welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Gary Lynn Asbell
Gary Lynn Asbell
Gary Lynn Asbell
Visitors: 56
0
Bar #853615(FL)     License for 35 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Gary Lynn Asbell? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

01-000322PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MASSAGE THERAPY vs DEBORAH LYNN KEYS  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 24, 2001
The issue in this case is whether, on December 29, 1997, Respondent, a licensed massage therapist, engaged or offered to engage a client in sexual activity while practicing massage therapy, in violation of Section 480.0485, Florida Statutes, and Rule 61G11-30.001(1)(d), Florida Administrative Code (1997).Department of Health failed to show by clear and convincing evidence that licensee was guilty of sexual misconduct in the practice of massage therapy.
99-003719  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MASSAGE THERAPY vs STANLEY MICHAEL CARROLL, M.A.  (1999)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 01, 1999
The issues are whether Respondent violated Section 480.046(1)(c), Florida Statutes, and if so, what penalty should be imposed.Respondent disciplined after being convicted of simple battery on a massage therapy client.
00-001208  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF HEARING AID SPECIALISTS vs DONALD CONLEY  (2000)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 21, 2000
The issue for consideration in this case is whether Respondent's license as a hearing aid specialist in Florida should be disciplined because of the matters alleged in the Administrative Complaints filed herein.00-1208; 00-1209; 00-1433 Evidence clear and convincing that hearing aid specialist who failed to refund clients` money even after timely return of merchandise and who failed to ensure receipts contained all required information was guilty of misconduct.
00-001209  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF HEARING AID SPECIALISTS vs DONALD CONLEY  (2000)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 21, 2000
The issue for consideration in this case is whether Respondent's license as a hearing aid specialist in Florida should be disciplined because of the matters alleged in the Administrative Complaints filed herein.00-1208; 00-1209; 00-1433 Evidence clear and convincing that hearing aid specialist who failed to refund clients` money even after timely return of merchandise and who failed to ensure receipts contained all required information was guilty of misconduct.
00-001433  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF HEARING AID SPECIALISTS vs DONALD CONLEY  (2000)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 04, 2000
The issue for consideration in this case is whether Respondent's license as a hearing aid specialist in Florida should be disciplined because of the matters alleged in the Administrative Complaints filed herein.00-1208; 00-1209; 00-1433 Evidence clear and convincing that hearing aid specialist who failed to refund clients` money even after timely return of merchandise and who failed to ensure receipts contained all required information was guilty of misconduct.
95-002857  CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD vs MICHAEL A. CHRISTY  (1995)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 02, 1995
The central issue in these cases is whether the Respondent committed the violations alleged in the administrative complaints; and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Licensee harmed consumers by failing to timely complete work.
94-003000  CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD vs GARY S. SACHS  (1994)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 02, 1994
Whether Respondent, a licensed general contractor, committed the offenses alleged in the administrative complaint and the penalties, if any, that should be imposed.Qualifying contractor responsible for company's misconduct.
95-000541  CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD vs JOHN W. HULL  (1995)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 06, 1995
The issue in this case is whether respondent's license as a certified building contractor should be disciplined for the reasons cited in the amended administrative complaint filed on July 19, 1995.Fine, restitution and costs imposed on licensee for misconduct and violating local building. code.
94-006449  CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD vs FREDERICK S. SCHMUNK, III  (1994)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 16, 1994
Whether Respondent, a licensed general contractor, committed the offenses set forth in the Administrative Complaint or is responsible for the offenses set forth in the Administrative Complaint and the penalties, if any, that should be imposed.Qualifying agent responsible for violations by corporation and for failure to supervise.
91-005279  CURTIS D. VICKERS vs DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MADISON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION  (1991)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 22, 1991
The issue presented, is whether the Respondent, Florida Department of Corrections/Madison Correctional Institution (Department), demoted Petitioner, Curtis Vickers, because of his race (black) and sex (male) while employed by the Department.Facts faiied to show that respondent's decision to terminate pertitioner was not racially or sexually motivated.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer