Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Find Similar Cases by Filters
You can browse Case Laws by Courts, or by your need.
Find 48 similar cases
MICHELLE AND THOMAS ALVAREZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NATURAL PERSONS AND GUARDIANS OF AMY NICOLE ALVAREZ, A MINOR vs FLORIDA BIRTH-RELATED NEUROLOGICAL INJURY COMPENSATION ASSOCIATION, 14-002621N (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:Miami, Florida Jun. 04, 2014 Number: 14-002621N Latest Update: Sep. 08, 2015

Findings Of Fact Amy Nicole Alvarez was born on June 16, 2010, at Jackson South Community Hospital in Miami, Florida. Michael S. Duchowny, M.D. (Dr. Duchowny), was requested by NICA to do an independent medical examination of Amy and to review her medical records. Dr. Duchowny examined Amy on July 2, 2014. In an affidavit dated September 22, 2014, Dr. Duchowny reported his findings and gave the following opinion: In summary, Amy’s neurological examination today reveals mild right spastic hemiparesis, speech dysarthria and a complex visual agnosia. She additionally evidences microcephaly. Although I am concerned about Amy’s overall cognitive development due to her microcephaly, she appears to be progressing satisfactory and is making progress with respect to verbal communication both in the receptive and expressive domains. Her visual impairment is likely to be centrally-based. I had an opportunity to review Amy’s medical records. It contained information that is consistent with Amy’s overall history but I have not reviewed Amy’s brain MRI scans. However, in view of Amy’s relatively good mental development and only mild degree of motor impairment, I would not recommend inclusion within the NICA program. As such, it is my opinion that AMY NICOLE ALVAREZ is not permanently and substantially mentally impaired nor is she permanently and substantially physically impaired due to oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring during the course of labor, delivery or the immediate post-delivery period in the hospital during the birth of AMY NICOLE ALVAREZ. (Emphasis in original.) A review of the file does not show any contrary opinion, nor was any potential contrary expert disclosed during the telephone hearing on the Motions for Summary Final Order. The opinion of Dr. Duchowny that Amy does not have a permanent and substantial mental or physical impairment is credited.

Florida Laws (9) 766.301766.302766.303766.304766.305766.309766.31766.311766.316
# 6

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer