welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  8. Caitlin Rose Mawn
Caitlin Rose Mawn
Caitlin Rose Mawn
Visitors: 49
0
Bar #99545(FL)     License for 12 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Caitlin Rose Mawn? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

16-1818  Iraida Rolland v. Rural King and Sedgwick CMS  (2016)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Nov. 22, 2016
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA IRAIDA ROLLAND, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. CASE NO. 1D16-1818 RURAL KING and SEDGWICK CMS, Appellees. _/ Opinion filed November 17, 2016. An appeal from an order of Judge of Compensation Claims. Stephen L. Rosen, Judge. Date of Accident: July 18, 2015. Katherine Stone of Barbas, Nunez, Sanders, Butler & Hovsepian, Tampa, for Appellant. Christopher A. Thorn..
16-004128RU  FLORIDA QUARTER HORSE RACING ASSOCIATION, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 22, 2016
Whether Respondent, Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering (“Division”), relied on an unadopted rule when it issued a 2016-2017 annual operating license and cardroom license to the South Florida Racing Association, LLC, d/b/a Hialeah Park (“Hialeah”), and continued to authorize slot machine operations at Hialeah beyond June 30, 2016.Agency's disregard of statutory application deadline and/or submission requirements was an unadopted rule.
15-007011RP  DAYTONA BEACH KENNEL CLUB, INC, vs DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 11, 2015
The issues for disposition in this case are whether proposed rules 61D-11.001(17) and 61D-11.002(5), Florida Administrative Code, which consist of the repeal of said rules, constitute an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority as defined in section 120.52(8), Florida Statutes; and whether the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering’s (Respondent), failure to prepare a statement of estimated regulatory costs constituted a material failure to follow the applicable rulemaking procedures or requirements set forth in chapter 120.The proposed repeal of rules 61D-11.001(17) and 61D-11.002(5) dealing with "designated player" games, was an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.
15-007012RP  JACKSONVILLE KENNEL CLUB, INC, vs DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 11, 2015
The issues for disposition in this case are whether proposed rules 61D-11.001(17) and 61D-11.002(5), Florida Administrative Code, which consist of the repeal of said rules, constitute an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority as defined in section 120.52(8), Florida Statutes; and whether the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering’s (Respondent), failure to prepare a statement of estimated regulatory costs constituted a material failure to follow the applicable rulemaking procedures or requirements set forth in chapter 120.The proposed repeal of rules 61D-11.001(17) and 61D-11.002(5) dealing with "designated player" games, was an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.
15-007013RP  MELBOURNE GREYHOUND PARK, LLC vs DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 11, 2015
The issues for disposition in this case are whether proposed rules 61D-11.001(17) and 61D-11.002(5), Florida Administrative Code, which consist of the repeal of said rules, constitute an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority as defined in section 120.52(8), Florida Statutes; and whether the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering’s (Respondent), failure to prepare a statement of estimated regulatory costs constituted a material failure to follow the applicable rulemaking procedures or requirements set forth in chapter 120.The proposed repeal of rules 61D-11.001(17) and 61D-11.002(5) dealing with "designated player" games, was an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.
15-007014RP  BONITA-FORT MYERS CORPORATION vs DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 11, 2015
The issues for disposition in this case are whether proposed rules 61D-11.001(17) and 61D-11.002(5), Florida Administrative Code, which consist of the repeal of said rules, constitute an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority as defined in section 120.52(8), Florida Statutes; and whether the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering’s (Respondent), failure to prepare a statement of estimated regulatory costs constituted a material failure to follow the applicable rulemaking procedures or requirements set forth in chapter 120.The proposed repeal of rules 61D-11.001(17) and 61D-11.002(5) dealing with "designated player" games, was an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.
15-007015RP  INVESTMENT CORPORATION OF PALM BEACH vs DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 11, 2015
The issues for disposition in this case are whether proposed rules 61D-11.001(17) and 61D-11.002(5), Florida Administrative Code, which consist of the repeal of said rules, constitute an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority as defined in section 120.52(8), Florida Statutes; and whether the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering’s (Respondent), failure to prepare a statement of estimated regulatory costs constituted a material failure to follow the applicable rulemaking procedures or requirements set forth in chapter 120.The proposed repeal of rules 61D-11.001(17) and 61D-11.002(5) dealing with "designated player" games, was an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.
15-007016RP  WEST FLAGLER ASSOCIATES, LTD. vs DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 11, 2015
The issues for disposition in this case are whether proposed rules 61D-11.001(17) and 61D-11.002(5), Florida Administrative Code, which consist of the repeal of said rules, constitute an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority as defined in section 120.52(8), Florida Statutes; and whether the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering’s (Respondent), failure to prepare a statement of estimated regulatory costs constituted a material failure to follow the applicable rulemaking procedures or requirements set forth in chapter 120.The proposed repeal of rules 61D-11.001(17) and 61D-11.002(5) dealing with "designated player" games, was an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.
15-007022RP  TAMPA BAY DOWNS, INC., AND TBDG ACQUISITION, LLC, D/B/A TGT POKER AND RACEBOOK vs DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 11, 2015
The issues for disposition in this case are whether proposed rules 61D-11.001(17) and 61D-11.002(5), Florida Administrative Code, which consist of the repeal of said rules, constitute an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority as defined in section 120.52(8), Florida Statutes; and whether the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering’s (Respondent), failure to prepare a statement of estimated regulatory costs constituted a material failure to follow the applicable rulemaking procedures or requirements set forth in chapter 120.The proposed repeal of rules 61D-11.001(17) and 61D-11.002(5) dealing with "designated player" games, was an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.
15-007010RP  DANIA ENTERTAINMENT CENTER, LLC vs DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 11, 2015
The issues for disposition in this case are whether proposed rules 61D-11.001(17) and 61D-11.002(5), Florida Administrative Code, which consist of the repeal of said rules, constitute an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority as defined in section 120.52(8), Florida Statutes; and whether the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering’s (Respondent), failure to prepare a statement of estimated regulatory costs constituted a material failure to follow the applicable rulemaking procedures or requirements set forth in chapter 120.The proposed repeal of rules 61D-11.001(17) and 61D-11.002(5) dealing with "designated player" games, was an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer