Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Christopher Brian Lunny
Christopher Brian Lunny
Visitors: 83
0
Bar #8982(FL)     License for 31 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Christopher Brian Lunny? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :
6:11-bk-01403-ABB  In Re Thompson  (2011)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida Filed: Aug. 29, 2011 Citations: 457 B.R. 872
457 B.R. 872 (2011) In re Michael S. THOMPSON and Crystal Lee Thompson, Debtors. No. 6:11-bk-01403-ABB. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division. August 29, 2011. *874 Jimmy D. Crawford, Boyette, Cummins & Nailos, PLLC, Clermont, FL, for Debtors. MEMORANDUM OPINION ARTHUR B. BRISKMAN, Bankruptcy Judge. This matter came before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 24) filed by Donald F. Walton, the Acting United States Trustee for Region 21 ("UST"), *875 seeking dismis..
9:05BK14156 ALP  In Re Austin  (2006)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida Filed: Sep. 14, 2006 Citations: 352 B.R. 529
352 B.R. 529 (2006) In re Valerie K. AUSTIN, Debtor. No. 9:05BK14156 ALP. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Fort Myers Division. September 14, 2006. *530 Edward R. Miller, Miller and Hollander, Naples, FL, for Debtor. ORDER ON TRUSTEE'S MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF AN ORDER DIRECTED TO DAVID MAHLER, AN ATTORNEY LICENSES IN NEW JERSEY, TO SHOW CAUSE WHY HE SHOULD NOT DISGORGE MONEY RECEIVED POST-PETITION FROM THE DEBTOR (Doc. No. 147) ALEXANDER L. PASKAY, Bankruptcy Judge. THE MATTER under c..
01-2412-3F7  In Re DeGross  (2001)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida Filed: Oct. 22, 2001 Citations: 272 B.R. 309
272 B.R. 309 (2001) In re Misty S. DEGROSS, Debtor. No. 01-2412-3F7. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Jacksonville Division. October 22, 2001. *310 *311 Peter D. Black, Jacksonville, FL, for Debtor. Elena L. Escamilla, Orlando, FL, United States Trustee. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW JERRY A. FUNK, Bankruptcy Judge. This case came before the Court upon the United States Trustee's Motion to Dismiss pursuant to 11 U.S.C. ยง 707(b). The Court conducted a hearing on August 2, 20..
17-000792MPI  AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs VITAS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION OF FLORIDA  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 06, 2017
Whether Petitioner is entitled to recover certain Medicaid funds paid to Respondent pursuant to section 409.923(1), Florida Statutes, for hospice services Respondent provided through three program locations (Melbourne, Boynton Beach, and Dade) during the audit period between September 1, 2009, and December 31, 2012; and the amount of sanctions, if any, that should be imposed pursuant to Florida Administrative Code Rule 59G-9.070(7)(e).Petitioner proved that Respondent must repay Medicaid overpayments for certain paid claims for hospice services, but failed to prove that Respondent was overpaid for other Medicaid claims. Petitioner proved that Respondent must pay a fine.
17-000793MPI  AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs VITAS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION OF FLORIDA  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 06, 2017
Whether Petitioner is entitled to recover certain Medicaid funds paid to Respondent pursuant to section 409.923(1), Florida Statutes, for hospice services Respondent provided through three program locations (Melbourne, Boynton Beach, and Dade) during the audit period between September 1, 2009, and December 31, 2012; and the amount of sanctions, if any, that should be imposed pursuant to Florida Administrative Code Rule 59G-9.070(7)(e).Petitioner proved that Respondent must repay Medicaid overpayments for certain paid claims for hospice services, but failed to prove that Respondent was overpaid for other Medicaid claims. Petitioner proved that Respondent must pay a fine.
17-000794MPI  AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs VITAS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION OF FLORIDA  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 06, 2017
Whether Petitioner is entitled to recover certain Medicaid funds paid to Respondent pursuant to section 409.923(1), Florida Statutes, for hospice services Respondent provided through three program locations (Melbourne, Boynton Beach, and Dade) during the audit period between September 1, 2009, and December 31, 2012; and the amount of sanctions, if any, that should be imposed pursuant to Florida Administrative Code Rule 59G-9.070(7)(e).Petitioner proved that Respondent must repay Medicaid overpayments for certain paid claims for hospice services, but failed to prove that Respondent was overpaid for other Medicaid claims. Petitioner proved that Respondent must pay a fine.
16-006490MPI  AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs HALIFAX HOSPICE, INC., D/B/A HALIFAX HEALTH HOSPICE  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 04, 2016
The issues are whether Petitioner is entitled to recover Medicaid funds paid to Respondent pursuant to section 409.913(1), Florida Statutes, for hospice services Respondent provided during the audit period between September 1, 2009, and December 31, 2012; and the amount of sanctions, if any, that should be imposed pursuant to section 409.913(15), (17).Petitioner proved that Respondent must repay Medicaid overpayments for certain paid claims, but failed to prove that Respondent was overpaid for other Medicaid claims. Petitioner proved that Respondent must pay a fine.
Bankruptcy No. 92-8656-8P1  In Re Immenhausen Corp.  (1994)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida Filed: Jan. 26, 1994 Citations: 164 B.R. 347
164 B.R. 347 (1993) In re IMMENHAUSEN CORPORATION, Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 92-8656-8P1. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. September 27, 1993. Order Granting Reconsideration and Clarification January 26, 1994. *348 Charles M. Tatelbaum, of Johnson, Blakely, Pope, Clearwater, FL, Elihu Fier, of Meyer, Kowalski, Blum & Fier, New York City, for debtor. Sara Kistler, Asst. U.S. Trustee. John J. Lamoureux, Judith A. English, Tampa, FL, for Berliner Handels-Und Frankfurter Ban..
15-003656RX  THE HOSPICE OF THE FLORIDA SUNCOAST, INC., D/B/A SUNCOAST HOSPICE vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 24, 2015
The issue in this existing rule challenge filed pursuant to section 120.56(3), Florida Statutes (2015),1/ is whether Florida Administrative Code Rule subparagraphs 59C-1.008(2)(a)2. and (2)(a)3. are invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority for the reasons alleged by Petitioner.Petitioner failed to prove that challenged parts of the fixed need pool rule are invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority under section 120.52(8)(b), (c), or "flush-left" paragraph, or that they are illegal procedural rules that are void.
20-003376BID  RA OUTDOORS, LLC, D/B/A ASPIRA vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 28, 2020
Whether Respondent, Department of Environmental Protection's ("Department") intended decision to award a contract to Intervenor, US eDirect, Inc. ("US eDirect"), for a Parks Business System ("PBS"), pursuant to Invitation to Negotiate 2019002 ("the ITN"), is contrary to the Department's governing statutes, rules, or the ITN specifications, and contrary to competition, clearly erroneous, arbitrary, or capricious.DEP's decision to award contract to Intervenor US eDirect for a Parks Business System pursuant to the ITN is not contrary to statutes, rules, ITN specifications, contrary to competition, clearly erroneous, arbitrary, or capricious.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer