The issue in this case is whether Respondent's intended award of a contract to Intervenor pursuant to Invitation to Negotiate No. 013-11 is contrary to Respondent's governing statutes, Respondent's rules and policies, and the specifications of the Invitation to Negotiate.Petitioner's proposal was non-responsive to the terms of the ITN. Petitioner failed to demonstrate that the proposals of the other vendors were non-responsive, or that the process was contrary to competition. Award of the contract to Intervenor upheld.
