Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Deborah J Andrews
Deborah J Andrews
Visitors: 45
0
Bar #751847(FL)     License for 36 years; Member in Good Standing
Atlantic Beach FL

Are you Deborah J Andrews? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

00-002231  THE SIERRA CLUB vs ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT AND HINES INTERESTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP  (2000)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 26, 2000
The issues to be resolved in this proceedings concern whether Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) No. 4-109-0216-ERP, should be modified to allow construction and operation of a surface water management system (project) related to the construction and operation of single-family homes on "Marshall Creek" (Parcel D) in a manner consistent with the standards for issuance of an ERP in accordance with Rules 40C-4.301 and 40C-4.302, Florida Administrative Code.Applicant Respondent showed reasonable assurance that all stormwater and water quality parameters would be met, especially in view of wetland mitigation and preservation plan.
02-001496  MARILYN MCMULKIN vs ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, JAY GINN, AND LINDA GINN  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 16, 2002
The issue in this case is whether, and under what conditions, the Respondent, St. Johns River Water Management District (District), should grant Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) No. 40-109-81153-1 authorizing Respondents, Jay and Linda Ginn (Ginns or Applicants), to construct a 136-unit single-family residential development with associated surface water management system.Petitioner opposed Respondents` residential development on the grounds that the stormwater management system caused flooding, water contamination from a nearby closed landfill, impacts on eagles` nests and wetland impacts. Applicants provided assurances.
02-001497  DIANE MILLS vs ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, JAY GINN, AND LINDA GINN  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 16, 2002
The issue in this case is whether, and under what conditions, the Respondent, St. Johns River Water Management District (District), should grant Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) No. 40-109-81153-1 authorizing Respondents, Jay and Linda Ginn (Ginns or Applicants), to construct a 136-unit single-family residential development with associated surface water management system.Petitioner opposed Respondents` residential development on the grounds that the stormwater management system caused flooding, water contamination from a nearby closed landfill, impacts on eagles` nests and wetland impacts. Applicants provided assurances.
03-001881  BOBBY C. BILLIE AND SHANNON LARSEN vs ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT AND MARSHALL CREEK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 21, 2003
The issues to be resolved in this proceeding concern whether an environmental resource permit (number 4-109-0216-ERP) (the ERP) should be modified to allow construction and operation of a surface water management system (the project) for a residential development known as EV-1, in a manner consistent with the standards for issuance of ERPs in accordance with Florida Administrative Code Rules 40C-4.301 and 40C-4.302.Respondent established reasonable assurances that storm water, water quality and wildlife-related standards of the statutes and rules would be met through the mitigation plan. Pet. established standing on some issues but did not meet burden of proof.
01-000583RP  THE SIERRA CLUB vs ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 09, 2001
Rule which tracked enabling statute did not enlarge, modify, or contravene statute.
02-002658  JULIE PARKER vs ST. JOHNS COUNTY  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 02, 2002
Whether the proposed amendment to the St. Johns County 2015 Future Land Use Map (FLUM), adopted by Ordinance No. 2002-31, is "in compliance" with the relevant provisions of the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, Chapter 163, Part, II, Florida Statutes. A second issue raised by St. Johns County (County) and The Estuaries Limited Liability Company (Estuaries) is whether, if the proposed amendment is not "in compliance," it is nevertheless valid and authorized pursuant to Chapter 70, Florida Statutes, the Bert J. Harris, Jr., Private Property Rights Protection Act.Challenger did not prove that County`s change to Future Land Use Map land use designation from Residential Coastal A to D, in light of Bert J. Harris, Jr. judicially approved Settlement Agreement and data and analysis, was not "in compliance."
99-001905  THE SIERRA CLUB vs HINES INTERESTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (1999)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 26, 1999
Whether the proposed entry road, golf course, and associated surface water management system for Marshall Creek Development (the Project), is consistent with the standards and criteria for issuance of an Environmental Resource Permit (ERP), as set forth in Rules 40C-4.301 and 40C-4.302, Florida Administrative Code. Whether the proposed consumptive use of water for irrigation of the Marshall Creek Golf Course and the proposed temporary consumptive use of water for household-type use is consistent with the standards and criteria for issuance of a Consumptive Use Permit, as set forth in Rule 40C-2.301, Florida Administrative Code.Hines Interests Limited Partnership showed that it met the standards for consumptive use and environmental resource permits with specific modifications.
99-002215  SARAH H. LEE vs ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT AND WALDEN CHASE DEVELOPERS, LTD.  (1999)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 17, 1999
Whether the proposed Walden Chase development (the "Project"), is consistent with the standards and criteria for issuance of an Environmental Resource Permit ("ERP") as set forth in Rules 40C-4.301 and 40C-4.302, Florida Administrative Code.Applicant`s presentment of satisfactory assurances dictates that a permit should be issued, subject to conditions.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer