Osceola FL Administrative law and Real estate Lawyers

Daniel Villazon

Visitors: 81

Bar #956090(FL) License for 33 years; Member in Good Standing

Kissimmee FL

Are you Daniel Villazon? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Florida Laws: 112.011, 120.569, 120.57, 120.60, 120.68, 20.165, 425.25, 447.309, 447.601, 455.01, 455.201, 455.213, 455.225, 455.227, 455.2273, 465.0251, 474.214, 475.01, 475.011, 475.021, 475.161, 475.17, 475.180, 475.181, 475.25, 475.42, 475.5015, 475.611, 475.615, 475.622, 475.6221, 475.6222, 475.624, 475.625, 475.628, 475.629, 57.111, 626.561, 718.503, 721.20, 741.28, 775.082, 775.083, 812.014, 893.135, 90.404, 92.38, 940.05, 95.11

Florida Administrative Code: 61J1-4.010, 61J1-8.002, 61J2-14.008, 61J2-14.009, 61J2-14.010, 61J2-14.011, 61J2-2.027, 61J2-24.001

11-003809 SAMUEL POPPELL vs FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION (2011)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 28, 2011

The issue in this case is whether Petitioner's application for licensure as real estate sales associate should be granted.Applicant for licensure as a real estate sales associate has pending criminal charges.

10-009926PL DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE vs VICTOR JESUS MONZON (2010)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 27, 2010

Whether Victor Jesus Monzon (Respondent) committed the violations alleged in the subject Administrative Complaint, and, if so, the penalties that should be imposed.Appraiser is not guilty of the alleged misconduct.

10-010914PL DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE vs RONALD C. HORMES (2010)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 27, 2010

The issues in this case are whether Respondent violated sections 475.622(1), 475.622(2), 475.624(2), and 475.624(15), Florida Statutes (2007),1/ and Florida Administrative Code Rule 61J1-7.001(2), and, if so, what discipline should be imposed.Appraiser failed to use the correct designation when signing an appraisal and incompetently prepared an appraisal.

09-002995PL DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE vs GREGORY JOHN OWEN (2009)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 01, 2009

Whether Respondent, Gregory John Owen, committed the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaint, and, if so, what discipline should be imposed.Respondent was found not guilty of allegations on four counts of real estate violations.

09-006338F ELBERT CECIL WRIGHT, III vs DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE (2009)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 16, 2009

The issue presented is whether Petitioner is entitled to recover from Respondent his attorney's fees and costs, pursuant to the Florida Equal Access to Justice Act, Section 57.111, Florida Statutes.Petitioner was entitled to be reimbursed for his attorney's fees and costs defending the underlying action which was initiated against him with no factual or legal basis.

10-001098PL DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE vs FRANCIS J. COLEMAN (2010)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 03, 2010

The issues in this case are whether Respondent violated Subsections 475.624(15), Florida Statutes (2006),1 and, if so, what discipline should be imposed.Appraiser used an inappropriate property as a comparable when using the sales comparison method in valuating the property at issue.

10-001538 JOHN P. CASTAGNA vs FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION (2010)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 22, 2010

The issue in this case is whether Petitioner's application for licensure as a real estate sales associate should be granted despite Petitioner's conviction, in 2008, for misappropriation of insurance premiums, a first-degree felony.Petitioner's application for licensure as a real estate sales associate should not be granted in light of Petitioner's conviction, in 2008, for misappropriation of insurance premiums, a first-degree felony.

10-000267PL DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE vs PETER JOSEPH ESPOSITO (2010)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 19, 2010

The issues in this case are stated in two counts set forth in the Administrative Complaint: Count I--whether Respondent is guilty of fraud, misrepresentation, concealment, false promises, false pretenses, dishonest conduct, culpable negligence, or breach of trust in a business transaction in violation of Subsection 475.624(2), Florida Statutes (2006); and Count II-- whether Respondent is guilty of failing to exercise reasonable diligence in developing an appraisal report in violation of Subsection 475.624(15), Florida Statutes (2006). Counts III through IX of the Administrative Complaint were dismissed on the day of the final hearing held in this matter.The Department could not establish by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent was in violation of statutes.

09-005890PL DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE vs ARIF ZAHEER AND VISTA HORIZON REALTY, INC. (2009)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 26, 2009

The issues in this case are whether Respondents, Arif Zaheer and Vista Horizon Realty, Inc., violated Subsections 475.25(1)(b), 475.25(1)(d)1., 475.25(1)(e), and 475.25(1)(k), Florida Statutes (2007),1 and Florida Administrative Code Rule 61J2-14.011; whether Respondent Arif Zaheer violated Subsection 455.227(1)(n), Florida Statutes, and Florida Administrative Code Rule 61J2-14.009; and, if so, what discipline should be imposed.Respondents received funds from clients for a downpayment on commercial property. Not all the funds were placed in escrow, and some of the funds were not returned to clients when requested.

09-004129PL DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE vs MARIA V. KING (2009)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 03, 2009

The issue to be determined is whether Respondent violated Section 475.25(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2006), as alleged in the Administrative Complaint and if so, what penalties should be imposed?Petitioner did not prove a violation of Section 475.125(1)(b), Florida Statutes, where Respondent forwarded a buyer's offer to purchase property for a price significantly above the listing price but disclosed all information provided by the buyer.