Leon FL Lawyers | Adrienne C. Rodgers -- eLawyers

Adrienne C. Rodgers

Visitors: 57

Bar #630071(FL) License for 22 years; Member in Good Standing

Tallahassee FL

Are you Adrienne C. Rodgers? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Florida Laws: 120.569, 120.57, 120.60, 120.68, 17.002, 409.141, 455.275, 456.001, 456.072, 466.001, 466.003, 466.017, 466.024, 466.028, 468.631, 489.105, 489.1195, 489.129, 489.131, 489.132, 489.140, 489.1401, 489.141, 489.142, 489.143, 490.009, 57.111, 713.35, 877.21, 922.12, 943.04, 943.0435, 95.11

Florida Administrative Code: 28-106.103, 28-106.216, 28-106.217, 64B5-13.005, 64B5-17.002

04-003047 WILLIAM AND MARLENE GRUBB vs DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD AND NORMAN LEVINSKY (2004)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 30, 2004

Whether Petitioners' claim for monies from the Florida Homeowners' Construction Recovery Fund is subject to adjudication pursuant to Section 120.57(1), Florida Statutes, and, if so, how much should Petitioners be awarded.Petitioners seeking monies from the Florida Homeowners` Construction Recovery Fund are not entitled to a Section 120.57(1), Florida Statutes, hearing on their claim.

3D08-1851 VADI v. State (2008)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jul. 30, 2008 Citations: 987 So. 2d 1225

987 So. 2d 1225 (2008) VADI v. STATE. No. 3D08-1851. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. July 30, 2008. Decision without published opinion. App.dismissed.

77-1781, 77-1782 Gibson v. State (1979)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Mar. 20, 1979 Citations: 368 So. 2d 667

368 So. 2d 667 (1979) Anthony GIBSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. Nos. 77-1781, 77-1782. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. March 20, 1979. Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Warren S. Schwartz, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant. Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and William M. Grodnick, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee. Before SCHWARTZ, J., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.) and EZELL, BOYCE F., Jr., (Ret.), Associate Judges. *668 SCHWARTZ, Judge. The defendant Gibson appea..

84-393, 84-394 Steiner v. State (1985)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: May 21, 1985 Citations: 469 So. 2d 179

469 So. 2d 179 (1985) Michael John STEINER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. Nos. 84-393, 84-394. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. May 21, 1985. *180 Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Karen M. Gottlieb, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant. Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Randi Klayman Lazarus, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee. Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ. SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge. The defendant appeals from concurrent sentences in excess of t..

79-715 Travelers Indem. Co. v. Chisholm (1980)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jul. 02, 1980 Citations: 384 So. 2d 1360

384 So. 2d 1360 (1980) TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, a Foreign Corporation, Appellant, v. Robert F. CHISHOLM, Appellee. No. 79-715. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. July 2, 1980. Richard C. Stoneman of Stoneman, Mattson & McGrady, St. Petersburg, for appellant. Barry M. Salzman of Chambers & Salzman, P.A., St. Petersburg, for appellee. OTT, Judge. Appellant, Travelers Indemnity Company, appeals from an order awarding attorney's fees to its insured, appellee Robert Chisholm. We..

92-2796 Morris v. State (1993)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jul. 21, 1993 Citations: 622 So. 2d 67

622 So. 2d 67 (1993) William A. MORRIS, III, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 92-2796. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. July 21, 1993. William R. Amlong of Amlong & Amlong, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant. Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Edward Giles, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee. ANSTEAD, Judge. At issue in this appeal is whether an official of a police agency authorized to serve a search warrant must participate in or..

12-000005PL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF DENTISTRY vs GUSTAVO B. BORGES, D.D.S. (2012)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 03, 2012

The issues in this case are whether Respondent's plea and adjudication of guilt to knowingly receiving child pornography, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, § 2252A(a)(2)(A), relates to Respondent's practice or ability to practice dentistry, violating section 466.028(1)(ll) by violating 456.072 (1)(c), Florida Statutes, and if so, the penalty that should be imposed.Petitioner proved by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent violated section 466.028(1)(ll) by violating section 456.072(1)(c).

13-001586PL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF DENTISTRY vs MIRANDA WHYLLY SMITH, D.D.S. (2013)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 30, 2013

The issues in this case are whether the Board of Dentistry (Board) should discipline the Respondent on charges that she violated section 466.028(1)(z), (ff), and (gg), Florida Statutes (2009-2012),1/ by: improperly delegating professional responsibilities to persons not qualified to perform them; operating her dental office below minimum acceptable standards; and allowing the administration of anesthesia, in violation of Board rules.DOH charged dentist with multiple violations. All but 3 dropped before hearing. Two proven: unlawful delegation to dental assistants, and allowing sedation without DOH permit. Recommended 6-month suspension, probation and $10,000 fine.

13-001164PL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF DENTISTRY vs MIRANDA SMITH, D.D.S. (2013)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 29, 2013

The issue to be determined in this proceeding is whether Respondent violated section 466.028(1)(x), Florida Statutes (2011), and if so, what penalty should be imposed for the violation.Petitioner did not prove that Respondent violated the standard of care in diagnosis and treatment. Recommend dismissal.

13-001221PL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF DENTISTRY vs MIRANDA SMITH, D.D.S. (2013)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 08, 2013

The issue in this case is whether the allegations set forth in the Amended Administrative Complaint filed by the Department of Health, Board of Dentistry (Petitioner), against Miranda Smith, D.D.S. (Respondent), are correct, and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Evidence fails to establish dentist violated standard of care.