welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. David Stanley Sadowsky
David Stanley Sadowsky
David Stanley Sadowsky
Visitors: 40
0
Bar #725714(FL)     License for 37 years
Clearwater FL

Are you David Stanley Sadowsky? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Bankruptcy No. 98-18570-8P7, Adversary No. 99-45  In Re Depencier  (1999)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida Filed: Mar. 23, 1999 Citations: 234 B.R. 180
234 B.R. 180 (1999) In re Robert R. DEPENCIER and Susan C. Depencier, Debtors. Snapper, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Robert R. Depencier and Susan C. Depencier, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 98-18570-8P7, Adversary No. 99-45. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. March 23, 1999. J. Corey Feist, Sarasota, FL, for plaintiff. Daniel Hermann, Largo, FL, for defendant. ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS ADVERSARY PROCEEDING AND PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AFTER TIME HAS EX..
13-002004GM  THE RICHMAN GROUP OF FLORIDA, INC. vs PINELLAS COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS  (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 28, 2013
The issue to be determined in this case is whether the proposed amendment to the Pinellas Countywide Plan Map, changing the land use designations on 34.6 acres of land in Safety Harbor, Florida, should be approved.The proposed amendment is determined to be consistent with the Countywide Rules and it is recommended that the amendment be approved.
03-001500  CITY OF CLEARWATER, FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF LAWRENCE H. DIMMITT, III, AND LAWRENCE H. DIMMITT, JR., AS TRUSTEE vs PINELLAS COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AS COUNTYWIDE PLANNING AUTHORITY  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 28, 2003
The issue is whether a proposed amendment to the Pinellas County Countywide Future Land Use Plan (FLUP) changing the land use designation on a 22.18-acre parcel located at 2301 Chautauqua Avenue in the City of Clearwater (City) from Residential Suburban/Preservation to Residential Low/Preservation should be approved.City plan amendment adversely impacted adjoining County land by changing character of the neighborhood and was therefore inconsistent with County plan; amendment denied.
92-005606  PINELLAS COUNTY CONSTRUCTION LICENSING BOARD vs DEAN EDDY  (1992)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 15, 1992
Whether Respondent violated provision of Chapter 75-489, Laws of Florida, as amended, as more specifically alleged in Counts One through Four of the Administrative Complaint dated August 10, 1992 and the First Amendment of the Administrative Complaint, dated November 9, 1992.Pinellas co. construction licensing board proved respondent violated provisions of electrical code.
93-000545  PINELLAS COUNTY CONSTRUCTION LICENSING BOARD vs JAMES FORHOLT  (1993)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 02, 1993
Whether Respondent violated Section 24(2)(d), (h), (j), (k), (m) and (n), Chapter 75-489, Laws of Florida, as amended, and, if so, what is an appropriate penalty.License discipline hearing on licensed aluminium contractor involving leaks in roofover installed. Insufficient evidence to sustain Administrativecomplaint.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer