function was normal and his motor deficit was quite mild. In so concluding, Dr. Duchowny documented the results of his examination, as well as his conclusions, as follows: PHYSICAL EXAMINATION today reveals an alert, well-developed and cooperative, well- nourished 10-month-old infant. Maxwell weighs 24 pounds and is 30 inches in height. The skin is warm and moist. There are no neurocutaneous stigmata. The hair is blond and of normal texture. The spine is straight without dysraphism. The head circumference measures 46.1 centimeters which is within standard percentiles. The anterior and posterior fontanels are patent and flat. There are no cranial or facial anomalies or asymmetries. The tongue and palate are moist. The neck is supple without masses, thyromegaly or adenopathy. The cardiovascular, respiratory, and abdominal examinations are unremarkable. Maxwell's NEUROLOGICAL EXAMINATION reveals him to be alert, cooperative and fully attentive. He is quite sociable and maintains an age appropriate stream of attention. He has good central gaze fixation with conjugate following movements. The pupils are 3 mm and react briskly to direct and consensually presented light. Funduscopic examination revealed no abnormal retinal findings. There are no significant facial asymmetries of movement. The uvula is midline and the pharyngeal folds are symmetric. Tongue movements are full in all planes. Motor examination reveals an asymmetry of movement with relatively greater movement on the right side. The left upper extremity has mild stiffness but has full range of motor. There is fine motor dexterity of both hands but Maxwell demonstrates a right arm preference and will preferentially reach for an object with the right hand. When an object is moved to the left, he will ultimately offer the left and readily transfers between hands. He has symmetrical movement of both legs. He has well-developed traction and grasp responses and good head control for age. The deep tendon reflexes are slightly exaggerated being 3+ at the knees and biceps. There are no pathologic reflexes. Plantar responses are downgoing. He can stand and bear weight with good axial tone and support does not take steps independently. He has good sitting balance as well. Sensory examination is intact to withdrawal of all extremities to stimulation. Neurovascular examination reveals no cervical, cranial or ocular bruits and no temperature or pulse asymmetries. In SUMMARY, Maxwell's neurological examination reveals that his motor developmental milestones are on time despite a very mild asymmetry of movement and muscle tone in the upper extremities. He is preferentially a right hander due to the motoric asymmetry. In other respects, Maxwell's neurologic status is quite good and his overall level of mental functioning appears to be on target at age level. I have had an opportunity to fully review the medical records which were mailed on January 12, 2009. The records indicate that Maxwell's neurologic problems at birth were the result of mechanical injury acquired during the delivery process. However, he has made remarkable progress and his mental function is normal and his motor deficit is quite mild . . . . (Respondent's Exhibits 3 and 4). Here, the opinions of Dr. Duchowny were logical, consistent with the record, not controverted, and not shown to lack credibility. Consequently, it must be resolved that Maxwell's brain injury did not render him permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired. See Thomas v. Salvation Army, 562 So. 2d 746, 749 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)("In evaluating medical evidence, a judge of compensation claims may not reject uncontroverted medical testimony without a reasonable explanation.").
Findings Of Fact Melina Antunes was born on August 27, 2015, at Florida Hospital, located in Orlando, Florida. Melina weighed in excess of 2,500 grams at birth. Donald Willis, M.D. (Dr. Willis), was requested by NICA to review the medical records for Melina. In a medical report dated December 12, 2016, Dr. Willis summarized his findings and opined in pertinent part as follows: In summary, induction of labor was complicated by a spontaneous uterine rupture. The baby and placenta were expelled into the maternal abdomen. The baby was depressed at birth with low Apgar scores and a cord blood gas consistent with acidosis (pH 6.65). MRI was consistent with HIE. There was an apparent obstetrical event (uterine rupture) that resulted in loss of oxygen to the baby’s brain during labor, delivery, and continuing into the immediate post delivery period. The oxygen deprivation resulted in brain injury. NICA retained Laufey Y. Sigurdardottir, M.D. (Dr. Sigurdardottir), a pediatric neurologist, to examine Melina and to review her medical records. Dr. Sigurdardottir examined Melina on February 15, 2017. In a medical report dated February 15, 2017, Dr. Sigurdardottir summarized her examination of Melina and opined in pertinent part as follows: Summary: Here we have a 17-month-old born after a sudden uterine rupture during active labor. The patient had neurologic depression at birth, significant acidosis with a pH of 6.6 and required active cooling as well as supportive medication for seizures in the neonatal period. She did have well documented injury on MRI but has made a remarkable recovery. Neurologic exam today, has mild abnormalities, but no standardized developmental testing is available for our review. Result as to question 1: Melina is not found to have substantial physical or mental impairment at this time. Results as to question 2: In review of available documents, Melina does have the clinical picture of an acute birth related hypoxic injury with both the clinical features of hypoxic encephalopathy and electrographic and MRI evidence to suggest hypoxic injury. Result as to question 3: The prognosis for full motor and mental recovery currently is excellent and her life expectancy is full. In light of her normal cognitive abilities and near normal neurologic exam, I do not feel that Melina should be included in the NICA program. If needed, I will be happy to answer additional questions or review further documentation of her developmental status. A review of the file in this case reveals that there have been no expert opinions filed that are contrary to the opinion of Dr. Willis that there was an apparent obstetrical event that resulted in loss of oxygen to the baby's brain during labor, delivery and the post-delivery period which resulted in brain injury. Dr. Willis’ opinion is credited. There are no expert opinions filed that are contrary to Dr. Sigurdardottir’s opinion that Melina does not have a substantial physical or mental impairment. Dr. Sigurdardottir’s opinion is credited.
The Issue The issue in this case is whether Reshnaya E. Francois suffered a birth-related injury as defined by section 766.302(2), Florida Statutes, for which compensation should be awarded under the Plan.
Findings Of Fact Reshnaya E. Francois was born on January 31, 2016, at Broward Health, in Coral Springs, Florida. Reshnaya weighed in excess of 2,500 grams at birth. The circumstances of the labor, delivery, and birth of the minor child are reflected in the medical records of Broward Health submitted with the Petition. At all times material, both Broward Health and Dr. Wajid were active members under NICA pursuant to sections 766.302(6) and (7). Reshnaya was delivered by Dr. Wajid, who was a NICA- participating physician, on January 31, 2016. Petitioners contend that Reshnaya suffered a birth- related neurological injury and seek compensation under the Plan. Respondent contends that Reshnaya has not suffered a birth- related neurological injury as defined by section 766.302(2). In order for a claim to be compensable under the Plan, certain statutory requisites must be met. Section 766.309 provides: The Administrative Law Judge shall make the following determinations based upon all available evidence: Whether the injury claimed is a birth- related neurological injury. If the claimant has demonstrated, to the satisfaction of the Administrative Law Judge, that the infant has sustained a brain or spinal cord injury caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury and that the infant was thereby rendered permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired, a rebuttable presumption shall arise that the injury is a birth-related neurological injury as defined in § 766.302(2). Whether obstetrical services were delivered by a participating physician in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate postdelivery period in a hospital; or by a certified nurse midwife in a teaching hospital supervised by a participating physician in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate postdelivery period in a hospital. How much compensation, if any, is awardable pursuant to § 766.31. If the Administrative Law Judge determines that the injury alleged is not a birth-related neurological injury or that obstetrical services were not delivered by a participating physician at birth, she or he shall enter an order . . . . The term “birth-related neurological injury” is defined in Section 766.302(2), Florida Statutes, as: . . . injury to the brain or spinal cord of a live infant weighing at least 2,500 grams for a single gestation or, in the case of a multiple gestation, a live infant weighing at least 2,000 grams at birth caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate postdelivery period in a hospital, which renders the infant permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired. This definition shall apply to live births only and shall not include disability or death caused by genetic or congenital abnormality. (Emphasis added). In the instant case, NICA has retained Donald Willis, M.D. (Dr. Willis), as its medical expert specializing in maternal-fetal medicine and pediatric neurology. Upon examination of the pertinent medical records, Dr. Willis opined: The newborn was not depressed. Apgar scores were 8/8. Decreased movement of the right arm was noted. The baby was taken to the Mother Baby Unit and admission exam described the baby as alert and active. The baby had an Erb’s palsy or Brachial Plexus injury of the right arm. Clinical appearance of the baby suggested Down syndrome. Chromosome analysis was done for clinical features suggestive of Down syndrome and this genetic abnormality was confirmed. Chromosome analysis was consistent with 47, XX+21 (Down syndrome). Dr. Willis’s medical Report is attached to his Affidavit. His Affidavit reflects his ultimate opinion that: In summary: Delivery was complicated by a mild shoulder dystocia and resulting Erb’s palsy. There was no evidence of injury to the spinal cord. The newborn was not depressed. Apgar scores were 8/9. Chromosome analysis was consistent with Down syndrome. There was no apparent obstetrical event that resulted in loss of oxygen or mechanical trauma to the baby’s brain or spinal cord during labor, delivery or the immediate post delivery period. The baby has a genetic or chromosome abnormality, Down syndrome. A review of the file in this case reveals that there have been no expert opinions filed that are contrary to the opinion of Dr. Willis. The opinion of Dr. Willis that Reshnaya did not suffer an obstetrical event that resulted in loss of oxygen or mechanical trauma to the baby’s brain or spinal cord during labor, delivery, or the immediate post-delivery period is credited. In the instant case, NICA has retained Michael S. Duchowny, M.D. (Dr. Duchowny), as its medical expert in pediatric neurology. Upon examination of the child and the pertinent medical records, Dr. Duchowny opined: In summary, Reshnaya’s examination today reveals findings consistent with Down syndrome including multiple dysmorphic features, hypotonia, and hyporeflexia. She has minimal weakness at the right shoulder girdle and her delayed motor milestones are likely related to her underlying genetic disorder. There are no focal or lateralizing features suggesting a structural brain injury. Dr. Duchowny’s medical report is attached to his Affidavit. His Affidavit reflects his ultimate opinion that: Neither the findings on today’s evaluation nor the medical record review indicate that Reshnaya has either a substantial mental or motor impairment acquired in the course of labor or delivery. I believe that her present neurological disability is more likely related to Downs syndrome. For this reason, I am not recommending that Reshnaya be considered for compensation within the NICA program. A review of the file in this case reveals that there have been no expert opinions filed that are contrary to the opinion of Dr. Duchowny. The opinion of Dr. Duchowny that Reshnaya did not suffer a substantial mental or motor impairment acquired in the course of labor or delivery is credited.
