Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Bruce Alan Leinback
Bruce Alan Leinback
Visitors: 65
0
Bar #219691(FL)     License for 49 years
Monticello FL

Are you Bruce Alan Leinback? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

03-001612  QUINCY L. MOORE vs NORTH FLORIDA COMMUNITY COLLEGE  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 02, 2003
Whether Respondent violated the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, as alleged in the Charge of Discrimination filed by Petitioner on February 5, 2001.Respondent articulated legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for offering more money to and hiring job candidate other than Petitioner. No evidence presented that Respondent`s reasons were pretextual. Recommend Charge of Discrimination be dismissed.
02-002922  JAMES B. BROWN vs NORTH FLORIDA COMMUNITY COLLEGE  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 22, 2002
Whether Respondent discriminated in its hiring practices against Petitioner because of his race, and whether Respondent retaliated against Petitioner because he filed a charge of discrimination, and a complaint.The employer stated legitimate nondiscriminatory reasons for its actions. The Petitioner did not show these reasons to be pre-textual.
95-005701BID  COASTAL MARINE CONSTRUCTION, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (1995)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 20, 1995
At issue in this proceeding is whether the decision of respondent, Department of Transportation (Department), to award the subject bid to intervenor, The Walsh Group, Ltd., Inc. and Subsidiaries d/b/a Archer-Western Contractors, Ltd. (Archer-Western), comported with the essential requirements of law.BID not at material variance from the Invitation To Bid and therefore award of BID not contary to the essential requirements of law.
91-005337BID  KELLY BROTHERS, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (1991)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 23, 1991
Whether the Department arbitrarily evaluated the bids submitted for State Job No. 10120-3522, or reviewed the bids in any manner that was fraudulent, illegal or dishonest. Whether the Department should set aside its notice of intent to award and rebid the contract. Whether Petitioner Kelly Brothers or Intervenor Tom Quinn was the lowest responsive bidder instead of Intervenor Hubbard, the prime contractor named in the notice of intent to award.Failure to meet Disadvantaged Business Enterprise goal and provide good faith documentation nonresponsive as a matter of law.
90-005032BID  JONES FLOOR COVERING, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES  (1990)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 14, 1990
Whether respondent Department of General Services should award a contract for carpet installation, in accordance with invitation to bid number 69-360-240- F, to petitioner, to intervenor, or to neither?Failure to check box on form indicating no felony conviction is material variance even absent conviction, since bidder not entitled to ""second look.""
90-005224RU  JONES FLOOR COVERING, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES  (1990)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 21, 1990
Whether a special condition in Department of General Services invitation to bid number 69-360-240-F is a rule and, if so, whether it is an invalid exercise of respondent's delegated legislative authority? Whether petitioner has standing to raise the question?No standing to challenge rule not affecting bid dispute (because protest was untimely), in absence of proof rule would impact future bids.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer