welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Elise Marie Matthes
Elise Marie Matthes
Elise Marie Matthes
Visitors: 49
0
Bar #917982(FL)     License for 33 years
Seminole FL

Are you Elise Marie Matthes? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

05-002034  COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS vs FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION  (2005)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 03, 2005
The issues to be resolved in this proceeding concern whether the City of Naples's (City) Waterway Marker Permit Application should be granted, given the requirements of Section 327.40, Florida Statutes (2005) and Florida Administrative Code Rule 68-23.105(1)(b)(3) through (6).Respondent City of Naples failed to show that delineating new slow boat speed zones with a waterway marking permit was needed for vessel traffic congestion, significant risk of collision or threat to public safety. Recommend that the permit be denied.
05-002035  MARINE INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATION OF COLLIER COUNTY, INC. vs FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION AND CITY OF NAPLES  (2005)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 03, 2005
The issues to be resolved in this proceeding concern whether the City of Naples's (City) Waterway Marker Permit Application should be granted, given the requirements of Section 327.40, Florida Statutes (2005) and Florida Administrative Code Rule 68-23.105(1)(b)(3) through (6).Respondent City of Naples failed to show that delineating new slow boat speed zones with a waterway marking permit was needed for vessel traffic congestion, significant risk of collision or threat to public safety. Recommend that the permit be denied.
05-002036  DOUGLAS FINLAY vs FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION  (2005)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 03, 2005
The issues to be resolved in this proceeding concern whether the City of Naples's (City) Waterway Marker Permit Application should be granted, given the requirements of Section 327.40, Florida Statutes (2005) and Florida Administrative Code Rule 68-23.105(1)(b)(3) through (6).Respondent City of Naples failed to show that delineating new slow boat speed zones with a waterway marking permit was needed for vessel traffic congestion, significant risk of collision or threat to public safety. Recommend that the permit be denied.
05-002037  ERIC ALEXANDER, JACK HAIL, DAVE SIRKOS, JAMES PERGOLA AND ALLEN WALBURN vs FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION AND CITY OF NAPLES  (2005)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 03, 2005
The issues to be resolved in this proceeding concern whether the City of Naples's (City) Waterway Marker Permit Application should be granted, given the requirements of Section 327.40, Florida Statutes (2005) and Florida Administrative Code Rule 68-23.105(1)(b)(3) through (6).Respondent City of Naples failed to show that delineating new slow boat speed zones with a waterway marking permit was needed for vessel traffic congestion, significant risk of collision or threat to public safety. Recommend that the permit be denied.
02-000464  LAMONT SILAS AND CLAUDETTE SILAS vs DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRIES RECOVERY FUND AND LOUIS SCLEASE, III  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 06, 2002
Whether Petitioners' claim for recovery from the Construction Industries Recovery Fund should be approved.Petitioners satisfied all the requirements for recovery from the Construction Industries Recovery Fund. Recommend approving maximum allowable recovery amount.
01-004668  STEPHAN A. HUMPHREY vs ROBERT P. RYAN, JR., D/B/A PERSONALIZED HOMES OF BREVARD, INC., AND DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRIES RECOVERY FUND  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 03, 2001
Whether Petitioner is eligible to recover from the Construction Industries Recovery Fund, and, if so, in what amount.Petitioner signed contract to construct home with Respondent on February 7, 1993, and contract was supplemented on September 5, 1993; Petitioner not eligible for payment of claim from the Fund since it was executed prior to July 1, 1993.
93-001460  DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND TREASURER vs ALEX J. CAMPOS  (1993)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 12, 1993
Whether the Department of Insurance (hereinafter referred to as the "Department") should remove Respondent from the office of President of Perry & Company, a premium finance company authorized to do business in Florida, pursuant to Section 624.310, Florida Statutes, for the reasons set forth in the Administrative Complaint?DOI failed to prove that, in his previous position with insurance company, respondent engaged in conduct warranting his removal from current position with premium financing company.
93-005873  DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND TREASURER vs BEACON FINANCE, INC., D/B/A TOP FINANCE  (1993)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 13, 1993
The issue presented is whether Respondent is guilty of the allegations contained in the Order to Show Cause filed against it, and, if so, what disciplinary action should be taken, if any.Certificate of authority of premium finance company revolked for rebating, refusal to produce records and hazardous business practices.
91-007304  DEPARTMENT OF LAW ENFORCEMENT, CRIMINAL JUSTICE STANDARDS AND TRAINING COMMISSION vs DONALD TURNAGE  (1991)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 13, 1991
Whether Respondent committed the acts alleged in the Administrative Complaint.Police officer found to violate ""Good Morals"" provision of statute based on positive drug (urine) test.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer