Elawyers Elawyers
Brynna J Ross
Brynna J Ross
Visitors: 102
0
Bar #49933(FL)     License for 17 years
Monticello FL

Are you Brynna J Ross? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

5D10-2813  Self v. State  (2011)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Feb. 25, 2011 Citations: 55 So. 3d 677
55 So. 3d 677 (2011) William T. SELF, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent. No. 5D10-2813. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. February 25, 2011. *678 Robert Wesley, Public Defender and Michelle Yard, Assistant Public Defender, Orlando, for Petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Roark Wall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent. PER CURIAM. William T. Self petitioned this Court for a writ of prohibition to prevent his cr..
2D09-3773  Faulkner v. State  (2010)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Nov. 10, 2010 Citations: 48 So. 3d 845
48 So. 3d 845 (2010) FAULKNER v. STATE. No. 2D09-3773. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. November 10, 2010. DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION Affirmed.
17-002441PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MASSAGE THERAPY vs BLAKE C. RICE, L.M.T.  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 20, 2017
Whether the Respondent, a licensed massage therapist, should be disciplined under section 480.046(1)(p), Florida Statutes (2016),1/ for sexual misconduct in the practice of massage therapy; and, if so, the appropriate discipline.DOH proved by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent was guilty of sexual misconduct in massage therapy. Respondent did not explain why Board should deviate from revocation and fine in penalty guideline.
16-004101PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF NURSING vs LISA MICHELLE JACKSON, R.N.  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 20, 2016
The issues to be determined are whether Respondent possessed Dilaudid without a legitimate purpose, and whether Respondent is unable to practice nursing with reasonable skill and safety, in violation of section 464.018(1), Florida Statutes, as alleged in the Administrative Complaint and, if so, the appropriate penalty.Petitioner proved that Respondent violated section 464.018(1) as a result of her possession and use of opiods. A one-year suspension of her license, with compliance with IPN standards before reinstatement was waranted.
16-006421PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF NURSING vs BRANDON YOUNG, C.N.A.  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 01, 2016
The issues to be determined are whether Respondent committed sexual misconduct against a patient, in violation of sections 464.204(1)(b) and 456.072(1)(v), Florida Statutes, as alleged in the Administrative Complaint and, if so, the appropriate penalty.Petitioner failed to prove, by clear and convincing evidence, that Respondent committed sexual misconduct against a patient. The Administrative Complaint should be dismissed.
15-003293PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MASSAGE THERAPY vs NA LI, L.M.T.  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 08, 2015
The issues to be determined are whether Respondent engaged in sexual misconduct in the practice of massage therapy, in violation of section 480.0485, Florida Statutes, and, if so, what is the appropriate sanction.Actions of Respondent in removing draping and touching patient's genitalia constituted sexual misconduct in the practice of massage.
15-004486PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs BRIAN MITCHELL LEE, M.D.  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 13, 2015
The issues to be determined are whether Respondent has been convicted of crimes related to the practice or the ability to practice medicine in violation of section 456.072(1)(c), Florida Statutes (2013), by virtue of being found guilty of traveling to meet a minor to engage in sexual contact; unlawful use of a two- way communications device to facilitate the commission of a felony; and using a computer to facilitate or solicit the sexual conduct of a child; and if so, what penalty should be imposed.Petitioner demonstrated that Respondent's convictions related to traveling to meet someone Respondent believed to be underage were crimes related to the practice or ability to practice medicine. Recommend revocation.
13-002254  BERNARD SPINRAD AND MARION SPINRAD vs WILLIAM GUERRERO, CHRISTINA BANG, A/K/A CHRISTINA GUERRERO, AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 14, 2013
The issue to be determined is whether the applicants, William Guererro and Christina Bang, a/k/a Christina Guerrero (Applicants), are entitled to issuance of a Consolidated Environmental Resource Permit and State Lands Approvals for various structures on the Applicants’ property at 58458 Overseas Highway, Marathon, Florida.The Applicants demonstrated that they were entitled to the exemptions and general permit for structures and activiites on their property, and to the soverign submerged lands authorizations related thereto.
14-005291F  DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION vs BERNARD SPINRAD AND MARIEN SPINRAD  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 14, 2013
The issue to be determined is whether Petitioner, Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), is entitled to attorney’s fees pursuant to section 57.105, Florida Statutes, from Respondents, Bernard Spinrad and Marien Spinrad (Spinrads), and their counsel, related to litigation between the parties in DOAH Case No. 13-2254.The Department failed to demonstrate that it was entitled to an award of attorney's fees pursuant to section 57.105, Florida Statutes.
13-000515  GARY PIRTLE vs ROY D. VOSS AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 12, 2013
The issues to be determined are whether Respondent Roy Voss is entitled to an exemption from the requirement to obtain an Environmental Resource Permit (“ERP”) and entitled to “consent by rule” to use sovereignty submerged lands to install five mooring pilings next to his existing dock in Stuart, Florida.The Respondent's installation of mooring pilings did not qualify for an exemption under section 373.406(6), Florida Statutes, or consent by rule under Florida Administrative Code Rule 18-21.005(1)(b), because the pilings created a navigational hazard.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer