A deficiency judgment—a money judgment for the difference between the total amount of the mortgage debt and the foreclosure sale price—is the unfortunate result of a foreclosure in some cases. Fortunately, most California homeowners won't have to pay a deficiency judgment after going through a foreclosure.
California foreclosures can be judicial or nonjudicial. Judicial foreclosures go through the state courts. Nonjudicial foreclosures, though, happen outside of the court system. In California, foreclosures are typically nonjudicial.
If a home sells at a foreclosure sale for less than the borrower owes on the loan, the difference between the sale price and the debt is called a deficiency balance. For example, suppose Calvin owes the bank $300,000, but his home sells at a foreclosure sale for only $275,000. The deficiency is $25,000.
Some states permit the foreclosing bank get a personal judgment—called a “deficiency judgment”—against a borrower for the deficiency balance after the foreclosure. The bank may then employ typical collection methods, like wage garnishment or a bank account levy, to collect the outstanding deficiency balance from the borrower. (Learn more about deficiency judgments generally.)
Generally, California law permits a deficiency judgment after a judicial foreclosure, but not after a nonjudicial foreclosure.
California law prohibits a bank from getting a deficiency judgment following a nonjudicial foreclosure. (Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 580d).
Because foreclosures are usually nonjudicial in California, most people going through foreclosure in that state don't have to worry about owing a deficiency judgment.
If the bank opts to use a judicial process, though, California law generally allows a deficiency judgment. To get the deficiency judgment, the bank has to file an application with the court within three months after the foreclosure sale. The judge then holds a fair value hearing to determine the fair value of the property. The deficiency judgment is then limited to the lesser of:
But even in cases where the bank decides to foreclose through the court, a deficiency judgment isn't allowed when the loan was:
When a senior lienholder forecloses, any junior liens—like second mortgages and HELOCs, among others—are also foreclosed and those junior lienholders lose their security interest in the real estate. This is referred to as a “sold-out junior lienholder.” If you have more than one mortgage on your home, and the first mortgage holder forecloses, you might face a lawsuit from one of those sold-out lienholders.
For years, courts have followed a decision by the First District Court of Appeal, Simon v. Superior Court, 4 Cal.App.4th 63 (1992), which said that if the bank or mortgage company that foreclosed the first mortgage also holds the junior loan, that entity can't sue the borrower personally on the promissory note for the junior loan after foreclosing the senior loan. But, in 2017, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth District disagreed with the holding in Simon, and held that California Code of Civil Procedure § 580d does not prevent a sold-out junior lienholder from seeking a deficiency judgment—even when the same entity holds both the senior and junior liens. (Black Sky Capital, LLC v. Cobb, 12 Cal.App.5th 887 (2017)). The California Supreme Court granted review of the Black Sky case and decided that when a bank or mortgage company holds two deeds of trust on the same property, the holder may seek a deficiency judgment on the extinguished junior lien under limited circumstances. (To learn more, read Nolo's legal update California Supreme Court Decision Changes State’s Deficiency Law. Also, keep in mind, another anti-deficiency law might apply.)
If you’re a California homeowner facing a foreclosure and want to learn whether you might face a deficiency judgment after a foreclosure, if you have any defenses to the action, or want to find out about different ways to avoid a foreclosure, consider talking to an attorney. If you can't afford an attorney, a HUD-approved housing counselor can tell you about foreclosure avoidance options.
beneficiaries on retirement accounts
In the event of death, does a retirement account automatically go to your beneficiary?
warrant in debt
I have been issued a warrant in debt for an unsecured loan (Beneficial) & I have sent them all the info about my monthly expenses as requested along with some payments. They have threatened to garnish my wages but after my expenses there's really almost zero left each month as my husband is unemployed & has been for a number of months. Can they still garnish my wages? I do not have any assets other than my car & clothes-we live with my husband's parents-so we don't own a home. I hope you can clarify things for me.
Thanks
Can I get my husbands car from a family member if im not on the car registration?
Can a city owned utility bill/debtor , such as water sewage and garbage utility seize/ auction/sell my home or put a lien on it for the amount said to be owed? to collect on a bill from 2005-2006 or 2007?. the outstanding amount said to be owed is $2865.65. I have lived at my property for 17 years. I was served a letter by a sheriff from an attorney for the city stating a lien or sale of property for unpaid balance. please help?
Re: Immigration Law Answers/More Info.
Thanks for answering.
We are now looking for a really good attorney with a great track record who knows both sides of the Mexican border.
FYI - I am caucasian-He is a cousin in law of my best friend and her family and also my boss who is married to my best friend's aunt. My boss is American, the rest are all Mexican. On that side there are about 50 or so legal people who are mostly citizens at this point with a couple in process and a few illegal. My boss has a huge business and has sponsored many people. He knows the drill. He would be willing to sponsor him, I'm sure.
Also, on my guy's side of the family -he has many blood relatives who are here legally. His aunt and 6 blood 1st cousins are citizens. He has 40 more family members with green cards/are here legally.
The reason we are looking for an attorney is because I'm more afraid of this situation because the immigration climate has changed.
My guy does NOT have citizenship anywhere else. We are considering marriage, and we had thought of marrying on both sides for family reasons. We would do so in whatever order is best, though I don't want him going to Mexico again if he can't pass back again. We will wait for that until we are sure of our plans.