Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Fred F Harris, Jr.
Fred F Harris, Jr.
Visitors: 27
0
Bar #253359(FL)     License for 46 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Fred F Harris, Jr.? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

18-1988  William Kneer v. Lincare and Travelers Insurance  (2019)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Apr. 03, 2019
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _ No. 1D18-1988 _ WILLIAM KNEER, Appellant, v. LINCARE and TRAVELERS INSURANCE, Appellees. _ On appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Stephen L. Rosen, Judge. Date of Accident: June 30, 2014. April 3, 2019 OSTERHAUS, J. In this workers’ compensation appeal, Claimant argues that § 440.093(3), Florida Statutes, is unconstitutional, and that the finding that he had no psychiatric work restrictions is unsupported by competent substan..
16-2162  DANIEL S. NEWMAN, etc. v. ERNST & YOUNG, LLP  (2017)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Oct. 11, 2017
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT DANIEL S. NEWMAN, as Receiver for FOUNDING PARTNERS STABLE VALUE FUND, LP, FOUNDING PARTNERS STABLE VALUE FUND, II., LP, FOUNDING PARTNERS GLOBAL FUND, LTD and FOUNDING PARTNERS HYBRID-VALUE FUND, L.P., Appellant, v. ERNST & YOUNG, LLP, a Delaware Limited Liability Partnership, and MAYER BROWN, LLP, an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership, Appellees. No. 4D16-2162 [October 11, 2017] Appeal of a non-final order from the Circuit Cou..
17-0858  C.M. v. State  (2017)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Oct. 11, 2017
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed October 11, 2017. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. _ No. 3D17-0858 Lower Tribunal No. 16-1900 _ C.M., a juvenile, Appellant, vs. The State of Florida, Appellee. An appeal conducted pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Maria De Jesus Santovenia, Judge. C.M., a juvenile, in proper person. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee. Befor..
Bankruptcy Nos. 96-10523, 98-00001. Adversary No. 00-686  In Re Wachsmuth Ex Rel. Gussen  (2001)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida Filed: Aug. 21, 2001 Citations: 272 B.R. 766
272 B.R. 766 (2001) In re Helge WACHSMUTH by and through Dr. Heinrich GUSSEN and Dr. Jörg Schülter, as Bankruptcy Trustee for the Estate of Eckhard Müller-Bückins, a Debtor in a Foreign Proceeding, Debtor. Helge Wachsmuth by and through Dr. Heinrich Gussen and Dr. Jörg Schülter, as Bankruptcy Trustee for the Estate of Eckhard Möller-Bückins, a Debtor in a Foreign Proceeding, Plaintiff, v. Steven E. Cohen, Jacobsen, Cohen & Cohen, P.A., Daniel S. Mandel, Mandel, Weisman & Kirschner, P.A., Marex, I..
86-3169    (1987)
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Filed: Feb. 20, 1987 Citations: 810 F.2d 1042
810 F.2d 1042 Blue Sky L. Rep. P 72,483, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,133 James R. GOCHNAUER and Patricia M. Gochnauer, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross Appellees, v. A.G. EDWARDS & SONS, INC., James Lester, Gene Roach, Defendants-Appellees-Cross Appellants, John Kerr, Defendant-Appellee. No. 86-3169. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. Feb. 20, 1987. John C. Lovett, Tallahassee, Fla., for plaintiffs-appellants-cross appellees. Donald A. Rett, Fred F. Harris, Jr., Roberts, Baggett, LaFace & Ri..
3D08-1658  Pollard v. State  (2008)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Aug. 06, 2008 Citations: 990 So. 2d 1078
990 So. 2d 1078 (2008) POLLARD v. STATE. No. 3D08-1658. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. August 6, 2008. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.
14-004744BID  BRIDGES OF AMERICA, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 13, 2014
The issue in this case is whether in deciding to award a contract for comprehensive re-entry services to be provided at the Everglades Re-Entry Center (”Everglades”), Respondent, Department of Corrections (the “Department” or “DOC”), acted contrary to one or more governing statutes, rules, policies, or procurement specifications, or any combination thereof; and if so, for each such instance, whether the misstep was clearly erroneous, arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to competition.There is no legal basis for withdrawing or re-issuing the Department's intended award of the contract.
02-001118  IN RE: RULE AMENDMENT - CIRCLE SQUARE WOODS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT vs *  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 19, 2002
The issue is whether the deletion of 1,737.03 acres of land from the Circle Square Woods Community Development District meets the applicable criteria set forth in Chapter 190, Florida Statutes.Petitioner satisfied requirements to contract its boundaries for a community development district in Marion County.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer