Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Edward Lee Myrick, Jr.
Edward Lee Myrick, Jr.
Visitors: 18
0
Bar #122335(FL)     License for 27 years; Member in Good Standing
Pompano Beach FL

Are you Edward Lee Myrick, Jr.? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

09-004306  EDWARD L. MYRICK, D/B/A EDWARD L. MYRICK PRODUCE vs SUN-RICH AMERICA, INC., D/B/A ROYAL PALM PRODUCE, AND CAPITOL INSURANCE COMPANIES, AS SURETY  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 14, 2009
The issues for determination are whether Respondents are indebted to Petitioner in the amount of $4,273.15 for agriculture products, plus a $50.00 filing fee, totaling $4,323.15; and whether Respondents are indebted to Petitioner in the amount of $551.00 for agriculture products, plus a $50.00 filing fee, totaling $601.00.Petitioner demonstrated that Respondent was indebted to it in the amount claimed in one case, but Petitioner did not pursue the claimed amount in the second case. Recommend payment of proven indebted amount, plus filing fee.
09-004606  EDWARD L. MYRICK, D/B/A EDWARD L. MYRICK PRODUCE vs SUN-RICH AMERICA, INC., D/B/A ROYAL PALM PRODUCE, AND CAPITOL INSURANCE COMPANIES, AS SURETY  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 20, 2009
The issues for determination are whether Respondents are indebted to Petitioner in the amount of $4,273.15 for agriculture products, plus a $50.00 filing fee, totaling $4,323.15; and whether Respondents are indebted to Petitioner in the amount of $551.00 for agriculture products, plus a $50.00 filing fee, totaling $601.00.Petitioner demonstrated that Respondent was indebted to it in the amount claimed in one case, but Petitioner did not pursue the claimed amount in the second case. Recommend payment of proven indebted amount, plus filing fee.
00-004934  GIN BROWN MATTHEWS, D/B/A COOK BROWN FARMS vs J. G. L. PRODUCE COMPANY AND REDLAND INSURANCE COMPANY  (2000)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 08, 2000
The issue in this case is whether Respondents owe Petitioner $13,512.09 for watermelons, as alleged in the Amended Complaint.Evidence demonstrated that oral agreement between parties was for a brokerage arrangement, not direct purchase of watermelons by Respondent. Recommend dismissal of complaint seeking enforcement of alleged sales contract.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer