Miami-Dade FL Lawyers | Daniel I Small -- eLawyers

15-4019 United States v. Robert McDonnell (2015)

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Filed: Jul. 10, 2015

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-4019 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. ROBERT F. MCDONNELL, Defendant – Appellant. - FORMER VIRGINIA ATTORNEYS GENERAL; ANDREW P. MILLER; ANTHONY FRANCIS TROY; J. MARSHALL COLEMAN; MARY SUE TERRY; STEPHEN DOUGLAS ROSENTHAL; MARK L. EARLEY; NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYERS; NANCY GERTNER, Law Professor; CHARLES J. OGLETREE, JR., Law Professor; JOHN C. JEFFRIES, JR., Law Professor; BENJAMIN TODD ..

92-1584 David J. McCullough and Winifred M. McCullough v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Bank of New England, N.A. (1993)

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: Mar. 12, 1993 Citations: 987 F.2d 870

987 F.2d 870, David J. McCULLOUGH and Winifred M. McCullough, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v.FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as Receiver for Bankof New England, N.A. no promise, condition, or warranty is made. Thus, we believe that 1823(e) governs plaintiffs' misrepresentation claim.

86-1551 United States v. William H. Nichols, United States of America v. Lea Ricard (1987)

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: Jun. 03, 1987 Citations: 820 F.2d 508

, for Lea Ricard. and (3) jurors would be reminded of the burden of proof. United States v. Angiulo, 485 F.2d 37, 39 (1st Cir.1973).3 The fact that the jury returned its verdict late in the day and only one hour after the charge was given does not show that the charge was coercive.

84-1628 United States v. Theodore v. Anzalone (1985)

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: Jul. 01, 1985 Citations: 766 F.2d 676

766 F.2d 676, UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v.Theodore V. ANZALONE, Defendant, Appellant. Should such a regulation have alerted or put on notice other participants in the transaction that something was required of them vis-a-vis the filing of the report 162, 83 L. Ed. 2d 98 (1984);

86-1047 In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. Appeal of Campaigner Publications, Inc., in Re Grand Jury Proceedings. Appeal of Caucus Distributors, Inc. (1986)

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: Jul. 03, 1986 Citations: 795 F.2d 226

, Appeal No. 86-1170, 20, In this appeal, Caucus Distributors challenges the further judgment and commitment issued by the district court on January 22, 1986, finding Caucus in contempt of a court order to compel and fining it an additional $5, 000 per day until full compliance was reached.

84-1236 United States v. John F. Dunn, Jr. (1985)

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: Mar. 29, 1985 Citations: 758 F.2d 30

61, 62 L. Ed. 2d 40 (1979). United States v. Petrozziello, 548 F.2d 20, 23 (1st Cir.1977).5 In this case, the district court's finding of one conspiracy involving Dunn, Connery and Sorrento more than amply supported the admission of the Sorrento tapes under the Petrozziello standards. U.S. Const.

82-1452 United States v. Dennis Dean Mahoney (1983)

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Filed: Aug. 22, 1983 Citations: 712 F.2d 956

712 F.2d 956 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dennis Dean MAHONEY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 82-1452. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Aug. 22, 1983. Daniel I. Small, Trial Atty., Organized Crime and Racketeering Section, William C. Bryson, Atty., Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellant. Hugh Lowe, Austin, Tex., for defendant-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. Before INGRAHAM, WILLIAMS and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit ..

80-1591 In Re: Grand Jury Proceedings, Raybourne Thompson, Jr. (1980)

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Filed: Jul. 30, 1980 Citations: 624 F.2d 17

624 F.2d 17 In re: Grand Jury Proceedings, Raybourne THOMPSON, Jr., Appellant. No. 80-1591. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. July 30, 1980. Butler, Binion, Rice, Cook & Knapp, Donald B. McFall, Houston, Tex., Watson, Ess, Marshall & Enggas, Leonard Singer, Allan L. Bioff, Kansas City, Mo., for defendant-appellant. Fisher, Roch & Gallagher, Michael W. Perrin, Houston, Tex., amicus curiae, for Fisher, Roch & Gallagher. Guy L. Goodwin, Daniel I. Small, Dept. of Justice, Gen. Litigation..

82-5369 United States v. Arthur A. Coia, Arthur E. Coia, Albert J. Le Pore, and Joseph J. Vacarro, Jr. (1983)

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Filed: Nov. 17, 1983 Citations: 719 F.2d 1120

719 F.2d 1120 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Arthur A. COIA, Arthur E. Coia, Albert J. Le Pore, and Joseph J. Vacarro, Jr., Defendants-Appellees. No. 82-5369. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. Nov. 17, 1983. Daniel I. Small, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Organized Crime/Racketeering Section, William C. Bryson, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellant. Joseph Beeler, James J. Hogan, Miami, Fla., for Arthur E. Coia. Joseph T. Travaline, Burlington, Mass., Leppo & Traini..

01-1176 Securities and Exch. v. SG Limited (2001)

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: Sep. 13, 2001 Citations: 265 F.3d 42

security known as an investment contract;of the money of others on the promise of profits.investment); Through this arrangement, SG, provided participants with the opportunity to share income, derived from website operations on a pro rata basis.Supreme Court's restatement of the Howey test.

Daniel I Small