welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. David Duncan
David Duncan
David Duncan
Visitors: 41
0
Bar #25918(FL)     License for 18 years
Jacksonville FL

Are you David Duncan? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

98-1564  United States v. Clay  (1998)
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: Nov. 13, 1998
David Duncan, with whom Zalkind, Rodriguez, Lunt Duncan was, on brief, for appellant., Marianne C. Hinkle, Assistant United States Attorney, with, whom Donald K. Stern, United States Attorney, was on brief, for the, United States.Per Curiam. See United, States v. Stanley, 915 F.2d 54, 55 (1st Cir.
95-2271  United States v. Cali  (1996)
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: Jun. 25, 1996
See, e.g., United States v. Peppe, 80 F.3d 19, 20 (1st Cir.St. Cyr, 977 F.2d at 701.offense level for both management of individuals and assets.defendant's base offense level.between section 3B1.1 adjustments and departures is .supervision of individuals as part of Cali's offense.district court's).
13-50463  United States v. David Tamman  (2015)
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Filed: Apr. 03, 2015
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 13-50463 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:11-cr-01165-PSG-2 DAVID TAMMAN, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Philip S. Gutierrez, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted November 21, 2014—Pasadena, California Filed April 3, 2015 Before: William A. Fletcher and Jay S. Bybee, Circuit Judges, and David Alan Ezra, Dist..
99-2336  Kwan Wah Liu v. Richard M. Phillips, James D. Goldman  (2000)
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: Nov. 28, 2000 Citations: 234 F.3d 55
Liu in turn brought the present civil action against Phillips and Goldman in federal district court. 457 U.S. at 819; Still, in general, a police officer or agent is not supposed to make an arrest unless he or she is aware of an offense on the books for which the subject may reasonably be charged.
1999    (2001)
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Filed: May 04, 2001 Citations: 248 F.3d 95
248 F.3d 95 (2nd Cir. 2001) ETOILE LE BLANC, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, STEPHEN OSSEN, PLAINTIFF, v. TERRY CLEVELAND AND ROBERT GRANT, JR., DEFENDANTS-THIRD-PARTY-PLAINTIFFS, J.R.D. RETAILERS LTD, D/B/A SYD AND DUSTY'S OUTFITTERS, THIRD-PARTY-DEFENDANT-APPELLEE. Docket No. 98-9020 August Term 1999 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT Argued: September 9, 1999 May 4, 2001 Appeal from a final order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (Kahn, J.), deny..
1998    (1999)
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Filed: Dec. 09, 1999 Citations: 198 F.3d 353
198 F.3d 353 (2nd Cir. 1999) ETOILE LEBLANC, STEPHEN OSSEN, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. TERRY CLEVELAND, ROBERT GRANT, JR., Defendants-Third-Party-Plaintiffs, J.R.D. RETAILERS LTD., d/b/a Syd and Dusty's Outfitters, Third-Party-Defendants-Appellees. Docket No. 97-9389 August Term, 1998 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SECOND CIRCUIT Argued: Feb. 11, 1999 Decided: Dec. 9, 1999 Appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (Lawrence E. Kahn, Judge), en..
955  United States v. Allan Blume, Toby Pett, Roger Ward, David Bianchini  (1992)
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Filed: Jun. 10, 1992 Citations: 967 F.2d 45
967 F.2d 45 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Allan BLUME, Toby Pett, Roger Ward, Defendants, David Bianchini, Defendant-Appellant. No. 955, Docket 91-1570. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued Feb. 28, 1992. Decided June 10, 1992. Thomas D. Anderson, Asst. U.S. Atty. (Charles A. Caruso, U.S. Atty., D. Vt., David V. Kirby, Chief, Crim. Div., of counsel), Burlington, Vt., for plaintiff-appellee. Kimberly Homan (Zalkind, Sheketoff, Wilson, Homan, Rodriguez & Lunt, N..
85-1615  United States v. William J. Cintolo  (1987)
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: May 01, 1987 Citations: 818 F.2d 980
818 F.2d 980, UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v.William J. CINTOLO, Defendant, Appellant. 1953, 1957, 32 L. Ed. 2d 584 (1972), and gives the challenger adequate warning that his contemplated conduct would be unlawful, United States v. Mazurie, 419 U.S. 544, 553, 95 S. Ct. who the client is.
98-1564  United States v. Clay  (1998)
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: Nov. 13, 1998
Defendant, Appellant.Aldrich and Campbell, Senior Circuit Judges.United States.Per Curiam.consider the totality of the relevant circumstances.States v. Stanley, 915 F.2d 54, 55 (1st Cir.Trullo, 809 F.2d 108, 112 (1st Cir. See United States v. Kimball, 25 F.3d 1, 6 (1st Cir.
01-1975  qn Re: Grand Jury v. q  (2001)
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: Nov. 08, 2001 Citations: 274 F.3d 563
274 F.3d 563 (1st Cir. and that it gives them a joint privilege they mention both attorney-client and work product privileges in the Oldco documents currently in the hands of Smith Jones. Even when that rule applies, however, a party always remains free to disclose his own communications.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer