Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Arthur Rudolph Wiedinger Jr.
Arthur Rudolph Wiedinger Jr.
Visitors: 49
0
Bar #242144(FL)     License for 48 years; Member in Good Standing
Tallahassee FL

Are you Arthur Rudolph Wiedinger Jr.? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

91-006290  PEGGY ANN PARAMORE vs BOARD OF ARCHITECTURE AND INTERIOR DESIGN  (1991)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 30, 1991
Whether or not Petitioner is qualified for licensure as an interior designer.Whether petitioner is qualified for licensure as an interior designer.
91-001884  KAREN D. MAST vs BOARD OF ARCHITECTURE AND INTERIOR DESIGN  (1991)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 25, 1991
The issue for consideration in this case is whether the Petitioner, Karen D. Mast, qualifies for licensure without examination as an interior designer as a result of the breadth of her experience consistent with provisions of Florida Statutes.Applicant's prior work over more than 6 years qualifies her for registration as interior designer without examination.
91-002708  COLLEEN ANN KELLY vs BOARD OF ARCHITECTURE AND INTERIOR DESIGN  (1991)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 02, 1991
The issue to be resolved in this proceeding concerns whether the Petitioner, Colleen Ann Kelly, is qualified for licensure without examination as an interior designer based upon her cumulative experience. If she possesses the required number of months experience in work which meets the definition of interior design, she will be able to be licensed as an interior designer without having to sit for the relevant examination.Petitioner did not have to do all activities reference in statute for disputed work experience to qualify as interior design experience Petitioner may be licensed No exam
90-007549  VIVIAN HOOVER HEEKE vs BOARD OF ARCHITECTURE AND INTERIOR DESIGN  (1990)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 16, 1991
Whether Petitioner is qualified for licensure, without examination, as an interior designer pursuant to Chapter 88-383, Laws of Florida, as amended by Chapter 89-19, Laws of Florida, based upon her employment history?Applicant who had at least 72 months of interior design experience qualified for licensure without examination.
90-007222  CARL HIGGINS vs BOARD OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS  (1990)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 15, 1990
The issue for determination in this proceeding is whether Petitioner is entitled to licensure by endorsement as a landscape architect without examination pursuant to Chapter 481, Florida Statutes.Applicant not entitled to license by endorsement as landscape architect when requirements in Tennesee were not equal to those in Florida.
91-004087RX  RICHARD CHARLES GASTON vs DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS  (1991)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 02, 1991
Whether Rule 33-7.005, Florida Administrative Code, constitutes an invalid exercise of delegated authority?Rule providing right to file for restoration of civil rights ""at time of release"" contrary to 944.293 and is invalid.
90-006691  RUTH J. STIEREN vs BOARD OF ARCHITECTURE  (1990)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 23, 1990
The central issue in this case is whether Petitioner is entitled to licensure as an interior designer under the criteria which allow licensure without examination.Petitioner failed to show experience in entire range of services constitu- ting "interior design."
91-000906  M. SHARMA BRYANT MCALWEE vs BOARD OF ARCHITECTURE AND INTERIOR DESIGN  (1991)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 11, 1991
The central issue in this case is whether Petitioner is entitled to licensure as an interior designer under the criteria set forth in Section 21, Chapter 88-383, Laws of Florida.Petitioner established her entitlement to licensure without exam based upon her experience as interior designer.
90-007815  KEYSTONE EXCAVATORS vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (1990)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 10, 1990
The only issue remaining in this case is the extent to which the Petitioner, the Department of Transportation (DOT), should penalize the Respondent, Keystone Excavators, Inc. (Keystone), for operating a commercial motor vehicle with an expired vehicle registration and for exceeding the maximum legal weight of 35,000 pounds allowed under Section 316.545, Fla. Stat. (1987).DOT has burden of proof. Legal tolerance added to legal weight to get amount overweight. DOT can modify statutory penalty for isolated inadvertence

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer