Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Brandon Jay Hechtman
Brandon Jay Hechtman
Visitors: 46
0
Bar #88652(FL)     License for 14 years
Coral Gables FL

Are you Brandon Jay Hechtman? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

16-003298  DOUG WILLIAMS vs CITY OF CORAL SPRINGS POLICE OFFICERS' PENSION FUND  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 27, 2016
The issue to be determined is whether the Board of Trustees for the City of Coral Springs Police Officers' Pension Fund (Respondent or the Board) should issue final orders suspending payment of pension benefits to Douglas Williams and Sherry Williams (Petitioners or the Williamses) pending a later Board decision on forfeiture pursuant to section 112.3173, Florida Statutes (2016),1/ consistent with initial orders recommending such suspension of benefits issued on March 15, 2016.Respondent failed to demonstrate that it had been delegated legislative authority from the City to allow it to adopt policy on suspension of retirement benefits, or to apply that policy to Petitioners.
16-003302  SHERRY WILLIAMS vs CITY OF CORAL SPRINGS POLICE OFFICERS' PENSION FUND  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 27, 2016
The issue to be determined is whether the Board of Trustees for the City of Coral Springs Police Officers' Pension Fund (Respondent or the Board) should issue final orders suspending payment of pension benefits to Douglas Williams and Sherry Williams (Petitioners or the Williamses) pending a later Board decision on forfeiture pursuant to section 112.3173, Florida Statutes (2016),1/ consistent with initial orders recommending such suspension of benefits issued on March 15, 2016.Respondent failed to demonstrate that it had been delegated legislative authority from the City to allow it to adopt policy on suspension of retirement benefits, or to apply that policy to Petitioners.
20-002557FC  DOUG WILLIAMS AND SHERRY WILLIAMS vs CITY OF CORAL SPRINGS POLICE OFFICERS' PENSION FUND  (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 04, 2020
The issue to be determined is whether Petitioners are entitled to an award of reasonable prevailing party attorney’s fees and costs stemming from a prior consolidated action before ALJ F. Scott Boyd, DOAH Case Nos. 16-3298 and 16-3302, pursuant to section 185.05, Florida Statutes. Before the final hearing, the parties stipulated to an amount of reasonable prevailing party attorney’s fees and costs if the undersigned determines that Petitioners are entitled to an award of reasonable prevailing party attorney’s fees and costs stemming from that prior action before ALJ Boyd.Petitioners have not demonstrated entitlement to costs and reasonable attorney's fees as "prevailing parties" pursuant to section 185.05(5), Fla. Stat.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer