Meister vs. Moore
Hi,
This is a mere academic question. I am trying to understand if the U.S. Supreme Court decision of Meister vs. Moore is a binding appelate decision across the country, or if it was only binding on the particular case. I am confused because the supreme court's decision includes the text ''If there has been a construction given to the statute by the Supreme Court of Michigan, that construction must, in
this case, be controlling with us.'' But at the same time, there are websites out there that state it's controlling case law. (Ex: ''It should be noted that Meister has never been reversed and is still controlling case law concerning the fundamental right to marry without state interference.'')
Can an appeal under a ''Writ of Error'' to the U.S. Supreme court, analyzing a state law, be controlling across the country?
It seems like from the language that the U.S supreme court expected the U.S. court in Pennsylvania to follow the case law of the Michigan supreme court, and the U.S. supreme court was actually ''bound'' by it.
I also thought that states didn't have to agree with the judicial interpretations of another state's laws, even if the interpretations were from a court in the foreign state?