Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Cynthia Elizabeth Nash-Early
Cynthia Elizabeth Nash-Early
Visitors: 45
0
Bar #20554(FL)     License for 18 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Cynthia Elizabeth Nash-Early? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :
19-004829F  CLAUDIA PATRICIA OROZCO-FANDINO, E.O. vs DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE  (2019)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 12, 2019
The issue is whether Respondent, Department of Health, Board of Medicine (“Department”), was “substantially justified” under section 57.111(3)(e), Florida Statutes, in initiating the underlying action against the electrolysis license of Petitioner, Claudia Patricia Orozco-Fandino, E.O. (“Petitioner” or “Ms. Orozco”).Petitioner was a prevailing small business party, but Respondent established that the disciplinary proceeding was substantially justified at the time it was initiated.
19-001931PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs JOHN CAREY TOMBERLIN, M.D.  (2019)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 15, 2019
The issues to be determined are whether Respondent, John Carey Tomberlin, M.D. (“Respondent” or “Dr. Tomberlin”), violated section 458.331(1)(t)1., Florida Statutes (2014), by failing to identify a subdural hematoma on the left side of Patient J.A.’s brain, as alleged in the Administrative Complaint; and if so, what penalty should be imposed.Petitioner did not establish by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent failed to meet the standard of care.
18-003899PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs CLAUDIA PATRICIA OROZCO-FANDINO, E.O.  (2018)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 26, 2018
The issues to be determined are whether Respondent violated section 478.52(1)(m), Florida Statutes (2017),1/ by accepting and performing professional responsibilities that she knew or had reason to know she was not competent to perform; and, if so, what penalty should be imposed for the violations proven.Petitioner failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent performed cosmetic surgery when her license was confined to electrology.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer