welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Bart O'Brian Moore
Bart O'Brian Moore
Bart O'Brian Moore
Visitors: 58
0
Bar #768715(FL)     License for 37 years; Member in Good Standing
Lake City FL

Are you Bart O'Brian Moore? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

14-005334RU  HARMONY ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DRUGS, DEVICES AND COSMETICS PROGRAM  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 08, 2015
Whether Petitioner has been substantially affected by agency statements made by Respondent, and, if so, whether the statements violate section 120.54(1)(a), Florida Statutes?Respondent's statements that prescription drugs retain their status as such after disposal as Uniform Pharmaceutical Waste substantially affected Petitioner and, as unpromulgated rules, violated section 120.54(1)(a).
09-001774  AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC., D/B/A LIFE CARE CENTER OF JACKSONVILLE  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 07, 2009
09-001775  AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC., D/B/A LIFE CARE CENTER OF OCALA  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 07, 2009
Whether Petitioner, the Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA or Agency), proved that Respondents, Life Care Centers of America, Inc., d/b/a Life Care Center of Port St. Lucie, and other Life Care facilities in Winter Haven, Ocala, Orlando, and Citrus County, were not in compliance with the Medicaid-patient-days condition stated on the face of the Certificates of Need (CON) for each facility for calendar year 2006, and, if not in compliance, whether the Agency may impose administrative fines in the amount sought in the first amended administrative complaints.The Agency proved by clear and convincing evidence that each Respondent nursing home did not meet their Certificate of Need Medicaid-patient-days conditions for calendar year 2006, but Respondent justified a reduced fine in each case.
09-001776  AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC., D/B/A LIFE CARE CENTER OF ORLANDO  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 07, 2009
Whether Petitioner, the Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA or Agency), proved that Respondents, Life Care Centers of America, Inc., d/b/a Life Care Center of Port St. Lucie, and other Life Care facilities in Winter Haven, Ocala, Orlando, and Citrus County, were not in compliance with the Medicaid-patient-days condition stated on the face of the Certificates of Need (CON) for each facility for calendar year 2006, and, if not in compliance, whether the Agency may impose administrative fines in the amount sought in the first amended administrative complaints.The Agency proved by clear and convincing evidence that each Respondent nursing home did not meet their Certificate of Need Medicaid-patient-days conditions for calendar year 2006, but Respondent justified a reduced fine in each case.
09-002146  AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC., D/B/A LIFE CARE CENTER OF CITRUS COUNTY  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 22, 2009
Whether Petitioner, the Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA or Agency), proved that Respondents, Life Care Centers of America, Inc., d/b/a Life Care Center of Port St. Lucie, and other Life Care facilities in Winter Haven, Ocala, Orlando, and Citrus County, were not in compliance with the Medicaid-patient-days condition stated on the face of the Certificates of Need (CON) for each facility for calendar year 2006, and, if not in compliance, whether the Agency may impose administrative fines in the amount sought in the first amended administrative complaints.The Agency proved by clear and convincing evidence that each Respondent nursing home did not meet their Certificate of Need Medicaid-patient-days conditions for calendar year 2006, but Rrespondent justified a reduced fine in each case.
09-001773  AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC., D/B/A LIFE CARE CENTER OF WINTER HAVEN  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 07, 2009
Whether Petitioner, the Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA or Agency), proved that Respondents, Life Care Centers of America, Inc., d/b/a Life Care Center of Port St. Lucie, and other Life Care facilities in Winter Haven, Ocala, Orlando, and Citrus County, were not in compliance with the Medicaid-patient-days condition stated on the face of the Certificates of Need (CON) for each facility for calendar year 2006, and, if not in compliance, whether the Agency may impose administrative fines in the amount sought in the first amended administrative complaints.The Agency proved by clear and convincing evidence that each Respondent nursing home did not meet their Certificate of Need Medicaid-patient-days conditions for calendar year 2006, but Respondent justified a reduced fine in each case.
07-003403RP  PROMISE HEALTHCARE, INC. vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2007)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 23, 2007
Petitioners proved that the proposed rule to include long-term care hospitals within the definition of tertiary health service is an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.
07-003404RP  SELECT SPECIALTY HOSPITAL-ORLANDO, INC. vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2007)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 24, 2007
Petitioners proved that the proposed rule to include long-term care hospitals within the definition of tertiary health service is an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.
90-002462  FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION vs R. GRANGER BRUNER, T/A GRANGER BRUNER REALTY  (1990)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 25, 1990
The issue in this case is whether the allegations of the Administrative Complaints are correct and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Broker failed to maintain escrow account; audit revealed shortage; hearsay insufficient to establish shortage amount; Respondent admits shortage.
08-005413  AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs SENIOR LIFESTYLES, LLC, D/B/A KIPLING MANOR RETIREMENT CENTER  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 28, 2008

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer