welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Amelia Savage
Amelia Savage
Amelia Savage
Visitors: 37
0
Bar #26967(FL)     License for 19 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Amelia Savage? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

18-002664  MARINEMAX, INC. vs LARRY LYNN AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2018)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 22, 2018
The issue to determine in this matter is whether Respondent Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) properly issued its proposed verification of an Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) exemption, dated March 23, 2018, for the installation of nine pilings off of Respondent Larry Lynn’s residential property, in the direction of Petitioner MarineMax, Inc.’s commercial property (MarineMax), pursuant to section 373.406(6), Florida Statutes, commonly known as the “de minimus” exemption.Mr. Lynn's installation of nine pilings off of his residential property does not create minimal or insignificant individual or cumulative impacts on the water resources, and, therefore, qualify for an exemption from an environmental resource permit.
16-000806  NANCY CONDRON vs ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT AND 1044PVB, LLC  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 12, 2016
The issue to be determined in this case is whether 1044PVB, LLC (“Applicant”), is entitled to Environmental Resource Permit (“ERP”) No. IND-109-143282-1 from the St. Johns River Water Management District (“District”), authorizing the construction of a surface water management system to serve a proposed residential development in St. Johns County, Florida.The applicant provided reasonable assurance of compliance with all applicable criteria for an environmental resource permit to construct a single-family residential development in St. Johns County.
13-004859  WILLIAM B. SWAIM vs SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 16, 2013
The issues are whether Petitioner has proved that he is entitled to two exemptions from statewide environmental resource permitting: the mosquito control activities exemption set forth in Florida Administrative Code Rule 62-340.750 and the seawall construction exemption set forth in section 403.813(1)(i), Florida Statutes (2013).Petitioner not entitled to mosquito control activities exemption or seawall construction exemption to SWERP due to, among other reasons, previous wetlands on property
08-003886  LEE COUNTY vs MOSAIC FERTILIZER, LLC AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 08, 2008
The issues are whether Respondent, Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC (Mosaic), has provided reasonable assurances that the proposed mining and reclamation of the South Fort Meade Mine in Hardee County can be conducted in a manner that comports with the applicable statutes and rules such that the proposed Environmental Resource Permit (ERP), Conceptual Reclamation Plan (CRP), variance from minimum standards for dissolved oxygen, and variance from littoral zone percentage provisions for the Project should be issued by Respondent, Department of Environmental Protection (Department).Applications for ERP, CRP, and two variances approved where Mosiac gave reasonable assurances that all relevant statutes and rules were satisfied.
08-003887  LEE COUNTY vs MOSAIC FERTILIZER, LLC AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 08, 2008
The issues are whether Respondent, Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC (Mosaic), has provided reasonable assurances that the proposed mining and reclamation of the South Fort Meade Mine in Hardee County can be conducted in a manner that comports with the applicable statutes and rules such that the proposed Environmental Resource Permit (ERP), Conceptual Reclamation Plan (CRP), variance from minimum standards for dissolved oxygen, and variance from littoral zone percentage provisions for the Project should be issued by Respondent, Department of Environmental Protection (Department).Applications for ERP, CRP, and two variances approved where Mosiac gave reasonable assurances that all relevant statutes and rules were satisfied.
08-003888  LEE COUNTY vs MOSAIC FERTILIZER, LLC AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 08, 2008
The issues are whether Respondent, Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC (Mosaic), has provided reasonable assurances that the proposed mining and reclamation of the South Fort Meade Mine in Hardee County can be conducted in a manner that comports with the applicable statutes and rules such that the proposed Environmental Resource Permit (ERP), Conceptual Reclamation Plan (CRP), variance from minimum standards for dissolved oxygen, and variance from littoral zone percentage provisions for the Project should be issued by Respondent, Department of Environmental Protection (Department).Applications for ERP, CRP, and two variances approved where Mosiac gave reasonable assurances that all relevant statutes and rules were satisfied.
08-003889  LEE COUNTY vs MOSAIC FERTILIZER, LLC AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 08, 2008
The issues are whether Respondent, Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC (Mosaic), has provided reasonable assurances that the proposed mining and reclamation of the South Fort Meade Mine in Hardee County can be conducted in a manner that comports with the applicable statutes and rules such that the proposed Environmental Resource Permit (ERP), Conceptual Reclamation Plan (CRP), variance from minimum standards for dissolved oxygen, and variance from littoral zone percentage provisions for the Project should be issued by Respondent, Department of Environmental Protection (Department).Applications for ERP, CRP, and two variances approved where Mosiac gave reasonable assurances that all relevant statutes and rules were satisfied.
08-000510  OLD PELICAN BAY III ASSOCIATION, INC. vs TERRY CARLSON AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 28, 2008
The issue is whether Terry Carlson's application to construct and install a single-family dock in Lee County, Florida, is exempt from the need for an Environmental Resource Permit.Applicant`s dock qualified for exemption from DEP permit requirements; the dock did not create navigational hazard, as claimed by Petitioner.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer