Jefferson FL Lawyers | Brynna J Ross -- eLawyers

13-001853 MICHAEL AND CATHY LAROSA vs PERRY FUNK AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (2013)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 17, 2013

The issue to be determined is whether Petitioners timely filed their petition for hearing to challenge the determination made by the Department of Environmental Protection (“Department”) that Respondent Perry Funk’s proposed dock project is exempt from the requirement to obtain an environmental resource permit.Petitioners failed to prove statements were made to them by a Department employee that justify application of the doctrine of equitable tolling to excuse their late-filed petition for hearing.

13-000686 ROBERT V. KRIEGEL vs MAHOGANY MILL OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (2013)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 20, 2013

Whether Petitioners Kay Rankin and Mike Beard have standing? Whether the project by Mahogany Mill Owners Association, Inc. ("Mahogany Mill"), to remove two existing finger piers and construct three new finger piers and two boat lifts (the "Project") is exempt from the need to obtain an Environmental Resource Permit ("ERP") from the Department of Environmental Protection (the "Department")? Whether the Project qualifies for authorization from the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Fund (the "Board of Trustees") to use sovereign submerged lands?Dock in Channel next to Mahogany Mill Pond in Pensacola qualifies for regulatory exemption since it extends no further into the Channel than pre-existing mooring pilings.

13-000687 BRYAN BAARS vs MAHOGANY MILL OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (2013)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 20, 2013

Whether Petitioners Kay Rankin and Mike Beard have standing? Whether the project by Mahogany Mill Owners Association, Inc. ("Mahogany Mill"), to remove two existing finger piers and construct three new finger piers and two boat lifts (the "Project") is exempt from the need to obtain an Environmental Resource Permit ("ERP") from the Department of Environmental Protection (the "Department")? Whether the Project qualifies for authorization from the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Fund (the "Board of Trustees") to use sovereign submerged lands?Dock in Channel next to Mahogany Mill Pond in Pensacola qualifies for regulatory exemption since it extends no further into the Channel than pre-existing mooring pilings.

13-000774 MIKE BEARD vs MAHOGANY MILL OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (2013)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 01, 2013

Whether Petitioners Kay Rankin and Mike Beard have standing? Whether the project by Mahogany Mill Owners Association, Inc. ("Mahogany Mill"), to remove two existing finger piers and construct three new finger piers and two boat lifts (the "Project") is exempt from the need to obtain an Environmental Resource Permit ("ERP") from the Department of Environmental Protection (the "Department")? Whether the Project qualifies for authorization from the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Fund (the "Board of Trustees") to use sovereign submerged lands?Dock in Channel next to Mahogany Mill Pond in Pensacola qualifies for regulatory exemption since it extends no further into the Channel than pre-existing mooring pilings.

13-000775 ED AND KAY RANKIN vs MAHOGANY MILL OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (2013)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 01, 2013

Whether Petitioners Kay Rankin and Mike Beard have standing? Whether the project by Mahogany Mill Owners Association, Inc. ("Mahogany Mill"), to remove two existing finger piers and construct three new finger piers and two boat lifts (the "Project") is exempt from the need to obtain an Environmental Resource Permit ("ERP") from the Department of Environmental Protection (the "Department")? Whether the Project qualifies for authorization from the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Fund (the "Board of Trustees") to use sovereign submerged lands?Dock in Channel next to Mahogany Mill Pond in Pensacola qualifies for regulatory exemption since it extends no further into the Channel than pre-existing mooring pilings.

11-005313 AMANDA POPE vs DANIEL AND DONNA GRACE; JOSEPH AND LINDA NOFTELL; PAUL AND DEBRA LINGER; ANN PASTORE; THOMPSON AND DANA FILLMER; JOSEPH AND DOTTIE SCRUGGS; STEPHEN FREY; LINDSEY BRANLITT AND JACQUELINE PORTER, TRUSTEES OF THE LAND TRUST DATED MAY 1, 2005; ET AL. (2011)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 14, 2011

At issue in this proceeding is whether Respondents Daniel and Donna Grace; Joseph and Linda Oftell; Paul and Debra Linger; Ann Pastore; Thompson and Dana Fillmer; Joseph and Dottie Scruggs; Stephen Frey; and Lindsey Bramlitt and Jacqueline Porter, Trustees of the Land Trust dated May 1, 2005 (collectively referenced herein as "Applicants") qualify for an exemption from the requirements of coastal construction control line ("CCCL") permitting pursuant to section 161.053(11)(b), Florida Statutes, for their proposed activities in regard to a dune walkover structure seaward of the CCCL at the end of Milliken Lane in St. Johns County, as provided in the Amended Exemption Determination issued by the Department of Environmental Protection ("Department") on September 8, 2011.Applicants failed to demonstrate entitlement to an exemption for the repair of a dune walkover pursuant to section 161.053(11)(b), Florida Statutes.

11-006248 ANASTASIA, INC. vs DANIEL A. MOWREY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (2011)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 09, 2011

At issue in this proceeding is whether Respondents Daniel and Donna Grace; Joseph and Linda Oftell; Paul and Debra Linger; Ann Pastore; Thompson and Dana Fillmer; Joseph and Dottie Scruggs; Stephen Frey; and Lindsey Bramlitt and Jacqueline Porter, Trustees of the Land Trust dated May 1, 2005 (collectively referenced herein as "Applicants") qualify for an exemption from the requirements of coastal construction control line ("CCCL") permitting pursuant to section 161.053(11)(b), Florida Statutes, for their proposed activities in regard to a dune walkover structure seaward of the CCCL at the end of Milliken Lane in St. Johns County, as provided in the Amended Exemption Determination issued by the Department of Environmental Protection ("Department") on September 8, 2011.Applicants failed to demonstrate entitlement to an exemption for the repair of a dune walkover pursuant to section 161.053(11)(b), Florida Statutes.

11-005620 SEA TURTLE OVERSIGHT PROTECTION, INC. vs THE MAYAN BEACH CLUB, INC., OCEAN LANE VILLAS, INC., AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (2011)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 02, 2011

Whether STOP and the County have standing to challenge the issuance of the Modification? Whether the Department should issue the Modification as authorized in Permit No. BO-612 M1?Removal of a sand mound on Ft. Lauderdale's beach does not constitute a "take" of marine sea turtles -- CCCL permit should be issued.

11-005768 BROWARD COUNTY vs THE MAYAN BEACH CLUB, INC., OCEAN LANE VILLAS, INC., AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (2011)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 10, 2011

Whether STOP and the County have standing to challenge the issuance of the Modification? Whether the Department should issue the Modification as authorized in Permit No. BO-612 M1?Removal of a sand mound on Ft. Lauderdale's beach does not constitute a "take" of marine sea turtles -- CCCL permit should be issued.

11-006495 FINR II, INC. vs CF INDUSTRIES, INC., AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (2011)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 29, 2011

The issue is whether CF Industries, Inc. (CF), has provided reasonable assurance that its proposed mining and reclamation of the South Pasture Extension (SPE) mine in Hardee County can be conducted in a manner that complies with applicable statutes and rules so that an Environmental Resource Permit (ERP), SPE conceptual reclamation plan (CRP), South Pasture Wetland Resource Permit (WRP) Modification, and South Pasture Conceptual Reclamation Plan Modification should be issued by the Department of Environmental Protection (Department).Applications for ERP, CRP, & WRP modifications to conduct phosphate mining and reclamation activities in Hardee County approved.

Brynna J Ross