Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Bradly Roger Bettin
Bradly Roger Bettin
Visitors: 19
0
Bar #369403(FL)     License for 41 years; Member in Good Standing
Cocoa FL

Are you Bradly Roger Bettin? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

83-678  In Interest of Hd  (1984)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jan. 04, 1984 Citations: 443 So. 2d 410
443 So. 2d 410 (1984) In the Interest of H.D., a Child. No. 83-678. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. January 4, 1984. Rehearing Denied January 18, 1984. Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Cathleen Brady, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant. Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Lydia M. Valenti, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee. HERSEY, Judge. Finding that Rule 8.290(d)(4) of the Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure tracks Rule 3.111(d..
94-3453  George v. City of Cocoa  (1996)
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Filed: Feb. 29, 1996 Citations: 78 F.3d 494
78 F.3d 494 Mary GEORGE; Charles L. Stovall; Martha Ray Bethel; W.O. Wells, Reverend; Joann Stovall; Barbara Jenkins; Sylvester Weaver, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF COCOA, FLORIDA: Cocoa City Council; Lester Campbell, Mayor-Councilmember of the City of Cocoa; Ray Debord, John Lee Blubach, Dave Salisbury, members of the Cocoa City Council, et al., Defendants-Appellees, Ray Griffin, Member of the Cocoa City Council; Fred Galey, Brevard County Supervisor of Elections, Defendants. No. 94-3453. U..
98-1283  VIRGINIA ELEC. & LIGHTING CORP. v. Koester  (1998)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jul. 27, 1998 Citations: 714 So. 2d 1164
714 So. 2d 1164 (1998) VIRGINIA ELECTRONICS AND LIGHTING CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. George KOESTER, Richard Hunt and Translight Corporation, Respondents. No. 98-1283. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. July 27, 1998. Michael Bowlus and John D. Webb of Ford, Jeter & Bowlus, P.A., Jacksonville, for Petitioner. Sally J. Kircher of Kircher & Vail, P.A., Jacksonville, for Respondents Koester and Translight Corporation. David B. Ferebee, Jacksonville, for Respondent Hunt. WEBSTER, Ju..
83-622  Sherban v. Richardson  (1984)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Mar. 07, 1984 Citations: 445 So. 2d 1147
445 So. 2d 1147 (1984) Elaine SHERBAN, Appellant, v. Audrey RICHARDSON, Appellee. No. 83-622. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. March 7, 1984. *1148 William R. Hussey, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant. Bruce Zeidel of Cohen, Scherer & Cohn, P.A., North Palm Beach, for appellee. HERSEY, Judge. This is an appeal from a final judgment based upon a jury verdict assessing damages for fraudulent misrepresentation as to ownership in a transaction involving the sale of corporate stock. ..
80-2200  Nunziato v. P & L Auto Parts, Inc.  (1981)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Aug. 18, 1981 Citations: 403 So. 2d 1031
403 So. 2d 1031 (1981) Frank NUNZIATO, Individually, and As Personal Representative of the Estate of Lena Nunziato, Deceased, Frank F. Nunziato and George T. Nunziato, by and through Frank Nunziato, Their Father and Next Friend, Appellants, v. P & L AUTO PARTS, INC. and South Carolina Insurance Company, Appellees. No. 80-2200. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. August 18, 1981. Rehearing Denied October 7, 1981. *1032 Kermit G. Kindred and Richard R. McCormack, Miami, for appella..
92-002990GM  BOAZ BAR-NAVON AND ENTERPRISES INTERNATIONAL, INC. vs BREVARD COUNTY  (1992)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 15, 1992
The issue in this case is whether the County's comprehensive plan amendment 91B.9 is "in compliance" under the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act. (It must be found to be "in compliance" if the County's determination that it is "in compliance" is at least "fairly debatable.")DCA intent: plan amendment in compliance. Petitioner didn't prove beyond fair debate, change from residential to mixed land use inconsistent with Future Land Use Map.
90-004821GM  JOYCE WILSON vs CITY OF COCOA AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS  (1990)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 03, 1990
The issue in this case is whether the subject plan amendment, which changes the future land use designations of parcels owned by each of the Petitioners, is not in compliance for the reasons set forth in the petitions.Plan amendment consistent with criteria of public participation, supporting data analysis, land use suitability, discouraging urban sprawl, etc.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer