welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Donna Antoinette Gerace
Donna Antoinette Gerace
Donna Antoinette Gerace
Visitors: 50
0
Bar #494518(FL)     License for 23 years; Member in Good Standing
Tallahassee FL

Are you Donna Antoinette Gerace? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

  Fla. Gravel Co. v. Davis  (1936)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Oct. 30, 1936
In this case plaintiff in error presents eight (8) questions for our determination. We have considered the first, second, third, fifth, sixth and eighth questions stated in connection with the record and find no reversible error disclosed. The fourth and seventh questions are as follows: "4. In an action from wrongful death, with a plea of contributory negligence, is an instruction proper which states `That defense assumes that the defendant itself was negligent as alleged, but says that the plai..
  Fla. Gravel Co. v. Davis  (1936)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Oct. 30, 1936
In this case plaintiff in error presents eight (8) questions for our determination. We have considered the first, second, third, fifth, sixth and eighth questions stated in connection with the record and find no reversible error disclosed. The fourth and seventh questions are as follows: "4. In an action from wrongful death, with a plea of contributory negligence, is an instruction proper which states `That defense assumes that the defendant itself was negligent as alleged, but says that the plai..
  Fla. Gravel Co. v. Davis  (1936)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Oct. 30, 1936
In this case plaintiff in error presents eight (8) questions for our determination. We have considered the first, second, third, fifth, sixth and eighth questions stated in connection with the record and find no reversible error disclosed. The fourth and seventh questions are as follows: "4. In an action from wrongful death, with a plea of contributory negligence, is an instruction proper which states `That defense assumes that the defendant itself was negligent as alleged, but says that the plai..
SC14-319  William R. Crews v. State of Florida  (2015)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Nov. 25, 2015
Supreme Court of Florida _ No. SC14-319 _ WILLIAM R. CREWS, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. [November 25, 2015] CANADY, J. In this case we are asked to decide a question of law which the First District Court of Appeal certified to be of great public importance: DOES THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR “MISCONDUCT IN OFFICE” BY A PUBLIC OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE IN SECTION 775.15(12)(b), FLORIDA STATUTES, APPLY TO A PUBLIC SCHOOL TEACHER Crews v. State, No. 1D12-4703 (Fla. 1st DCA Feb. 4, 2014..
SC13-704  State of Florida v. Frank A. Mosley  (2014)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Oct. 16, 2014
Supreme Court of Florida _ No. SC13-704 _ STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. FRANK A. MOSLEY, Respondent. [October 16, 2014] CANADY, J. In this case we consider whether consecutive sentences may be imposed for prison releasee reoffender (PRR) offenses that were committed during a single criminal episode. We have for review the decision of the First District Court of Appeal in Mosley v. State, 112 So. 3d 538 , 539 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013), which held that “PRR sentences may not be ordered to run consecu..
SC13-650  Demetrice Armicle McNeal v. State of Florida  (2014)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Jun. 05, 2014
Supreme Court of Florida _ No. SC13-650 _ DEMETRICE ARMICLE MCNEAL, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. [June 5, 2014] QUINCE, J. We have for review McNeal v. State, 109 So. 3d 268 , 271 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013), in which the First District Court of Appeal found that satisfying the foundational requirements under the past recollection recorded exception to hearsay need not come from the declarant’s testimony. 1 At the time that the First 1. The past recollection recorded exception provides a..
06-001423PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF NURSING vs DAVID CARPENTER, R.N.  (2006)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 19, 2006
The issues are whether Respondent is guilty of failing to meet the applicable standard of care with respect to acts and omissions involving two patients, in violation of Section 464.018(1)(n), Florida Statutes, and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Respondent falsified patient records to show a change of dressing and demonstrated negligent failure to change the dressing. Recommend $1000 fine.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer