Duval FL Environmental Law and Litigation Lawyers | Deborah -- eLawyers

90-5120 Critical Mass Energy Project v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (1992)

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit Filed: Aug. 21, 1992

975 F.2d 871 Nuclear Reg. Rep. P 20,558, 298 U.S.App.D.C. 8, 61 USLW 2122, 22 Envtl. L. Rep. 21,373, 39 Cont.Cas.Fed. (CCH) P 76,602 CRITICAL MASS ENERGY PROJECT, Appellant, v. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, et al. No. 90-5120. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued En Banc Jan. 29, 1992. Decided Aug. 21, 1992. Paul R.Q. Wolfson, Coral Gables, Fla., with whom David C. Vladeck, Alan B. Morrison, and Eric R. Glitzenstein, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appell..

89-1394 Synovus Financial Corporation v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Southtrust Corporation, Intervenor (1992)

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit Filed: Mar. 27, 1992 Citations: 952 F.2d 426

952 F.2d 426 293 U.S.App.D.C. 70, 60 USLW 2421 SYNOVUS FINANCIAL CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM, Respondent, SouthTrust Corporation, Intervenor. No. 89-1394. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued Oct. 11, 1990. Decided Dec. 20, 1991. As Amended Dec. 20, 1991. Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc Denied March 27, 1992. [293 U.S.App.D.C. 71] Petition for Review of an Order of the Federal Reserve system. Griffin B. Bell and Jam..

90-5120 Critical Mass Energy Project v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and Institute for Nuclear Power Operations (1991)

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit Filed: Sep. 06, 1991 Citations: 931 F.2d 939

931 F.2d 939 289 U.S.App.D.C. 301 CRITICAL MASS ENERGY PROJECT, Appellant, v. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, and Institute for Nuclear Power Operations, Appellees. No. 90-5120. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued March 11, 1991. Decided April 30, 1991. Rehearing Denied Sept. 6, 1991. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (Civil Action No. 84-1943). Paul R.Q. Wolfson, with whom David C. Vladeck, Alan B. Morrison and Eric R. Glitz..

1D99-1810 Muben-Lamar, LP v. Department of Revenue (2000)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Apr. 20, 2000 Citations: 763 So. 2d 1209

763 So. 2d 1209 (2000) MUBEN-LAMAR, L.P., a New Jersey Limited Partnership, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellee. No. 1D99-1810. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. April 20, 2000. Larry Levy of The Levy Law Firm, Tallahassee, and William J. Deas, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellant. Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Jeffrey M. Dikman, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Muben-Lamar, L.P., appeals an order entering final summary ju..

91-01827 Florida Power Corp. v. Lynn (1992)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jan. 24, 1992 Citations: 594 So. 2d 789

594 So. 2d 789 (1992) FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION, a Florida Corporation, Appellant, v. Andrew J. LYNN and Richard M. Haber, As Co-Trustees of the Christine Priest Trust, and Andrew J. Lynn, Individually, As Tenants in Common, and Andrew J. Lynn, Lillian E. Lynn and Richard M. Haber, As Co-Trustees of the Andrew A. Lynn Trust; Citizens Bank of Clearwater, a Florida Banking Association; Hillsborough County, a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida; Joanne Hixon Shell F/K/a Joanne Hixon Mills ..

LL-242 Martin v. State (1979)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Mar. 02, 1979 Citations: 367 So. 2d 1119

367 So. 2d 1119 (1979) Lee Hiram MARTIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. LL-242. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. March 2, 1979. *1120 Michael J. Minerva, Public Defender, and Louis G. Carres, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant. Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Miguel A. Olivella, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee. BOOTH, Judge. The primary issue presented on this appeal is whether a pistol is a "firearm" within the meaning of section 790.001(6), Florida Statutes (..

01-001851GM THE SIERRA CLUB vs ST JOHNS COUNTY AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS (2001)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 11, 2001

Whether the Plan Amendments to the St. Johns County Comprehensive Plan, adopted by Ordinance Number 2001-18, are "in compliance" as defined in Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes, or are not "in compliance" as alleged in the petitions of The Sierra Club (Sierra) and Ellen A. Whitmer (Whitmer).Plan Amendments adopted by St. Johns County in Ordinance No. 2001-18 are "in compliance" as defined in Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes, and the rules promulgated there under.

01-001852GM ELLEN A. WHITMER vs ST. JOHNS COUNTY AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS (2001)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 11, 2001

Whether the Plan Amendments to the St. Johns County Comprehensive Plan, adopted by Ordinance Number 2001-18, are "in compliance" as defined in Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes, or are not "in compliance" as alleged in the petitions of The Sierra Club (Sierra) and Ellen A. Whitmer (Whitmer).Plan Amendments adopted by St. Johns County in Ordinance No. 2001-18 are "in compliance" as defined in Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes, and the rules promulgated there under.

02-002676GM DAVID AND DECEMBER MCSHERRY; DWIGHT ADAMS; AND SUSTAINABLE ALACHUA COUNTY, INC. vs ALACHUA COUNTY AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS (2002)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 05, 2002

The issue in these cases is whether the Alachua County Comprehensive Plan amendments adopted through Alachua County Ordinance Number 03-05 on August 26, 2003, are "in compliance," as defined in Subsection 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2003).Petitioner failed to prove beyond "fair debate" that the 2003 Amendments to Alachua County`s Plan were not "in compliance" with the relevant statutory and rule requirements.

00-002230 BOBBY C. BILLIE AND SHANNON LARSEN vs ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT AND HINES INTERESTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (2000)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 26, 2000

The issues to be resolved in this proceedings concern whether Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) No. 4-109-0216-ERP, should be modified to allow construction and operation of a surface water management system (project) related to the construction and operation of single-family homes on "Marshall Creek" (Parcel D) in a manner consistent with the standards for issuance of an ERP in accordance with Rules 40C-4.301 and 40C-4.302, Florida Administrative Code.Applicant Respondent showed reasonable assurance that all stormwater and water quality parameters would be met, especially in view of wetland mitigation and preservation plan.

Deborah J Andrews