Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Donald Edward Hemke
Donald Edward Hemke
Visitors: 38
0
Bar #305057(FL)     License for 44 years; Member in Good Standing
Tampa FL

Are you Donald Edward Hemke? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Bankruptcy No. 87-3145-8P7, Adv. No. 91-18  In Re Reese  (1991)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida Filed: Oct. 09, 1991 Citations: 133 B.R. 245
133 B.R. 245 (1991) In re Debra Lee REESE, a/k/a Debra Lee Mastin, Debtor. Debra Lee REESE, Plaintiff, v. NCNB NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 87-3145-8P7, Adv. No. 91-18. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. October 9, 1991. Joel S. Treuhaft, Tampa, Fla., for plaintiff. Dennis J. LeVine, Tampa, Fla., for defendant. ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ALEXANDER L. PASKAY, Chief Judge. THIS IS a closed Chapter 7 liquidation case which was reopened to ..
92-2149  The Reserve, Ltd. v. Town of Longboat Key  (1994)
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Filed: Apr. 01, 1994 Citations: 17 F.3d 1374
17 F.3d 1374 The RESERVE, LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOWN OF LONGBOAT KEY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-2149. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. April 1, 1994. Donald Edward Hemke, Alan C. Sundberg, Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emmanuel, Smith & Cutler, PA, Thomas J. Roehn, Annis, Mitchell, Cockey, Edwards & Roehn, PA, Tampa, FL, for plaintiff-appellant. David P. Persson, Davis, Persson & Smith, Sarasota, FL, Edward F. Ryan, Nancy E. Stroud, Burke, Bosselman & Weaver, Boca Raton, FL, fo..
02-16762  Murray J. Klauber v. City of Sarasota  (2003)
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Filed: Nov. 18, 2003 Citations: 350 F.3d 1301
350 F.3d 1301 Murray J. KLAUBER, Dr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SARASOTA, Sarasota Community Redevelopment Agency, David R. Sollenberger, Defendants-Appellees. No. 02-16762. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. Filed November 18, 2003. Donald Edward Hemke, Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emmanuel, Smith & Cutler P.A., Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellant. Robert M. Fournier, Sarasota, FL, for Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Flo..
02-20352-8G7  In Re Summit Staffing Polk County, Inc.  (2003)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida Filed: Oct. 15, 2003 Citations: 305 B.R. 347
305 B.R. 347 (2003) In re SUMMIT STAFFING POLK COUNTY, INC., Debtor. No. 02-20352-8G7. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. October 15, 2003. *348 Thomas D. Pulliam, Esquire, Lakeland, FL, for Debtor. Jeffrey C. Hakanson, Esquire, Gibbons, Cohn, Neuman, Bello, Segall & Allen, P.A., Tampa, FL, for Creditor. Herbert R. Donica, Esquire, Herbert R. Donica, P.A., Tampa, FL, for Andrea P. Bauman. ORDER ON TRUSTEE'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, ASSOCIATED RECEIVABLES FUNDING OF ..
15-002362BID  THE A. D. MORGAN CORPORATION vs SARASOTA COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 27, 2015
The issue in this bid protest matter is whether the decision of Respondent, Sarasota County School Board, to rank Intervenor, Willis A. Smith Construction, Inc., as the top construction management firm with which to negotiate services for the construction of the Sarasota County Technical Institute South Campus (North Port) ahead of Petitioner, A.D. Morgan Corporation, was contrary to its governing statutes, rules or policies, or the solicitation specifications.Petitioner failed to show that the School Board's intended award for competitive negotiations was contrary to its governing rules, policies or solicitation specifications.
00-000555BID  RYAN INC. EASTERN vs PEACE RIVER/MANASOTA REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY AUTHORITY  (2000)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 03, 2000
The issue is whether Respondent's tentative award to Intervenor of a contract to construct and install a water pipeline should be invalidated because of fraud, arbitrariness, illegality, or dishonesty.Respondent improperly allowed winning bidder and its pipe supplier eight days after bid opening to decide whether to withdraw conditions and exceptions to specifications for a 42-inch pipe, as the conditions and exceptions rendered the bid unresponsive.
93-005552BID  NATIONAL HEALTH LABORATORIES, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES  (1993)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 24, 1993
Whether the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services was arbitrary and capricious in rejecting the bid of the Petitioner, National Health Laboratories, Inc., for its determination that the Petitioner had failed to submit proof of registration to do business in the State of Florida in its bid package as specifically required by the Department's Invitation to Bid, Section E, Fatal Criteria. The factual issue presented is whether the materials included in the Petitioner's bid package constituted proof of registration to business in the State of Florida. The legal issue is whether the Department's rejection of the materials presented was arbitrary and capricious.Disqualification of bidder for failure to meet a fatal criterion was not arbitrary.
91-006824BID  SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CLINICAL LABORATORIES vs DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES  (1991)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 28, 1991
The issue in this case is whether, in evaluating the proposals submitted and awarding the contract for medical laboratory services, the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services acted according to the requirements of law.DHRS acted arbitrarily in reviewing bids, miscalculating cost proposal, should be re-bid.
88-002034BID  CITY OF GAINESVILLE vs. UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA  (1988)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Nov. 30, 1988
Absent a finding that agency acted fraudulently, illegally or dishonestly to subvert Bid process decision based upon honest discretion will not overturn.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer