Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Find Similar Cases by Filters
You can browse Case Laws by Courts, or by your need.
Find 49 similar cases
ELICIA BARBER, ON BEHALF OF AND AS PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN OF LEVI HARPER, A MINOR vs FLORIDA BIRTH-RELATED NEUROLOGICAL INJURY COMPENSATION ASSOCIATION, 19-001888N (2019)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:Jacksonville, Florida Apr. 01, 2019 Number: 19-001888N Latest Update: Jan. 27, 2020

Findings Of Fact Based upon Petitioner and Respondent’s stipulation, the following facts are found: Elicia Barber (Petitioner) is the parent and legal guardian of Levi Harper (Levi), and is the “Claimant” as defined by section 766.302(2). On or about May 11, 2019, Levi incurred a “birth- related neurological injury” as that term is defined in section 766.302(2), which was the sole and proximate cause of Levi’s birth-related injury. At birth, Levi weighed 2,940 grams. Fernando Moreno, M.D., David Miller, M.D., and Daina Green, M.D., rendered obstetrical services in the delivery of Levi and, at all times material to this proceeding, were “participating physicians” as that term is defined in section 766.302(7). St. Vincent’s Medical Center is a hospital located in Jacksonville, Florida, and is the “hospital” as that term is defined in section 766.302(6), where Levi was born. Petitioner filed a petition pursuant to section 766.305, seeking compensation from NICA, and that Petition is incorporated by reference in its entirety, including all attachments. Any reference made within this document to NICA encompasses, where appropriate, the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan (the Plan).

Florida Laws (5) 766.301766.302766.305766.31766.311 DOAH Case (1) 19-1888N
# 1
MAGALY N. MARINEZ, ON BEHALF OF, AS MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN OF EMMANUEL JARED MARINEZ, A MINOR, DECEASED vs FLORIDA BIRTH-RELATED NEUROLOGICAL INJURY COMPENSATION ASSOCIATION, 03-002502N (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:Winter Springs, Florida Jul. 11, 2003 Number: 03-002502N Latest Update: Jan. 20, 2004

The Issue Whether Emmanuel Jared Marinez, a deceased minor, suffered an injury for which compensation should be awarded under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan (Plan). If so, the amount and manner of payment of the parental award, the death benefit, the amount owing for attorney's fees and costs, and the amount owing for past expenses.

Findings Of Fact Findings related to compensability Magaly N. Marinez is the natural mother of Emmanuel Jared Marinez, a deceased minor. Emmanuel was born a live infant on December 26, 2001, at Orlando Regional South Seminole Hospital, a hospital located in Longwood, Florida, and his birth weight exceeded 2,500 grams. Emmanuel expired January 6, 2002, following removal from life support. The physician providing obstetrical services at Emmanuel's birth was Stephen Phillips, M.D., who, at all times material hereto, was a "participating physician" in the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan, as defined by Section 766.302(7), Florida Statutes.1 Pertinent to this case, coverage is afforded by the Plan for infants who suffer a "birth-related neurological injury," defined as an "injury to the brain . . . caused by oxygen deprivation . . . occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate postdelivery period in a hospital, which renders the infant permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired." § 766.302(2), Fla. Stat. See also §§ 766.309 and 766.31, Fla. Stat. Here, the parties have stipulated, and the proof is otherwise compelling, that Emmanuel suffered a severe brain injury caused by oxygen deprivation occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate postdelivery period in the hospital that rendered him permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired and which, following removal from life support, resulted in death. Consequently, the proof demonstrates that Emmanuel suffered a "birth-related neurological injury" and, since obstetrical services were provided by a participating physician at birth, the claim is compensable. §§ 766.309(1) and 766.31(1), Fla. Stat. Findings related to the award Where, as here, it has been resolved that a claim qualifies for coverage under the Plan, the administrative law judge is required to make a determination of how much compensation should be awarded. § 766.31(1), Fla. Stat. Pertinent to this case, Section 766.31 provides for an award providing compensation for the following items: Actual expenses for medically necessary and reasonable medical and hospital, habilitative and training, family residential or custodial care, professional residential, and custodial care and service, for medically necessary drugs, special equipment, and facilities, and for related travel. However, such expenses shall not include: Expenses for items or services that the infant has received, or is entitled to receive, under the laws of any state or the Federal Government, except to the extent such exclusion may be prohibited by federal law. * * * 1. Periodic payments of an award to the parents or legal guardians of the infant found to have sustained a birth-related neurological injury, which award shall not exceed $100,000. However, at the discretion of the administrative law judge, such award may be made in a lump sum. Death benefit for the infant in an amount of $10,000. Reasonable expenses incurred in connection with the filing of a claim under ss. 766.301-766.316, including reasonable attorney's fees, which shall be subject to the approval and award of the administrative law judge . . . . At hearing, the parties agreed that Petitioner receive a parental award of $100,000.00, to be paid in lump sum; a death benefit for the infant of $10,000.00; an award of $10,500.00 for attorney's fees ($10,000.00) and other expenses ($500.00) incurred in connection with the filing of the claim; and no award for past expenses, since any such expenses have been paid by a collateral source. Such agreement is reasonable, and is approved.

Florida Laws (11) 120.68766.301766.302766.303766.305766.309766.31766.311766.312766.313766.316
# 7
ADRIANA AND CODY PILLOW, ON BEHALF OF AND AS PARENTS AND NATURAL GUARDIANS OF LANDON PILLOW, A MINOR vs FLORIDA BIRTH-RELATED NEUROLOGICAL INJURY COMPENSATION ASSOCIATION, 13-002901N (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:Lake Butler, Florida Aug. 01, 2013 Number: 13-002901N Latest Update: Aug. 04, 2014

Findings Of Fact Landon Pillow was born on November 29, 2010, at North Florida Regional Medical Center in Gainesville, Florida. Landon weighed 3,500 grams at birth. Donald Willis, M.D. (Dr. Willis), was requested by NICA to review the medical records for Landon, to determine whether an injury occurred in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period in the hospital due to oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period. Dr. Willis described his findings as follows: In summary, there was a non-reassuring FHR pattern during labor. It is unlikely this resulted in any significant oxygen deprivation to the fetus, based on a cord blood gas pH > 7.0 and a normal newborn hospital course. Babies with birth related hypoxic brain injury will generally have multi-organ failures during the newborn period. There was no apparent obstetrical event that resulted in loss of oxygen or mechanical trauma to the baby’s brain during labor, delivery or the immediate post delivery period. Dr. Willis reviewed additional medical records on January 16, 2014, and, based on his review of those records, opined as follows: The additional records do not change any of my opinions concerning this case. The child suffered a brain injury, but the etiology is still undetermined. Based on the cord blood gas pH > 7 and a normal newborn hospital course after delivery, it does not seem reasonable to time the brain insult as birth related. NICA retained Michael S. Duchowny, M.D., to examine Landon and to review his medical records. Dr. Duchowny examined Landon on April 30, 2014, and gave the following opinion: In summary, Landon’s neurological examination today was extremely limited because of his postictal state. However, there were no specific focal or lateralizing findings despite the history of a left hemisphere infarct and porencephalic cavity. A review of medical records sent on February 26, 2014 confirms the history obtained today which revealed no evidence of a neurological injury to the brain or spinal cord due to oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury in the course of labor, delivery, or the immediate postnatal period. Landon’s cord blood pH was 7.25 and the base excess was -4. Both values are near-normal. Although the neurological examination was suboptimal, the history obtained today from the family and from medical records indicate that Landon’s neurological impairment was acquired prenatally. I therefore believe that he should not be considered for compensation within the NICA program. A review of the file in this case reveals that there have been no expert opinions filed that are contrary to the opinions of Dr. Willis and Dr. Duchowny that there was no obstetrical event that resulted in injury to the brain or spinal cord due to oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury during labor, delivery or the immediate post-delivery period. Their opinions are credited.

Florida Laws (10) 7.25766.301766.302766.303766.304766.305766.309766.31766.311766.316
# 8

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer