Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Alfred J Malefatto
Alfred J Malefatto
Visitors: 51
0
Bar #300152(FL)     License for 44 years
West Palm Beach FL

Are you Alfred J Malefatto? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

Florida Laws: 120.569120.57120.68373.019373.223403.501403.509

Florida Administrative Code: 62-520.410

2:00-cv-00532  Glesil v. Moore  (2001)
District Court, M.D. Florida Filed: Sep. 13, 2001 Citations: 160 F. Supp. 2d 1348
160 F. Supp. 2d 1348 (2001) NORTHLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. HBE CORPORATION, d/b/a Adam's Mark Hotel, Fred S. Kummer, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. No. 6:00-cv-532-Orl-31DAB. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division. September 13, 2001. *1349 *1350 *1351 *1352 Ronald L. Kammer, Hinshaw & Culbertson, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff. Duncan B. Dowling, III, Rogers, Dowling, Orlando, FL, Michael M. Baylson, Duane, Morris & Heckscher, Philadelphia, PA, for De..
91-3501    (1992)
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Filed: Apr. 13, 1992 Citations: 957 F.2d 856
957 F.2d 856 60 USLW 2667 Beverly Ann SMITH, as Personal Representative of the Estate of David L. Smith, and Beverly Ann Smith, Individually, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MELLON BANK, a Delaware corporation, Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-3501. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. April 13, 1992. John R. Overchuck, Overchuck, Langa & Crews, PA, Laura P. Denault, Orlando, Fla., for plaintiff-appellant. Mark F. Bideau, Greenberg, Traurig, Hoffman, Lipoff, Rosen & Quentel, Alfred J. Malefatto, W..
4D99-3184  Semple v. Semple  (2000)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jul. 05, 2000
763 So. 2d 484 (2000) Raymond SEMPLE, Appellant, v. Nanci SEMPLE, Appellee. No. 4D99-3184. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. July 5, 2000. William C. Porter, Vinemont, Alabama, for appellant. No appearance for appellee. SHAHOOD, J. Appellant was denied due process when the trial court entered Final Judgment of Injunction for Protection Against Domestic Violence and awarded temporary custody of the parties' minor child to the mother without being afforded a full evidentiary hea..
5D07-1292  Cann v. MAINSTREET MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.  (2008)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jan. 14, 2008 Citations: 972 So. 2d 198
972 So. 2d 198 (2008) CANN v. MAINSTREET MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. No. 5D07-1292. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. January 14, 2008. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.
AR-87  Sporl v. Lowrey  (1983)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: May 06, 1983 Citations: 431 So. 2d 245
431 So. 2d 245 (1983) James A. SPORL, Ken Carmichael, Marg Henley, Julius Levine, Otto Prochaska, Britton Stamps, and Henry Willett, As and Constituting the Board of Adjustment of the City of Gulf Breeze, Petitioners, v. Honorable George E. LOWREY, As One of the Judges of the Circuit Court of the First Judicial Circuit, in and for Santa Rosa County, Florida, Respondent. No. AR-87. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. May 6, 1983. Paul A. Rasmussen, of Eggen, Bowden & Rasmussen, Pe..
15-001559EPP  FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT POWER PLANT UNITS 3-5 MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONS OF CERTIFICATION vs *  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 19, 2015
The issue to be determined in this case is whether the Governor and Cabinet, in their capacity as the Siting Board and pursuant to the Florida Electrical Power Plant Siting Act (“PPSA”), should approve FPL’s request to modify the Conditions of Certification for Units 3, 4, and 5 of the Turkey Point Power Plant in southeast Miami-Dade County.FPL demonstrated that the proposed modification complies with all applicable regulating criteria and with the certification criteria in the Power Plant Siting Act.
82-001602  FLORIDA WILDLIFE FEDERATION AND PROPERTY OWNERS vs. CASETTA, LTD., AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION  (1982)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Feb. 16, 1983
The issues to be resolved in this proceeding are whether the Department should issue a permit to Casetta, and whether the Department should issue a permit to Harbor Point. The two application proceedings were consolidated for hearing purposes. In many respects, common factual and legal issues relate to the two proceedings. For that reason, in the interest of economy of time and space, a single recommended order is being issued with respect to the two proceedings.Deny both parties requests for dredge/fill permits to connect to a lake. There were no reasonable assurances and not in public interest.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer