Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Anthony Nicholas Deluccia, Jr.
Anthony Nicholas Deluccia, Jr.
Visitors: 74
0
Bar #216569(FL)     License for 49 years; Member in Good Standing
Hillsboro Beach FL

Are you Anthony Nicholas Deluccia, Jr.? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

84-001482  SUNBURST URETHANE SYSTEMS, INC. vs. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES  (1984)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Aug. 27, 1984
Petition seeking review of bid process resulted in Petitioner losing because not lowest bidder. Zoning restrictions should not to be evaluated by Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (DHRS).
83-002543  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES vs. DAVID R. HUTTO, D/B/A NEIGHBORHOOD DISCOUNT  (1983)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: May 08, 1984
Grocery disqualified from Federal Food Stamp program should not have Women Infants and Children (WIC) contract revoked. Hearing Officer recommends proceeding be dismissed.
83-001839  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES vs. UNICARE HEALTH FACILITIES, INC.  (1983)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Oct. 21, 1983
Petitioner's failure to produce evidence indicating Respondent's violation of rules or statutes resulted in administrative complaint being dismissed.
83-001461  ORA LEE ANDREWS vs. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES  (1983)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Sep. 08, 1983
Petitioner claims entitlement to more than $13/month assistance because of mistake in number of people in her household. Recommend dismissal.
82-003019  MICHAEL L. COYLE vs. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES  (1982)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Apr. 11, 1983
The ultimate issue is whether Coyle is eligible for vocational rehabilitation benefits. The eligibility requirements for vocational rehabilitation benefits are set forth in both federal and state law. An individual is eligible when it is certified that: A physical or mental disability is present; A substantial handicap to employment exists; and Vocational rehabilitation services may reasonably be expected to render an individual fit to engage in gainful employment. Based upon the evidence presented at the hearing, there is no viable dispute that Coyle would not benefit from the receipt of vocational rehabilitation services, or that a documented physical disability does not exist. The real factual issue presented is whether Coyle has a substantial handicap to his employment. Both parties submitted post hearing proposed findings of fact in the form of proposed recommended orders filed March 4 and March 15, 1983. To the extent the proposed findings of fact have not been included in the factual findings in this order, they are specifically rejected as being irrelevant, not being based upon the most credible evidence, or not being a finding of fact.Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (DHRS) failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that Petitioner was unable to perform his job. Therefore, Petitioner was eligible for Vocational Rehabilitation benefits.
82-001967  MARTIN M. MCALLISTER vs. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES  (1982)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Jan. 20, 1983
The ultimate issue to be determined in this proceeding is which of the bids submitted to the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services in response to its Request for Proposal for office space and facilities in Arcadia, Florida, is the lowest and best response to the invitation. The Petitioner contends that the Intervenor's bid was not responsive to the Request for Proposal, and that even if the Intervenor's bid were considered responsive, that Petitioner's bid was the lowest and best response. The Intervenor contends that its bid was responsive and that it was the lowest and best response. The Department contends that it properly evaluated the responses and that the bid should be awarded to the Intervenor.Intervenor had the lowest and best response to Respondent`s Request for Proposal (RFP).
82-000312  CHUCK BUNDSCHU, INC. vs. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES  (1982)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Jul. 07, 1982
The questions presented here concern the entitlement of the Petitioner or Intervenor to be awarded lease rights under the Respondent's proposed Lease No. 590:8026, in that Petitioner and Intervenor have claimed that entitlement to the exclusion of the other party.Intervenor was the low bidder for lease, according to statute and rule.
81-002413  LUCY JEFFERY vs. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES  (1981)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Mar. 03, 1982
Whether Petitioner is eligible for low income energy assistance as provided in Section 409.508, Florida Statutes (1980), Home Energy Assistance Program; Rules 10 CER 81-5 through 81-13, Low Income Energy Assistance Program, amended by Rules 10 CER 81-16 and 81-17, Florida Administrative Code.Petitioner's medical statement does not claim medical condition is life threatening, which is the requirement for energy assistance. Deny petition.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer