Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Carol Ann Licko
Carol Ann Licko
Visitors: 87
0
Bar #435872(FL)     License for 41 years
Miami FL

Are you Carol Ann Licko? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :
13-000855  CARTER PRITCHETT ADVERTISING vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 13, 2013
Whether the State of Florida, Department of Transportation ("Department") properly denied Carter Pritchett Advertising, Inc.'s ("Carter") applications for outdoor advertising sign permits.The Department properly denied Petitioner's applications for outdoor advertising sign permits because Petitioner failed to satisfy the requirements of the "Use Test."
11-001681  CARTER OUTDOOR ADVERTISING vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (2011)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 05, 2011
The issues in this case are: whether the Department of Transportation ("Department") properly issued a Notice of Intent to Revoke Sign Permit for Violation to Carter Outdoor Advertising a/k/a Carter Pritchett Advertising ("Carter") for the outdoor advertising sign permitted with tag numbers BV314/315 and whether the Department properly denied CBS Outdoor, Inc.'s ("CBS") application for outdoor advertising sign permit based on a spacing conflict with the outdoor advertising sign permitted with tag numbers BV314/315.DOT met its burden and demonstrated that Carter abandoned its nonconforming sign because it no longer exists at the permitted location after Carter voluntarily removed it in violation of rule 14-10.007(6)(b). Therefore, Carter's permit should be revoked.
11-001682  CBS OUTDOOR, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (2011)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 05, 2011
The issues in this case are: whether the Department of Transportation ("Department") properly issued a Notice of Intent to Revoke Sign Permit for Violation to Carter Outdoor Advertising a/k/a Carter Pritchett Advertising ("Carter") for the outdoor advertising sign permitted with tag numbers BV314/315 and whether the Department properly denied CBS Outdoor, Inc.'s ("CBS") application for outdoor advertising sign permit based on a spacing conflict with the outdoor advertising sign permitted with tag numbers BV314/315.DOT met its burden and demonstrated that Carter abandoned its nonconforming sign because it no longer exists at the permitted location after Carter voluntarily removed it in violation of rule 14-10.007(6)(b). Therefore, Carter's permit should be revoked.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer