Can a county or a municipality refuse or restrict entry to outsiders? Or even kick them out although they have residences there?
That question has arisen with the spread of COVID-19 as several counties in Colorado and elsewhere have taken various steps to keep out outsiders, including those who own second residences within their boundaries, out.
People in the U.S. have a right to travel freely and buy second homes wherever they want. But communities have emergency powers to keep residents safe.
Between these two rights, battles are brewing.
Gunnison County, Colorado, for instance is an area with several thousand second homes—many of them owned by Texans who come to the area to ski. In mid-March, Colorado Gov. Jared Polis ordered all ski resorts in the state closed, but by then the out-of-staters had brought coronavirus with them, and Gunnison County's lone 24-bed hospital was overburdened.
The county's Department of Health and Human Services decided to act, and on April 3 it issued an order to owners of the 4,000 second homes in the county: If you're not here now, don't come here. If you're here, please leave. The agency said people who disobey could face a $5,000 fine and 18 months in jail.
The action triggered an angry response from Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, who charged that the order was "patent discrimination" that "runs afoul of the United States Constitution." He asked that the county modify the owner to recognize the rights of nonresident property owners, apparently resulting in some softening in Gunnison County. By April 10, the county had approved 199 exemption requests for people who were living there at the time.
Other locales, meanwhile, have also gotten tough with nonresidents.
Mammoth Lakes, California, another ski area with limited medical facilities, has set up checkpoints on roads coming into the county for purposes of turning away tourists.
On April 9, Clear Creek County, Colorado issued an order putting up roadblocks on all county roads.
So, can counties or municipalities legally do that?
It depends on whom you ask.
The Texas attorney general says no. But Deputy Gunnison County Attorney Matthew Hoyt disagreed. In a letter responding to Paxton, he said that laws are firmly in place to support the county's action. Nonresidents' "liberty interest gives way to the paramount government interest in protecting public safety when the community faces a disaster," he wrote.
Barbara Green, attorney for the Town of Crested Butte in Gunnison County agreed with Hoyt in comments to the Colorado Sun. "There is police power to protect the health, safety and welfare of the people," she said.
But David McDonald, an attorney with the conservative Mountain States Legal Foundation, agreed with the Texas AG. “This violates the rights of Americans to travel freely," he told the Sun. "And it feels like a rather knee-jerk reaction."
At this point, it's worth pointing out a bit of history. More than a century ago, as the Spanish Flu Pandemic was ravaging the county much like COVID-19 today, the restrictive actions taken in Gunnison County are still cited as extraordinary in historical accounts.
The measures included closures and social distancing, but also blockades, required quarantines of anyone who arrived by the train that continued to operate, and fines for anyone who broke the rules. By the time the flu had run its deadly course, 8,000 people had died in Colorado, but only five of them in Gunnison County.
The message here seems to be: Constitutionality aside, tough measures can save lives.
Rental Amount on Sublease
For 6 months I've been renting my apartment as a sublease. The landlord said the management company is allowing them to sublease. Today I got in the mail that the rent for the unit is increasing to $933. For the last 6months, I've been paying $1400, not knowing the original rent was $900. Is he breaking the law? What rights do I have as far as getting back any money I've paid extra in the last 6months?
Mother's Landlord ( Diff. State )is keeping her belongings
My Mother was in the process of moving all her things back to NJ., when she passed away. Her fromer landlord/friend ( in SC )will not let me have her belongings. My Mother's rent is paid up until Sept of 08. She passed in March. There is also a possibility of about $40,000 missing. My Mother was dying of brain cancer. How can I get her belongings, car, and etc. returned. I am her only child. She left no will thatwe know of.
bar admission
I was charged with party to a crime retail theft when i was 17, it was later expunged, I am thinking about law school in could this prevent me from law school or even bar admission? I would be 26 when I finish law school. I have no other incidents on my record.
In a civil case. Where a person filed a complaint against another. Stateing that the other person made a death threat against them.
But in fact no such threat was made.
And the person makeing the complaint has produced a witness that was not at theincident. And the converstion was a wisper into the others ear. All that was said was " You are a very mean person" Then the person left with now further action.
The complaintent filed a report and now it is going to family court.
What can the other person to to prove the witness is lying and so is the complaintant.
Life insurance Disability Waiver of Premium misrepresented and cancelled
My mother has been disabled since age 54. Every year her life insurance premium has been waived as long as she received and returned a form to the insurance company that she is unable to work. This past year she has moved from her home, to a retirement center, to a nursing home and I was unable to find the paperwork. I contacted the life insurance company and received the paperwork and returned it, but was told that the company had made an error and she would no longer be covered as she has reached retirement age. That, in fact, her coverage should have been discontinued at age 65 (9 years ago as she is now 74.) She had been led to believe that as long as she continued to be unable to work she would ALWAYS have her premium waived. This was substantiated by the fact that they continued to do so for the 9 years after she turned 65.
What recourse do we have in that the insurance company misrepresented her coverage which dissuaded Mom from seeking other coverage and we are now unable to afford the current exorbitant premiums?
How can I be sure that the paperwork they sent is not a newer policy with different coverage..? The paperwork I found has different verbiage and precedes the copy sent to me.