Where exam candidate cannot take exam because admission card arrives late he should not be required to retake sections already passed.

The central issue in this case is whether Petitioner's application to take the electrical contractors' examination should be approved or denied.Petitioner's vast experience in one segment of electrical contracting not sufficient to qualify for contractor exam requiring management experience.

Application denied without prejudice. Applicant plead nolo contendre to retail theft. Crime involves moral turpitude. Statute permits denial.

Respondent either falsely executed or executed and didn't report bonds to surety or pay excess when demanded. Recommend suspension until pays back.

The issues in this case are as follow: Whether the conviction of a felony is disqualifying pursuant to Section 648.45(1)(e), Florida Statutes; Whether the failure to report a conviction on an application is grounds for denying the application pursuant to Section 648.45(1)(c), Florida Statutes; Whether, by virtue of the conviction and the failure to report the matter on his application, the Petitioner is disqualified further pursuant to Section 648.27(1), Florida Statutes. Respondent submitted post hearing findings of fact in the form of a proposed recommended order. To the extent the proposed findings of fact have not been included in the factual findings in this order, they are specifically rejected as being irrelevant, not being based upon the most credible evidence, or not being a finding of fact.Juvenile felony was not reported on application, but it was not disqualifying and not related to profession. Pardon eliminated scienter of not reporting it.

Felony conviction is sufficient to revoke limited surety agent licensure.

Whether Respondent's eligibility for licensure as a Runner should be revoked, or suspended for alleged violations of Chapter 648, Florida Statutes, as set forth in the Administrative Complaint, dated July 7, 1981. This case was filed with the Division of Administrative Hearings on July l, 1981. In view of the fact that the Administrative Complaint dealt with a charge involving the same incident recited in a subsequently filed case by the same Petitioner against James Leroy Sponheim, DOAH Case No. 81-1950, the cases were consolidated for the purposes of hearing pursuant to Rule 28-5.106, Florida Administrative Code, by Order issued August 17, 1981, and Notice of Hearing was issued for October 8, 1981. The hearing was continued upon the request of Respondents to await the outcome of a pending judicial appeal of a criminal conviction of Respondent James L. Sponheim, in the County Court of Pasco County. Subsequently, Respondent Bonnie Louise Sponheim filed a motion to sever her case and proceed to hearing as soon as possible. The motion was granted, and her case was noticed for hearing on February 17, 1982. At the commencement of that hearing, Respondent filed a motion for continuance, based on substitution of counsel. The motion was granted, subject to reconsolidation of the two cases in order to prevent multiple hearings. Final hearing was then set in the consolidated cases for April 16, 1982. Respondent is alleged to have violated various provisions of Chapter 648, Florida Statutes by arresting or taking into custody, and surrendering one Stephen Sissitka to Pasco County law enforcement authorities, while in an unlicensed status. The parties agreed that the statutory period for rendition of a Recommended Order in the consolidated cases would be waived for a reasonable time in the discretion of the Hearing Officer. Post-hearing submissions by the parties have been fully considered and those portions thereof not adopted herein are deemed to be unnecessary, irrelevant, or unwarranted in fact or law.Respondent, Runner, has not engaged in fraudulent or dishonest actions as accused though she did not hold a license. Hearing Officer recommends dismissal.