Findings Of Fact Adam was born on June 11, 2018, at HealthPark Medical Center, in Fort Myers, Florida. Adam was a single gestation and his weight at birth exceeded 2500 grams. Obstetrical services were delivered by a participating physician, Jane A. Daniel, M.D., in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period in a hospital, HealthPark Medical Center. As set forth in greater detail below, the unrefuted evidence establishes that Adam did not sustain a “birth-related neurological injury,” as defined by section 766.302(2). Donald Willis, M.D., a board-certified obstetrician specializing in maternal-fetal medicine, was retained by Respondent to review the pertinent medical records of Ms. Johnson and Adam and opine as to whether Adam sustained an injury to his brain or spinal cord caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury that occurred during the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period in a hospital. In his affidavit, dated December 11, 2020, Dr. Willis summarized his opinions as follows: In summary, an abnormal FHR pattern developed during labor and resulted in a depressed newborn. Cord blood pH was 6.9 with a base excess of -18.6. Seizures began shortly after birth. The newborn hospital course was complicated by multi-system organ failures, consistent with birth-related oxygen deprivation. MRI on DOL 4 was suggestive of HIE, but findings improved with follow-up MRI. There was an apparent obstetrical event that resulted in oxygen deprivation to the brain during labor, delivery and continuing into the immediate post-delivery period. The oxygen deprivation resulted [in] a potential for brain injury, but the follow-up normal MRI suggests that no actual brain injury occurred. Respondent also retained Michael S. Duchowny, M.D., a pediatric neurologist, to review the medical records of Ms. Johnson and Adam, and to conduct an Independent Medical Examination (IME) of Adam. The purpose of his review and IME was to determine whether Adam suffered from a permanent and substantial mental and physical impairment as a result of an injury to the brain or spinal cord caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post- delivery period. Dr. Duchowny reviewed the pertinent medical records and, on October 20, 2020, conducted the IME. In his affidavit, dated December 16, 2020, Dr. Duchowny summarized his opinions as follows: In summary, Adam’s evaluation reveals findings consistent with a substantial motor but not mental impairment. He evidences a spastic diplegia, but with relative preservation of motor milestones, and age-appropriate receptive and expressive communication. Adam additionally has a severe behavior disorder, and has a sleep disorder and attentional impairment. His seizures are in remission. Review of the medical records reveals that Adam was the product of a 40 week gestation and was delivered vaginally with Apgar scores of 3, 6, 7 and 6 at one, five and 10 minutes. Terminal meconium was noted at delivery. Adam initially required positive pressure ventilation until his respirations were subsequently managed with nasal CPAP. His cord gas pH was 6.917 with a base excess of – 18.6. Adam developed seizures in the NICU and was intubated on the first day of life for apnea. Multiple seizures were documented on video/EEG monitoring. He was oliguric on the first day of life and had elevated liver function studies. An elevated lactic acid level was noted and there was a borderline elevation of DIC parameters. Adam was enrolled in a body hypothermia protocol on the first day of life. His blood pressure was maintained with dopamine. A head ultrasound on June 11 at 22:23 (DOL#2) was unremarkable. A brain MR imaging study performed on June 15, (DOL#5) revealed multifocal areas of restricted diffusion. Follow-up brain MR imaging study on July 5th revealed near-complete resolution of the previously observed diffusion abnormalities. A third MR imaging study obtained one month ago confirms the resolution of the DWI findings noted on the first brain MR imaging study. In conclusion, Dr. Duchowny opined that Adam does not have a substantial mental impairment, and, therefore, did not recommend that Adam be considered for inclusion in the Plan. The undisputed findings and opinions of Drs. Willis and Duchowny are credited. The undersigned finds that Adam did not sustain an injury to the brain or spinal cord caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period in a hospital, which rendered him permanently and substantially mentally and physical impaired.
The Issue The issue in this case is whether Reshnaya E. Francois suffered a birth-related injury as defined by section 766.302(2), Florida Statutes, for which compensation should be awarded under the Plan.
Findings Of Fact Reshnaya E. Francois was born on January 31, 2016, at Broward Health, in Coral Springs, Florida. Reshnaya weighed in excess of 2,500 grams at birth. The circumstances of the labor, delivery, and birth of the minor child are reflected in the medical records of Broward Health submitted with the Petition. At all times material, both Broward Health and Dr. Wajid were active members under NICA pursuant to sections 766.302(6) and (7). Reshnaya was delivered by Dr. Wajid, who was a NICA- participating physician, on January 31, 2016. Petitioners contend that Reshnaya suffered a birth- related neurological injury and seek compensation under the Plan. Respondent contends that Reshnaya has not suffered a birth- related neurological injury as defined by section 766.302(2). In order for a claim to be compensable under the Plan, certain statutory requisites must be met. Section 766.309 provides: The Administrative Law Judge shall make the following determinations based upon all available evidence: Whether the injury claimed is a birth- related neurological injury. If the claimant has demonstrated, to the satisfaction of the Administrative Law Judge, that the infant has sustained a brain or spinal cord injury caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury and that the infant was thereby rendered permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired, a rebuttable presumption shall arise that the injury is a birth-related neurological injury as defined in § 766.302(2). Whether obstetrical services were delivered by a participating physician in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate postdelivery period in a hospital; or by a certified nurse midwife in a teaching hospital supervised by a participating physician in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate postdelivery period in a hospital. How much compensation, if any, is awardable pursuant to § 766.31. If the Administrative Law Judge determines that the injury alleged is not a birth-related neurological injury or that obstetrical services were not delivered by a participating physician at birth, she or he shall enter an order . . . . The term “birth-related neurological injury” is defined in Section 766.302(2), Florida Statutes, as: . . . injury to the brain or spinal cord of a live infant weighing at least 2,500 grams for a single gestation or, in the case of a multiple gestation, a live infant weighing at least 2,000 grams at birth caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate postdelivery period in a hospital, which renders the infant permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired. This definition shall apply to live births only and shall not include disability or death caused by genetic or congenital abnormality. (Emphasis added). In the instant case, NICA has retained Donald Willis, M.D. (Dr. Willis), as its medical expert specializing in maternal-fetal medicine and pediatric neurology. Upon examination of the pertinent medical records, Dr. Willis opined: The newborn was not depressed. Apgar scores were 8/8. Decreased movement of the right arm was noted. The baby was taken to the Mother Baby Unit and admission exam described the baby as alert and active. The baby had an Erb’s palsy or Brachial Plexus injury of the right arm. Clinical appearance of the baby suggested Down syndrome. Chromosome analysis was done for clinical features suggestive of Down syndrome and this genetic abnormality was confirmed. Chromosome analysis was consistent with 47, XX+21 (Down syndrome). Dr. Willis’s medical Report is attached to his Affidavit. His Affidavit reflects his ultimate opinion that: In summary: Delivery was complicated by a mild shoulder dystocia and resulting Erb’s palsy. There was no evidence of injury to the spinal cord. The newborn was not depressed. Apgar scores were 8/9. Chromosome analysis was consistent with Down syndrome. There was no apparent obstetrical event that resulted in loss of oxygen or mechanical trauma to the baby’s brain or spinal cord during labor, delivery or the immediate post delivery period. The baby has a genetic or chromosome abnormality, Down syndrome. A review of the file in this case reveals that there have been no expert opinions filed that are contrary to the opinion of Dr. Willis. The opinion of Dr. Willis that Reshnaya did not suffer an obstetrical event that resulted in loss of oxygen or mechanical trauma to the baby’s brain or spinal cord during labor, delivery, or the immediate post-delivery period is credited. In the instant case, NICA has retained Michael S. Duchowny, M.D. (Dr. Duchowny), as its medical expert in pediatric neurology. Upon examination of the child and the pertinent medical records, Dr. Duchowny opined: In summary, Reshnaya’s examination today reveals findings consistent with Down syndrome including multiple dysmorphic features, hypotonia, and hyporeflexia. She has minimal weakness at the right shoulder girdle and her delayed motor milestones are likely related to her underlying genetic disorder. There are no focal or lateralizing features suggesting a structural brain injury. Dr. Duchowny’s medical report is attached to his Affidavit. His Affidavit reflects his ultimate opinion that: Neither the findings on today’s evaluation nor the medical record review indicate that Reshnaya has either a substantial mental or motor impairment acquired in the course of labor or delivery. I believe that her present neurological disability is more likely related to Downs syndrome. For this reason, I am not recommending that Reshnaya be considered for compensation within the NICA program. A review of the file in this case reveals that there have been no expert opinions filed that are contrary to the opinion of Dr. Duchowny. The opinion of Dr. Duchowny that Reshnaya did not suffer a substantial mental or motor impairment acquired in the course of labor or delivery is credited.
The Issue At issue in this proceeding is whether Michael Chase Anwar, a minor, suffered an injury for which compensation should be awarded under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan.
Findings Of Fact Preliminary matters Lisa Anwar and Saeed Anwar are the parents and natural guardians of Michael Chase Anwar (Michael), a minor. Michael was born a live infant on September 11, 1995, at Florida Hospital, a hospital located in Orlando, Florida, and his birth weight was in excess of 2500 grams. The physician providing obstetrical services during the birth of Michael was Jorge Jesus Lense, M.D., who was, at all times material hereto, a participating physician in the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan (the Plan), as defined by Section 766.302(7), Florida Statutes. Mrs. Anwar's antepartum course and Michael's birth At or about 12:48 a.m., September 11,1995, Mrs. Anwar was admitted, in labor, to Florida Hospital. At the time, her estimated date of confinement was noted as September 22, 1995, and her antepartum course was without apparent complication; however, the fetus was noted to be large for gestational age. Onset of labor was noted as 11:15 p.m., September 10, 1995, with spontaneous rupture of the membranes, and clear amniotic fluid noted. Mrs. Anwar's obstetrical course from admission through Michael's delivery at 1:55 p.m., September 11, 1995, is detailed in Dr. Lense's delivery notes, as follows: The patient . . . presented with spontaneous rupture of membranes since 2315 hours on September 10, 1995. She was in active labor on admission. She progressed through labor to 8 cm dilatation at which time she had a prolonged fetal heart rate deceleration lasting approximately four minutes to fetal heart tones of 70s associated with a tetanic uterine contraction lasting approximately four minutes. This was relieved with terbutaline 0.125 mg subcutaneously and 0.125 mg intravenously. Fetal heart rate returned to normal with good variability and accelerations. She was having mild to moderate variable decelerations. She allowed labor to progress. She progressed rapidly to the anterior lip of the cervix to complete and +1 station. Because the fetal heart rate tracing was reassuring she was allowed to progress spontaneously to reach complete dilatation. However, the variable decelerations progressively worsened. She had temperature elevation of 100.5 [to 101.4]. She was begun on ampicillin 2 grams intravenously for presumed chorioamnionitis [an inflammation of female membranes]. She began pushing second stage labor. The variable decelerations worsened, and the decision was made to shorten second state of labor with vacuum assist. A vacuum was applied after the bladder was empty, complete, complete +3 station. The fetal head was delivered to complete, complete and +4 with the vacuum. However, it was difficult to maintain an adequate suction on the vacuum secondary to the thickness of the fetal hair. However, the patient was able to deliver the infant spontaneously without difficulty. Double nuchal cord was reduced. The rest of the infant was delivered without difficulty . . . The cord was doubly clamped and cut. The infant was noted to have poor respiratory effort and tone at the time of delivery. The neonatal resuscitation team and the neonatal intensive care unit neonatologists were called to the delivery. . . . At delivery Michael was intubated due to apnea (failure of the newborn infant to initiate pulmonary ventilation), and required positive pressure ventilation. Apgar scores of 2 at one minute, 3 at five minutes, and 5 at ten minutes were noted. Chord pH obtained on delivery was noted as 7.01, representing severe acidosis. The Apgar scores assigned to Michael are a numerical expression of the condition of a newborn infant, and reflect the sum points gained on assessment of heart rate, respiratory effort, muscle tone, reflex irritability, and color, with each category being assigned a score ranging from the lowest score of 0 through a maximum score of 2. As noted, at one minute Michael's Apgar score totalled 1, with heart rate being graded at 2, and respiratory effort, muscle tone, reflex irritability, and color being graded at zero. At five minutes his Apgar score totalled 3, with heart rate being graded at 2, color being graded at 1, and respiratory effort, muscle tone, and reflex irritability being graded at zero. At ten minutes his Apgar score totalled 5, with heart rate being graded at 2, respiratory effort, reflex irritability and color being graded at 1 each, and muscle tone being graded at zero. Such scores are abnormal, and consistent with perinatal depression. Michael's course and development subsequent to delivery Following resuscitation, Michael was transferred to the neonatal intensive care unit in guarded condition. After admission, positive pressure ventilation was continued, and he was placed on ventilatory support. A blood culture, complete blood count, urine wellcogen and RPR were obtained, and Michael was started on ampicillin and gentamicin to address the risk of sepsis or infection. Possible seizure activity was noted during the first day of life, with tonic-clonic movements of all four extremities, and he was loaded with phenobarbital. An electroencephalogram was obtained and read as an abnormal neonatal recording characterized by diffuse depression of background cerebral activity; however, no electrographic seizures or lateralized epileptiform discharges were observed, and motion and electrical artifact were noted to be present. Michael was extubated the morning of September 12, 1995, following which he was noted to be "breathing spontaneously, receiving oxygen via nasal cannula." However, overnight he was noted as "quite irritable, jittery, with back arching," and required occasional sedation with Fentanyl. A head ultrasound completed on September 12, 1995, revealed the following: THERE IS A SMALL BLEED IN CHOROID PLEXUS NOTED BILATERALLY. IT COULD BE WORSE ON THE RIGHT THAN ON THE LEFT. THE VENTRICLES ARE NORMAL IN SIZE. THERE IS NO INTRAVENTRICULAR BLEED. NO OTHER ABNORMALITY. IMPRESSION: SMALL CHOROID PLEXUS BLEED NOTED BILATERALLY, WITH THE LEFT BEING MORE EXTENSIVE THAN THE RIGHT. Stated differently, the ultrasound revealed a bilateral grade one intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH). Between the afternoon of September 11, 1995, and the afternoon of September 12, 1995, Michael's hematocrit was noted to drop from 46 percent to 29 percent. Hemoglobin likewise dropped from 15.6 to 10.0. Consequently, due to his anemic condition, Michael was transfused on September 12, 1995. On September 12, 1995, Michael was examined by a consulting physician, most likely to address his neurologic condition. That examination, by Prashant M. Desai, M.D., reported the following observations, impressions, and recommendations: PHYSICAL EXAMINATION GENERAL: Weight is approximately 3.5 kg. Head circumference was 36.75 cm. Anterior fontanel is soft. The infant is lying supine in an open warmer, receiving oxygen via nasal cannula. He looks healthy, well-developed and well-hydrated. No clear dysmorphic features are noted. No apparent significant congenital skin lesions. He is sleeping comfortably. When disturbed, he becomes jittery and extremely irritable. He is difficult to console. He arches his neck and back. He keeps his hands fisted, flexes the elbows, and displays hand tremoring. BACK & SPINE: Appear normal. EXTREMITIES: There is mild stiffness of the extremities. Reflexes are brisk. He will not allow flexion of his neck, and instead, he resists it by neck arching and back arching. He will transiently open his eyes. Face is symmetric. Tongue is midline. Gag reflex is present. IMPRESSION: FULL-TERM ONE-DAY-OLD NEWBORN INFANT WITH PERINATAL DEPRESSION AND HYPOXIC-ISCHEMIC ENCEPHALOPATHY. RECENT DROP IN HEMOGLOBIN AND HEMATOCRIT MAY INDICATE INTRACRANIAL HEMORRHAGE. SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE IS POSSIBLE, AND WOULD BE COMPATIBLE WITH CLINICALLY NOTED NECK AND BACK ARCHING, JITTERINESS AND EXTREME IRRITABILITY. HE HAS BEEN LOADED WITH PHENOBARBITAL AND PLACED ON MAINTENANCE PHENOBARBITAL SECONDARY TO SOME SEIZURE-LIKE ACTIVITY YESTERDAY. ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM SHOWS DIFFUSE DEPRESSION OF BACKGROUND CEREBRAL ACTIVITY. THIS WOULD BE COMPATIBLE WITH HISTORY OF PERINATAL DEPRESSION. RECOMMENDATIONS: Head computerized axial tomography scan when feasible. Continue Phenobarbital at 4-5 mg/kg/day in two divided doses. He may require p.r.n. sedation with Fentanyl, given his irritability. Obtain a repeat electroencephalogram prior to hospital discharge. Duration of anticonvulsant treatment will depend on his hospital course. If his seizures recur and, in particular, if his extreme irritability persists, a metabolic work-up might be indicated. A CT (computerized tomography) brain scan of September 13, 1995, was read as "probably within normal limits." The scan was read and reported as follows: FINDINGS: THE DURAL VENOUS SINUSES AND THE VEIN OF GALEN ARE RELATIVELY DENSE COMPARED TO BRAIN. THIS IS PROBABLY RELATED TO THIS CHILD'S AGE AND THE COMPARATIVE LOW ATTENUATION OF THE UNMYELINATED BRAIN. THIS APPEARANCE CAN ALSO BE SEEN WITH ELEVATED HEMATOCRIT. WHILE THIS CAN ALSO BE SEEN WITH DURAL SINUS THROMBOSIS, THIS WOULD IMPLY THAT THE ENTIRE DURAL SINUS SYSTEM AS WELL AS THE VEIN OF GALEN WERE THROMBOSED. THAT IS UNLIKELY IN THIS SITUATION ESPECIALLY SINCE NO ASSOCIATED PARENCHYMAL CHANGES ARE NOTED. NO FOCAL PARENCHYMAL ATTENUATION ABNORMALITY IS NOTED. IMPRESSION: THE EXAM IS PROBABLY WITHIN NORMAL LIMITS. THE POSSIBILITY OF AN ELEVATED HEMATOCRIT IS RAISED. On September 14, 1995, Michael was noted to have an increased temperature. To further address the risk of sepsis or infection he was accorded a regimen of Vanco and Claforan for three days. Blood culture, urine, and CSF (cerebrospinal fluid) studies were reported as negative. Phenobarbital was discontinued September 16, 1995, and ampicillin and gentamicin were discontinued September 18, 1995. All intervening culture studies were reported as negative. A repeat electroencephalogram of September 20, 1995, was read as a "mildly abnormal neonatal recording due to some mild diffuse suppression of background cerebral activity." However, consistent with improvement in Michael's status, the recording was noted to be "considerably improved from [the] previous electroencephalogram performed on day 1" of life. On September 25, 1995, Michael had a second CT brain scan.1 That scan, unlike the first scan, was apparently read as abnormal, reflecting a presentation consistent with hypoxic- ischemic encephalopathy2 or, stated differently, brain injury occasioned by oxygen deprivation. (Discharge Summary for Michael Anwar, at page 2). Michael was discharged at 4:45 p.m., September 25, 1995, to the care of his parents.3 At the time, he was noted to exhibit "diffusely poor tone" ("infant limp, floppy tone"), and "little spontaneous movement" or, stated differently, "little spontaneous arousal." However, positive suck, positive blink, and positive gag were present, and Michael was free of seizure activity. Discharge diagnosis was, as follows: DISCHARGE DIAGNOSIS: 35 weeks appropriate for gestational age male Perinatal depression Sepsis, ruled out Seizures, ruled out Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy Bilateral Grade 1 Intraventricular hemorrhage Anemia On February 27, 1998, following the filing of the claim for compensation, Michael was examined by Michael Duchowny, M.D., a board certified pediatric neurologist. Dr. Duchowny's examination revealed the following: PHYSICAL EXAMINATION reveals a small 2 1/2 year old, appropriately proportioned boy. The weight is 25 pounds. The skin is warm and moist without neurocutaneous stigmata. There are no gross dysmorphisms. No digital, skeletal or palmar abnormalities are noted. The head circumference measures 48.6 centimeters which approximates the 3rd percentile for age. There are no cranial or facial anomalies or asymmetries, and the fontanels are closed. The neck is supple without masses, thyromegaly or adenopathy and the cardiovascular, respiratory and abdominal examinations are normal. NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION reveals an alert boy who is socially interactive and has only a few words. There is an abundant amount of babbling sounds which suggest the emergence of speech patterns. Michael is in fact able to identify all of his body parts and knows both primary and secondary colors. He is quite alert and his socialization skills are well developed. He maintains good central gaze fixation with conjugate following movements and the ocular fundi are normal. There are full and conjugate extraocular movements with blink to threat from both directions. There are no significant facial asymmetries. The tongue movements are poorly coordinated and drooling is a prominent feature. Motor examination reveals a static generalized hypotonia with a dynamic increase in tone and bilateral upper extremity posturing. Michael is grossly ataxic [uncoordinated], both for axial and appendicular musculature [both truncal stability as well as all four limbs (arms and legs)] and his gait shows marked instability and a tendency to fall in all directions. Romberg sign could not be tested. He is unable to perform alternating movement sequences and he had poor dexterity for individual finger movements. The DTR's are present and 2 to 3+ bilaterally and plantar responses are downgoing. Sensory examination is intact to withdrawal of extremities to touch and pin, and a neurovascular examination discloses no cervical, cranial or ocular bruits. There are no temperature or pulse asymmetries. IN SUMMARY: Michael's neurologic examination reveals findings consistent with ataxic cerebral palsy. I believe that his cognitive and social skills are actually quite good but [are] restricted as a result of his motor deficit. I suspect that Michael will continue to improve in the future and that he will walk independently within the next 12 to 18 months. The dispute regarding compensability Given the proof, it cannot be subject to serious debate that Michael suffered an injury or anomaly in brain development that has resulted in neurologic impairment. What remains to resolve is the cause and timing (genesis) of the event which led to Michael's anomalous brain development or, more pertinent to these proceedings, whether the proof demonstrates, more likely than not, that the anomaly Michael suffers was "caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period," as opposed to some other genesis. Section 766.302(2), Florida Statutes. Also at issue is whether, if such an injury occurred, Michael was rendered "permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired." Sections 766.302(2) and 766.309(1)(a), Florida Statutes. Here, the nature and significance of Michael's impairment is dispositive of the claim, and it is unnecessary to resolve the dispute regarding the cause and timing of the event which led to Michael's anomalous brain development.4 Regarding the nature and significance of Michael's impairment, the proof demonstrates that the physical impairment he suffers may best be described as moderate, as opposed to severe, and that his physical impairment is not static, but improving. As for Michael's mental status, it has been observed to be at or near age level, and, consequently, there is no evidence of any mental impairment.5
The Issue At issue is weather Tyler Anthony Carter, a minor, qualifies for coverage under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan (Plan).
Findings Of Fact Stipulated facts Victoria Knight Carter and Roy Carter are the natural parents of Tyler Anthony Carter, a minor. Tyler was born a live infant on February 7, 2005, at North Shore Medical Center, a licensed hospital located in Miami, Florida, and his birth weight exceeded 2,500 grams. Obstetrical services were delivered at Tyler's birth by Ramon Hechavarria, M.D., who, at all times material hereto, was a "participating physician" in the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan, as defined by Section 766.302(7), Florida Statutes. Coverage under the Plan Pertinent to this case, coverage is afforded by the Plan for infants who suffer a "birth-related neurological injury," defined as an "injury to the brain or spinal cord . . . caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate postdelivery period in a hospital, which renders the infant permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired." § 766.302(2), Fla. Stat. Here, the proof demonstrated that Tyler's delivery was complicated by a shoulder dystocia, which caused a brachial plexus injury, that resulted in a weakness (an Erb's palsy) in the left upper extremity. Otherwise, Tyler was not shown to suffer any injury at birth. To address the nature and significance of Tyler's injury, NICA offered the testimony of Michael Duchowny, M.D., a physician board-certified in pediatrics, neurology with special competence in child neurology, and clinical neurophysiology.1 (Respondent's Exhibit 1, deposition of Dr. Duchowny). Dr. Duchowny evaluated Tyler on October 17, 2007, and reported the results of his physical and neurological evaluation, as follows: PHYSICAL EXAMINATION reveals an alert, cooperative 2 1/2-year-old, well-developed and well-nourished toddler. Tyler[] weighs 29 pounds. His skin is warm and moist. There are no dysmorphic features or neurocutaneous stigmata. Head circumference measures 49.2 centimeters, which is within standard percentiles for age. The fontanels are closed. There are no cranial or facial anomalies or asymmetries. The neck is supple without masses, thyromegaly or adenopathy. The cardiovascular, respiratory, and abdominal examinations are unremarkable. Tyler's NEUROLOGICAL EXAMINATION reveals an alert and sociable toddler. His speech is fluent and appropriately articulated. He maintains an age appropriate stream of attention. His social skills are appropriately developed for age. Cranial nerve examination is unremarkable. The extraocular movements are fully conjugate in all planes and the pupils are 3 mm and briskly reactive to direct and consensually presented light. A brief funduscopic examination is unremarkable. There are no significant facial asymmetries. The uvula is midline and the pharyngeal folds are symmetric. The tongue is moist and papillated. Motor examination reveals an asymmetry of the upper extremities. There is slightly diminished muscle bulk in the distal left upper extremity. Tyler is unable to raise the left arm past neutrality. He tends to posture the left arm with flexion at the elbow and wrist. Tyler cannot fully supinate the left hand. He can build a tower with using either hand and has bimanual dexterity. However, he demonstrates a consistent right hand preference. There are no fixed contractures. The deep tendon reflexes are 2+ in the lower extremities and the right upper extremity but 1+ at the [left] biceps. The sensory examination is intact to withdrawal of all extremities to stimulation. The neurovascular examination reveals no cervical, cranial or ocular bruits and no temperature or pulse asymmetries. In SUMMARY, Tyler's neurological examination reveals a mild left Erb's palsy, which was likely acquired during delivery due to traction on the brachial plexus. In contrast, there are no abnormalities referable to the right upper extremity or the lower extremities. Tyler's mental functioning is appropriate for age level. (Joint Exhibit 1, Report of Dr. Duchowny, dated October 17, 2007; Respondent's Exhibit 1, pp. 15 and 16). An Erb's palsy, as evidenced by Tyler, is a weakness of an upper extremity due to damage to the nerve roots of the left brachial plexus, a peripheral nerve injury, and does not represent an injury to the brain or spinal cord (the central nervous system). (Respondent's Exhibit 1, pp. 10 and 11).2 Moreover, the physical impairment Tyler suffers is mild, as opposed to substantial, and there is no compelling evidence of mental impairment, much less substantial mental impairment. (Respondent's Exhibit 1, pp. 8-10). Ackley v. General Parcel Service, 646 So. 2d 242, 245 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)("The determination of the cause of a non-observable medical condition, such as a psychiatric illness, is essentially a medical question."); Thomas v. Salvation Army, 562 So. 2d 746, 749 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)("In evaluating medical evidence, a judge of compensation claims may not reject uncontroverted medical testimony without a reasonable explanation."). Consequently, while Tyler may have suffered a mechanical injury, permanent in nature (to his left brachial plexus) during the course of birth, he does not qualify for coverage under the Plan.
Findings Of Fact Xavier Concepcion was born on September 16, 2014, at Memorial Hospital West in Pembroke Pines, Florida. NICA retained Donald C. Willis, M.D. (Dr. Willis), to review Xavier’s medical records. In a medical report dated January 20, 2016, Dr. Willis made the following findings and expressed the following opinion: In summary, labor was complicated by maternal infection (chorioamnionitis) and a non- reassuring FHR pattern prior to birth. The baby was depressed at birth with a cord blood pH of <6.9. Seizure activity developed shortly after birth. MRI was consistent with acute brain infarction. There was an apparent obstetrical event that resulted in loss of oxygen to the baby’s brain during labor, delivery and continuing into the immediate post delivery period. It is possible the brain injury from oxygen deprivation was worsened by infection. I am unable to comment about the severity of the brain injury. Dr. Willis’ opinion that there was an obstetrical event that resulted in loss of oxygen to the baby’s brain during labor, delivery and continuing into the immediate post delivery period is credited. Respondent retained Michael Duchowny, M.D. (Dr. Duchowny), a pediatric neurologist, to evaluate Xavier. Dr. Duchowny reviewed Xavier’s medical records, and performed an independent medical examination on him on May 25, 2016. Dr. Duchowny made the following findings and summarized his evaluation as follows: Motor examination reveals symmetric muscle strength, bulk and tone. There are no adventitious movements and no focal weakness or atrophy. Xavier does not evidence dystonic postures or hypertonicity. He has full range of motion at all joints. Coordination: Xavier walks in a stable fashion and does not fall. He can arise from the floor without difficulty. His balance is good and he has well-developed axial and peripheral balance. He grasps with both hand[s] and moved objects between hands without difficulty. He did not fall and his head control is good. * * * In Summary, Xavier’s neurological examination discloses no significant findings. He is developmentally appropriate with no focal or lateralizing features to suggest a structural brain abnormality. Review of the medical records reveals that Xavier was born at Memorial West Hospital at term and transferred to Joe DiMaggio Children’s Hospital. Maternal membranes were ruptured 30 hours prior to delivery, and maternal chorioamnionitis and fever were treated with penicillin. Xavier was born vaginally and was pale, cyanotic, flaccid and unresponsive. A tight nuchal cord was removed. He weighed 7 pounds 7 ounces and his Apgar scores were 1, 5 and 7 at one, five, and ten minutes. The records indicated that an initial arterial pH was 6.95 but the base excess was unknown. Xavier was intubated at 3 minutes of age, established spontaneous respiration at 25 minutes of age and was subsequently extubated. His CBC revealed a bandemia of 22 on September 22nd. Seizures were noted on the first day of life and there was evidence of a mild coagulopathy. The placenta was positive for E.coli. An MRI scan of the brain revealed multiple acute infarcts in the left temporal, occipital and superior parietal regions and right thalamus and putamen, and a small subdural hematoma. Despite Xavier’s difficulties at birth, he has developed well and does not evidence neurodevelopmental delay. I am therefore not recommending Xavier for compensation within the NICA program. In order for a birth-related injury to be compensable under the Plan, the injury must meet the definition of a birth- related neurological injury and the injury must have caused both permanent and substantial mental and physical impairment. Dr. Duchowny’s opinion that Xavier has developed well and does not evidence neurodevelopmental delay is credited. A review of the file in this case reveals that there have been no expert opinions filed that are contrary to the opinion of Dr. Duchowny that Xavier has developed well and does not evidence neurodevelopmental delay. There is nothing in Dr. Duchowny’s report that indicates that Xavier has either a substantial mental or physical impairment. Thus, Xavier does not meet the requirement of having a substantial physical or mental impairment.
Findings Of Fact Neha was born on May 15, 2012, at Broward General Medical Center, located in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Neha weighed six pounds nine ounces at birth. NICA retained Michael S. Duchowny, M.D., as its medical expert in pediatric neurology. Dr. Duchowny examined Neha on March 20, 2013, and reviewed her medical records. In an affidavit dated April 24, 2013, Dr. Duchowny opined as follows: Neha’s neurological examination is significant only for a mild degree of hypontia coupled with very slight motor development delay. In other regards, she seems to be developing quite well and I suspect that her language development will progress on schedule. There are no focal or lateralizing findings to suggest structural brain damage. A review of medical records reveals that Neha was born by stat cesarean section at Broward General Hospital due to fetal bradycardia. She was delivered with a full body nuchal cord and a true knot that was removed at birth. There was evidence of severe metabolic acidosis-arterial blood gases drawn 11 minutes after birth revealed a pH of 6.66, PC02 of 162, P02 of 11, and base excess of -32. These values were improved on a repeat series drawn at 12:27 PM. Thick meconium was suctioned below the vocal cords and Neha was diagnosed with meconium aspiration syndrome. Seizures occurred several after birth and were treated with phenobarbital and phenytoin. As previously stated by the family, Neha was immediately enrolled in a general hypothermia protocol. Of significance, a brain ultrasound exam obtained on May 15 at 6:46 PM, was normal and an MRI scan of the brain obtained on May 23 (DOL #8) was also within normal limits. Neha’s examination today does not reveal either a substantial mental or motor impairment, findings are consistent with the lack of significant MRI findings. I believe that the hypothermia protocol in all likelihood was neuro-protective and more likely than not, contributed to Neha’s positive outcome. Given Neha’s favorable outcome, I believe that she should not be considered for inclusion within the NICA program. As such, it is my opinion that Neha Kannikal is not permanently and substantially mentally impaired nor is she permanently and substantially physically impaired due to oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring during the course of labor, delivery or the immediate post-delivery period in the hospital during the birth of Neha Kannikal. A review of the file does not show any opinion contrary to Dr. Duchowny's opinion that Neha does not have a substantial and permanent mental and physical impairment due to lack of oxygen or mechanical trauma is credited.
The Issue At issue is whether Melody N. Smith, a minor, suffered an injury for which compensation should be awarded under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan.
Findings Of Fact Fundamental findings 1. Irwin C. Smith and Kristelle K. Smith are the parents and natural guardians of Melody N. Smith (Melody), a minor. Melody was born a live infant on October 16, 1989, at Baptist Medical Center, a hospital located in Jacksonville, Florida, and her birth weight was in excess of 2,500 grams. 2. The physician providing obstetrical services at birth was Ernest Ferrelle, M.D., who was, at all times material hereto, a “participating physician" in the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan, as defined by Section 766.302(7), Florida Statutes. 3. Here, there is no dispute that Melody is permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired, consequent to a brain anomaly. What is at issue is the cause and timing of Melody's brain anomaly or, pertinent to these proceedings, whether her neurologic impairment resulted from an "injury to the brain . . . caused by oxygen deprivation. . . occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period ina hospital."* — — The cause-and timing of Melody's brain anomaly 4. On September 12, 1989, approximately one month before Melody's delivery, Mrs. Smith underwent an amniocentesis,’ following a diagnosis of polyhydramniosis,* to test for congenital abnormality. The test revealed the fetus suffered a common congenital abnormality known as Turner's Syndrome. 5. Turner's Syndrome, the hallmark of which is the presence of 45 chromosomes, as opposed to the normal 46 chromosomes, in every cell of the fetus, is a severe congenital abnormality that results in abortion or fetal loss among 99 percent of affected fetuses. Typical defects associated with the syndrome include cardiac, renal, and lymphatic abnormalities. Additionally, apart from those abnormalities typically associated with the syndrome, such infants are also known to present with other deficits, including developmental abnormalities of the brain. Compounding the complexity of risks associated with fetal development in this case, Mrs. Smith was diagnosed with chorioamnionitis, an inflammation of the fetal membranes, suggesting the presence of an infectious process. 6. At approximately 6:45 p.m., October 15, 1989, Mrs. Smith was admitted to Baptist Medical Center in labor. Fetal heart monitoring was started shortly after admission and revealed a fetal heart rate within normal limits. 7. At 3:00 a.m., October 16, 1989, an amniotomy (a deliberate rupture of the fetal membranes) was performed to drain excessive fluid. Upon rupture of the membranes, meconium stained amniotic fluid was noted; however, the fetal heart rate continued — we within normal limits, without any sign of fetal distress .* 8, Following the amniotomy, the fetal head stayed high and Mrs. Smith's physician elected to proceed with delivery by cesarean section. Consequently, Mrs. Smith was moved to the operating room at 8:11 a.m., and Melody was delivered at 8:41 a.m., October 16, 1989. 9. Upon delivery, Melody was DeLee suctioned and received oxygen by ambu bag for "a few seconds." Apgars were 3 at one minute and 9 at five minutes, consistent with infant well-being.* Umbilical cord pH, at delivery, was subsequently reported as 7.28, well within normal limits. 10. Following delivery, Melody was transported to the neonatal intensive care unit, where she was admitted in mild respiratory distress.* Admission chest x-ray was hazy, with fluid noted in the fissures, and the heart was noted to be enlarged, consistent with congenital heart disease. 11. Melody was initially on room air; however, at 18 hours of life, secondary to a bath, she inexplicably became hypothermic and required an oxihood. By day 2 of life, Melody was weaned to the equivalent of room air, and the oxihood was discontinued on day 3 of life. 12. On October 23, 1989, at day 7 of life, a computerized tomography (CT) brain scan was performed on Melody. The results of the scan were abnormal and provided "nonspecific findings" (not definitive for any particular diagnosis), suggesting atrophic changes in the brain. As a preliminary assessment, Melody's physicians noted these changes as consistent with those WwW —_ tw associated with a hypoxic ischemic insult; however, they were unsure, and were not shown to have ultimately resolved, the etiology and timing of Melody's anomaly. 13. As to etiology, the record developed in this case does not permit a conclusion to be drawn. Notably, there were many forces at work and risks present during the course of fetal development that could have caused or contributed to Melody's presentation, including congenital abnormality and infection. Moreover, the possibility of hypoxic insult cannot be discounted. There is, however, no compelling basis to prefer one factor over another as the cause of Melody's anomaly or, stated otherwise, to conclude that Melody's anomaly is attributable to hypoxic insult, as opposed to the other risks present during the course of her development . 14. While the proof does not permit a conclusion to be drawn as to the cause of Melody's brain anomaly, it does support the conclusion that, whatever its cause, it was not consequent to an injury to the brain caused by oxygen deprivation occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period.’ 15. In reaching such conclusion, it is first observed that there was no evidence of fetal stress during the course of labor and delivery. Rather, the fetal heart tracings were normal throughout labor, and delivery by cesarean section was not traumatic. 16. Melody's presentation was likewise not consistent with hypoxic insult during labor and delivery. First, her umbilical ~ ~~ cord pH was normal. Had she undergone a hypoxic ischemic injury during birth, the pH would have reflected metabolic acidosis. Second, she did not require intubation and ventilation at birth, and her five-minute Apgar score was normal. 17. Melody's clinical course was likewise not consistent with hypoxic insult during labor or delivery. There was no evidence of multiple organ system dysfunction, which one would expect had Melody suffered a hypoxic ischemic event during birth. Moreover, no seizure activity developed in the immediate postpartum period. 18. Finally, the anomaly Melody was shown to suffer, as represented on the CT scan of October 23, 1989, at 7 days of life, was inconsistent with a hypoxic ischemic insult during labor and delivery. Rather, the progress or atrophic nature of the presentation, assuming a hypoxic ischemic etiology as opposed to congenital abnormality, dates the insult at least 4 to 6 weeks prior to the CT scan.
Conclusions For Petitioners: Robert J. Winicki, Esquire Winicki Law Firm 10161 Centurion Parkway North, Suite 190 Jacksonville, Florida 32256 For Respondent: W. Douglas Moody, Jr., Esquire Graham & Moody, P.A. 101 North Gadsden Street Tallahassee, Florida 32301
Other Judicial Opinions A party who is adversely affected by this Final Order is entitled to judicial review pursuant to Sections 120.68 and 766.311, Florida Statutes. Review proceedings are governed by the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. Such proceedings are commenced by filing one copy of a Notice of Appeal with the Agency Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings and a second copy, accompanied by filing fees prescribed by law, with the appropriate District Court of Appeal. See, Section 120.68(2), Florida Statutes, and Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Association v. Carreras, 598 So. 2d 299 (Fla. ist DCA 1992). The Notice of Appeal must be filed within 30 days of rendition of the order to be reviewed.
Findings Of Fact Calise L. Muniz was born on May 2, 2015, at Holmes Regional Medical Center, located in Melbourne, Florida. Calise weighed in excess of 2,500 grams at birth. Donald Willis, M.D. (Dr. Willis), was requested by NICA to review the medical records for Calise. In a medical report dated January 24, 2017, Dr. Willis opined in pertinent part as follows: In summary, the mother apparently became hypotensive after placement of epidural anesthesia with resulting fetal distress. The baby was depressed at birth. The initial ABG was consistent with metabolic acidosis. Cooling protocol was initiated for HIE. EEG was normal for age. No MRI or CT scan was done during the newborn hospital course. There was an apparent obstetrical event that resulted in loss of oxygen during labor and delivery. However, there was no documentation of actual brain injury. NICA retained Laufey Y. Sigurdardottir, M.D. (Dr. Sigurdardottir), a pediatric neurologist, to examine Calise and to review her medical records. Dr. Sigurdardottir examined Calise on February 1, 2017. In a medical report dated February 1, 2017, Dr. Sigurdardottir summarized her examination of Calise and opined in pertinent part as follows: Summary: Calise is a 21-month-old female who was born via emergency cesarean section after nonreassuring fetal heart rate tracings were noted after a high spinal anesthesia. She had poor Apgars of 2, 4 and 5 after 1, 5 and 10 minutes, and was treated with cooling protocol. She did not have any neonatal seizures and the only neuroimaging available is a head ultrasound on day of life 1 that was normal. On neurologic exam today she is normal, both with her motor skills and cognition and language development. There are no signs of autistic features. Results as to question 1: Calise is not found to have substantial physical or mental impairment at this time. Results as to question 2: In review of available documents, she does have the clinical picture of an acute birth-related hypoxic injury. Results as to question 3: The prognosis for full motor and mental recovery is excellent and her life expectancy is full. In light of the normal cognitive abilities and normal neurologic exam, I do not feel that Calise should be included in the NICA program. If needed, I will be happy to answer additional questions. A review of the file in this case reveals that there have been no expert opinions filed that are contrary to the opinion of Dr. Willis that while there was an apparent obstetrical event that resulted in loss of oxygen to the baby's brain during labor and delivery, there was no documentation of actual brain injury. Dr. Willis’ opinion is credited. There are no expert opinions filed that are contrary to Dr. Sigurdardottir’s opinion that Calise does not have a substantial physical or mental impairment. Dr. Sigurdardottir’s opinion is credited.
