Broward FL Lawyers | Anthony Nicholas Deluccia, Jr. -- eLawyers

03-003290 JULIE A. BEDELL vs DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES (2003)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 12, 2003

The issue is whether Respondent, Department of Children and Family Services, violated the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, as amended, Section 760.10, Florida Statutes (1993), as alleged in the Petition for Relief filed by Petitioner, Julie A. Bedell. Specifically, Petitioner alleged that after she was hired, completed training, and was assigned to a section, her section supervisor terminated her probationary employment because of her age (49 years), while other younger employees were retained.Petitioner`s allegation of discrimination, that Respondent terminated her because she was 49 years old, was, in fact, not true. Petitioner`s refusal to obey policy and procedures was the factual basis for her termination.

04-003271 DAPHNE BROWN vs DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES (2004)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 20, 2004

The issue is whether Respondent committed an unlawful employment practice contrary to Section 760.10, Florida Statutes (2004),1/ by discriminating against Petitioner based on her age, race, and/or national origin.Petitioner was terminated from her job for insubordination. No credible evidence was presented to establish that her age, race, or national origin had any bearing on the Respondent`s decision to dismiss her.

85-000618 MARILYN MCFADDEN vs. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES (1985)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Aug. 19, 1999

May Petitioner terminate vocational rehabilitation services to Respondent, specifically, vocational rehabilitation benefits under Chapter 10, F.A.C., for a two year program to become a newspaper writer?Respondent had vocational rehabilitation program with HRS. Her needs changed, but she was refused services under the existing program. Termination of vocational rehabilitation benefits should be affirmed.

93-006584 ELMER AND VIVIAN GRIFFIN vs DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES (1993)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 17, 1993

The issue in this case is whether Respondent may refuse to renew the foster care license of Petitioners.Foster care license removed due to corporal punishment and poor parenting skills.

92-004789F LARRY TOWNSAN | L. T. vs DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES (1992)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 05, 1992

Whether the Petitioner is entitled to an award of an award of attorney's fees and costs related to the Respondent's prosecution of DOAH Case No. 92- 0252C.Petitioner not entiled to fees where no evidence that nonprevailing party acted for improper purpose.

92-003009 A BOND OF LOVE ADOPTION AGENCY, INC., AND SUSAN L. STOCKMAN vs DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES (1992)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 18, 1992

The issue for consideration in this hearing is whether Petitioner meets the education and experience requirements for licensure as Executive Director or for appointment to the Board of Directors of an adoption agency in Florida as outlined in Rule 10M- 24, F.A.C..Evidence is clear that attorney with extensive adoption practice and service as intermediary meets rule criteria for licensure as adoption agency executed directions.

89-001183 WILLIAM GRIMSLEY vs. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES (1989)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Aug. 09, 1989

Whether the Petitioner abandoned his position as a state employee.Employee who attempted to contact agency with collect call, not accepted, and through his sister, who did not reach supervisor, did not abandon job.

88-003791BID EARL S. DYESS, JR. vs. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES (1988)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Apr. 14, 1989

Whether the Petitioner was the lowest responsive bidder in Lease No. 590:1975, and therefore entitled to the contract award.Further definition of term "Dry and measurable" at BID conference distributed to all bidders cannot be challenged when bid awarded to someone else.

88-005941RU EARL S. DYESS, JR. vs. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES (1988)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Feb. 22, 1989

Whether the agency's definition of the term "dry and measurable" as used in HRS bid documents is an unpromulgated rule which cannot be used as a basis for the agency's decision to reject the Petitioner's response to a bid proposal in Lease Number 590:1975. Whether the agency's requirement that a building be "dry and measurable" before a bid is accepted is an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.Rule challenge. Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services' interpretation of "dry and measurable" did not amount to an illicit rule.

88-004585 LORENZO THOMAS vs. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES (1988)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Jan. 12, 1989

State employees running for office, if under Hatch Act, are deemed to have resigned if prior approval not obtained. Approval of former candidacy not enough

Anthony Nicholas Deluccia, Jr.