welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Anne Trefz Gibson
Anne Trefz Gibson
Anne Trefz Gibson
Visitors: 27
0
Bar #121665(FL)     License for 27 years; Member in Good Standing
Winter Haven FL

Are you Anne Trefz Gibson? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

10-000544DRI  DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS vs POLK COUNTY AND SAFARI WILD LLC, C/O C. LEX SALISBURY  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 05, 2010
Whether the activity authorized by the Development Order is "development" as defined in Section 380.04, Florida Statutes? If so, whether the Development Order is consistent with the Principles for Guiding Development in the Green Swamp Area of Critical State Concern, the Polk County Comprehensive Plan, Polk County Land Development Regulations, and statutory and rule provisions that relate to development in the Green Swamp Area of Critical State Concern?Polk County Development Order is not in compliance with Polk County Land Development Regulations or Comprehensive Plan for the project in Green Swamp Area of critical state concern.
05-000717GM  ELOISE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, BRUCE BACHMAN AND JOHNNY BROOKS vs POLK COUNTY, FLORIDA  (2005)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 28, 2005
The issues in this case are whether the Small Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment No. 05S-01 (the Plan Amendment) adopted by Polk County (County) through the enactment of Ordinance No. 05-004 is “in compliance,” as that term is defined by Section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes,1 and whether Petitioner, Citizens for Proper Planning, Inc. (CPPI), has standing as an “affected person” as defined by Section 163.3184(1)(a), Florida Statutes, in this proceeding.Petitioners proved, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the small scale development plan amendment to the Future Land Use Map was inconsistent with the County`s Comprehensive Plan.
05-000787GM  CITIZENS FOR PROPER PLANNING, INC. vs POLK COUNTY, FLORIDA  (2005)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 03, 2005
The issues in this case are whether the Small Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment No. 05S-01 (the Plan Amendment) adopted by Polk County (County) through the enactment of Ordinance No. 05-004 is “in compliance,” as that term is defined by Section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes,1 and whether Petitioner, Citizens for Proper Planning, Inc. (CPPI), has standing as an “affected person” as defined by Section 163.3184(1)(a), Florida Statutes, in this proceeding.Petitioners proved, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the small scale development plan amendment to the Future Land Use Map was inconsistent with the County`s Comprehensive Plan.
03-000593GM  JIM DURHAM AND CITIZENS FOR PROPER PLANNING, INC. vs POLK COUNTY  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 21, 2003
The issue is whether Polk County's small scale development amendment (CPA2003S-02) adopted by Ordinance No. 03-03 on January 22, 2003, as later amended by Ordinance No. 03-19 on March 15, 2003, is in compliance.Small scale amendment which changed use on land from residential to commercial conflicts with two other policies in the Plan and is inconsistent with the Plan and not in compliance.
03-000933GM  CITIZENS FOR PROPER PLANNING, INC., AND JIM DURHAM vs POLK COUNTY  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 19, 2003
The issue is whether Polk County's small scale development amendment (CPA2003S-02) adopted by Ordinance No. 03-03 on January 22, 2003, as later amended by Ordinance No. 03-19 on March 15, 2003, is in compliance.Small scale amendment which changed use on land from residential to commercial conflicts with two other policies in the Plan and is inconsistent with the Plan and not in compliance.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer