189 U.S. 71 (1903) UNION AND PLANTERS' BANK v. MEMPHIS. SAME v. SAME. Nos. 67, 221. Supreme Court of United States. Submitted March 20, 1903. Decided April 13, 1903. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT AND FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE. *73 Mr. William H. Carroll and Mr. Tim E. Cooper for appellant. Mr. Luke E. Wright and Mr. John H. Watkins for appellees. Mr. CHIEF JUSTICE FULLER, after making the foregoing...
189 U.S. 453 (1903) THE PAQUETE HABANA. Nos. 578, 579, 580, 581, 582, 583, 584, 585, 586, 587, 588, 589. [*] Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 19, 1903. Decided April 6, 1903. APPEALS FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Mr. Solicitor General Hoyt for the United States. *456 Mr. J. Parker Kirlin for claimants. *463 MR. JUSTICE HOLMES delivered the opinion of the court. These are cases of fishing smacks, which were libelled as *464 prize...
189 U.S. 1 (1903) KENNEDY MINING AND MILLING COMPANY v. ARGONAUT MINING COMPANY. No. 49. Supreme Court of United States. Argued December 10, 11, 1902. Decided March 9, 1903. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. *5 Mr. John Malmesbury Wright and Mr. John Garber for plaintiff in error. Mr. Byron Waters was with them on the brief. Mr. Curtis H. Lindley for defendant in error. Mr. Henry Eickhoff was with him on the brief. MR. CHIEF JUSTICE FULLER, after making the foregoing...
191 U.S. 126 (1903) HOWARD v. FLEMING. HOWARD v. NORTH CAROLINA. Nos. 44, 45. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 27, 1903. Decided November 16, 1903. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA. *127 Mr. Frank P. Blair, with whom Mr. Leslie A. Gilmore was on the brief, for appellants in No. 44, and plaintiffs in error in No. 45. Mr. Robert D. Gilmer, Attorney General of the...
188 U.S. 254 (1903) THE MANILA PRIZE CASES. [1] Nos. 309, 310, 311. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 28, 29, 1902. Decided January 23, 1903. APPEALS FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. *258 Mr. Assistant Attorney General Hoyt and Mr. Special Attorney Charles C. Binney for the United States. Mr. Benjamin Micou for Admiral Dewey and other officers. Mr. Hilary A. Herbert was with him on the brief. Mr. William B. King for Rear Admiral Coghlan and others. Mr. George A....
187 U.S. 454 23 S. Ct. 157 47 L. Ed. 256 PACIFIC COAST STEAMSHIP COMPANY, Appt. , v. UNITED STATES. NO 29 PACIFIC COAST STEAMSHIP COMPANY, Appt. , v. UNITED STATES. NO 30 PACIFIC COAST STEAMSHIP COMPANY, Appt. , v. UNITED STATES. NO 31 Nos. 29, 30, 31. Supreme Court of the United States Argued December 8, 1902. January 5, 1903 Messrs. S. M. Stockslager, George C. Heard, John R. Winn , and John G. Heid for appellant. Solicitor General Richards and Assistant Attorney General Beck for the United...
188 U.S. 720 (1903) THE MANGROVE PRIZE MONEY. [1] Nos. 24, 34. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 7, 8, 9, 1903. Decided February 23, 1903. APPEALS FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Mr. Assistant Attorney General Hoyt for the United States. Mr. William B. King, with whom Mr. George A. King was on the brief, for the officers and crew of the Indiana. Mr. James H. Hayden, with whom Mr. Joseph K. McCammon was on the brief, for the...
188 U.S. 399 23 S. Ct. 468 47 L. Ed. 519 LOUISVILLE & JEFFERSONVILLE FERRY COMPANY, Plff. in Err. , v. COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY. Nos. 18, 19, 20, 21, 22. Decided February 23, 1903. Mr. Justice Harlan delivered the opinion of the court: 1 It having been stipulated between the parties that the above cases should abide the decision in No. 17, just decided, 187 U. S. , ante , 463, 23 Sup. Ct. Rep. 463, the judgment in each case is reversed, and each case is remanded to the state court for such...
190 U.S. 1 (1903) In re WATTS AND SACHS, PETITIONERS. Nos. 15, 16. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 20, 1903. Decided May 18, 1903. ORIGINAL. HABEAS CORPUS AND CERTIORARI. *16 Mr. David Fairleigh, with whom Mr. Bernard Flexner was on the brief, for the petitioner Watts. Mr. W.H.H. Miller, with whom Mr. W.M. Smith was on the brief, for the petitioner Sachs. Mr. George H. Hester (by special leave), with whom Mr. William Wilhartz was on the brief, for the receiver in bankruptcy of M....
189 U.S. 199 (1903) UNITED STATES v. NIX. NIX v. UNITED STATES. Nos. 142, 195. Supreme Court of United States. Submitted December 18, 1902. Decided March 2, 1903. APPEALS FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. *200 Mr. Assistant Attorney General Pradt and Mr. Assistant Attorney Brannigan for the United States. Mr. Frank B. Crosthwaite and Mr. Franklin H. Mackey for Nix. MR. JUSTICE BROWN, after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the court. Item 2 of the third finding, namely, "...
188 U.S. 662 (1903) CHICAGO THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY v. ILLINOIS. Nos. 140, 265. Supreme Court of United States. Argued and submitted January 20, 21, 1902. Decided February 23, 1903. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. *664 Mr. John J. Herrick, with whom Mr. David Fales was on the brief, for plaintiff in error. Mr. Edwin W. Sims, Mr. Frank L. Shepard and Mr. William F. Struckmann, for defendant in error, contended in their brief. *672 MR. JUSTICE PECKHAM, after making the foregoing...
189 U.S. 158 (1903) THE OSCEOLA. No. 98. Supreme Court of United States. Argued December 2, 1902. Decided March 2, 1903. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. *160 Mr. C.H. Van Alstine for appellants. Mr. John H. Roemer for appellee. *168 MR. JUSTICE BROWN, after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the court. In the view we take of this case we find it necessary to express an opinion only upon the first and third questions, which are in...
189 U.S. 363 (1903) THE CONEMAUGH. [1] No. 97. Supreme Court of United States. Argued December 1, 2, 1902. Decided March 9, 1903. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. *366 Mr. C.E. Kremer for petitioner. Mr. F.C. Harvey and Mr. W.O. Johnson were on the brief. Mr. Harvey D. Goulder for respondent. Mr. S.H. Holding and Mr. F.S. Masten were on the brief. Mr. Wilhemus Mynderse for intervenors. Mr. F.H. Canfield was on the brief. MR. JUSTICE McKENNA, after making the...
188 U.S. 82 (1903) DIAMOND MATCH COMPANY v. ONTONAGON. No. 96. Supreme Court of United States. Argued December 1, 1902. Decided January 19, 1903. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. *89 Mr. Edwin Walker for the appellants argued. Mr. T.L. Chadbourne submitted a brief on behalf of appellees. *90 MR. JUSTICE McKENNA, after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the court. The contention of appellant is presented in three...
188 U.S. 626 (1903) AMERICAN ICE COMPANY v. EASTERN TRUST AND BANKING COMPANY. No. 95. Supreme Court of United States. Argued December 2, 1902. Decided February 23, 1903. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. *628 Mr. William G. Johnson for appellants. Mr. Benjamin F. Leighton for appellee. *629 MR. JUSTICE PECKHAM, after making the above statement of facts, delivered the opinion of the court. The appellants have made several assignments of error which have been argued...
188 U.S. 208 (1903) CONNECTICUT MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. HILLMON. No. 94. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 13, 14, 1902. Decided January 2, 1903. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. *210 Mr. William G. Beale for petitioner. Mr. Buell McKeever, Mr. Gilbert E. Porter and Mr. James W. Green were with him on the brief. Mr. Lysander B. Wheat for respondent. Mr. C.F. Hutchings and Mr. John H. Atwood were with him on the brief. MR. JUSTICE BROWN,...
188 U.S. 1 (1903) KELLEY v. RHOADS. No. 93. Supreme Court of United States. Submitted November 12, 1902. Decided January 19, 1903. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WYOMING. *4 Mr. J.A. Van Orsdel for plaintiff in error. Mr. Willis Van Devanter for defendant in error. Mr. W.R. Stoll was with him on the brief. MR. JUSTICE BROWN, after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the court. This case resolves itself into the single question whether the property of the...
188 U.S. 220 (1903) EASTON v. IOWA. No. 92. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 14, 15, 1903. Decided February 2, 1903. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IOWA. *221 Mr. Charles F. Brown and Mr. H.T. Reed, with whom Mr. John J. Crawford and Mr. C.W. Reed were on the brief, for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Charles W. Mullan, attorney general of the State of Iowa, for defendant in error. *227 MR. JUSTICE SHIRAS, after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the...
191 U.S. 103 24 S. Ct. 36 48 L. Ed. 112 ECKINGTON & SOLDIERS' HOME RAILWAY COMPANY of the District of Columbia, Plff. in Err. , v. FLORENCE McDEVITT. No. 9. Argued January 21, 1903. Ordered submitted to full bench February 2, 1903. Submitted to full bench March 9, 1903. Decided November 16, 1903. This was an action brought in the supreme court of the District of Columbia, August 8, 1894, to recover damages for alleged breach of contract. Plaintiff, on April 4, 1889, being the owner of a tract...
187 U.S. 585 (1903) AYRES v. POLSDORFER. No. 89. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 13, 1902. Decided January 5, 1903. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. *587 Mr. Thomas B. Turley and Mr. J.B. Heiskell for plaintiff in error. Mr. C.W. Heiskell was with them on the brief. *588 Mr. Wassell Randolph for defendants in error. Mr. William M. Randolph and Mr. George Randolph were with him on the brief. MR. JUSTICE McKENNA, after making the foregoing statement,...
