Jefferson FL Lawyers | Ann Cocheu -- eLawyers

Ann Cocheu

Visitors: 84

850-414-3300

Bar #255785(FL) License for 47 years

Monticello FL

Are you Ann Cocheu? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

Florida Laws: 120.569, 120.57, 466.002, 468.609

Florida Administrative Code: 61G19-6.0035, 61G19-6.012, 61G19-6.017

99-005247 GARY RANDALL OSTOSKI vs DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF PHYSICAL THERAPY PRACTICE (1999)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 13, 1999

The issue in this case is whether Respondent should grant Petitioner's request for licensure by endorsement as a physical therapist pursuant to Sections 486.031 or 486.081, Florida Statutes (1997), and Florida Administrative Code Rule 64B17- (All statutory references are to Florida Statutes (1997) unless otherwise stated. All references to rules are to rules promulgated in the Florida Administrative Code in effect on the date of this Recommended Order.)Applicant who received a Bachelor of Science from a non-accredited foreign university, passed the national examination in Colorado, and is licensed in Colorado is entitled to a Florida license.

99-004167RP FLORIDA MEDICAL ASSOCIATION vs DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF PODIATRIC MEDICINE (1999)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 04, 1999

The issue presented is whether Respondent's proposed Rule 64B18-23.001, Florida Administrative Code, is an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.Proposed rule is invalid since it exceeded the Board`s rulemaking authority, was arbitrary and capricious, and was not supported by competent or substantial evidence.

96-004167 MICHAEL ROSE vs BOARD OF MEDICINE (1996)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 03, 1996

Is Petitioner entitled to be licensed as a nutrition counselor consistent with Section 468.51(3), Florida Statutes (1995)?Prior experience not sufficient to prove entitlement to licensure by grandfather clause.

95-004970 KAREN L. DAMM vs BOARD OF OPTICIANRY (1995)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 10, 1995

Did Petitioner attempt to obtain a license to practice opticianry by misrepresentation or fraud, by modifying information in her 1995 application for licensure when compared to her 1994 application? 1/Petitioner did not commit fraud or misrepresent information in the attempt to obtain a license.

93-000244RP FLORIDA NUTRITION COUNSELORS ASSOCIATION vs BOARD OF MEDICINE, DIETETICS AND NUTRITION PRACTICE COUNCIL (1993)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 21, 1993

The issue for consideration in this hearing is whether the Board of Medicine's proposed amendments to Rules 21M-49.002(6), 21M-50.002(3)(f) and (j), 21M-50.003(1), 21M-50.007(3) and (18), and 21M-50.009(1), F.A.C., are invalid because of being vague and an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.All proposed rules under challenge held valid except that which states counselors "should" report apparent rule violations which was invalid as vague.

95-002707 PAMELA KLONIS vs BOARD OF MEDICINE (1995)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 25, 1995

The issue in this case is whether Petitioner is entitled to licensure as a nutrition counselor.Licensed nurse with substantial but not exclusive background in weight loss counselling entitled to license as nutrition counselor.

95-001438RP THE UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK vs BOARD OF NURSING (1995)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 24, 1995

The issue in this case is whether the Petition for Formal Hearing Challenging the Proposed Amendment to Rule 59S-3.001(1) of the Florida Board of Nursing should be granted.Proposed amendment to definition of "approved program" of nursing education . Petitioner out- of-state, never applied and doesn't intend to apply for approval. No standing.

92-001021 MARCELINO D. MATA vs BOARD OF MEDICINE (1992)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 18, 1992

The issue for determination in this proceeding is whether the denial of a license to practice medicine in the state constitutes unlawful discrimination against Petitioner.Denial of application for license as a physician is not unlawful discrimination. Petitioner failed to establish prima facie case.

91-000534RX FLORIDA OPTOMETRIC ASSOCIATION; ALBERT ARAN, M.D.; PHILIP DAGOSTINO, O.D.; PAUL E. GARLAND, M.D.; AND JOHN MCCLANE, III, O.D. vs BOARD OF MEDICINE (1991)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 25, 1991

Whether Proposed Rule 21M-20.15, is an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority as defined in Section 120.52(8)(a)-(e), Florida Statutes?Rule establishing standard of care for surgery and delegation of duties by surgeon not invalid except for last sentence of paragraph 3 of rule.

88-000270 MARCELINO D. MATA vs. BOARD OF MEDICINE (1988)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Jun. 25, 1992

The issue is whether Petitioner's application for licensure as a physician, by endorsement, should be granted.Application for licensure denied where physician did not prove rehabilita- tion from earlier conduct of practicing medicine without a license.