welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  8. Austin Matulonis Hensel
Austin Matulonis Hensel
Austin Matulonis Hensel
Visitors: 41
0
Bar #111535(FL)     License for 11 years; Member in Good Standing
Tallahassee FL

Are you Austin Matulonis Hensel? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

15-004992  JOHN DADDONO vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 04, 2015
The issue in this case is whether Petitioner’s Outdoor Advertising Permit Applications should be denied due to application deficiencies, and because the signs are located adjacent to a designated scenic highway.Petitioner's application for an outdoor advertising sign located adjacent to a designated scenic highway should be denied.
15-000733  KATHRYN HOGAN PEREDA AND MARGARET HOGAN MARKER, D/B/A HFT ADVERTISING vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 13, 2015
The issue in this case is whether the Department of Transportation (“Department”) properly issued a Notice of Denied Outdoor Advertising Permit Application for the eastward face of the Monument Sign owned by Kathryn Hogan Pereda and Margaret Hogan Marker, d/b/a/ HFT Advertising (“Petitioner” or “HFT”).The Department properly denied Petitioner's permit application because the sign failed to meet the spacing requirements of section 479.07 and no exemptions apply.
14-004926  DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs I-10 PECAN HOUSE, INC.  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 20, 2014
As to DOAH Case Nos. 14-4926 and 14-4927, the issues are whether the billboards identified in the notices of violation are located on the premises of Respondent's business and, thus, exempt from licensure; and, if not, whether the billboards are eligible for licensure pursuant to section 479.07, Florida Statutes, or, alternatively, the "grandfather" provision set forth in section 479.105, Florida Statutes. With respect to DOAH Case No. 14-4928, the issue is whether Respondent engaged in, or benefitted from, the unpermitted removal, cutting, or trimming of vegetation.14-4926: Recommend removal of billboard identified in NOV 1487. 14-4927: Recommend reconsideration of application pursuant to pre-2014 version of 479.105. 14-4928: Removal of vegetation enhanced visibility of billboard; rec. $1k fine, no mitigation.
14-004927  DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs I-10 PECAN HOUSE, INC.  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 20, 2014
As to DOAH Case Nos. 14-4926 and 14-4927, the issues are whether the billboards identified in the notices of violation are located on the premises of Respondent's business and, thus, exempt from licensure; and, if not, whether the billboards are eligible for licensure pursuant to section 479.07, Florida Statutes, or, alternatively, the "grandfather" provision set forth in section 479.105, Florida Statutes. With respect to DOAH Case No. 14-4928, the issue is whether Respondent engaged in, or benefitted from, the unpermitted removal, cutting, or trimming of vegetation.14-4926: Recommend removal of billboard identified in NOV 1487. 14-4927: Recommend reconsideration of application pursuant to pre-2014 version of 479.105. 14-4928: Removal of vegetation enhanced visibility of billboard; rec. $1k fine, no mitigation.
14-004928  DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs OLAN Q. NOBLES  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 20, 2014
As to DOAH Case Nos. 14-4926 and 14-4927, the issues are whether the billboards identified in the notices of violation are located on the premises of Respondent's business and, thus, exempt from licensure; and, if not, whether the billboards are eligible for licensure pursuant to section 479.07, Florida Statutes, or, alternatively, the "grandfather" provision set forth in section 479.105, Florida Statutes. With respect to DOAH Case No. 14-4928, the issue is whether Respondent engaged in, or benefitted from, the unpermitted removal, cutting, or trimming of vegetation.14-4926: Recommend removal of billboard identified in NOV 1487. 14-4927: Recommend reconsideration of application pursuant to pre-2014 version of 479.105. 14-4928: Removal of vegetation enhanced visibility of billboard; rec. $1k fine, no mitigation.
19-001398  JOHN MAJKA, INDIVIDUALLY, AND ON BEHALF OF HARRY E. MILLER vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (2019)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 15, 2019
Whether the Second Amended Notice of Driveway Modification, in which Respondent, Florida Department of Transportation (“FDOT”), seeks to modify the driveway used by Petitioners, John Majka, individually and on behalf of Harry E. Miller, and Intervenor, JPM Ventures, Inc. (“JPM”), is consistent with sections 335.181, 335.182, and 335.1825, Florida Statutes, and Florida Administrative Code Rules 14-96.011 and 14-96.015; and whether FDOT engaged in conduct in violation of section 120.569(2)(e).Resp. proved its modifications to Pet's driveway were necessary for safety and operational reasons under chapter 335, and Rules 14-96.011 and 14-96.015, F.A.C; Petitioners failed to prove Resp. engaged in improper purpose under section 120.569(2)(e).
19-005890  OUTFRONT MEDIA, LLC vs FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (2019)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 05, 2019
Whether Petitioner’s applications for outdoor advertising permits should be granted or denied.Applications for sign permits along Interstate I-275 must be denied for failure to comply with the spacing requirement imposed by section 479.07(9)(a)1., Florida Statutes.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer