Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Bradford Jon Beilly
Bradford Jon Beilly
Visitors: 80
1
Bar #310328(FL)     License for 45 years; Member in Good Standing
Fort Lauderdale FL

Are you Bradford Jon Beilly? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

15-005037  KIRK ZIADIE vs DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 14, 2015
The issue is whether Petitioner's application for renewal of his professional occupational license as a thoroughbred horse trainer should be granted.Respondent failed to prove violation of section 550.2415(1)(a), Florida Statutes, because the procedures followed in conducting drug tests constituted an unadopted rule and were contrary to the adopted rule.
15-002326PL  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING vs KIRK ZIADIE  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 23, 2015
Petitioner's failure to follow its rule and its reliance upon an unadopted rule precluded a finding of violation on some counts, but Petitioner proved 18 counts of racing a horse with a drug which merited a fine of $18,000 and suspension for six years.
10-002388PL  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, BOARD OF VETERINARY MEDICINE vs PHILLIP J. ALEONG, D.V.M.  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 30, 2010
The issues in this case are whether Respondent committed the violation alleged in the Administrative Complaint, and if so, the penalty that should be imposed.Respondent is guilty of recordkeeping violation by failing to record amounts of medications administered to racehorses. Recommend guideline penalty of letter of reprimand, 6-month term of probation, and $1,500 fine.
08-005457PL  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, BOARD OF VETERINARY MEDICINE vs PHILIP J. ALEONG, D.V.M.  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 31, 2008
Whether Respondent committed the violation alleged in the Administrative Complaint and, if so, what disciplinary action should be taken against him.Respondent is guilty of practicing while his license was suspended; that he believed, based on advice of counsel, that such action was not prohibited, militated in favor of a less severe penalty than revocation of his license.
07-002415PL  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, BOARD OF VETERINARY MEDICINE vs PHILIP JEROME ALEONG, D.V.M.  (2007)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 30, 2007
The issue presented is whether Respondent is guilty of the allegations contained in the Administrative Complaint filed against him, and, if so, what disciplinary action should be taken against him, if any.Reprimand and $1,000 fine for veterinarian who failed to maintain medical record of a pre-purchase examination for not less than three years after date of last entry based on Board`s guidelines and mitigating factors.
06-002717PL  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, BOARD OF VETERINARY MEDICINE vs PHILIP JEROME ALEONG, D.V.M.  (2006)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 27, 2006
The issue in this case is whether Respondent, Phillip J. Aleong, D.V.M., violated Section 474.214(1)(f), Florida Statutes (2005), by failing to pay an administrative fine and investigative costs within 30 days from the date of the filing of Final Order BPR-2005-04911 with Petitioner's Clerk as alleged in an Administrative Complaint filed by Petitioner, the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, on June 26, 2006, in BPR Case Number 2005-066424; and, if so, what disciplinary action should be taken against his license to practice veterinary medicine in the State of Florida.Respondent violated Petitioner`s Order when he paid a fine in a prior case late.
02-000473  CIVIL CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGY, INC. vs SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 07, 2002
The issue is whether Respondent's certification as a minority business enterprise should be revoked, as proposed by Petitioner in its letter dated December 20, 2001.Minority owner failed to demonstrate adequate technical knowledge of her business; shared resources with a non-minority in the same field; and made a material misrepresentation on her application; MBE certification revoked.
21-001184RP  THE FLORIDA HORSEMEN'S BENEVOLENT AND PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION, INC., A FLORIDA NONPROFIT CORPORATION, AND GULFSTREAM PARK RACING ASSOCIATION, INC. A FLORIDA CORPORATION vs DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING  (2021)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 31, 2021
The issue is whether the proposed amendment to Florida Administrative Code Rule 61D-3.001 is an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.Petitioners established that the proposed amendment to Florida Administrative Code Rule 61D-3.001 is an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority in that it contravenes the statute it purports to implement.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer