The issue for consideration in this case is whether Respondent's license as a physician in Florida should be disciplined in some fashion because of the matters set forth in the Administrative Complaint filed herein.Failure to determine gestational age of fetus before terminating pregancy and keep proper records constitutes gross malpractice.

License revoked where unlicensed person repeatedly and flagrantly dispensed a controlled substance from pharmacy without being furnished valid prescription.

An Administrative Complaint dated May 22, 1991, and amended at the commencement of the hearing on June 14th, alleges that Respondent violated Section 458.441(1)(t), F.S. by rendering inappropriate treatment to a patient, by failing to ask appropriate follow-up questions as to her pain and condition, and by failing to see her in a timely manner. The issue is whether the violations occurred, and if so what discipline is appropriate.Failure to provide follow-up care to glaucoma patient constitutes deviation from standard of care. $1000 fine plus 2 year probation

Whether Respondent's license to practice medicine has been disciplined in another state and, if so, what is the appropriate penalty for the Petitioner to impose?Found guilty of having license disciplined in Georgia recommended probation to run concurrently with Georgia probation

The central issue in this case is whether the Respondent is guilty of the violations alleged in the amended administrative complaint dated October 19, 1990; and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Department failed to prove by clear and convincing standard violations against respondent medical records within standard actions also within standard.

The central issue in this case is whether the Respondent is guilty of the violations alleged in the administrative complaint; and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Telephoning in a prescription is practicing medicine per 458.305 and where such act violates respondent's probation, constitutes violation of order of board

The central issue in this case is whether the Respondent is guilty of the violations alleged in the administrative complaint; and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Respondent prescribed drugs on several occasions to person he knew had abuse problem is below level of reasonable care and is gross or repeated malpractice.

The issue is whether respondent's medical license should be disciplined for the reasons set forth in the amended administrative complaint.Respondent guilty of inadequate records, sexual contact with patient and inappropriate prescribing.

The issue for consideration herein was whether the Respondent's license as a registered architect in Florida should be disciplined because of the misconduct alleged in the Administrative Complaint filed herein.Architect's plans which do not contain required items and have numerous other deficiencies support discipline.

Whether Respondent is guilty of violation Section 462.14(1)(q), Florida Statutes, by prescribing, dispensing, administering, mixing, or otherwise preparing a legend drug, including any controlled substance, other than in the course of the naturopathic physician's professional practice. Whether Respondent is guilty of violating Section 462.14.(1)(n), Florida Statutes, by failing to keep written medical records justifying the course of treatment of the patient, S.N. Whether Respondent is guilty of violating Section 462.14(1)(h), Florida Statutes, by failing to perform a statutory or legal obligation placed upon a licensed naturopathic physician, by prescribing a controlled substance to patient S.N. not done in good faith or not done in the course of Respondent's professional practice. Whether Respondent is guilty of gross or repeated malpractice or failed to practice naturopathic medicine with that level of care, skill, and treatment which is recognized by a reasonably prudent similar physician as being appropriate under similar conditions and circumstances, in violation of Section 462.14(1)(t), Florida Statutes. Whether Respondent is guilty of exercising undue influence on the patient or client, S.N., in such a manner as to exploit the patient or client for the financial gain of the licensee, in violation of Section 462.14(1)(o), Florida Statutes. Whether Respondent is guilty of gross or repeated malpractice or failed to practice naturopathic medicine with that level of care, skill, and treatment which is recognized by a reasonably prudent similar physician as being appropriate under similar conditions and circumstances, concerning patients M.C.P., J.S. and M.A. for the following reasons: failure to perform an adequate physical examination or order appropriate tests; failure to adequately monitor the patient; failure to properly supervises the staff of MIWC; and, prescribing legend drugs inappropriately, in violation of Section 462.14(1)(t), Florida Statutes. Whether Respondent is guilty of violating Section 462.14(1)(n), Florida Statutes by failing to keep written medical records justifying the course of treatment of the patients, M.C.P., J.S. and M.A. Whether Respondent is guilty of violating Section 462.14(1)(q), Florida Statutes, by prescribing, dispensing, administering, mixing, or otherwise preparing a legend drug, including any controlled substance, to patients M.C.P., and M.A. other than in the course of the naturopathic physician's professional practice. Whether Respondent is guilty of violating Section 462.14(1)(w), Florida Statutes, by delegating professional responsibilities to a person when the licensee delegating such responsibilities knows or has reason to know that such a person is not qualified by training, experience, or licensure to perform them. Whether Respondent is guilty of violating Section 462.14(1)(h), Florida Statutes, by allowing the dispensing of drugs not under his direct supervision. Whether Respondent is guilty of violating Section 462.14(1) (h), Florida Statutes, by failure to properly label medical drugs dispensed at the Island Weight Clinic (hereinafter, WIWC) Whether Respondent is guilty of violating Section 462.14(1)(h), Florida Statutes, by failure to make a complete and accurate inventory of all controlled substances on a biannual basis. Whether Respondent is guilty of violating Section 462.14(1) (1), Florida Statutes, by making deceptive, untrue, or fraudulent representations in the practice of naturopathic medicine by claiming the substance HCG is an effective adjunctive therapy in the treatment of obesity.Naturopathic physician`s license revoked for prescribing legend drugs inappropriately; failed to keep records; improper procedure at weight control clinic.