Findings Of Fact Jordan Gonzalez was born on May 29, 2008, at North Shore Medical Center in Miami, Florida. Jordan weighed 2,530 grams at birth. Donald Willis, M.D. (Dr. Willis), was requested by NICA to review the medical records for Jordan and his mother. In an affidavit dated February 19, 2013, Dr. Willis opined the following within a reasonable degree of medical probability: It is my opinion that in summary, fetal abnormalities were identified by ultrasound during pregnancy. The baby was delivered by Cesarean section due to the development of fetal ascites. The mother was not in labor. The baby had several congenital abnormalities including hypoplastic lungs, single umbilical artery, ascites, dilated ventricles in the brain, agenesis of the corpus callosum and a small phallus. MRI did not identify findings suggestive of hypoxic brain injury. As such, it is my opinion that there was no apparent obstetrical event that resulted in loss of oxygen or mechanical trauma to the baby's brain during delivery or during resuscitation in the immediate post delivery period in the hospital. The mother was not in labor. The fetus had known abnormalities identified by ultrasound during pregnancy. It is most likely the baby's brain abnormalities are congenital and not related to oxygen deprivation at birth. Jordan was examined and evaluated by Michael Duchowny, M.D. (Dr. Duchowny), on January 30, 2013. In an affidavit dated February 27, 2013, Dr. Duchowny found the following on his examination of Jordan: It is my opinion that the findings from the examination are consistent with both a substantial mental and motor impairment. Jordan is functioning at approximately age 2-3 month level and in addition to his global development delay manifests microcephaly, dynamic hypotonia and dynamic static hypotonia with hyperreflexia and pathological reflexes. However his examination reveals multiple congenital anomalies which together with the neuroimaging findings suggest that Jordan's neurological deficits were most likely acquired prior to birth. As such, it is my opinion that there is no evidence from his postnatal course or from his present physical findings to indicate that Jordan Gonzalez sustained an hypoxic or ischemic insults in the course of labor, delivery or the immediate neonatal period. I therefore am not recommending Jordan for inclusion into the NICA program. A review of the file does not show any contrary opinions to those of Dr. Willis and Dr. Duchowny. The opinions of Dr. Willis and Dr. Duchowny that Jordan did not suffer a neurological injury due to oxygen deprivation or mechanical trauma during labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate postdelivery period are credited.
The Issue At issue in this proceeding is whether Emmanuel Hooks, a minor, suffered an injury for which compensation should be awarded under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan.
Findings Of Fact Fundamental findings Petitioner, Brianna Denise Davidson, is the mother and natural guardian of Emmanuel Hooks, a minor. Emmanuel was born a live infant on July 26, 1999, at Gulf Coast Medical Center, a hospital located in Panama City, Florida, and his birth weight exceeded 2,500 grams. The physician providing obstetrical services at Emmanuel's birth was Steven G. Smith, M.D., who, at all times material hereto, was a "participating physician" in the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan, as defined by Section 766.302(7), Florida Statutes. Emmanuel's birth At or about 9:10 p.m., July 25, 1999, Ms. Davidson (with an estimated date of delivery of July 26, 1999, and the fetus at 40 weeks gestation) presented to Gulf Coast Medical Center in labor. Initial vaginal examination revealed the cervix at 2-3 centimeters dilation, effacement as "thin," and the fetus at station -3. External fetal monitoring revealed a reassuring fetal heart rate (of 140-150 beats per minute), with accelerations. Ms. Davidson was continually monitored, and at 11:00 p.m., she was admitted to labor and delivery. At the time, uterine contractions were noted at 3-5 minute intervals, and vaginal examination revealed the cervix at 3 centimeters, effacement at 90 percent, and the fetus at station -3. Ms. Davidson's labor apparently did not progress, and at 2:49 a.m., July 26, 1999, she was started on Pitocin. Thereafter, Ms. Davidson's labor progressed slowly, and at 6:45 a.m., vaginal examination revealed the cervix at 5 centimeters, effacement at 90 percent, and the fetus at station -1. In the interim, external fetal monitoring continued to reveal a reassuring fetal heart rate. Ms. Davidson's labor continued to slowly progress, and by 9:00 a.m., vaginal examination revealed the cervix at 8 centimeters, effacement at 100 percent, and the fetus at station -1. In the interim, at 8:48 a.m., Ms. Davidson's membranes spontaneously ruptured, with clear fluid noted. Thereafter, variable decelerations were noted with each contraction, consistent with umbilical cord compression, and fetal heart base line remained reassuring (in the 140-beat minute range). From 9:00 a.m. to 11:45 a.m., Ms. Davidson's labor failed to progress (with the cervix at 8 centimeters, effacement at 100 percent, and the fetus at station -1), and at 11:45 a.m., Ms. Davidson was transported to the operating room for delivery by caesarean section. Notably, between 9:00 a.m., and 11:45 a.m., while variable decelerations continued, the fetal heart rate base line remained in the 140-beat per minute range, and fetal electrode revealed the presence of short term variability. According to the records, Ms. Davidson was in the operating room at 11:45 a.m., anesthesia started at 11:45 a.m., surgery started at 12:32 p.m., and Emmanuel was delivered at 12:35 p.m. Of note, the "nucal cord x 1" observed during delivery was described as "loose," and fetal heart monitoring in the operating room and immediately prior to the caesarean section revealed a reassuring fetal heart rate. On delivery, Emmanuel was bulb-suctioned, but did not require resuscitation. Initial newborn assessment noted no apparent abnormalities, and Apgar scores were recorded as 8 at one minute and 9 at 5 minutes. The Apgar scores assigned to Emmanuel are a numeric expression of the condition of a newborn infant, and reflect the sum points gained on assessment of heart rate, respiratory effort, muscle tone, reflex response, and color, with each category being assigned a score ranging from the lowest score of 0 through maximum score of 2. As noted, at one minute, Emmanuel's Apgar score totaled 8, with heart rate, respiratory effort, muscle tone, and reflect response being graded at 2 each, and color being graded a 0. At five minutes, Emmanuel's Apgar score totaled 9, with heart rate, respiratory effort, muscle tone, and reflex response again graded at 2 each, and color now graded at 1. Such scores are considered normal, and inconsistent with recent hypoxic insult or trauma. Following the initial newborn assessment, Emmanuel was transported to the regular nursery, where he remained until he was discharged with his mother on July 29, 1999. Notably, the newborn nursery admission assessment was grossly normal, and there is no evidence of any complication during Emmanuel's stay. Emmanuel's subsequent development On December 10, 2001, following the filing of the subject claim, Emmanuel was examined by Dr. Michael Duchowny, a physician board-certified in pediatrics, neurology with special competence in child neurology, electroencephalography, and clinical neurophysiology. Dr. Duchowny reported the results of his neurology evaluation, as well as the history he obtained from the parents, as follows: HISTORY ACCORDING TO MR. AND MRS. HOOKS: Emmanuel is a 2 1/2 year old boy who the parents indicated suffers from cerebral palsy and brain injury. They began by explaining that Emmanuel suffered brain injury at birth due to a cord being wrapped around his neck. He was delivered by emergency caesarean section. They noted that Emmanuel's MRI has shown periventricular leukomalacia and furnished a copy of the MRI report. Emmanuel's growth and developmental milestones have been slow. He did not rollover until 9 months, nor did he sit until a year of age. He stood at 14 months, walked at 18 months and said his first word at age 2. He now has a lexicon of only one word ("ma-ma"). Emmanuel is not toilet trained. He is described as being extremely active. He does not sit still at anytime during the day and it is difficult to examine him or provide therapy. He attends a wellness center where he receives physical, speech and occupational therapy on a twice weekly basis. Communication is a particular problem area for him. Emmanuel's appetite has also been diminished and he is now "only starting to eat". His mother indicated that Emmanuel suffers from "low muscle tone" and that he drools frequently. She also mentioned that he wakes up frequently at night and is just beginning to sleep more consistently. Emmanuel does not play with other children at school. His activity level and intrusiveness have precluded meaningful peer interactions. The parents are aware that his eye contact is poor. The parents stated that Emmanuel "had seizures", but then went on to explain that 2 EEG's were normal and he was never placed on medication. The events were described as "getting into a trance". He has not had motor convulsions. FAMILY HISTORY: Both parents are healthy. A 4 year brother had no medical problems and there are no family members with degenerative illnesses, mental retardation or cerebral palsy. Emmanuel was born at Gulf Coast Medical after a 39 week gestation. He weighed 8-pounds, 9- ounces at birth and breathed well. He was discharged from the nursery at 3 days of age. Emmanuel is fully immunized, has no significant drug allergies and never been hospitalized or undergone surgery. His vision and hearing are said to be excellent. PHYSICAL EXAMINATION reveals an alert, but extremely active and well developed 2 1/2 year old toddler. Emmanuel weighs 39-pounds. His head circumference measures 50.2 cm and there are no cranial or facial anomalies or asymmetries. Emmanuel's neck is supple without masses, thyromegaly or adenopathy. The cardiovascular, respiratory and abdominal examinations are normal. Emmanuel's NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION is difficult to complete, as he is constantly in motion. The physical examination requires restraint from his father, as he continually tries to touch things and pull items off the desktop and shelves. Emanuel has very poor eye contact and did not communicate in words at anytime during the session. It was difficult for him to follow commands as well, as his attention span constantly shifted. He drooled intermittently. The tongue movements are poorly coordinated. Cranial nerve examination reveals full visual fields to direct confrontation testing. There is blink to threat from either direction. I could not perform a fundoscopic examination. There are no facial asymmetries. Motor examination reveals mild generalized hypotonia with full range of motion. There are no adventitious movements, aside from the high activity level and no evidence of focal weakness or atrophy. Emmanuel's gait is stable, but slightly wide- based and he has generalized hypotonia. The deep tendon reflexes are 2+ bilaterally and plantar responses are in flexion. There is withdrawal of all extremities to touch. Neurovascular examination reveals no cervical, cranial or ocular bruits and no temperature or pulse asymmetries. Cerebellar testing could not be completed due to poor cooperation. In SUMMARY, Emmanuel's neurologic examination is significant for multiple areas of developmental delay. He is extremely overactive and inattentive, and has a significant behavior and communication problem. He additionally demonstrates poor eye contact and has a significant social disability. There are no specific focal or lateralizing findings to suggest a structural brain lesion. The findings on Emmanuel's neurologic examination suggests a diagnosis of a pervasive developmental disorder. Emmanuel fits within the autistic spectrum and this was communicated to the family . . . . The cause and timing of Emmanuel's neurological impairment To address the issue of whether Emmanuel's impairments were associated with an "injury to the brain or spinal cord . . . caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period in a hospital," as required for coverage under the Plan, Petitioner offered selected medical records relating to Ms. Davidson's antepartum course, as well as those associated with Emmanuel's birth and subsequent development. Additionally, Emmanuel's parents testified on their own behalf, and Respondent offered the deposition testimony of Dr. Duchowny, whose qualifications were previously noted, and the deposition testimony of Dr. Donald Willis, a physician board-certified in obstetrics and gynecology, as well as maternal-fetal medicine. As for the cause and timing of Emmanuel's impairments, it was Dr. Duchowny's opinion, based on the results of his neurology evaluation and review of the medical records, that Emmanuel's impairments are not related to perinatal asphyxia or trauma. More particularly, Dr. Duchowny expressed his views, as follows: Q. Based on your review of the records and your evaluation of Emmanuel Hooks, can you give us an overview of his condition? A. Yes. I thought that Emmanuel's neurologic examination revealed evidence of developmental neurologic impairment. He was hyperactive and had an attention deficit disorder and additionally had significant behavior, social and communication problems. All of this suggested he had developmental problems in multiple areas, consistent with a diagnosis of pervasive developmental disorder. Many of the children with pervasive developmental disorder go on to develop childhood autism as they get older. * * * Q. In this particular case, do you believe that Emmanuel's condition was acquired during the course of labor-delivery in the immediate post-delivery period? A. No, I do not. Q. What is the basis for that opinion? A. The basis for my opinion is that autism is a developmental disorder which results from unknown factors operating in utero prior to the onset of labor and delivery and is not a recognized complication of birth asphysia or birth trauma. Q. I take it your opinion is that Emmanuel Hooks did not acquire whatever neurological deficits he had as a result of any oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring during labor-delivery or the immediate post- delivery period? A. That's correct. Q. In fact, was there any evidence in the medical records of any oxygen deprivation that occurred during the course of labor- delivery or resuscitation during the immediate post-delivery period? A. No. Q. Was there any evidence of mechanical injury occurring during the course of labor- delivery or the immediate post-delivery resuscitative period? A. No, there was not? Q. In your opinion, were Emmanuel's problems acquired prior to the course of labor- delivery? A. Yes. As for Dr. Willis, he was also of the opinion that the medical records revealed no evidence of oxygen deprivation or other trauma associated with Emmanuel's birth. The medical records, as well as the testimony of the physicians and the parents, have been carefully considered. So considered, it must be concluded that the proof failed to demonstrate that any impairment Emmanuel suffers was occasioned by an injury to the brain or spinal cord injury caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period.
The Issue At issue in this proceeding is whether Jonathan Trujillo, a minor, suffered an injury for which compensation should be awarded under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan.
Findings Of Fact Fundamental findings Jonathan Trujillo (Jonathan) is the natural son of Odalis Merida and Antonio Trujillo. He was born a live infant on December 31, 1993, at Jackson Memorial Hospital, a teaching hospital located in Miami, Dade County, Florida, and his birth weight was in excess of 2500 grams. The physicians providing obstetrical services during the birth of Jonathan were Doctors Oliva and McGare, resident physicians in an approved training program, who were supervised by Gene Burkett, M.D., a "participating physician" in the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan (the "Plan"). Consequently, each physician who provided obstetrical services during the birth of Jonathan was a "participating physician" in the Plan. Sections 766.302(7) and 766.314(4)(c), Florida Statutes. The birth of Jonathan Trujillo At or about 5:20 p.m., December 31, 1993, Odalis Merida (Ms. Merida) was admitted to Jackson Memorial Hospital in active labor. Notably, Ms. Merida's prenatal course had been complicated by the development of Class B gestational diabetes, requiring insulin during the course of her pregnancy, and the development of severe preeclampsia, characterized by hypertension. Consequently, Ms. Merida's pregnancy was rated high risk. To address Ms. Merida's diabetes during labor and delivery, she was maintained on drip insulin, and to address her hypertension, she was administered magnesium sulfate. Ms. Merida's condition and the substances administered to address her condition, although apparently necessary and appropriate, were not without risk or side effect to the fetus. Notably, magnesium sulfate is a muscle relaxant which can induce "floppiness" in a new born, as well as respiratory distress. 1/ The presence of maternal diabetes portends the risk of infantile hypoglycemia, which occurred in the instant case. A clinical symptom of hypoglycemia is "floppiness" in the new born, which may be exaggerated when, as here, it is found in conjunction with ploycythemia, discussed infra. Upon admission, Jonathan was at term, with a gestational age of 41 weeks, and fetal heart monitoring, commenced at or about 5:25 p.m., revealed good fetal heart tone. A physical examination at 6:00 p.m. noted the cervix to be at 7 centimeters, effacement complete, and the fetus at station 0. Contractions were regular at 2 minutes, and when the membrane was ruptured clear amniotic fluid was observed. Ms. Merida progressed through labor without incident until approximately 8:45 p.m., following the administration of an epidural anesthesia, when late decelerations of the fetal heart beat with bradycardia were noted, as a consequence of epidural hypertension. More specifically, Ms. Merida's blood pressure was observed to drop from a base line rate of 200/150 to 98/45, and a few late decelerations of the infant's heart rate were observed from a baseline rate of 120 to 130 beats per minute to 80 beats per minute. Ms. Merida was repositioned to her left side, the infant's heart rate promptly recovered, and no further unusual incidents were observed during the course of her labor or delivery. Given the limited duration and isolated nature of the late decelerations and bradycardia, it was the opinion of the physicians who testified in this proceeding that such anomaly did not adversely affect the infant's oxygenation or, stated differently, did not result in a hypoxic/ischemic insult to the infant's brain. Such opinions are credited. At 9:40 p.m., December 31, 1993, Ms. Merida, as she had with her first child, spontaneously delivered Jonathan vaginally, without apparent complication. Notably, Jonathan was vigorous on delivery, breathed spontaneously, did not require resuscitation, and his apgar scores were 9 at one minute, five minutes and ten minutes. In all, Jonathan's presentation was reflective of a healthy, vigorous infant. 2/ Jonathan was admitted to the newborn nursery at 10:00 p.m. Physical assessment upon admission revealed a large infant, at 4040 grams, with a large head (above the 90th percentile), who was crying spontaneously, alert, pink in color, but with a "slight floppiness" in the extremities. Jonathan was noted to breath spontaneously, without flaring or grunting; heart rate was noted at 160 beats per minute, with regular rhythm; fontanel were soft and flat; and reflexes were present. In brief, Jonathan's presentation in the newborn nursery was that of a healthy, vigorous infant, with the only negative observation being a "slight floppiness" in his extremities. Such "floppiness" was, however, more likely than not, related to the magnesium sulfate administered to Ms. Merida during labor and delivery, the hypoglycemia Jonathan was subsequently diagnosed to have acquired, or a combination of the two, and does not detract from the conclusion that Jonathan had no apparent signs of distress at birth. Later in the day, following testing, Jonathan was diagnosed with moderate to severe hypoglycemia, polycythemia, and moderate thrombocytopenia. Such conditions, singularly, or in combination, placed the infant at risk. Hypoglycemia, low blood sugar, may place the infant at risk of seizures and, pertinent to this case, resultant brain hemorrhage. Here, the moderate to severe hypoglycemia that Jonathan suffered was apparently recurrent, although it did resolve over time, and was addressed each time it presented through the administration of glucose. Polycythemia is a disorder whereby the number of red blood cells are abnormally high, making the blood thicker (hyperviscous) than normal. Apparently, brain hemorrhage is often related to decreased blood flow on the venus side of the brain, and where the blood is hyperviscous it could help or contribute to a brain hemorrhage. Here, with a hematocrit of 64, Jonathan's condition met the definition of polycythemia, which is a hematocrit over 60; however, such condition was not, or was not shown to be, significant in the instant case. Thrombocytopenia is a disorder resulting in an abnormally low platelet count which could affect clotting and therefore predispose the infant to bleeding through, among other things, trauma. Here, Jonathan's thrombocytopenia, more likely than not isoimmune thrombocytopenia, was considered moderate, as opposed to severe, and serial testing reported his platelet count as follows for the date and time indicated: DATE TIME 3/ PLATELET COUNT 1/1/94 07:00 Platelet estimate 40,000-80,000 1/2/94 03:47 Platelet estimate 80,000-100,000 1/3/94 07:57 Platelet estimate 40,000-80,000 1/3/94 15:08 Platelet estimate 40,000-80,000 1/4/94 05:04 Platelet count 49,000 1/5/94 06:46 Platelet estimate 40,000-80,000 1/6/94 12:50 Platelet estimate 40,000-80,000 1/8/94 21:12 Platelet count 182,000 1/10/94 03:52 Platelet count 263,000 1/12/94 06:00 Platelet count 357,000 The normal platelet count for newborns, as with adults, is 150,000 to 400,000, and, as may be observed from the serial testing, Jonathan's thrombocytopenia resolved over time. While at risk, Jonathan's neonatal course in the nursery was uneventful until 26 hours of life when he was noted to have suffered a generalized seizure characterized by cyanosis, severe bradycardia (heart beat in the range of 40 beats per minute), and respiratory arrest (apnea), requiring intubation. At or about 1:00 a.m., January 1, 1994, Jonathan was transferred to the neonatal intensive care unit, where he was maintained on positive ventilation until approximately January 6, 1994. Examination, through EEG's and CT and MRI scans of the brain, revealed that Jonathan had suffered an intraventricular hemorrhage, Grade IV, characterized by a massive bleed, with dilation of the ventricles. 4/ Thereafter residual hypodensity of the white matter of the brain was observed, consistent with degeneration of the hemorrhage and, ultimately, hypodensity compatable with evolving encephalomalacia (swelling of the brain.) Subsequently, on February 2, 1994, developing hydrocephalus required the placement of an intraventricular shunt to relieve intracranial pressure. Currently, in the opinions of Dr. Robert Roth and Dr. Michael Duchowny, whose opinions are credited, Jonathan is permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired. Such impairment is evidenced by, inter alia, cortical blindness, hypotonia and, more likely than not, mental retardation. It is further the opinion of such physicians, which is again credited, that the cause of Jonathan's neurologic impairment is the injury to the brain he suffered as a consequence of the Grade IV intraventricular hemorrhage. Given the foregoing, resolution of this claim resolves itself to an identification of the genesis of Jonathan's Grade IV intraventricular hemorrhage or, stated otherwise, whether the proof demonstrates, more likely than not, that the hemorrhage, which resulted in injury to Jonathan's brain and the ensuing neurological injuries, resulted from "oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period" in the hospital. Sections 766.302(2) and 766.309(1)(a), Florida Statutes. The cause of Jonathan's Grade IV intraventricular hemorrhage A Grade IV intraventricular hemorrhage in a term infant, such as Jonathan, is a rare occurrence, and its cause frequently cannot be identified. Notwithstanding, Jonathan did suffer such a hemorrhage, and he was shown to suffer from two conditions, isoimmune thrombocytopenia and hypoglycemia, which could offer some explanation for the hemorrhage. Here, petitioner contends that Jonathan, due to his large head, received an injury to his brain occasioned by the "mechanical" forces of labor and delivery, and that such injury resulted in a slow bleed which, because of his thrombocytopenia, progressed over the next 26 hours and ultimately manifested as a generalized seizure characterized by cyanosis, severe bradycardia and respiratory arrest. In support of such contention, petitioner offered the testimony of Robert S. Roth, M.D., a physician board certified in pediatrics and neonatal/perinatal medicine. Pertinent to this case, Dr. Roth observed that infants born with thrombocytopenia are at increased risk of suffering an intraventricular brain hemorrhage if subjected to the trauma occasioned by the mechanical forces of labor and vaginal delivery. In his opinion, Jonathan's medical records reveal a classic case of neonatal brain hemorrhage resulting from the mechanical forces of labor and vaginal delivery that occurred because of Jonathan's large head and thrombocytopenia. Those conditions, affected by the forces of labor and delivery, combined to "start the process of hemorrhage in the brain," resulting in "tissue changes and cell death and vascular pressure changes" over time, and culminating when it progressed to the "centers that control breathing," manifested by apnea or seizure- like activity that led to apnea. Notably, it was Dr. Roth's opinion that it was not Jonathan's large head alone or his thrombocytopenia alone, apparently because of its moderate nature, which occasioned the initial bleed and resulting hemorrhage but, rather, the two conditions acting in consort. There was, however, no injury to Jonathan's scalp or skull noted at delivery, nor any molding of his head consequent to the delivery. It is of further note, in evaluating Dr. Roth's opinion, that he also observed that, had Jonathan been delivered by cesarean section before the onset of labor, he would have had a "lower probability" of having a hemorrhage than had he undergone active labor and vaginal delivery. Such observation clearly implies that factors other than labor and delivery could have operated to induce Jonathan's hemorrhage. Finally, in considering Dr. Roth's opinion of progressive deterioration, it is worthy of note that, apart from the "slight floppiness" observed shortly after birth, Jonathan evidenced no symptoms of neurologic injury until 26 hours of life. As heretofore noted, the "slight floppiness" exhibited by Jonathan was reasonably attributed to the magnesium sulfate administered to Ms. Merida during labor and delivery, the hypoglycemia Jonathan was shown to have developed, or a combination of the two, as opposed to a symptom of neurologic injury. Consequently, there is no objective evidence or symptom, that one would otherwise expect to observe, to support Dr. Roth's opinion of progressive deterioration. Contrasted with the opinions of Dr. Roth, regarding the genesis of Jonathan's hemorrhage, are the opinions offered on behalf of NICA through Michael S. Duchowny, M.D., a physician board certified in pediatric neurology. Dr. Duchowny, although acknowledging that thrombocytopenia offered an increased risk of intraventricular hemorrhage to an infant through the forces of labor and delivery, was of the opinion that Jonathan's hemorrhage at 26 hours of life was a spontaneous event, unrelated to labor and delivery, and that the cause of that hemorrhage could not be identified with any reasonable degree of medical certainty or, stated differently, that any attempt to attribute a cause for Jonathan's hemorrhage was, at best, speculative. 5/ In reaching his conclusion, Dr. Duchowny observed that there was no objective evidence or symptom of trauma or oxygen deprivation at birth, as one would expect had there been a neurologic insult during the course of labor and delivery, and that there was likewise no objective evidence or symptom of neurologic injury over the course of Jonathan's first 26 hours of life, as one would expect to observe were he suffering a progressive disorder, as opined by Dr. Roth. Dr. Duchowny was further of the opinion that, although moderately thrombocytopenic, Jonathan's platelet count was not sufficiently low, a level he described as 20,000 or less, to increase the likelihood that Jonathan would suffer a bleed. Resolving the conflict between the opinions of Doctors Roth and Duchowny is not an easy or lightly undertaken effort. Each physician is eminently qualified and the genuineness of the opinions they expressed is apparent. The seriousness of the resolution is further intensified by the obvious needs of a severely impaired infant; however, while such needs are significant, it cannot be overlooked that where, as here, responsibility for the care of the infant is sought to be imposed on the Plan, the proof must be compelling that, more likely than not, the infant suffered a "birth-related neurological injury" as defined by law. In this case, the proof falls short of meeting such standard. 6/ As heretofore noted, the labor and delivery of Jonathan was essentially normal and there was no obstetrical incident or identifiable event during labor and delivery that would evidence that he had suffered a hypoxic insult, mechanical injury or traumatic event. Indeed, although Jonathan did have a large head (above the 90th percentile), there was no cephalopelvic disproportion noted, no arrest of labor, no protracted labor, and no use of forceps or vacuum extraction in delivery. Upon delivery, no apparent cranial injuries were observed, no molding of the head was noted, and Jonathan presented as a vigorous infant with normal Apgars. In summary, there was no identifiable incident during the course of labor or delivery, or thereafter during Jonathan's first 26 hours of life, evidencing oxygen deprivation, mechanical injury, or other insult, that would account for the hemorrhage he suffered. In reaching the foregoing conclusion, it has not been overlooked that an infant suffering from thrombocytopenia is at increased risk of intraventricular hemorrhage through the forces of labor and delivery. Here, however, it was not suggested or shown that Jonathan's mild thrombocytopenia would, itself, foster a hemorrhage of the nature he suffered, rather petitioner's proof suggested that his large head and thrombocytopenic condition combined, when subjected to the trauma of labor and delivery, to precipitate a bleed that slowly progressed to a Grade IV intraventricular hemorrhage or precipitated a seizure that resulted in such a hemorrhage. Given the nature of the proffer, there being no apparent complication during labor and delivery, no objective sign of head trauma at birth, no symptoms of neurologic insult at birth, and no symptom of neurologic insult over the 26 hours prior to Jonathan's acute compromise, it must be concluded, as suggested by Dr. Duchowny, that any conclusion timing the genesis of Jonathan's hemorrhage to the events of labor and delivery is not supported by reasonable medical probability but is, at best, speculative. Consequently, it must be concluded, that petitioners have failed to demonstrate that Jonathan's hemorrhage was related to trauma, oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring during the course of labor and delivery, as opposed to a spontaneous event, of unknown origin, occurring at Jonathan's twenty-sixth hour of life. 7/
Findings Of Fact Uzziah Walker was born on November 23, 2012, at Sacred Heart Hospital located in Pensacola, Florida. Uzziah weighed in excess of 2,500 grams at birth. Donald Willis, M.D. (Dr. Willis), was requested by NICA to review the medical records for Uzziah. In an affidavit dated May 24, 2015, Dr. Willis described his findings in pertinent part as follows: In summary, there was no apparent fetal distress during labor. Spontaneous vaginal delivery resulted in a large subgaleal hemorrhage with blood loss and poor perfusion. The baby was not hypoxic at birth. Cord blood gas was normal (pH 7.25). However, blood loss from the scalp hemorrhage and poor perfusion resulted in intraventricular hemorrhage during the immediate post delivery period. There was an apparent obstetrical event that resulted in scalp hemorrhage and poor perfusion with loss of oxygen to the baby’s brain during the immediate post delivery period. The poor perfusion resulted in brain injury. I am unable to comment about the severity of the brain injury. NICA retained Michael Duchowny, M.D. (Dr. Duchowny), a pediatric neurologist, to examine Uzziah and to review his medical records. Dr. Duchowny examined Uzziah on March 11, 2015. In an affidavit dated May 29, 2015, Dr. Duchowny opined in pertinent part as follows: Review of medical records and imaging studies sent on February 4 and 6, 2015 was performed. They detail Uzziah’s birth at Baptist Hospital Health System in Pensacola with a forceps assisted delivery after a rapid decent. Uzziah evidenced tachycardia and some retractions at the time of delivery but his Apgar scores were 7 and 8. He was observed to have a subgaleal hematoma; a CT scan of the brain on November 23 revealed a large soft tissue hematoma and a small collection of subdural blood over the right cerebellar tent with a small amount of right ventricular hemorrhage. Of note, there was no cerebral edema or ventricular compression. No skull fractures were noted despite bilateral subgaleal hematomas. The neonatal course was otherwise uncomplicated. In summary, Uzziah’s neurological examination today reveals normal findings. He does not exhibit either mental or physical impairment and his overall development has caught up and is proceeding in an age appropriate fashion. I believe that Uzziah’s perinatal hematomas were resorbed without residual brain injury and his future prognosis is excellent. I explained to his family that Uzziah is doing very well and that his future is favorable from a prognostic standpoint. Given Uzziah’s normal neurological status today, I am not recommending compensation with the NICA program. A review of the file in this case reveals that there have been no opinions filed that are contrary to the opinion of Dr. Willis that there was an apparent obstetrical event that resulted in scalp hemorrhage and poor perfusion with loss of oxygen to the baby's brain during the immediate post-delivery period, and that the poor perfusion resulted in brain injury. Dr. Willis’ opinion is credited. There are no opinions filed that are contrary to Dr. Duchowny’s opinion that Uzziah’s overall development is proceeding in an age appropriate fashion and does not exhibit either mental or physical impairment. Dr. Duchowny’s opinion is credited.
The Issue At issue in this proceeding is whether Daniel Jazon, a minor, suffered an injury for which compensation should be awarded under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan.
Findings Of Fact Fundamental findings Daniel Jazon (Daniel) is the natural son of Elizabeth Jazon and William Jazon. He was born a live infant on May 8, 1993, at Baptist Hospital, a hospital duly licensed in the State of Florida and located in Miami, Dade County, Florida. Daniel's birth weight exceeded 2,500 grams. The physician providing obstetrical services during the birth of Daniel was George Battle, M.D., who was, at all times material hereto, a "participating physician" in the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan, as defined by Section 766.302(7), Florida Statutes. Daniel's birth and subsequent condition A review of the medical records reveals that Daniel was born full term after an essentially uncomplicated pregnancy. Total labor time was approximately 17 hours, and progressed slowly. During the last hour variable decelerations occurred and brief episodes of fetal bradycardia, so delivery was assisted by vacuum and outlet forceps were used. Daniel cried and breathed immediately at birth, and his Apgar scores were noted as 7 at one minute and 9 at five minutes. He was noted to be mildly sluggish at birth, but improved with tactile stimulation and blow-by oxygen. Daniel was also noted not to move his left arm for approximately three minutes. Daniel was transferred to the regular nursery, but fed poorly. At approximately seven hours of age jitteriness was noted, followed by episodes of rhythmic jerking of the left arm and leg lasting up to nine minutes. Upon transfer to the neonatal intensive care unit, similar seizure activity was noted, so Daniel was loaded with phenobarbital. A CT scan of the brain revealed a right temporal parietal infarct. A neurological consultation by Kenneth Butler, M.D., on May 9, 1993, observed definite weakness in the left upper extremity and diminished reflexes on the left side. Daniel evidenced further focal seizure activity on May 10, 1993, involving the left chest, shoulder, arm and hand, and was started on Dilantin. Daniel remained seizure- free, and a CT scan of the brain on May 12, 1993, revealed the right temporal parietal infarct without any change, which demonstrated, more likely than not, that the infarct was old and predated labor and delivery. 1/ Daniel remained seizure free, and was discharged to the care of his mother on May 27, 1993. At discharge, his neurological examination remained abnormal, with hypotonia, hyperreflexia and ankle clonus. Following discharge, Daniel continued to be followed by Dr. Butler. His examinations of June 22, 1993, September 10, 1993, November 9, 1993, and March 10, 1994, reveal that the physical impairments Daniel suffered as a consequence of his right temporal infarct progressively resolved and, as of his last examination, no significant physical or neurologic deficits were observed.
Conclusions The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction over the parties to, and the subject matter of, these proceedings. Section 766.301, et seq., Florida Statutes. The Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan (the "Plan") was established by the Legislature "to provide compensation, on a no fault basis, for a limited class of catastrophic injuries, [defined as 'birth- related neurological injuries' in the Plan]" relating to births occurring on or after January 1, 1989. Humana of Florida, Inc. v. McKaughn, 20 Fla.L.Weekly D565, D567 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995), and Section 766.303(1), Florida Statutes. The injured "infant, his personal representative, parents, dependents, and next of kin," may seek compensation under the Plan by filing a claim for compensation with the Division of Administrative Hearings within five years of the infant's birth. Sections 766.302(3), 766.303(2), 766.305(1) and 766.313, Florida Statutes. The Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Association (NICA), which administers the Plan, has "45 days from the date of service of a complete claim . . . in which to file a response to the petition and to submit relevant written information relating to the issue of whether the injury is a birth-related neurological injury." Section 766.305(3), Florida Statutes. If NICA determines that the injury alleged in a claim is a compensable birth-related neurological injury, it may award compensation to the claimant, provided that the award is approved by the Hearing Officer to whom the claim has been assigned. Section 766.305(6), Florida Statutes. If, on the other hand, NICA disputes the claim, as it has in the instant case, the dispute must be resolved by the assigned Hearing Officer in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 120, Florida Statutes. Sections 766.304, 766.307, 766.309 and 766.31, Florida Statutes. In discharging this responsibility, the Hearing Officer must make the following determination based upon the available evidence: Whether the injury claimed is a birth- related neurological injury. If the claimant has demonstrated, to the satisfaction of the hearing officer, that the infant has sustained a brain or spinal cord injury caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury and that the infant was thereby rendered permanently and substantially mentally and physically im- paired, a rebuttable presumption shall arise that the injury is a birth-related neurologi- cal injury as defined in s. 766.303(2). Whether obstetrical services were de- livered by a participating physician in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period in a hospital; or by a certified nurse midwife in a teaching hospital supervised by a partici- pating physician in the course of labor, de- livery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period in a hospital. Section 766.309(1), Florida Statutes. 2/ An award may be sustained only if the Hearing Officer concludes that the "infant has sustained a birth-related neurological injury and that obstetrical services were delivered by a participating physician at birth." Section 766.31(1), Florida Statutes. Pertinent to this case, "birth-related neurological injury" is defined by Section 766.302(2), Florida Statutes, to mean: . . . injury to the brain or spinal cord of a live infant weighing at least 2,500 grams at birth caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immedi- ate post-delivery period in a hospital, which renders the infant permanently and substan- tially mentally and physically impaired. This definition shall apply to live births only and shall not include disability or death caused by genetic or congenital abnormality. Here, the proof demonstrated that Daniel was born a live infant, that his birth weight was in excess of 2,500 grams, and that the physician who provided obstetrical services during the course of his birth was a "participating physician" as that term is defined by Section 766.302(7), Florida Statutes. However the record developed in this case failed to demonstrate that Daniel suffered a "birth-related neurological injury," within the meaning of Section 766.302(2), Florida Statutes, since it failed to support the conclusion that Daniel suffered any injury to his brain or spinal cord caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury during labor, delivery or resuscitation in the immediate post- delivery period which rendered him permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired. Sections 766.302(2), 766.309(1) and 766.31(1), Florida Statutes. Rather, the proof demonstrated that the right temporal parietal infarct Daniel suffered occurred prior to labor and delivery, and that currently Daniel is not permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired. Where, as here, the Hearing Officer determines that ". . . the injury alleged is not a birth-related neurological injury . . . he [is required to] enter an order [to such effect] and . . . cause a copy of such order to be sent immediately to the parties by registered or certified mail." Section 766.309(2), Florida Statutes. Such an order constitutes final agency action subject to appellate court review. Section 766.311(1), Florida Statutes.
The Issue The issue in this case is whether Ailani Sanchez suffered a birth-related injury as defined by section 766.302(2), Florida Statutes, for which compensation should be awarded under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan (the Plan).
Findings Of Fact Ailani Sanchez was born a live infant at 5:46 a.m., on October 29, 2015, at Lakeland Regional Medical Center. Ailani was a single gestation, weighing 2,950 grams at birth. Ailani was delivered via cesarean section for suspected abruption/velamentous insertion of cord by Dr. Zollicoffer who was a NICA participating physician on October 29, 2015. Ailani's Apgar scores were 2/4/4. Upon delivery, she was floppy and pale and had no respiratory effort. Pulse oximetry was within target saturations for age and her heart rate remained 100 or greater. She was intubated at seven minutes of age and transferred to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). No seizures were noted. Ailani had increasing spontaneous respiratory effort and whole body cooling was started prior to her transfer to St. Joseph's Hospital NICU on October 29, 2015. Upon admission to St. Joseph's Hospital on October 29, 2015, Ailani was lethargic with decreased reactions to stimuli, but appeared pink and well perfused. Neurologically, she was noted to be improving; she was breathing spontaneously and moving all extremities to stimuli. After a complicated newborn hospital course, Ailani was ultimately discharged from St. Joseph's Hospital on January 6, 2016. At the time of her discharge, she was noted to be feeding by mouth and was overall gaining weight. Prior to her discharge, an EEG on October 30, 2015, showed seizures predominantly on the right side of her brain and generalized brain dysfunction. A brain MRI obtained on November 5, 2015, revealed restricted diffusion related to acute infarction in the right temporal occipital region with laminar necrosis. Additional laminar necrosis in the frontal lobes and insular cortex bilaterally was noted. An EEG on November 16, 2015, was consistent with nonspecific cerebral dysfunction with occasional sharp waves in the temporal parietal regions bilaterally with no evidence of seizures and irregular slow waves with slightly more predominance to the right. Ailani was seen for a newborn visit by her pediatrician, Dr. Bou Salvador, on January 7, 2016. Nutritionally, she was noted to be breast feeding adequately, with supplements with formula. Developmentally, she was noted to have equal movements of all extremities and follow midline. She responded to a bell and was able to lift her head while lying on her stomach. Examination of her spine, extremities, and peripheral pulses were all normal. Neurologically, she was reportedly normal, with normal strength, tone, and reflexes reported. On January 19, 2016, Ailani was evaluated at All Children's Outpatient Care upon referral by St. Joseph's Hospital secondary to hypoxic ischemia. The occupational therapist's impression included decreased bilateral coordination, decreased developmental milestones, decreased gross motor skills, decreased play skills, decreased strength, and fine motor deficits. Skilled therapy was identified to have the potential to improve her functional level in the areas of manipulation. It was recommended that Ailani undergo 30 minutes of occupational therapy once a week for six months. Her prognosis for achieving goals established by her therapist was noted to be excellent. On February 4, 2016, Ailani was evaluated for participation in, and deemed eligible for, the Early Steps Program. On February 18, 2016, Ailani was evaluated by Dr. Qureshi at Kids Neurology. Developmentally, she was noted to smile and coo and focus. It was noted that Ailani had three seizures at the age of one day old, but none since. At this time, she was taking Keppra and Phenobarbital, from which she was being weaned. A sleep deprived EEG, obtained since the last visit, was normal. She was noted to be doing very well neurologically. Her physical examination revealed she was lifting her chest and head with her arms extended. Early head control with bobbing motion was noted. She was noted to say "aah," smile, and follow pass midline. The plan noted at this time was to continue to wean and discontinue Keppra and Phenobarbital. Ailani was again seen by Dr. Bou Salvador on March 4, 2016, for her four-month well visit. Nutritionally, she was noted to be feeding with formula adequately. She had been started on solids for one to two feeds. Developmentally, she was noted to squeal and laugh. She was able to follow 180 degrees. She turned to void and was able to hold her head up 90 degrees while lying on her stomach. She was able to sit with support with her head up. She was able to pull to sit with no head lag. She could bring her hands together and had no persistent fist clenching. Her physical examination was normal. Her neurological examination was also normal, with normal strength, tone, and reflexes reported. Ailani was again seen by Dr. Bou Salvador on May 4, 2016, for her six-month well visit. Nutritionally, she was noted to be breast feeding adequately. Developmentally, she was noted to be social and smiling responsively. Adaptive equal movements of all extremities and the ability to follow midline were noted. She could respond to a bell and was able to lift her head while lying on her stomach. A physical examination was normal. A neurological examination was also normal, with normal strength, tone, and reflexes reported. On May 24, 2016, Ailani returned to Dr. Qureshi at Kids Neurology. It was noted that Ailani had been weaned from her seizure medication and had had no seizures for the last three months. She was noted to be doing very well neurologically. Physically and developmentally, she was noted to have no head lag, to be rolling over, to have her chest up in a prone position, to be trying to crawl, to be lifting her head, and to be sitting briefly unsupported. She was also noted to be leaning forward on her hands, engaging in bounce activity, supporting most of her weight, reaching out and grasping large objects, transferring from hand to hand, babbling, enjoying mirror, and using polysyllable sounds. She was noted to be feeding herself. Dr. Qureshi reported that Ailani was in occupation therapy but that it was on hold since her evaluation was "pretty unremarkable." Ailani was noted to be progressing well for her age and was receiving Early Steps intervention once a week at home. She was given a prescription of Phenobarbital for use only if a seizure occurred. On June 18, 2016, Ailani was seen by Dr. Frances Arrillaga at Pediatric Cardiology Associates for a cardiology consultation secondary to a history of pulmonary hypertension, and an echocardiogram that showed a patent foramen ovale (PFO). Ailani's mother reported that since her discharge from St. Joseph's, she was doing well. Cyanosis, difficulty breathing and unexplained diaphoresis and feeding problems, were denied. An echocardiogram on this date showed a PFO, with otherwise normal anatomy. There were normal right ventricular (RV) pressures, normal left ventricular (LV) size and function. No cardiovascular restrictions were given and she was told to return in one year for further follow up. Ailani was again seen by Dr. Bou Salvador on August 4, 2016, for her nine-month well visit. Nutritionally, she was reported to be feeding adequately. She was feeding 2 to 3 varieties of solid foods with no problems and was starting with a cup for water and juice. Developmentally, she was reported to be playing pat-a-cake and looking for fallen objects. She could bang two cubes in her hand with thumb-finger grasp. She could say "dada" and "mama" and walk while holding on. She was also noted to be crawling and standing momentarily. Her physical and neurological examinations were noted to be normal, with normal strength, tone, and reflexes noted. An August 22, 2016, a progress note from Early Intervention reflects that Ailani was babbling two syllables together, was happy, pulling to a stand and cruising along furniture, and was responding to her name. Attendance at Early Intervention was noted to be consistent and once a week. Ailani was again seen by Dr. Bou Salvador on November 3, 2016, for her 12-month well visit. Nutritionally, she was noted to be eating two to three varieties of solid foods with no problems and was feeding herself finger foods. Developmentally, she was reported to be playing pat-a-cake and drinking from a cup. She was able to bang two cubes held in her hands with thumb-finger grasp. She was saying "mama" and "dada," imitated speech sounds, could say three words other than "mama" and "dada," and understood "no." She was able to walk while holding on, and was reported to stand alone and walk well. A physical examination revealed normal extremities. A neurologic examination was also normal, with normal strength, tone, and reflexes reported. On November 21, 2016, Ailani returned to Dr. Qureshi at Kids Neurology. It was noted that Ailani had been weaned off medications six months earlier and had no seizure activity since. She was noted to be doing very well. It was noted that no therapy was being provided at this time, although she was evaluated for occupational therapy but did not qualify for it. Developmentally, she was noted to be walking with one hand held, rising independently, taking several steps, getting to sitting, pulling to stand, standing for two seconds, saying a few words besides "mama" and "dada," playing ball game, making postural adjustment to dressing, waiving "bye bye," and indicating what she wants. She was noted to have pincer grasp, releasing objects to others when grabbed, and banging two things. Dr. Qureshi noted "she is doing amazing right now." A December 24, 2016, emergency room record (for a cough/choking episode after eating a piece of Dorito) from Florida Hospital Tampa reflects that Ailani had not had seizures since birth, and had been off Keppra and Phenobarbital for almost a year. A physical examination revealed an active, well- developed, and well-nourished child. Neurologically, she was noted to be awake, alert, and interacting with family and staff. She was also noted to be active and playful. An Early Intervention progress note from February 15, 2017, reflects Ailani had age-level play skills, could communicate using vocalizations and some single words, could follow routine directions, and was independent with walking and floor transfers. Good progress was noted to be made, many goals were reported met, and the parents decided to reduce services to one time per month. On January 30, 2017, Ailani was reevaluated for participation in Early Steps. It was noted that Ailani's mother had no concerns at this time. The report notes that Ailani liked the slide, liked to kick the ball, liked to play with her siblings and cousins, and that she is very curious. No hearing or vision concerns were noted. It was reported that many of her goals had been met, and that Ailani was using a variety of vowels and consonants, identifying at least three family members when named, that she was saying a variety of words, and was using a sign for "more food." Ailani was noted to still be eligible for Early Steps secondary to her diagnosis of hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy. Ailani was seen by Dr. Bou Salvador on March 28, 2017, for her 16-month well visit. She was noted to have good eating habits and a good appetite. No mealtime problems were reported, and she was noted to be eating solid foods with no problems. She was noted to have socially appropriate behavior for her age. She was talking well and was able to balance on one foot for five seconds, could throw a ball overhead, and pedal a tricycle. Her orthopedic and neurologic examinations were normal, with normal strength, tone, and reflexes reported. At the request of NICA, Donald C. Willis, M.D., who specializes in obstetrics and gynecology and maternal-fetal medicine, reviewed the medical records included in the Stipulated Record as Joint Exhibits A through G. In his report dated August 2, 2017, which was admitted into evidence without objection, Dr. Willis noted in pertinent part that Ailani's mother was cramping when she presented to the hospital, and was three centimeters dilated with suspected amniotic membranes ruptured. Contractions were noted to be occurring occasionally. Medical records indicated the presence of late decelerations on admission, which progressed to bradycardia, for which an immediate Cesarean section was recommended. Dr. Willis observed that Ailani was depressed at birth with Apgar scores of 2/4/4, and that cord blood gas was abnormal with a pH of only 6.97. He further noted that Ailani was floppy, pale, and had poor perfusion; that bag and mask ventilation was initiated, followed by intubation for continued respiratory distress; that hypotension was present and required IV fluids; that the initial blood count was low; and that Ailani remained acidotic after birth with a pH of 6.7 and a base excess of -27 at 90 minutes after birth. Dr. Willis further noted Ailani's hospital course consistent with her medical records and ultimately opined that “there was an obstetrical event that resulted in loss of oxygen to the baby's brain during labor, delivery and continuing into the immediate post delivery period. The oxygen deprivation resulted in brain injury.” Dr. Willis was unable to comment about the severity of the injury, however. At the request of NICA, Laufey Y. Sigurdardottir, M.D., who is board certified in neurology and specializing in pediatric neurology, reviewed the medical records included in the Stipulated Record as Joint Exhibits A through G, and performed a thorough examination of Ailani on October 18, 2017. Dr. Sigurdardottir's summary of Ailani's medical history, along with her findings upon a full physical and neurological examination, is documented within her written report, which was admitted into evidence without objection. Dr. Sigurdardottir noted that Ailani was a non-dysmorphic, interactive toddler with normal facial features and apparently intact vision. No abnormalities in Ailani's extremities were noted other than occasional toe walking. Neurologically, Ailani was noted to be interactive, curious, and exhibiting normal joint attention. Ailani exhibited pretend play with a stethoscope, said the word "mom" a few times, pointed to her mouth when asked to do so, enjoyed playing with a tablet computer, shook her head for "no," exhibited understandable words, and exhibited no autistic features. Cranial nerves were intact, facial grimacing was symmetric and normal, and hearing seemed intact. No drooling was noted. Muscle tone was noted to be normal, strength was full and symmetric and deep tendon reflexes were symmetric and within normal limits. Gross and fine motor skills were noted to be within normal limits for age. Overall, Dr. Sigurdardottir determined that despite her initial abnormal neurological examination, and delays in early development, Ailani's current neurologic and developmental functioning is age-appropriate. She went on to opine in relevant part that, Ailani is not found to have substantial delays in motor and mental abilities at this time . . . . In review of available documents, there is evidence of impairment consistent with a neurologic injury to the brain or spinal cord acquired due to oxygen deprivation . . . . The prognosis for full motor and mental recovery is excellent and the life expectancy is full In light of evidence presented I believe Ailani does not fulfill criteria of a substantial mental and physical impairment at this time. I do not feel that Ailani should be included in the NICA program. Neither Petitioner nor Intervenor submitted or introduced into evidence any expert reports rebutting the opinions of Dr. Willis and/or Dr. Sigurdardottir.
The Issue At issue is whether Maxwell Hubmann, a minor, qualifies for coverage under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan (Plan).
Findings Of Fact Stipulated facts related to compensability Petitioners, Roger and Sara Hubmann, are the parents of Maxwell Hubmann, a minor. Maxwell was born a live infant on March 25, 2008, at Sacred Heart Hospital, a hospital located in Pensacola, Florida, and his birth weight exceeded 2,500 grams. Obstetrical services were delivered at Maxwell's birth by Brian Sontag, M.D., who, at all times material hereto, was a "participating physician" in the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan, as defined by Section 766.302(7), Florida Statutes. Coverage under the Plan Pertinent to this case, coverage is afforded by the Plan for infants who suffer a "birth-related neurological injury," defined as an "injury to the brain . . . caused by . . . mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate postdelivery period in a hospital, which renders the infant permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired." § 766.302(2), Fla. Stat. See also §§ 766.309 and 766.31, Fla. Stat. Here, the parties have stipulated, and the proof is otherwise compelling, that Maxwell suffered a traumatic brain injury during the delivery process. (Transcript, pp. 9 and 10; Respondent's Exhibits 1-4). What remains to resolve is whether such injury rendered Maxwell permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired. To address the nature and significance of Maxwell's injury, NICA offered the affidavit and report of Michael Duchowny, M.D., a physician board-certified in pediatrics, neurology with special competence in child neurology, and clinical neurophysiology, who evaluated Maxwell on January 28, 2009. Based on his evaluation, as well as his review of the medical records, Dr. Duchowny was of the opinion that while Maxwell suffered a traumatic brain injury during delivery, his mental function was normal and his motor deficit was quite mild. In so concluding, Dr. Duchowny documented the results of his examination, as well as his conclusions, as follows: PHYSICAL EXAMINATION today reveals an alert, well-developed and cooperative, well- nourished 10-month-old infant. Maxwell weighs 24 pounds and is 30 inches in height. The skin is warm and moist. There are no neurocutaneous stigmata. The hair is blond and of normal texture. The spine is straight without dysraphism. The head circumference measures 46.1 centimeters which is within standard percentiles. The anterior and posterior fontanels are patent and flat. There are no cranial or facial anomalies or asymmetries. The tongue and palate are moist. The neck is supple without masses, thyromegaly or adenopathy. The cardiovascular, respiratory, and abdominal examinations are unremarkable. Maxwell's NEUROLOGICAL EXAMINATION reveals him to be alert, cooperative and fully attentive. He is quite sociable and maintains an age appropriate stream of attention. He has good central gaze fixation with conjugate following movements. The pupils are 3 mm and react briskly to direct and consensually presented light. Funduscopic examination revealed no abnormal retinal findings. There are no significant facial asymmetries of movement. The uvula is midline and the pharyngeal folds are symmetric. Tongue movements are full in all planes. Motor examination reveals an asymmetry of movement with relatively greater movement on the right side. The left upper extremity has mild stiffness but has full range of motor. There is fine motor dexterity of both hands but Maxwell demonstrates a right arm preference and will preferentially reach for an object with the right hand. When an object is moved to the left, he will ultimately offer the left and readily transfers between hands. He has symmetrical movement of both legs. He has well-developed traction and grasp responses and good head control for age. The deep tendon reflexes are slightly exaggerated being 3+ at the knees and biceps. There are no pathologic reflexes. Plantar responses are downgoing. He can stand and bear weight with good axial tone and support does not take steps independently. He has good sitting balance as well. Sensory examination is intact to withdrawal of all extremities to stimulation. Neurovascular examination reveals no cervical, cranial or ocular bruits and no temperature or pulse asymmetries. In SUMMARY, Maxwell's neurological examination reveals that his motor developmental milestones are on time despite a very mild asymmetry of movement and muscle tone in the upper extremities. He is preferentially a right hander due to the motoric asymmetry. In other respects, Maxwell's neurologic status is quite good and his overall level of mental functioning appears to be on target at age level. I have had an opportunity to fully review the medical records which were mailed on January 12, 2009. The records indicate that Maxwell's neurologic problems at birth were the result of mechanical injury acquired during the delivery process. However, he has made remarkable progress and his mental function is normal and his motor deficit is quite mild . . . . (Respondent's Exhibits 3 and 4). Here, the opinions of Dr. Duchowny were logical, consistent with the record, not controverted, and not shown to lack credibility. Consequently, it must be resolved that Maxwell's brain injury did not render him permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired. See Thomas v. Salvation Army, 562 So. 2d 746, 749 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)("In evaluating medical evidence, a judge of compensation claims may not reject uncontroverted medical testimony without a reasonable explanation.").
Findings Of Fact Bryan Alavez was born on August 7, 2011, at Tampa General Hospital located in Tampa, Florida. Bryan weighed 4,590 grams at birth. Donald Willis, M.D. (Dr. Willis), was requested by NICA to review the medical records for Bryan. In a medical report dated July 14, 2014, Dr. Willis opined as follows: In summary, the mother had poorly controlled Gestational Diabetes, which most likely resulted in the large for gestational age (macrosomic) newborn and resulting shoulder dystocia. Umbilical cord blood gas was within normal limits, suggesting the baby did not have hypoxia during labor. However, newborn depression occurred, most likely related to shoulder dystocia. The Apgar was 0 at one minute. Chest compressions and bag and mask ventilation were required at birth. The baby improved and was taken to the NICU with respiratory depression requiring nasal canula oxygen. A fractured humerus occurred at time of shoulder dystocia delivery. The baby did not have seizures. Encephalopathy was not suspected. Imaging studies of the brain were not done. The fetus did not suffer oxygen deprivation or mechanical trauma to the brain during labor. Some oxygen deprivation may have occurred as a result of the shoulder dystocia, as indicated by an Apgar score of 0 at one minute. However, there is no documentation that any significant brain injury resulted from this possible oxygen deprivation. There was an apparent obstetrical event, shoulder dystocia, but this does not appear to have resulted in any significant loss of oxygen or mechanical trauma to the baby’s brain during labor, delivery, or the immediate post delivery period. NICA retained Raymond J. Fernandez, M.D. (Dr. Fernandez), a pediatric neurologist, to examine Bryan and to review his medical records. Dr. Fernandez examined Bryan on September 15, 2014. In a medical report regarding his independent medical examination of Bryan, Dr. Fernandez opined as follows: IMPRESSION: Despite transient neurological depression immediately after birth, there is no evidence for substantial mental and motor impairment due to oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury of brain or spinal cord during labor, delivery, or within the immediate postdelivery period of resuscitation. This opinion is based on record review and clinical history and physical and neurodevelopmental examination. There was no suspicion of perinatal encephalopathy while in the NICU or after discharge. Imaging of the brain and spinal cord has not been necessary. Bryan sustained a fracture of his left humerus as a complication of shoulder dystocia and there was question of left brachial plexus injury causing left arm weakness. He appears to have subtle residual left upper extremity proximal weakness. This is due to mechanical injury of peripheral nerves (brachial plexus). It is not due to oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury of brain or spinal cord. A review of the file in this case reveals that there have been no expert opinions filed that are contrary to the opinion of Dr. Willis that there was an apparent obstetrical event, shoulder dystocia, but this event does not appear to have resulted in any significant loss of oxygen or mechanical trauma to the baby's brain during labor, delivery, or the immediate post delivery period. Dr. Willis’ opinion is credited. There are no contrary expert opinions filed that are contrary to Dr. Fernandez’s opinion that although Bryan appears to have subtle residual left upper extremity proximal weakness, this is due to mechanical injury to peripheral nerves, and is not due to oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury of the brain or spinal cord. Dr. Fernandez’s opinion is credited.
Findings Of Fact Luke Z. Davis was born on March 27, 2014, at Shands at the University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. Luke weighed 4,060 grams at birth. Donald Willis, M.D. (Dr. Willis), was requested by NICA to review the medical records for Luke, to determine whether an injury occurred to the brain or spinal cord caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period. In a medical report dated February 25, 2016, Dr. Willis described his findings in part as follows: There was an apparent obstetrical event, shoulder dystocia that resulted in loss of oxygen to the baby's brain during delivery and continuing into the immediate post delivery period. There was no trauma to the spinal cord. The oxygen deprivation to the brain resulted in some degree of brain injury, as identified by brain hemorrhage on MRI. The MRI reported no evidence of global brain injury. I am not able to comment about the severity of the brain injury. Dr. Willis reaffirmed his opinion in an affidavit dated May 25, 2016. NICA retained Laufey Sigurdardottir, M.D. (Dr. Sigurdardottir), a pediatric neurologist, to examine Luke and to review his medical records. Dr. Sigurdardottir examined Luke on March 30, 2016. In her report dated March 30, 2016, Dr. Sigurdardottir opined in pertinent part as follows: Summary: Here we have a 2-year-old with a difficult birth due to shoulder dystocia leading to an acute hypoxic event lasting 13 minutes. The patient did receive cooling protocol, had evidence of a brain injury on MRI, although not severe, and is left with a significant motor impairment from a flaccid right arm, as well as expressive language delay . . . . [T]he patient is found to have substantial physical impairment, as his right upper extremity has little to no functional use. There is a possible mild mental impairment due to language delay, but his delays do not seem substantial at this time. [T]here is evidence of a hypoxic ischemic event occurring at birth resulting in neurologic depression at birth, as well as mechanical injury resulting in a severe paresis of right upper extremity. Both his hypoxic events, as well as his mechanical brachial plexopathy is birth related. A review of the file in this case reveals that there have been no expert opinions filed that are contrary to the opinion of Dr. Willis that there was no evidence of global brain injury or injury to the spinal cord. Dr. Willis’ opinion is credited. There are no expert opinions filed that are contrary to Dr. Sigurdardottir’s opinion that Luke does not suffer from a substantial mental impairment. Dr. Sigurdardottir’s opinion is credited.
