welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  8. George Spears Reynolds IV
George Spears Reynolds IV
George Spears Reynolds IV
Visitors: 25
0
Bar #56895(FL)     License for 16 years; Member in Good Standing
Tallahassee FL

Are you George Spears Reynolds IV? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

19-005130  NETWORK ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC., D/B/A BOLTON PEREZ AND ASSOCIATES vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (2019)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 24, 2019
The issue in this administrative proceeding is whether the Florida Department of Transportation’s ("DOT" or "the Department") denial of Petitioner’s, Network Engineering Services, Inc. d/b/a Bolton Perez & Associates ("BPA"), 2019 application for qualification pursuant to section 337.105, Florida Statutes, and Florida Administrative Code Chapter 14-75, was for good cause due to Petitioner’s participation in the construction of the Florida International University ("FIU") City Prosperity Project ("FIU Bridge project").DOT's reliance on the OSHA report and NTSB's investigation into the FIU bridge collapse was insufficient "good cause" to deny BPA's request for qualification for 2019. DOT failed to demonstrate BPA failed to exercise independent judgment as a CEI.
21-000950BID  HEAVY CIVIL, INC. vs FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (2021)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 16, 2021
Whether the Florida Department of Transportation's determination that Heavy Civil, Inc., was a nonresponsive bidder was contrary to the agency's governing statutes, rules, policies, or the solicitation specifications; and, if so, whether the award was clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious.Proposal non-responsive where Petitioner failed to send paper bid bond to the location listed in the solicitation notice by the deadline.
21-001728BID  AMERICAN LIGHTING AND SIGNALIZATION, LLC vs FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (2021)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 28, 2021
Whether Respondent's, Florida Department of Transportation ("the Department"), decision to award a contract to Intervenor, DBi Services, Inc. ("DBi" or "Intervenor"), pursuant to the Bid Solicitation Notice and the Specifications Package (jointly referred to as "Solicitation") for Contract No. E5X18 (highway lighting maintenance in District Five), was contrary to its governing statutes, rules, or policies, or the solicitation specifications; and, if so, whether the award was contrary to competition, clearly erroneous, arbitrary, or capricious.ALS failed to establish that the Department acted contrary to its governing statutes, rules or policies, or the solicitation. Recommend award to Intervenor.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer